[quote]orion wrote:
And that Rand Paul already starts to build a reputation and if he should run for the presidency he has a whole movement already in place.
[/quote]
Ah yes Randy boy. A chip off the ole block. Maybe he will take the movement in a whole new direction.
Roswell was an inside job! The aliens knew about the crash weeks in advance.
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
I think that his policies are being discussed is already a win[/quote]
He didn’t win in last nights debate as he claimed that the Taliban are just like us…they’re not bad guys…He’s a dangerous man and as bad as Obama is at least he had the balls to kill Osama Binladen. Paul would have tip toed around that issue asking the Pakistani government for permission.
While he has some good points when it comes to economic issues his foreign policy views are as naive as his followers. I’m only sorry that he didn’t get to speak about his naive views on legalizing drugs. One more issue that his followers love so very much.
In a way I’m almost sorry we’ll never get to see a Paul/Obama Presidential election. If just to shut the mouths of the many ignorant Paul supporters who think that this barely sane old man could actually win. It would be a defeat of epic proportions for Ron Paul. Obama would win every state and probably capture 65% of the vote.
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
I think that his policies are being discussed is already a win[/quote]
He didn’t win in last nights debate as he claimed that the Taliban are just like us…they’re not bad guys…He’s a dangerous man and as bad as Obama is at least he had the balls to kill Osama Binladen. Paul would have tip toed around that issue asking the Pakistani government for permission.
While he has some good points when it comes to economic issues his foreign policy views are as naive as his followers. I’m only sorry that he didn’t get to speak about his naive views on legalizing drugs. One more issue that his followers love so very much.
In a way I’m almost sorry we’ll never get to see a Paul/Obama Presidential election. If just to shut the mouths of the many ignorant Paul supporters who think that this barely sane old man could actually win. It would be a defeat of epic proportions for Ron Paul. Obama would win every state and probably capture 65% of the vote. [/quote]
Out of curiosity who would you vote for between Paul/Obama ?
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
I think that his policies are being discussed is already a win[/quote]
He didn’t win in last nights debate as he claimed that the Taliban are just like us…they’re not bad guys…He’s a dangerous man and as bad as Obama is at least he had the balls to kill Osama Binladen. Paul would have tip toed around that issue asking the Pakistani government for permission.
While he has some good points when it comes to economic issues his foreign policy views are as naive as his followers. I’m only sorry that he didn’t get to speak about his naive views on legalizing drugs. One more issue that his followers love so very much.
In a way I’m almost sorry we’ll never get to see a Paul/Obama Presidential election. If just to shut the mouths of the many ignorant Paul supporters who think that this barely sane old man could actually win. It would be a defeat of epic proportions for Ron Paul. Obama would win every state and probably capture 65% of the vote. [/quote]
Out of curiosity who would you vote for between Paul/Obama ?
[/quote]
They’re both equally bad but for completely different reasons. Fortunately I’ll never have to make that choice because Paul will never become the republican nominee. He has absolutely no chance of capturing the nomination, NONE!
[quote]ZEB wrote:
He has absolutely no chance of capturing the nomination, NONE![/quote]
I don’t think you know what the word “chance” means.
[quote]LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:
[quote]ZEB wrote:
He has absolutely no chance of capturing the nomination, NONE![/quote]
I don’t think you know what the word “chance” means.[/quote]
You had your “chance” to bet me long ago and ran from it. Care to revisit that little wager regarding Paul getting the nomination. It will involve you not posting on this site for the rest of the year under any name.
In other words, put your money where your mouth is or shut up. Is that even possible for a Paul supporter to shut up?
THE CONSTITUTION ARRGGGGHHHHH!!!
lol
[quote]ZEB wrote:
You had your “chance” to bet me long ago and ran from it. [/quote]
I did bet you and even gave you good odds; you’re the one that turned it down.
[quote]LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:
[quote]ZEB wrote:
You had your “chance” to bet me long ago and ran from it. [/quote]
I did bet you and even gave you good odds; you’re the one that turned it down.[/quote]
I did no such thing. And if you’d like to pick it up where we left off let’s do so now. If Paul loses the nomination you don’t post again under any name. If he wins the nomination I will never post here again.
Yes or no simple as that.
