Revenge of the Sith: AngryVader's Log

[quote]Flow wrote:
Hey Vader,

How high do you think you’ll put the calories to gain more mass? Something like 3200?[/quote]

I think 3200 is probably my true maintenance level, so I’d have to eat a little more than that to gain more mass.

I’m kind of taking more of the Berardi “Don’t Diet” approach at the moment, where I’m eating just slightly below maintenance. I’ve already lost a few pounds since Sunday, but that always happens when I first start cleaning things up. If I drop more than a few pounds in the next two weeks, then I’ll probably bump the cals back up a little. I’m not trying to drop weight fast or anything, just clean things up a little, train hard and let things even out a little.

In the past, when I drop cals below 2500 or so, I start to feel drained and burnt out after 2-3 weeks and then the intensity of my workouts really drops.

[quote]AngryVader wrote:
tmoney1 wrote:
VADER!

Looks like training is going well. I assume with your injuries you aren’t doing sprints anymore, or are you?

Keep on keepin on.

Not yet. I’m dying to resume them. I’ve been waiting for all the feeling in my foot to come back before I do that. The good news is that I think I’m there. My foot feels pretty much ‘normal’ at this point. The bad news is that the track I normally run is is pretty much ruined now, so I’ll need to check out a few other schools in the area to find one with a good track, preferably one that actually has lighting.

Looks like you might have a better team than we do this year. :frowning: Things are not looking sunny here in Warriors Country.[/quote]

That’s good the feeling in your foot is back. Bummer about the track, it’s hard to find a good quality track that actually let community citizens use.

HAHA I think the Warriors will be ok after Monta Ellis returns from his suspension (it was his fault all the way). You still have Captain Jack and Biedrins played well the other night. The Thunder look promising, we got our first win on Sunday!!! It’s early in the season, so we’ll see.

Glad you are doing better and returning to your Vader-like qualities.

[quote]tmoney1 wrote:
AngryVader wrote:
tmoney1 wrote:
VADER!

Looks like training is going well. I assume with your injuries you aren’t doing sprints anymore, or are you?

Keep on keepin on.

Not yet. I’m dying to resume them. I’ve been waiting for all the feeling in my foot to come back before I do that. The good news is that I think I’m there. My foot feels pretty much ‘normal’ at this point. The bad news is that the track I normally run is is pretty much ruined now, so I’ll need to check out a few other schools in the area to find one with a good track, preferably one that actually has lighting.

Looks like you might have a better team than we do this year. :frowning: Things are not looking sunny here in Warriors Country.

That’s good the feeling in your foot is back. Bummer about the track, it’s hard to find a good quality track that actually let community citizens use.

HAHA I think the Warriors will be ok after Monta Ellis returns from his suspension (it was his fault all the way). You still have Captain Jack and Biedrins played well the other night. The Thunder look promising, we got our first win on Sunday!!! It’s early in the season, so we’ll see.

Glad you are doing better and returning to your Vader-like qualities.[/quote]

Thanks. I guess to truly be Vader though, I’ll always have to be a little fucked up physically. :slight_smile:

Yeah, I think they’ll be okay once Ellis comes back, but that’s if he comes back. There are a lot of rumblings from Ellis and his agent that if Rowell is going to keep the threat of voiding the contract still, even with the suspension, that I guess they are saying they may demand a trade or release and let him go somewhere else.

Plus, with Harrington demanding a trade and Nelson wanting him gone, it’s just kind of giving the fans a bad vibe so early into the season.

It’s just upsetting because nobody wanted go near the W’s a few years ago and it seems like Rowell is doing what he can to bring those days back.

I think it’s time for Nellie to let the young guys play a little more and see what they can do. Nelson has to realize they aren’t a playoff team this year, so he should start developing those guys now. Now that he has his contract extension, it’s not like he doesn’t have time.

I summon the intellect of a greater Sith than I. . .

What do you think of the volume fluctuation proticol CP uses?

I see that you keep things relatively consistent in regard to work-load week-in-week-out. How do you do the whole “time off” thing, or do you do it at all?

Two q’s in one :stuck_out_tongue: Thanks, Vader!

