You basically can’t draw a circle around a big city that isn’t blue. Sure places like San Diego have a Republican Mayor, but they aren’t solid red by any means, and many other city officials are Dems.
Didn’t she say protestors? Also, she in no way advocated violence. Just protesting. I am still waiting on evidence to show Democrat support for violence.
Soros and Hollywood liberals.
The democrats have been calling these “protests” for the last 100+ days, that doesn’t mean that’s what they were. There were protests for about a week and everything after that were riots, no matter what you call it, it’s a riot.
She either knew that and were egging it on, or she’s unbelievably stupid, or both. At the time she said it, 25 people were already killed in the unrest. You cannot, not notice that especially if you are leader in the country.
They turned out exactly as their parents wanted.
Another option, she was encouraging protests, and not rioters. I think you are reading into it more than justified.
Not sure what that means tbh. We had a conservative sweep but there’s no evidence of a strategy for our two big issues; covid and brexit.
It’s a worry that our economy will be far far weaker than it could have been. Have a look at the Brexit negotiations, it’s a dumpster fire. This was bojos priority as well.
Wow. That would be almost as crazy as saying climate change is a “myth”.
It’s true that communism as it was conceived by Marx is not popular in America, largely because our cultural elites are also materially privileged, and they are not about to endorse any policy that would jeopardize their wealth. However, something that could be fairly characterized as cultural Marxism is not just popular, but quickly becoming the only acceptable mode of thought in many of our elite institutions. This is the idea that society can be neatly divided into oppressor and oppressed classes. Intersectionalism muddies this up a bit, but only to the extent that it creates hierarchies of victims in the oppressed classes. The oppressor class is very easy to define: White, male, heterosexual, and “cis-gender,” meaning people who identify with their biological sex. Even if you’re dirt poor, if you’re straight, white, and male, you are privileged and oppressing everyone else. Conversely, if you are a trans woman of color who is a multimillionaire, you oppressed. Question this ideology at your own peril in many of our largest corporations and universities.
Wow. Imagine a leader in the country allowing 25 people to be killed while downplaying the significance of the cause. That would be almost as bad as a small pathogen killing 1000+ a day and saying that it was under control, and avoiding measures that science shows would help control it.
This narrative should be killed. It doesn’t do anything positive for poc, and can be argued to be quite harmful.
Old-school socialists (apparently a dying breed nowadays) would argue that woke intersectionality is a distraction from overall income inequality, regardless of race/color.
It’s what happens when the feminists hijack an ideology.
Just look at all the people charged with felony riot and released without bail. What else would you call that?
3rd wave feminists. They are significantly different than most of the OGs (though of course not all).
It is without doubt quite harmful. But that’s what you get when you let unproductive, historically illiterate people have tenure and they need to make up theories to feel like they’re producing…well, something or other lol.
It makes me glad I chose hard science.
That is fine, it is a right wing narrative, naturally
It is a right wing narrative that has more elements of truth to it than it would be to say that public transportation causes mass riots, all of a sudden, at several locations, all at around the same time
are not a monolith. I do believe there are left wing narratives that have fanned the flames, although not all people that identify with Democrat want that - enough do for that to be an issue for some
It has a higher possibility of being true, I’ll give you that. I was just pointing out correlation was being talked about like causation.
That may have been your only intention but I saw that along with the possibility of other’s experiencing frustration through obfuscation - I believe it does often play out that way even if someone does not intend to obfuscate.
Holy crap dude… you can’t make this shit up, by 6/18 nothing but riots were happening. Look some things up on your own, I am not your personal news service. All the unhinged crap is available on your favorite search engine.you can swallow the narrative by the media or look at the facts and see the contrast. It’s not like it’s hidden. They just take the facts and either ignore them or lie about them. If you wish to be informed do some work. If you want to just believe what you want to hear, whether it’s true or not, then you’re just going to be wrong a lot and make poor decisions based on bad info. That’s up to you, I gave you tons of leads from sources you would accept.