Notice I didn’t even mention the Presidency? That’s just too absurd to include in any bet regarding Paul.
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:
[quote]ZEB wrote:
You had your “chance” to bet me long ago and ran from it. [/quote]
I did bet you and even gave you good odds; you’re the one that turned it down.[/quote]
I did no such thing. And if you’d like to pick it up where we left off let’s do so now. If Paul loses the nomination you don’t post again under any name. If he wins the nomination I will never post here again.
Yes or no simple as that.
Notice I didn’t even mention the Presidency? That’s just too absurd to include in any bet regarding Paul.[/quote]
Why do you get to name the terms?
You need to pick who will win.
If you don’t pick a winner never post here again.
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
I think that his policies are being discussed is already a win[/quote]
He didn’t win in last nights debate as he claimed that the Taliban are just like us…they’re not bad guys…He’s a dangerous man and as bad as Obama is at least he had the balls to kill Osama Binladen. Paul would have tip toed around that issue asking the Pakistani government for permission.
While he has some good points when it comes to economic issues his foreign policy views are as naive as his followers. I’m only sorry that he didn’t get to speak about his naive views on legalizing drugs. One more issue that his followers love so very much.
In a way I’m almost sorry we’ll never get to see a Paul/Obama Presidential election. If just to shut the mouths of the many ignorant Paul supporters who think that this barely sane old man could actually win. It would be a defeat of epic proportions for Ron Paul. Obama would win every state and probably capture 65% of the vote. [/quote]
Out of curiosity who would you vote for between Paul/Obama ?
[/quote]
They’re both equally bad but for completely different reasons. Fortunately I’ll never have to make that choice because Paul will never become the republican nominee. He has absolutely no chance of capturing the nomination, NONE![/quote]
I agree with you I see it as a three way and a close one at that 
[quote]LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:
If you don’t pick a winner never post here again.[/quote]
And this is what you did last time…HEDGE. Where is all that Ron Paul confidence when you have to back it up?
G O N E !
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:
If you don’t pick a winner never post here again.[/quote]
And this is what you did last time…HEDGE. Where is all that Ron Paul confidence when you have to back it up?
G O N E ![/quote]
It has nothing to do with confidence. It’s called gambling and it’s all about the payout.
You do know about risk versus reward, right?
You’re setting up the game to give yourself better odds but not giving anything in return.
I call that cowardice.
[quote]LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:
If you don’t pick a winner never post here again.[/quote]
And this is what you did last time…HEDGE. Where is all that Ron Paul confidence when you have to back it up?
G O N E ![/quote]
It has nothing to do with confidence. It’s called gambling and it’s all about the payout.
You do know about risk versus reward, right?
You’re setting up the game to give yourself better odds but not giving anything in return.
I call that cowardice. [/quote]
Ha ha ha…Okay you don’t have enough confidence in Paul to make such a bet. I will say that Romney is going to get the nomination, and you take Paul. But you are not crazy enough to make such a bet are you?
By the way would you call the Casino’s cowards, or are they smart?
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:
If you don’t pick a winner never post here again.[/quote]
And this is what you did last time…HEDGE. Where is all that Ron Paul confidence when you have to back it up?
G O N E ![/quote]
It has nothing to do with confidence. It’s called gambling and it’s all about the payout.
You do know about risk versus reward, right?
You’re setting up the game to give yourself better odds but not giving anything in return.
I call that cowardice. [/quote]
Ha ha ha…Okay you don’t have enough confidence in Paul to make such a bet. I will say that Romney is going to get the nomination, and you take Paul. But you are not crazy enough to make such a bet are you?
By the way would you call the Casino’s cowards, or are they smart?[/quote]
What kind of bet you taking for Romney for Prez ?
[quote]ZEB wrote:
By the way would you call the Casino’s cowards, or are they smart?[/quote]
You’re not a casino and it’s obvious you don’t know how they work. What do you think the payout would be for a bet on 80% probability?
Here ZEB, since you’re so awesome about making predictions and such.
[quote]LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:
Here ZEB, since you’re so awesome about making predictions and such.
http://www.intrade.com/v4/home/[/quote]
That’s a very cool site thanks for the link. But as for Ron Paul you’re just ticked off that the many predictions that I’ve made about Paul have so far all come true.
No President Paul N O P E.