[quote]Flow wrote:
I summon the intellect of a greater Sith than I. . .

What do you think of the volume fluctuation proticol CP uses?

I see that you keep things relatively consistent in regard to work-load week-in-week-out. How do you do the whole “time off” thing, or do you do it at all?

Two q’s in one :stuck_out_tongue: Thanks, Vader![/quote]

Do you have a link to the CP protocol? I’m not sure I’m familiar with it.

In general though, you observe correctly. I rarely change my workouts or volume from week to week. Occasionally, I change things up, like I did with my chest workout this week, when I feel like things just aren’t working anymore.

Mainly, I’ll make changes to my workouts just when I’m just plain tired of the particular routine or a certain exercise I’ve been doing.

I’ve never really messed with back off weeks or taking scheduled weeks off from training. I’ve always felt like I’ve handed the work load fine. I only ever feel burnt out when I cut cals too low.

I will say that I do listen to my body though. If I feel like I need an extra day off, need to skip a workout or if I’m just not feeling it when I get to the gym, I’ll just take a day off.

A back off week, where I drop the volume significantly, every 4-6 weeks might be something I’ll try in the future though.

[quote]AngryVader wrote:
Flow wrote:
I summon the intellect of a greater Sith than I. . .

What do you think of the volume fluctuation proticol CP uses?

I see that you keep things relatively consistent in regard to work-load week-in-week-out. How do you do the whole “time off” thing, or do you do it at all?

Two q’s in one :stuck_out_tongue: Thanks, Vader!

Do you have a link to the CP protocol? I’m not sure I’m familiar with it.

In general though, you observe correctly. I rarely change my workouts or volume from week to week. Occasionally, I change things up, like I did with my chest workout this week, when I feel like things just aren’t working anymore.

Mainly, I’ll make changes to my workouts just when I’m just plain tired of the particular routine or a certain exercise I’ve been doing.

I’ve never really messed with back off weeks or taking scheduled weeks off from training. I’ve always felt like I’ve handed the work load fine. I only ever feel burnt out when I cut cals too low.

I will say that I do listen to my body though. If I feel like I need an extra day off, need to skip a workout or if I’m just not feeling it when I get to the gym, I’ll just take a day off.

A back off week, where I drop the volume significantly, every 4-6 weeks might be something I’ll try in the future though.

[/quote]

Here is Tony Gentilcore’s description of said protocol:

http://www.T-Nation.com/free_online_forum/sports_body_training_performance_bodybuilding_author/tonys_training_log_and_other_tomfoolery_1?id=2373327&pageNo=3

[i][quote]
Tony Gentilcore wrote:

Like anything, it depends. The reason why we’re adamant on fluctuating training stress is because we want to manage overall fatigue. One’s fatigue will ALWAYS mask their true fitness, and I think many trainees make the mistake of continuing to pile on volume week after week and often wonder why they’re not making any progress.

I great example of how each week is structured would be taking the “main” movement of the day (bench press in this example).

Week #1: 4x5
Week #2: 4x4
Week #3: 5x5
Week #4: 3x5

We may play around with accessory work as well, but that would give you some semblance of what it is I mean by fluctuating training stress.

Week 1 serves as an “introduction” to the movement. Weight may be kept conservative while they get acclimated to the movement.

Week 2 we can increase weight a bit, but bring volume down slightly

Week 3 serves as a VERY high volume week. By now, they should be somewhat comfortable with the movement and the trainee shouldn’t be scared to amp it up a bit.

Week 4 is the de-load, which will allow some supercompensation to occur and then they can come back in week #1 on their next program and get after again.

Hopefully that makes sense.
[/quote][/i]

Your approach is something I may decide to take on more or less, but so far ‘stealing’ CP’s ideas has worked out like loading a sling shot for me.

Two weeks ago I was at the end of my last cycle doing front squats for difficult sets of three with 175-185.

During that cycle, I ramped up the volume weekly and then did a deload similar to CP’s on the fourth week. Well before I go too far into detail- the fourth week deload worked well. . .

This week I’m doing sets of five with 185+. They are comparably as difficult as the sets of three as well.

Thought it would be good food for thought!

Your weights keep going up nicely btw.

