If I’m wrong I’m happy to learn.
Is this it?
I think so.
I’ve been confused about US racial politics and definitions before.
Do you think Nick Fuentes considers Middle Easterners a being white? I’m not familiar with his ilk.
I have no idea who he is; I’ve only seen his name on this board.
I don’t think so. If I’m not mistaken, Europeans originally came up with racial classifications.
1 Like
But nobody speaks about afro-italians or something.
”Race” as a classification does not really exist in common talk. When I talk about whites etc. I refer to the skin color.
We talk about ethnic groups. Caucasians would be “whites”, arabs/middle-easterns other group etc.
In my experiance in Europe it’s mostly been by class instead of race - America created it’s own unique flavor of racial divisions. One drop rule and so on.
1 Like
These Fake Prideful Christians (who are super into politics) are a plague to the earth.
There is no hate quite like Christian love.
Let me quote some bible verse and be racist.
1 Like
What’s the cut-off point? At what skin color does one go from white to whatever other categories you use?
1 Like
I have not really thought this through. I very rarely think about this. The problem is also that via genetic variability and mixing all classifications are very vague.
I guess we speak about ethnicity, not race. So besides skin colour the might be other on the surface characteristics that define these. We could speak about arabs for example.
But it’s still problematic to make any clear definition that would make any sense in real world besides about how one looks.
Neither have I, so I use the definitions that exist if I use the terms.
1 Like
And the definitions vary.
I was originally referring that Jesus has been misintrepeted looking like Italian from renaissance era. But he most likely looked more like how Middle-Easterns look. Nothing else.
1 Like
I must say, I am pleased with the fallout of the disgusting murder of Charlie Kirk. Seems people of good will, both left and right are acting in righteous disgust of the far-left behavior and antics and people in general are fed up. The veil has been lifted in many ways and these nasty people are being exposed for what they truly are.
You have to understand something. When you participate in social media, you make yourself a public personality. Especially, if your account is not private. And when you are a public personality, many more things are fair game, your words can and will be used against you. Once it’s out there, you’re fair game.
I just hope and pray we continue to root out the evil in our society, by doing everything peacefully, lawfully and above board. But we must continue to act with the tools we have available to us and wield our influence. That’s how we destroy the radical left.
2 Likes
Exactly
2 Likes
Scriptural evidence is needed to prove your insuation
You don’t need to…you have already proven numerous times that you are a racist
6 Likes
In the world of philosophy, the proving of a negative tends to be an impossible tasking.
“Prove to me that there is no invisible purple dragon that lives on Neptune”.
Can’t be done. All we can do is provide evidence that no evidence currently exists that proves OF the existence, but as we’re aware: “the absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence”
Instead, the onus is to prove the existence OF the thing.
In this case, one cannot prove that there is no single white person in the Bible: instead, all one need to is provide proof of there being ONE of such person in the Bible to DISprove the assertion.
4 Likes
What is evident is that “othering” is still rampant.
What were the Romans or the Greeks?
I genuinely don’t know. That’s not an area I have any knowledge in. I’m more just discussing how philosophical arguments work.
2 Likes