[quote]LittleStrick wrote:
Oh no! Not the deload! I hurt with you…
How is school going?[/quote]
An A in my history class and so far I’m pulling an A in my English Comp class. Real school starts in the fall. Taking 3, maybe 4 classes. If I’m still not working, I’m gonna make it 4.[/quote]
6 sets of stairs today. Here I thought only a few people enjoyed pain, there were at least 15 others already on the stairs this morning when we got there.
[quote]ruglayer09052000 wrote:
Military deload complete. Only deads to go!!! Yayyyy!!! I was in and out of the gym in like 40 mins today. I think that’s a record.[/quote]
Haha. I wish I could do that. I seem to spend atleast 1h 30min. I’m too fat to go any faster haha.
RL, after reading your post in bulldog’s log, there is no reason that it has to be 300# only. There might be enough interest in this to have a couple of groups…250# group and a 300# group. Or whatever weight is decided upon. If I recall correctly, and I might not, you, Jack, and OP are all within 5-15# of each other. We could differentiate, in the log, by starting each post with the goal weight as the 1st line in the post.
If you are good with the 300# goal, nevermind, but it is just a thought.
[quote]LittleStrick wrote:
RL, after reading your post in bulldog’s log, there is no reason that it has to be 300# only. There might be enough interest in this to have a couple of groups…250# group and a 300# group. Or whatever weight is decided upon. If I recall correctly, and I might not, you, Jack, and OP are all within 5-15# of each other. We could differentiate, in the log, by starting each post with the goal weight as the 1st line in the post.
If you are good with the 300# goal, nevermind, but it is just a thought.[/quote]
Thats sounds like a good idea.I just thought about it .Ive seen threads for Deads and bench race threads, but no Mpresses
[quote]LittleStrick wrote:
RL, after reading your post in bulldog’s log, there is no reason that it has to be 300# only. There might be enough interest in this to have a couple of groups…250# group and a 300# group.
Or whatever weight is decided upon. If I recall correctly, and I might not, you, Jack, and OP are all within 5-15# of each other. We could differentiate, in the log, by starting each post with the goal weight as the 1st line in the post.
If you are good with the 300# goal, nevermind, but it is just a thought.[/quote]
That sounds like an option, seeing how you two are way ahead of me. But, keep looking over your shoulders. I can be sneaky at times!!!
[quote]LittleStrick wrote:
RL, after reading your post in bulldog’s log, there is no reason that it has to be 300# only. There might be enough interest in this to have a couple of groups…250# group and a 300# group.
Or whatever weight is decided upon. If I recall correctly, and I might not, you, Jack, and OP are all within 5-15# of each other. We could differentiate, in the log, by starting each post with the goal weight as the 1st line in the post.
If you are good with the 300# goal, nevermind, but it is just a thought.[/quote]
That sounds like an option, seeing how you two are way ahead of me. But, keep looking over your shoulders. I can be sneaky at times!!![/quote]
Oh, don’t worry, I’ll definitly be watching. Your bench progression proves the need for that.