Rich Guy Has an Affair with Daughter

Off Topic
81

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]Schwarzfahrer wrote:
Because. That’s the scenario.
I see it makes you uneasy, it should and that’s the point.
We’re not playing in your favour, the deck is being stacked against you:

Think of a remote island. Think of you being twenty again, her too.
You have no idea how to fashion a sail or where you are except that you’re thousands of miles from a continent. The island provides plenty of coconut, fish, fruit and water.

And the nights can get very cold sometimes.

[/quote]

If you are a 1000 miles away from a continent, then you would be on Tristan da Cunha, which is populated with women. But I digress.

Well, I would probably use my phone as it can connect to Satellites, but if I can’t use that. Then I guess, I’d sit around on the beach and get tipsy off of rum and wait for a boat to come by. I’m sure I could build a shelter that could keep us both warm, without having to resort to sex.

If monks can go all their life without dipping the pen in ink, I am sure I can when the only person on an island is my sister.[/quote]

Westermark imprinting should save you, right?

82

Lol. Mixed monasteries in the middle ages were known as quite the “frisky” places.
Now that orders are usually either male or female, homosexually, at least with males, is rampant there.
Only the Navy is jollier in that regard.

83

[quote]Schwarzfahrer wrote:
You don’t live on my planet. You live in a galaxy of denial.

On Earth, tens of thousands catholic priests can’t keep their peckers off small children.[/quote]

4,392 clergymen is not tens of thousands, plus most of those numbers were from the 60’s and 70’s. Stop exaggerating.

[quote]
And it’s just the tip of the iceberg.
A stupid rule that was designed with little regard to man’s lust.[/quote]

Sorry if the Catholic Church has no room to make rules for people’s lust. Why don’t you go find another institute to lust over, besides the Catholic Church.

Lack of virtue

That’s called concupiscence, Catholic Church teaches (and it works) that with virtue you can over come your bodies concupiscence.

Sex is a very morally central topic. Denying that it isn’t doesn’t make it not.

84

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]gregron wrote:
^^That is the worst scenario ever.

I know how to get down coconuts and get into them, how to purify and make water drinkable and I know how to catch/clean fish but I dont know how to fashion a sail? (i wouldnt even need a sail to have a raft with paddles)

No way[/quote]

I can’t do the sail thing, but I could do the rest (plus, the boat and paddles).[/quote]

Well assuming your strand enough to start losing all hope I’m sure you could use a little trial and error to figure something out for a sail.
(i was just pointing out how stupid that scenario was)

85

[quote]ether_bunny wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]Schwarzfahrer wrote:
Because. That’s the scenario.
I see it makes you uneasy, it should and that’s the point.
We’re not playing in your favour, the deck is being stacked against you:

Think of a remote island. Think of you being twenty again, her too.
You have no idea how to fashion a sail or where you are except that you’re thousands of miles from a continent. The island provides plenty of coconut, fish, fruit and water.

And the nights can get very cold sometimes.

[/quote]

If you are a 1000 miles away from a continent, then you would be on Tristan da Cunha, which is populated with women. But I digress.

Well, I would probably use my phone as it can connect to Satellites, but if I can’t use that. Then I guess, I’d sit around on the beach and get tipsy off of rum and wait for a boat to come by. I’m sure I could build a shelter that could keep us both warm, without having to resort to sex.

If monks can go all their life without dipping the pen in ink, I am sure I can when the only person on an island is my sister.[/quote]

Westermark imprinting should save you, right?[/quote]

Not sure what you’re getting at.

86

[quote]Schwarzfahrer wrote:

If you won’t find a valve, your body will make you find one.

[/quote]
Like a wet dream?

87

[quote]Schwarzfahrer wrote:
Lol. Mixed monasteries in the middle ages were known as quite the “frisky” places.
Now that orders are usually either male or female, homosexually, at least with males, is rampant there.
Only the Navy is jollier in that regard.[/quote]

Source.

88

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
I’m sure I could build a shelter that could keep us both warm, without having to resort to sex.
[/quote]

“Resort to sex” sounds awefully catholic.

