Bush Covered it!

Interesting email I received:

You know, it is easy to forget the ‘promises’ that Bill and Hillary made while in office. It strikes home when it is listed like this:
After the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, which killed six and injured 1000; President Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished. ----- BUSH COVERED IT!
After the 1995 bombing in Saudi Arabia, which killed five U.S. military personnel; Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished. ----- BUSH COVERED IT!
After the 1996 Khobar Towers bombing in Saudi Arabia, which killed 19 and injured 200 U.S. military personnel; Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.
----- BUSH COVERED IT!
After the 1998 bombing of U.S. embassies in Africa, which killed 224
and injured 5,000; Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished. ----- BUSH COVERED IT!
After the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole, which killed 17 and injured 39 U.S. sailors; Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished. ----- BUSH COVERED IT!

Maybe if Clinton had kept his promise, an estimated 3,000 people in New York and Washington, D.C. that are now dead would be alive today.
BUSH TOLD THOSE FIREMAN – THEY WOULD HEAR US TOO!

And, Now that Bush is taking action to bring these people to justice, we have Democrats charging him with being a war monger.

AN INTERESTING QUESTION: This question was raised on a Philly radio call-in show. Without casting stones, it is a legitimate question. There are two men, both extremely wealthy. One develops relatively cheap software and gives billions of dollars to charity. The other sponsors terrorism. That being the case, why was it that the Clinton Administration spent more money chasing down Bill Gates over the past eight years than Osama bin Laden?
THINK ABOUT IT!
It is a strange turn of events. Hillary gets $8 Million for her forthcoming memoir. Bill gets about $12 Million for his memoir. This from two people who have spent the past 8 years being unable to recall anything about past events while under oath!

Excellent post.

I’m surprised no left-wingers had anything to say about this one?

What’s up guys.

I’ve something to say: this email must have been sent by the same folks that put out that new commercial ending in: “Kerry - wrong then, wrong now” which ties together many totally different events and concludes that Kerry is somehow responsible for them all…at least that is what the average viewer is led to think.

One promise was left out in this email. The promise the Clinton Administration made that Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda will be the biggest threat and ought to become the Bush Administration’s primary focus. Instead of acknowledging this threat and listening to Clarke’s continuous warnings,
-the Bush admin. instead held, what, 2 meetings on terrorism during their first 9 months in the WH?
-Bush took the longest vacation by a President in 32 years the month before the attacks?
-The first time they met on OBL and AQ was a week before the attacks?
-How many FBI agents needed to send memos to Washington stating something was on the verge of happening?
-Zacharias Moussaoui was arrested 8/16 as he attending flight school with no concern of how to take off and land…

The point is, the attacks occurred and it is perhaps impossible to place blame anywhere. I don’t think it belongs with Clinton, and I don’t think it necessarily belongs with Bush. I think blaming a figurehead is making the issue far more black and white than it actually is. Considering the information I put in this post, it seems the Bush Admin could have done more. Plus, their failure to take responsibility for virtually anything that has gone wrong on their watch is disgusting, and the reason they’re currently behind in the polls.

By the way, have you seen the latest Bushism? He’s still pronouncing it wrong, now it’s “Abu Garef” and it’s no longer a scandal, apparently, it’s been downgraded to a, ahem, very hesitent, ‘situation.’ Hey, TWIT HAPPENS, as in, happens to be president.

When mistakes were made and someone’s ass should have been on the line (fired)… Bush covered it!

Hard to believe it took 22 hours for you guys to reply. Guess it was hard to twist those facts since the were direct quotes on Clinton’s part.

Yeah, Bush doesn’t want any association with Abu Ghraib. Neither would I.

He probably did authorize tougher interrogation practices.

While I would like to endorse these practices, I feel that they open Pandora’s Box.

It’s easy to say that it’s an us vs. them thing. In the short run, I agree. In the long run, who’s the terrorist?

When we went it alone and opposed the whole world…Bush Covered it!
When stem cell research was blocked from federal money…Bush covered it!
When our troops went into Iraq with out the proper equipment…Bush covered it!

After 9-11 the whole world was united behind the USA. Iran hand people supporting us. What did this president do? He blew it. He threw it all away. Know the whole world is against us. The terrorist are still around and even stronger by some calculations. His view on science is to forbid it. Stem cell what good is it, so he has further heavy research blocked. Something we can’t let others proceed. His views on the enviroment are crazy.

LEts not get into the fact why he invaded Iraq. All he wanted to do was one up his daddy. Who I consider to be a far better man than him. Sometime I think of trouble and damage he was caused to this country I just clinch my fist and wish for a day to meet him in a dark alley.

Sorry to say that I’m disappointed. I thought there would be some intelligent responses. Oh well, par for the course.

~ Jack

http://images.t-nation.com/forum_images/4/6/469446.1088101022119.jah_warrior.bmp

They brought the war to us, all we are doing is giving it back to them. I just wish the politicians would leave the mayhem to the military and let them take care of things. here are som interesting facts:
WORLD WAR THREE ?