[quote]Flow wrote:
Here is Tony Gentilcore’s description of said protocol:

http://www.T-Nation.com/free_online_forum/sports_body_training_performance_bodybuilding_author/tonys_training_log_and_other_tomfoolery_1?id=2373327&pageNo=3

[i]
Tony Gentilcore wrote:

Like anything, it depends. The reason why we’re adamant on fluctuating training stress is because we want to manage overall fatigue. One’s fatigue will ALWAYS mask their true fitness, and I think many trainees make the mistake of continuing to pile on volume week after week and often wonder why they’re not making any progress.

I great example of how each week is structured would be taking the “main” movement of the day (bench press in this example).

Week #1: 4x5
Week #2: 4x4
Week #3: 5x5
Week #4: 3x5

We may play around with accessory work as well, but that would give you some semblance of what it is I mean by fluctuating training stress.

Week 1 serves as an “introduction” to the movement. Weight may be kept conservative while they get acclimated to the movement.

Week 2 we can increase weight a bit, but bring volume down slightly

Week 3 serves as a VERY high volume week. By now, they should be somewhat comfortable with the movement and the trainee shouldn’t be scared to amp it up a bit.

Week 4 is the de-load, which will allow some supercompensation to occur and then they can come back in week #1 on their next program and get after again.

Hopefully that makes sense.
[/i]

Your approach is something I may decide to take on more or less, but so far ‘stealing’ CP’s ideas has worked out like loading a sling shot for me.

Two weeks ago I was at the end of my last cycle doing front squats for difficult sets of three with 175-185.

During that cycle, I ramped up the volume weekly and then did a deload similar to CP’s on the fourth week. Well before I go too far into detail- the fourth week deload worked well. . .

This week I’m doing sets of five with 185+. They are comparably as difficult as the sets of three as well.

Thought it would be good food for thought!

Your weights keep going up nicely btw.[/quote]

That’s weird, I’ve read though that log, but for some reason I don’t remember that page at all. It’s a good thing you sent me that too because that band series a few posts later looks like something I want to add to my routine.

That is an interesting approach though and I don’t think it’s a bad idea at all. I may give something like that a try in the upcoming months just to change things up.

And thanks. Until the shoulder started bothering me, my upper body had been coming around a lot quicker. Now that my glute and foot feel better and the squats are starting to feel more comfortable, I feel like the lower body is finally coming around again.

I promised myself that I wouldn’t resume any kind of real supplementation outside of protein and Surge until I was front squatting 225 again. I think I will be there soon.

Wednesday 11/05 - Glorious SMR!

So I tried that DeFranco upper body series and I really liked it. My shoulder felt A TON better afterwards. I’m adding it to my morning routine and as part of my warmup on my chest and shoulder day.

I then did the normal lower body crap and then some extra stuff with the lacrosse ball for the back, chest, calves and glutes.

I feel pretty damn good right now.

Do you think there’s some underlying connection for all of your muscle quality issues?

[quote]pch2 wrote:
Do you think there’s some underlying connection for all of your muscle quality issues? [/quote]

Yeah, probably the fact that I’m 35 and never really bothered with SMR at all until recently. :stuck_out_tongue:

The shoulder issue is structural though. I had my shoulders x-rayed a long time ago, as they used to bother me a lot. The x-ray showed that I have extremely hook shaped acromioms, so there’s not a lot of space in the AC joint. It doesn’t take much for my shoulder to feel irritated or impinged. I was actually offered surgery to smooth them out, but the doctor said there was no guarantee they wouldn’t return to the original shape over time, so I elected to just deal with it.

In the past it was usually enough to just do a little bit of external rotation work and they wouldn’t bother me, but I had been slacking off on that lately, which clearly was a mistake, and it seems that I need the additional mobility/SMR stuff now as well.

Yeah I like Rowell’s leadership with the team, he is trying as hard as he can to bring success back to the Bay.

I think Rowell has to act in the best interest of team, even though it goes against the will of the fans, because Ellis is a solid player and is a key component to the W’s success, but if Rowell brings Ellis back and he does something like that again, then Rowell looks bad and will probably lose his job.