Wench, I’m gonna draw my dick now and make you a son!

You know that sex has the ability to feel good and kinda cozy and not like a sin?

89

^^Uh oh he’s grasping at straws now… watch out

90

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]ether_bunny wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]Schwarzfahrer wrote:
Because. That’s the scenario.
I see it makes you uneasy, it should and that’s the point.
We’re not playing in your favour, the deck is being stacked against you:

Think of a remote island. Think of you being twenty again, her too.
You have no idea how to fashion a sail or where you are except that you’re thousands of miles from a continent. The island provides plenty of coconut, fish, fruit and water.

And the nights can get very cold sometimes.

[/quote]

If you are a 1000 miles away from a continent, then you would be on Tristan da Cunha, which is populated with women. But I digress.

Well, I would probably use my phone as it can connect to Satellites, but if I can’t use that. Then I guess, I’d sit around on the beach and get tipsy off of rum and wait for a boat to come by. I’m sure I could build a shelter that could keep us both warm, without having to resort to sex.

If monks can go all their life without dipping the pen in ink, I am sure I can when the only person on an island is my sister.[/quote]

Westermark imprinting should save you, right?[/quote]

Not sure what you’re getting at.[/quote]

The whole thing from pysch 210 or so, where children raised together will not be attracted to each other, but those raised separately will be.

91

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]Schwarzfahrer wrote:
You don’t live on my planet. You live in a galaxy of denial.
On Earth, tens of thousands catholic priests can’t keep their peckers off small children.[/quote]

4,392 clergymen is not tens of thousands, plus most of those numbers were from the 60’s and 70’s. Stop exaggerating.
[/quote]
like I said it’s just the tip of the iceberg.
There are plenty of childrapin scandals involving the church in every decade.
If anything, this got better because we broke up moral blackholes and can speak about sexuality in the open. Hundred years ago, you wouldn’t have been able to really understand what was going on.

[quote] [quote]
And it’s just the tip of the iceberg.
A stupid rule that was designed with little regard to man’s lust.[/quote]

Sorry if the Catholic Church has no room to make rules for people’s lust. Why don’t you go find another institute to lust over, besides the Catholic Church.
[/quote]
That’s why it’s partly their fault.
For making up such absurdities.
Most men won’t take this. And if they fail, children might suffer for their shortcomings.

[quote][quote]
If you won’t find a valve, your body will make you find one.
[/quote]

That’s called concupiscence, Catholic Church teaches (and it works) that with virtue you can over come your bodies concupiscence.[/quote]
Does it work as well as converting homosexuals?

[quote] [quote]
Deny that if you want, this has nothing to do with having moral standards. And it shouldn’t.
[/quote]

Sex is a very morally central topic. Denying that it isn’t doesn’t make it not.[/quote]

As long as it doesn’t affect me, two adults can do whatever they want.
Breaking into other people’s initmate affairs = Taliban regime

92

[quote]Schwarzfahrer wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
I’m sure I could build a shelter that could keep us both warm, without having to resort to sex.
[/quote]

“Resort to sex” sounds awefully catholic.

Wench, I’m gonna draw my dick now and make you a son!

You know that sex has the ability to feel good and kinda cozy and not like a sin?

[/quote]

Haha…you crack me up, I’m sure that having 1/3 of the population under our belt, that Catholics know how to get down, hanky panky, put the bread in the oven, horizontal mattress mambo.

Sex isn’t bad, we know that. That is why Catholic families range from 4 to 7 children per marriage.

*My family averages 9 children per mother (did a quick calculation).

93

[quote]ether_bunny wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]ether_bunny wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]Schwarzfahrer wrote:
Because. That’s the scenario.
I see it makes you uneasy, it should and that’s the point.
We’re not playing in your favour, the deck is being stacked against you:

Think of a remote island. Think of you being twenty again, her too.
You have no idea how to fashion a sail or where you are except that you’re thousands of miles from a continent. The island provides plenty of coconut, fish, fruit and water.

And the nights can get very cold sometimes.