Not very long, but very informative. You have to read the catalogue of events in this brief piece. Then, ask yourself how anyone can take the position that all we have to do is bring our troops home from Iraq, sit back, re-set the snooze alarm, go back to sleep, and no one will ever bother us again. In case you missed it, World War III began in November 1979… that alarm has been ringing for years.

U.S. Navy Captain Ouimette is the Executive Officer at Naval Air Station, Pensacola, Florida. Here is a copy of the speech he gave last month. It is an accurate account of why we are in so much trouble today and why this action is so necessary.

AMERICA NEEDS TO WAKE UP!
That’s what we think we heard on the 11th of September 2001 (When more than 3,000 Americans were killed) and maybe it was, but I think it should have been “Get Out of Bed!” In fact, I think the alarm clock has been buzzing since 1979 and we have continued to hit the snooze button and roll over for a few more minutes of peaceful sleep since then.

It was a cool fall day in November 1979 in a country going through a religious and political upheaval when a group of Iranian students attacked and seized the American Embassy in Tehran. This seizure was an outright attack on American soil; it was an attack that held the world’s most powerful country hostage and paralyzed a Presidency. The attack on this sovereign U. S. embassy set the stage for events to follow for the next 23 years.

America was still reeling from the aftermath of the Vietnam experience and had a serious threat from the Soviet Union when then, President Carter, had to do something. He chose to conduct a clandestine raid in the desert. The ill-fated mission ended in ruin, but stood as a symbol of America’s inability to deal with terrorism. America’s military had been decimated and downsized since the end of the Vietnam War. A poorly trained, poorly equipped and poorly organized military was called on to execute a complex mission that was doomed from the start.

Shortly after the Tehran experience, Americans began to be kidnapped and killed throughout the Middle East. America could do little to protect her citizens living and working abroad. The attacks against US soil continued.

In April of 1983 a large vehicle packed with high explosives was driven into the US Embassy compound in Beirut. When it exploded, it killed 63 people.

The alarm went off again and America hit the Snooze Button once more.

Then just six short months later a large truck heavily laden down with over 2500 pounds of TNT smashed through the main gate of the US Marine Corps headquarters in Beirut and 241 US servicemen are killed. America mourns her dead and hit the Snooze Button once more.

Two months later in December 1983, another truck loaded with explosives is driven into the US Embassy in Kuwait, and America continues her slumber.

The following year, in September 1984, another van was driven into the gate of the US Embassy in Beirut and America slept.

Soon the terrorism spreads to Europe. In April 1985 a bomb explodes in a restaurant frequented by US soldiers in Madrid.

Then in August a Volkswagen loaded with explosives is driven into the main gate of the US Air Force Base at Rhein-Main, 22 are killed and the snooze alarm is buzzing louder and louder as US interests are continually attacked.

Fifty-nine days later a cruise ship, the Achille Lauro is hijacked and we watched as an American in a wheelchair is singled out of the passenger list and executedby being pushed overboard.

The terrorists then shift their tactics to bombing civilian airliners when they bomb TWA Flight 840 in April of 1986 that killed 4 and the most tragic bombing, Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland in 1988, killing 259.

Clinton treated these terrorist acts as crimes; in fact we are still trying to bring these people to trial. These are acts of war.

The wake up alarm is getting louder and louder.

The terrorists decide to bring the fight to America. In January 1993, two CIA agents are shot and killed as they enter CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia.

The following month, February 1993, a group of terrorists are arrested after a rented van packed with explosives is driven into the underground parking garage of the World Trade Center in New York City. Six people are killed and over 1000 are injured. Still this is a crime and not an act of war?

The Snooze alarm is depressed again.

Then in November 1995 a car bomb explodes at a US military complex in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia killing seven service men and women.

A few months later in June of 1996, another truck bomb explodes only 35 yards from the US military compound in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia. It destroys the Khobar Towers, a US Air Force barracks, killing 19 and injuring over 500. The terrorists are getting braver and smarter as they see that America does not respond decisively.

They move to coordinate their attacks in a simultaneous attack on two US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania. These attacks were planned with precision. They kill 224. America responds with cruise missile attacks and goes back to sleep.

The USS Cole was docked in the port of Aden, Yemen for refueling on 12 October 2000, when a small craft pulled along side the ship and exploded killing 17 US Navy Sailors. Attacking a US War Ship is an act of war, but we sent the FBI to investigate the crime and went back to sleep.

And of course you know the events of 11 September 2001. Most Americans think this was the first attack against US soil or in America. How wrong they are. America has been under a constant attack since 1979 and we chose to hit the snooze alarm and roll over and go back to sleep.

In the news lately we have seen lots of finger pointing from every high officials in government over what they knew and what they didn’t know. But if you’ve read the papers and paid a little attention I think you can see exactly what they knew. You don’t have to be in the FBI or CIA or on the National Security Council to see the pattern that has been developing since 1979.

