Another decent blurb by Bob Novak.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2007/09/rudy_scores_with_conservative.html
JeffR
[quote]JeffR wrote:
I understand that there will be some old dogmas that will be challened.
[/quote]
Lemme guess…you have the constitution in mind, right?
Does he have a lisp? How about a partial lisp?
merlin
[quote]JeffR wrote:
The NUMBER ONE ISSUE. It’s ramifications are dizzying.
Of all the candidates, I trust Rudy to deal effectively with this. That means doing whatever is necessary to make sure that nukes/sarin don’t end up in the hands of lixy’s pals.
I understand that there will be some old dogmas that will be challened.
However, I trust that our checks and balances will allow us to weather this storm.
This is a totally new kind of war. The strategy and the tactics must evolve. Now the enemy attacks whenever he has the weaponry. No warning. Just death and destruction
[/quote]
Ironic it seems to be the number one issue he doesn’t get at all. If he doesn’t understand why we get attacked and even kooky Ron Paul does—it doesn’t say too much.
Also with terror you don’t seem to get training terrorist/ recruiting terrorists/providing terrorists with sanctuaries and emboldening enemies that support terrorists aren’t effective means of defeating the terrorists (the opposite). Sometimes its hard to tell if you fringe far to the right, hard to see from the mainstream republicans, are for or against terrorism?
Interesting article (with interesting links) about Giuliani being little more than a warmongering liberal trying to pass off as conservative.
Pro-abortion, pro-gay rights, pro-gun control, pro-amnesty for immigrants, low respect for the laws, senior partner in a law firm that represents anti-US interests, etc.
If that’s the best hope of the RepubLIEcans, then I guess we can look forward to President Clinton running her two terms very soon.
[quote]100meters wrote:
JeffR wrote:
The NUMBER ONE ISSUE. It’s ramifications are dizzying.
Of all the candidates, I trust Rudy to deal effectively with this. That means doing whatever is necessary to make sure that nukes/sarin don’t end up in the hands of lixy’s pals.
I understand that there will be some old dogmas that will be challened.
However, I trust that our checks and balances will allow us to weather this storm.
This is a totally new kind of war. The strategy and the tactics must evolve. Now the enemy attacks whenever he has the weaponry. No warning. Just death and destruction
Ironic it seems to be the number one issue he doesn’t get at all. If he doesn’t understand why we get attacked and even kooky Ron Paul does—it doesn’t say too much.
Also with terror you don’t seem to get training terrorist/ recruiting terrorists/providing terrorists with sanctuaries and emboldening enemies that support terrorists aren’t effective means of defeating the terrorists (the opposite). Sometimes its hard to tell if you fringe far to the right, hard to see from the mainstream republicans, are for or against terrorism?
[/quote]
lumpy,
I wonder if you’ve been keeping up with current events. See Anbar. If given time, most people will rise up against terrorism.
The U.S. is providing that time.
It’s a new idea in that region. Let the people vote. Let them determine their own destiny.
Eventually, they’ll work through their problems.
It took blood, loud noises, and quite a few bumps on our journey to stability.
We musn’t be too judgemental.
Oh, it sickens and amuses me that the same democrats screaming about “Iraqi’s not making political progress” are the same tools who are easily the WORST Congress in 100 years.
Let’s highlight THEIR track record.
JeffR
[quote]pookie wrote:
Interesting article (with interesting links) about Giuliani being little more than a warmongering liberal trying to pass off as conservative.
Pro-abortion, pro-gay rights, pro-gun control, pro-amnesty for immigrants, low respect for the laws, senior partner in a law firm that represents anti-US interests, etc.
If that’s the best hope of the RepubLIEcans, then I guess we can look forward to President Clinton running her two terms very soon.
[/quote]
pookie,
I wanted to let you know that I view your aversion to Rudy as validation.
If you are against him, I MUST support him.
The more you rail against him, the more sure I am that he is the man for the job.
It also doesn’t surprise me that you’d support someone like hillary.
hillary in 2008!!!
JeffR
[quote]lixy wrote:
JeffR wrote:
I understand that there will be some old dogmas that will be challened.
Lemme guess…you have the constitution in mind, right?[/quote]
lixy,
We operate quite a bit different in the U.S. In your world, might makes right.
In ours, we make fundamental changes in the voting booth. We elect representatives who we vest with our trust. These Representatives are empowered to legislate and act by the people.
That is the definition of a Republican form of government.
