I’m pretty sure they’d put him in a supermax and keep him segregated and alone given profile. Then he gets something like 30mins outside every 3 days and is essentially in solitary confinement otherwise.
Seems anticlimactic to a violent assault for an inmate to have a trophy but imagine spending years to decades with virtually no human interaction, no new input aside from your cell walls and a very structured and limited routine to the shower as your existence for years to decades.
He’s going to break himself being completely alone and manhandled as an especially disliked prisoner by staff when necessary and not be able to do anything about it because they’ll probably have him on suicide watch too, with nothing. Not even sheets. Completely alone and treated like a piece of shit for every sparse human interaction he will ever have, forever.
I’m not a psychologist but I would imagine this would be a much worse way to go than one, minutes long assault.
I think a lot of people are discouraged with the complete lack of “swift justice.” High profile cases are often far from speedy and coupled with appeals can go on for years. I’m honestly surprised we don’t see more mob justice. For instance with the Charlotte stabbing that happened last week, the general consensus from people I know is he should be hung within weeks. What’s left to prove about that case?
I should read some case law to find out more, but I feel like the Supreme Court could take up a case that clarifies “speedy” and doesn’t allow activist trial judges to drag preceedings out indefinitely.
I guess technology could change process of due diligence for expedited conviction, but I personally don’t think giving up innocence until proven guilty and trial should be taken lightly during elevated emotion. A precedent of eliminating or downplaying due process can’t end well in the big picture.
what I would like to see is a consistent codification for penalties post conviction. Leave no room for an unqualified black woman to be unnecessarily easy on a repeat violent offender and leave him on the streets, or in trains stabbing necks for example.
I haven’t fact checked but apparently the judge who allowed the train guy to stay free wasn’t a lawyer, did not have any relevant experience and was clearly motivated by something other than blind justice.
Is it wrong to want “division” between me and people who want to make my and my children’s lives and society shit?
Oh wait, I’ll get to a “middle ground” on this. Make them sort of shitty. And white men are sort of like little Hitlers, not actual Hitlers. Middle ground with people that hate you.
No, and there is no peacefully coexisting with “people” (I use this term lightly when referring to anyone cheering the murder of a good man) that would cheer in glee if we died or were murdered.
Tolerance of evil and immorality will always lead to moral relativism.
Ecclesiastes 8:11, “Because sentence against an evil work is not executed speedily, therefore the heart of the sons of men is fully set in them to do evil.”
If the guy is indeed a leftist, it is impressive as fuck. Even it such leftist was named, like, DeAndre. DeAndres are usually more used to firing guns but, since they point sideways, they barely hit anything with a single shot. Gotta be a bunch of them shooting round nd rounds to maybe hit something. 50 Cent got shot a bunch of times, yet look at him doing just fine, doesn’t even look like he has high blood pressure or anything.
Just to share a thought and personal story. I’m almost 40, graduated HS in 04. As a young teen was a big viewer of The Daily Show and though a free thinker in some respects, I was left of center. This isn’t abnormal, most teens are. I even read Al Franken’s books. I disliked Rush Limbaugh. I believed all the things I had heard about Rush Limbaugh from the media and repeated them, never actually listening to his show. Then at 16 or 17 I got a job delivering helium tanks to florists so I spent a lot of time driving listening to the radio. I started listening to Rush to see “what dumb thing he’ll say today,” expecting some Daily Show out of context laughs. Instead, I realized nothing he was saying was extreme. He wasn’t racist, sexist, he wasn’t a nazi. Furthermore, I agreed with most of his takes and he was entertaining as hell! I listened to Rush almost daily until his death.
A lot of lessons came out of that for me. More young people need to listen to opinions they don’t like or in reality, don’t THINK they like.
They want you to be angry, they most likely want a war, the leaders will be rich off war.
They love @Andrewgen_Receptors enragement and people like him, in want it, Andrew is playing their game.
Young people have no real need for getting so into politics and these views, really strange. Old people get into following politics mostly cause they don’t do much but think about the financial future.
None of my friends ever followed any politics at all until they got older and bought houses.
Fuentes almost got killed a few months back. He doesn’t have the audience Charlie does, but this could have easily have been him. Or Crowder. Or Shapiro.
Nick Fuentes fans were never exceptional snipers so that checks out. Still… I disagreed with some things Charlie Kirk said, but the way he made those multi-gendered pro-Palestine College kis look ignorant (which they were) was epic.