Good call on Nellie and letting the younger guys play. I know he’s a ‘my way or the highway’ kinda guy. That’s weird he wants Harrington gone, because two years ago when the W’s made the playoffs and beat the Mavs, Nellie traded for Harrington mid-season because he didn’t like Troy Murphy and Mike Dunleavy, but I guess things change with time.

Long live Run TMC

[quote]AngryVader wrote:

Thanks. I guess to truly be Vader though, I’ll always have to be a little fucked up physically. :slight_smile:

Yeah, I think they’ll be okay once Ellis comes back, but that’s if he comes back. There are a lot of rumblings from Ellis and his agent that if Rowell is going to keep the threat of voiding the contract still, even with the suspension, that I guess they are saying they may demand a trade or release and let him go somewhere else.

Plus, with Harrington demanding a trade and Nelson wanting him gone, it’s just kind of giving the fans a bad vibe so early into the season.

It’s just upsetting because nobody wanted go near the W’s a few years ago and it seems like Rowell is doing what he can to bring those days back.

I think it’s time for Nellie to let the young guys play a little more and see what they can do. Nelson has to realize they aren’t a playoff team this year, so he should start developing those guys now. Now that he has his contract extension, it’s not like he doesn’t have time.
[/quote]

Thursday 11/06 - Hams and calves

RDL: 305 x 3,3, 315 x 3,3,3, 325 x 3,3,3

Lying Leg Curl: 160 x 5,5,5,5,5

Natural Glute/Ham: BW x 6,5,5,6

Back Ext: 45 x 12,10,10
Dragonflys: BW x 8,8,8 - These are getting too easy, so I’m probably going to switch to something like hanging pikes or weighted reverse crunches on a decline.

Seated Calf Raise: 110 x 18,16,15, back off set 80 x 23 - followed up with 90 sec stretch on the leg press with 200 lbs.

Everything felt great! The RDLs are starting to feel easy again.

I understand Rowell’s position on the Ellis thing. Ellis is actually bugging me that he seems to not really be taking true responsibility for what he did. They just handed him the franchise tag and money and the first thing he does is bail on a moped.

It wasn’t even a full month after he signed the contract. How stupid do you have to be?

The other issue the fans have with Rowell at the moment is that it appears that Mullin and Rowell don’t see eye-to-eye and that Mullin is out after this year. Most of us here credit Mullin with turning the franchise around and don’t want to see Mullin go anywhere.

Well, it looks like Wright got some PT last night and it paid off. Nellie said he’ll be playing a lot more from now on, so that will be interesting to watch.

The issue with Harrington is that he just isn’t a Nellieball player. Nelson has been on him for two years about his defense and bad rebounding at the 4 spot, but despite this Harrington has been demanding more playing time.

The final straw was when Harrington went public with the trade demand the day before the season started. I think Nelson has just lost patience with the guy.

I like Harrington, but after seeing him play night in and night out, his inconsistency and inability to finish inside has started to wear on the fans. A lot of us actually thought he was going to be traded during the offseason, as there have been rumblings he wanted a trade since even before the trade deadline last year.

The really bad part is I honestly don’t know who they could trade for him. I think Harrington would be great in a 6th man scenario, but not at $9-10 mil a year.

[quote]tmoney1 wrote:
Yeah I like Rowell’s leadership with the team, he is trying as hard as he can to bring success back to the Bay.

I think Rowell has to act in the best interest of team, even though it goes against the will of the fans, because Ellis is a solid player and is a key component to the W’s success, but if Rowell brings Ellis back and he does something like that again, then Rowell looks bad and will probably lose his job.

Good call on Nellie and letting the younger guys play. I know he’s a ‘my way or the highway’ kinda guy. That’s weird he wants Harrington gone, because two years ago when the W’s made the playoffs and beat the Mavs, Nellie traded for Harrington mid-season because he didn’t like Troy Murphy and Mike Dunleavy, but I guess things change with time.

Long live Run TMC
[/quote]

Well said Vader.

May the force (of the Warriors) be with you.

[quote]AngryVader wrote:
I understand Rowell’s position on the Ellis thing. Ellis is actually bugging me that he seems to not really be taking true responsibility for what he did. They just handed him the franchise tag and money and the first thing he does is bail on a moped.