The President is right on when he says we are engaged in a war. I think we have been in a war for the past 23 years and it will continue until we as a people decide enough is enough.

America needs to “Get out of Bed” and act decisively now. America has been changed forever. We have to be ready to pay the price and make the sacrifice to ensure our way of life continues. We cannot afford to keep hitting the snooze button again and again and roll over and go back to sleep.

After the attack on Pearl Harbor, Admiral Yamamoto said “…it seems all we have done is awakened a sleeping giant.” This is the message we need to disseminate to terrorists around the world.

This is not a political thing to be hashed over in an election year, this is an AMERICAN thing. This is about our Freedom and the Freedom of our children in years to come.

Amen! Well said!

271 killed and Clinton did nothing about it.

Bush ignores the issue due to his own agenda duiring his first months in office, and then members of both parties f’d up and weren’t able to pass communications along from the FBI to the CIA, and 3,000 people got killed.

Then Bush went in there like Rambo and got nearly another 1,000 of our guys killed with no end in site. Way to go!!! Woo-Hoo!

But wait, the terrorism problem isn’t getting any better.

Instead of going for the big win, he should’ve just been going after them with covert operations… which I believe the history books will tell our children is what the Clinton administration was doing.

And I’m a card carrying Republican.

Go Figure.

On a reread, nice way to start blaming Hillary for what Bill Clinton did.

And hey, sometimes we have things to do other than read moronic political posts and waste our precious time trying to make horses drink water.

However, if it will make you feel better maybe I’ll consider spending every waking minute looking for posts so that you don’t have to wait to long for a reply.

I know delays indicate that the original content must surely be accurate and irrefutable…

Nice post HB. I’ve echoed similar basic sentiments, and they anchor my frustration with Bush and his blind supporters.

Please key in on the word “intelligent”.

Jack-o,

Have you ever said anything remotely close to this word you’ve keyed in on?

Thanks,
RSU

RSU,

I don’t find that it’s necessary to regurgitate the same references and sentiment that many of my colleagues on the forum already share. Nine times out of ten, there are those that beat me to the punch, due to the simple fact that I don’t hover over the T-Mag forum all day. I actually do need to put food on the table.

If it’s my intelligent feedback you’re looking for, I have one thing to say to you. YOU CAN’T HANDLE THE TRUTH! (just kiddin’) It’s a whole lot more fun to sit back and watch the ignorance smear across this political forum, like mayonnaise on a fat chick’s ass.

God bless ya RSU…

The thing that gets me is that people say Bill Clinton sat back and did nothing about terrorism. However, if you can remember the news, (if not look it up on the Internet), Republicans began to bash Clinton calling him “obsessed” (Term used by Cheney) in trying to find Osama bin Laden. Clinton tripled the budget for terrorism while the Republican Congress was kicking and screaming the whole. He then modernized the military and had covert operations going throughout the region.
And so that brings us to the point of, What exactly do Bush cover? has terrorism decreased, no its increased. Have the people responsible for 9/11 paid, No, they have evaded Bush the same way the evaded Clinton, Have any anger been directed toward Saudi arabia which is the real reason for what is happening? no we beat the hell out of Afghanistan (justified) and Iraq.
Just a warning, next year if Bush wins, you can talk about the reissuing the draft because we have run out solidiers and say “Bush Covered It”

[quote]jackzepplin wrote:
I’m surprised no left-wingers had anything to say about this one?[/quote]

…[quote]due to the simple fact that I don’t hover over the T-Mag forum all day. I actually do need to put food on the table.[/quote]

Keep your blessings.

Clinton evisercated both the military and the intelligence services. His whole claim to have shrunk the government was true only because he cut enough from military and intelligence spending to cover the growth in spending in every other government program.

I agree with you that the Congress was not cooperative on Clinton’s attempts to fight terrorism by lobbing a few cruise missles here and there. However, if you look back at that time, Clinton did a horrible job of making the argument to Congress that it was necessary at that time. He chose to invest his political capital elsewhere, despite the fact that he and his administration were the ones with the intelligence (such as it was), coming in, not the Congress.

Also, this whole thing about terrorism increasing worldwide is a non-sequiter. This is including Chechnya, Tamil, and other areas that aren’t Iraq and Afghanistan. The U.S., thank God, hasn’t been directly attacked, and we are more able to prevent such attacks now than previously. I still think we have a long way to go on that front, but we are definitely improved.

Another thing is that the increase in terrorism in Iraq and Afghanistan was expected, especially during U.S. occupation. They knew that Iraq would draw terrorists – the idea was it would be easier to have them all in Iraq and attempt to fight them there than it would to have the widely dispersed. And don’t tell me, as an attempt at a counter argument, that we expected the Iraqis to be happy with us, which we did, which, to a large extent, they were (happy to get Hussein removed - now, understandably, they want sovereignty). Even if 99% of the population was happy with the U.S., if 1% were unhappy and given to terrorism or helping terrorists, and more terrorists did indeed come in from Iran (which is sending them there) and elsewhere, you would still have an increase in terrorism in Iraq.