The signers of the Constitution never intended it to be a static document. The beauty of it is it’s flexibility.
I have no doubt that the signers would never have countenanced nor excused us if we allow your pals to exploit our freedoms.
I view amending the Constitution as a last resort.
If you are asking me whether I believe that amending the Constitution should be an option for our self- preservation, I give you a resounding yes.
As this war goes on, more people will awaken to it’s ramifications.
If I were you, lixy, I wouldn’t count on the other 1/2 of the country staying asleep for much longer.
JeffR
Sigh, Jerffy, you are a poster child for the effects of terror on the willingness of the populace to give up anything and everything in order to feel safe.
Life is dangerous. Even without terrorism in the equation, it’s dangerous. Maybe mommy and daddy weren’t nurturing enough, but dude, really, try not to let your fears rule you.
Seems the link didn’t make it… here it is again: Columns > Giuliani Is Everyone’s Worst Nightmare
[quote]JeffR wrote:
pookie,
I wanted to let you know that I view your aversion to Rudy as validation.[/quote]
That’s understandable. You’re criminally stupid, a pathological liar and enjoy cowering under the boot of a strong authority figure. Your mental illnesses are poor standards to select the next leader of your country against though.
Come on jeffry, you’d suck him off and eat his shit if you had the chance. Tell us something new.
So, now that we know you support abortion, gay rights, gun control, loose morals and illegal immigration, care to reveal other new tidbits of your secret you? How often do you wear dresses? Have you scheduled the date for you big operation?
If I was picking your next leader, you’d get Ron Paul.
Clinton’s an opportunist who will make a lousy president, but even that is way above Rudy’s league. There’s no way she can fuck things up as bad as he will. Don’t worry though, Rudy will join Gore, Dukakis and Dole in the annals of forgotten has-beens. He simply has a more colorful wardrobe than they had.
Undoubtedly. Care to wager?
[quote]pookie wrote:
Seems the link didn’t make it… here it is again: Columns > Giuliani Is Everyone’s Worst Nightmare
JeffR wrote:
pookie,
I wanted to let you know that I view your aversion to Rudy as validation.
That’s understandable. You’re criminally stupid, a pathological liar and enjoy cowering under the boot of a strong authority figure. Your mental illnesses are poor standards to select the next leader of your country against though.
If you are against him, I MUST support him.
Come on jeffry, you’d suck him off and eat his shit if you had the chance. Tell us something new.
The more you rail against him, the more sure I am that he is the man for the job.
So, now that we know you support abortion, gay rights, gun control, loose morals and illegal immigration, care to reveal other new tidbits of your secret you? How often do you wear dresses? Have you scheduled the date for you big operation?
It also doesn’t surprise me that you’d support someone like hillary.
If I was picking your next leader, you’d get Ron Paul.
Clinton’s an opportunist who will make a lousy president, but even that is way above Rudy’s league. There’s no way she can fuck things up as bad as he will. Don’t worry though, Rudy will join Gore, Dukakis and Dole in the annals of forgotten has-beens. He simply has a more colorful wardrobe than they had.
hillary in 2008!!!
Undoubtedly. Care to wager?
[/quote]
Disgusting, immature, rephrehensible, typical post by you pookie.
If Rudy is the nominee, I’ll wager a year COMPLETELY OFF THIS BOARD that he wins the Presidency.
When he wins, you are gone for a year (and no pulling a lumpy/100 meters/bradley name change). You’ll do something honest for once.
Deal?
JeffR
Tootie frootie, fucking Rudy.
If he’s the man, call me Trudy.
Seriously, he doesn’t give a shit about a man like me, so why the fuck should I give a shit about him? He’s just another carpetbagger. Thumbs down.
Republican warmongering has gone on long enough. Terrorsim is not a military issue, it is a law enforcement issue on a world wide scale. The more countries we attack or invade, the more we cause more problems with terrorism. We are less safe from terrorism today than we were pre 911.
[quote]Mick28 wrote:
Fitnessdiva wrote:
We are less safe from terrorism today than we were pre 911.
True, that’s why we’ve had multiple attacks in our country since 9-11-01. Oh … wait…that’s right we haven’t.
I’m no fan of Bush, but facts are facts.[/quote]
Look at the number of terrorists we’ve created since then. Just because we haven’t been attacked means nothing, it isn’t out of the ordinary. Wait about 20 years when the terrorist we are creating now start growing up.
[quote]JeffR wrote:
100meters wrote:
JeffR wrote:
The NUMBER ONE ISSUE. It’s ramifications are dizzying.