[/quote]

If you are a 1000 miles away from a continent, then you would be on Tristan da Cunha, which is populated with women. But I digress.

Well, I would probably use my phone as it can connect to Satellites, but if I can’t use that. Then I guess, I’d sit around on the beach and get tipsy off of rum and wait for a boat to come by. I’m sure I could build a shelter that could keep us both warm, without having to resort to sex.

If monks can go all their life without dipping the pen in ink, I am sure I can when the only person on an island is my sister.[/quote]

Westermark imprinting should save you, right?[/quote]

Not sure what you’re getting at.[/quote]

The whole thing from pysch 210 or so, where children raised together will not be attracted to each other, but those raised separately will be.[/quote]

Oh, well I don’t have a sister. However, even with my cousins it’s not really something that would go through my head (both distant and close).

94

[quote]gregron wrote:

[quote]Schwarzfahrer wrote:

If you won’t find a valve, your body will make you find one.

[/quote]
Like a wet dream?[/quote]

Apparently, that’s not good enough for the male psyche.

Were wet dreams sufficient when you were a teenager;)
I think not.

In a prison with lax discipline, sexuality can be a big tool [for dominance].

On an island with a beautiful girl at you side as the only companion, nature will make sure humanity could repopulate earth from that corner of the earth.

95

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]Schwarzfahrer wrote:

[quote]Hyena wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Hyena wrote:
What a couple of disgusting creatures. Just because the daughter squealed (after what, 7 years?) they try to make it sound like she is a victim. Sorry, but no. It takes two to tango. They should both be shot.[/quote]

As a warning to others that they better live up to your moral standards?

[/quote]

Yes. In this country we have exactly that STANDARDS. You shoot and kill somebody, that is outside of the standards, and you will be killed back, or caged for the rest of your life because of it. You KNOWINGLY bang your own daughter, and have an intimate, romantic relationship with her, that is outside of the standards, and they both should be punished for it.

Not to mention incest is one of the only practices considered taboo in every society on the planet. As gregron mentioned, if a girl gets banged by her uncle, is the kid her cousin? son? both? There is no society on earth where incest is normal, or acceptable.

I’m sure your post was meant to point out that I think I’m better than them, well guess what, I am.
[/quote]

Osama, I wish you’d strand on some idyllic island with a hot sister as the only other human present.

How long would it take to break your precious morals?

[/quote]

Until I was dead.[/quote]

Or until she was… … . AAAAAAWWWWWWW YYYEEEAAAAHHHH.

It doesn’t count if she stops breathing, does it?

96

I think it’s only a matter of time before Schwarzfahrer mentions MFM’ing his sister.

Which is going to support my hypothesis all the strange internet fetishes come from either Japan or Germany.

97

Well, they call it le petit mort, n’est-ce pas?

98

[quote]Schwarzfahrer wrote:
Breaking into other people’s initmate affairs = Taliban regime[/quote]

Tip of the iceberg, what I never mentioned as well is that only 6% of those 4,392 clergymen where convicted. There is no evidence that there are any other cases besides what was reported. That is like saying that Germany is still under Nazi regime, because you know only a few people are public Nazi sympathizers, and it is only the tip of the iceberg.

Your logic is flabbergasting, not sure what you are trying to get at.

It’s their fault for not being weak in the instance of morality…you should learn some grit. How is it an absurdity? Oh okay, so it is the Church’s fault that men fail…that makes sense. I think we need to put some personal responsibility on folks.

Converting homosexuals, to what? Converting them to Catholicism…I’m sure converting to Catholicism is easier than becoming virtuous.

Oh yes, because someone holds some kind of moral stance they must be part of the Taliban. Well, anyone that is German must be a Nazi.

99

Schwarzfahrer has obviously been over this a lot in his own mind, so I’m pretty sure he fucked his sister, and spent the following years trying to justify it to himself, and came up with the current argument. I wonder if it actually holds any water when he goes over it in his head.

I still cannot believe that people are defending these two sacks of shit.

100

[quote]Hyena wrote:
these two sacks of shit.[/quote]

Exactly.

Who cares?