It wasn’t even a full month after he signed the contract. How stupid do you have to be?

The other issue the fans have with Rowell at the moment is that it appears that Mullin and Rowell don’t see eye-to-eye and that Mullin is out after this year. Most of us here credit Mullin with turning the franchise around and don’t want to see Mullin go anywhere.

Well, it looks like Wright got some PT last night and it paid off. Nellie said he’ll be playing a lot more from now on, so that will be interesting to watch.

The issue with Harrington is that he just isn’t a Nellieball player. Nelson has been on him for two years about his defense and bad rebounding at the 4 spot, but despite this Harrington has been demanding more playing time.

The final straw was when Harrington went public with the trade demand the day before the season started. I think Nelson has just lost patience with the guy.

I like Harrington, but after seeing him play night in and night out, his inconsistency and inability to finish inside has started to wear on the fans. A lot of us actually thought we was going to be traded during the offseason, as there have been rumblings him wanted a trade since even before the trade deadline last year.

The really bad part is I honestly don’t know who they could trade for him. I think Harrington would be great in a 6th man scenario, but not at $9-10 mil a year.

tmoney1 wrote:
Yeah I like Rowell’s leadership with the team, he is trying as hard as he can to bring success back to the Bay.

I think Rowell has to act in the best interest of team, even though it goes against the will of the fans, because Ellis is a solid player and is a key component to the W’s success, but if Rowell brings Ellis back and he does something like that again, then Rowell looks bad and will probably lose his job.

Good call on Nellie and letting the younger guys play. I know he’s a ‘my way or the highway’ kinda guy. That’s weird he wants Harrington gone, because two years ago when the W’s made the playoffs and beat the Mavs, Nellie traded for Harrington mid-season because he didn’t like Troy Murphy and Mike Dunleavy, but I guess things change with time.

Long live Run TMC

[/quote]

What do you think of that Crosstrainer program you use to track food/supps/workouts? Useful at all?

I may be picking up a Blackberry Storm and saw that the mobile version might be compatible with blackberrys.

I probably don’t need it, though, but am curious…

Oh, and just for you:

http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2008/11/06/darth_toaster/

[quote]PonceDeLeon wrote:
What do you think of that Crosstrainer program you use to track food/supps/workouts? Useful at all?

I may be picking up a Blackberry Storm and saw that the mobile version might be compatible with blackberrys.

I probably don’t need it, though, but am curious…[/quote]

I love the program. It’s really useful for tracking your cals and macro info. The database for the program is pretty big and it’s really easy to add things that aren’t in the default database. Plus, it has a favorites category, so I basically have my own little custom list of the foods I frequently eat. It only takes me about 5 minutes once I get home from work to enter every thing in.

My only issue with it is that it runs slow, but that’s mainly because my computer sucks.

The plugin is really convenient, but since I eat pretty much the same thing every day (at least M-F), there isn’t a huge need to use the plugin anymore, as I know where I am calorie-wise by the time I get home.

[quote]PonceDeLeon wrote:
Oh, and just for you:

http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2008/11/06/darth_toaster/
[/quote]

AWESOME!

Friday 11/07 - Back and Bis

Chins: BW+90 x 3,3,3,3,2,2,2,2

BB Row: 280 x 5, 285 x 5,5,5,5 - For some reason I thought I was going to struggle with these, but they were almost too easy.

HS High Row: 290 x 8,8,6 - superset with
Nautilus Pullover: 160 x 10,8,10 - Had to rest longer than usual on the last set because some newbie dipshit didn’t realize that my towel on the machine meant I was still using it, nor what the term ‘work in’ means, or what a superset is.

Reverse EZ Bar Curl: 75 x 8, 80 x 8,8,8

Mechanical EZ Preacher Curl: 65 x 8/5/4,8/4/3,8/4/3 - I’m not sure I like these and might switch back to dumbbells or something else entirely.

Shit! I just realized I forgot to do the Doggcrapp stretches. I’m always bad about forgetting something new like that at the end of workouts.

I hate stretching… can never be arsed to do em.

how long to you stretch for on average?