Of all the candidates, I trust Rudy to deal effectively with this. That means doing whatever is necessary to make sure that nukes/sarin don’t end up in the hands of lixy’s pals.
I understand that there will be some old dogmas that will be challened.
However, I trust that our checks and balances will allow us to weather this storm.
This is a totally new kind of war. The strategy and the tactics must evolve. Now the enemy attacks whenever he has the weaponry. No warning. Just death and destruction
Ironic it seems to be the number one issue he doesn’t get at all. If he doesn’t understand why we get attacked and even kooky Ron Paul does—it doesn’t say too much.
Also with terror you don’t seem to get training terrorist/ recruiting terrorists/providing terrorists with sanctuaries and emboldening enemies that support terrorists aren’t effective means of defeating the terrorists (the opposite). Sometimes its hard to tell if you fringe far to the right, hard to see from the mainstream republicans, are for or against terrorism?
lumpy,
I wonder if you’ve been keeping up with current events. See Anbar. If given time, most people will rise up against terrorism.
The U.S. is providing that time.
It’s a new idea in that region. Let the people vote. Let them determine their own destiny.
Eventually, they’ll work through their problems.
It took blood, loud noises, and quite a few bumps on our journey to stability.
We musn’t be too judgemental.
Oh, it sickens and amuses me that the same democrats screaming about “Iraqi’s not making political progress” are the same tools who are easily the WORST Congress in 100 years.
Let’s highlight THEIR track record.
JeffR
[/quote]
Worst (I’m assuming based on polls) because they haven’t ended the war yet. So yes boo for not having 60 votes.
Also Anbar kindof speaks more for the advantage of leaving Iraq. (if we were to let the sunnis determine their own destiny - 97% want us out and aren’t against attack on us forces), but don’t let facts get in the way of your judgement—Rudy doesn’t either.
[quote]Mick28 wrote:
True, that’s why we’ve had multiple attacks in our country since 9-11-01. Oh … wait…that’s right we haven’t.
[/quote]
Wow, I sure feel more free. Honestly, I don’t care about safety. It isn’t the State’s responsibility to make people feel safe. In a free society it is the individual’s responsibility.
The only fact is that American foreign aggression is making us less safe in the long run. Wait until all these parentless children are old enough to martyr themselves.
[quote]JeffR wrote:
pookie wrote:
Seems the link didn’t make it… here it is again: Columns > Giuliani Is Everyone’s Worst Nightmare
JeffR wrote:
pookie,
I wanted to let you know that I view your aversion to Rudy as validation.
That’s understandable. You’re criminally stupid, a pathological liar and enjoy cowering under the boot of a strong authority figure. Your mental illnesses are poor standards to select the next leader of your country against though.
If you are against him, I MUST support him.
Come on jeffry, you’d suck him off and eat his shit if you had the chance. Tell us something new.
The more you rail against him, the more sure I am that he is the man for the job.
So, now that we know you support abortion, gay rights, gun control, loose morals and illegal immigration, care to reveal other new tidbits of your secret you? How often do you wear dresses? Have you scheduled the date for you big operation?
It also doesn’t surprise me that you’d support someone like hillary.
If I was picking your next leader, you’d get Ron Paul.
Clinton’s an opportunist who will make a lousy president, but even that is way above Rudy’s league. There’s no way she can fuck things up as bad as he will. Don’t worry though, Rudy will join Gore, Dukakis and Dole in the annals of forgotten has-beens. He simply has a more colorful wardrobe than they had.
hillary in 2008!!!
Undoubtedly. Care to wager?
Disgusting, immature, rephrehensible, typical post by you pookie.
If Rudy is the nominee, I’ll wager a year COMPLETELY OFF THIS BOARD that he wins the Presidency.
When he wins, you are gone for a year (and no pulling a lumpy/100 meters/bradley name change). You’ll do something honest for once.
Deal?
JeffR
[/quote]
I still haven’t changed my name?
[quote]Mick28 wrote:
Fitnessdiva wrote:
We are less safe from terrorism today than we were pre 911.
True, that’s why we’ve had multiple attacks in our country since 9-11-01. Oh … wait…that’s right we haven’t.
I’m no fan of Bush, but facts are facts.[/quote]
Remember we’re fighting a “global war on terror”?
Factually terrorism has increased by leaps and bounds (thanks to kooky tactics like creating and maintaining terrorist training ground—)