Republicans are Demons

Off Topic Politics & World Issues
62

[quote]killerDIRK wrote:

Sex Machine. NO I am not trying to be funny. Apearantly Santorum does not believe in contraception AT ALL
[/quote]

What on earth has that got to do with anything? He personally doesn’t believe in using contraception. Why would you care if POTUS wears a condom or his wife takes the pill?

No, that is ridiculous. There is no portion of the country large or small that wants to see contraception abolished.

For whom? What’s it got to do with you what POTUS advocates in his private life? Was Bill Clinton trying to make everyone screw chubby interns?

You mean his apology to that disgusting 30-year-old rabid feminist slut Fluke who wants the state to pay for her deviant sexual behaviour? Yes, I was pissed about his apology to that bitch also.

65

Sorry to disappoint you push but I do not whine. In regards to rush apologizing, considering he finally got hit where it counts, his income level through sponsorship, rush may??? have started to realize that words have meaning and consequences to them. . .

66

[quote]killerDIRK wrote:
pushharder, the word PREY was INTENTIONALLY written as such. Seeing as how Catholic Priests love to PREY on children in the church.

Sex Machine. NO I am not trying to be funny. Apearantly Santorum does not believe in contraception AT ALL and a portion of this country would like to see it abolished. So no sex outside of marriage.

I do not TRY. I do and may fail beautifully but at least I still DO.

This diatribe came out of me in response to that fatass oxycontin snorting loudmouth Rush, what a fucktard.

So thank you all for taking this so much farther than I ever though it could go…

I though I was one of the last “threadkillers” out there… ; )[/quote]

You’re sitting here bitching about Rush, when our very own Cali Dems wanted to pass a law allowing people to eat naked in public restaurants ? Who wanted to Unionize babysitters ? Who gave a sweetheart deal to the Prison Guard Union ? Who suggested that voters NOT be allowed to vote on tax measures ?

Dude, seriously, you fucking kidding me ? If you’re gonna hate on Rush, make sure you spread the hate around equally, right after you push grandma down a flight of stairs.

67

would not push grandma down the stairs. So yeah I do HATE the party that I usually vote for since they have
NO FUCKING BALLS whatsoever. They back down during political fights that I may or may NOT agree with. Some times I think a dog licking its balls understands life better than my own political party.

So here it is. For the most part I am fiscally CONSERVATIVE and socially liberal TO A POINT. A person MUST take personal responsability for that which they do…so I hope this rhetoric helps you figure out my position on a few more issues

69

[quote]killerDIRK wrote:
would not push grandma down the stairs. So yeah I do HATE the party that I usually vote for since they have
NO FUCKING BALLS whatsoever. They back down during political fights that I may or may NOT agree with. Some times I think a dog licking its balls understands life better than my own political party.

So here it is. For the most part I am fiscally CONSERVATIVE and socially liberal TO A POINT. A person MUST take personal responsability for that which they do…so I hope this rhetoric helps you figure out my position on a few more issues[/quote]

This closet libertarianism saddens me.

70

If one takes personal responsability for ones own social liberalism then why would there be a NEED for fiscal conservatism to have to support it ?

I am asking seriously and not to be a prick. You have peaked my curiousity on this, thank you .

71

[quote]killerDIRK wrote:
If one takes personal responsability for ones own social liberalism then why would there be a NEED for fiscal conservatism to have to support it ?

I am asking seriously and not to be a prick. You have peaked my curiousity on this, thank you .[/quote]

Oh dont worry, he has voted for many “compassionate” conservatives in his life.

I would not expect him to address the cognitive dissonance.

72

[quote]killerDIRK wrote:
If one takes personal responsability for ones own social liberalism then why would there be a NEED for fiscal conservatism to have to support it ?

I am asking seriously and not to be a prick. You have peaked my curiousity on this, thank you .[/quote]

Push is correct.

When does Liberalism take responsibility fiscally ?

Look at the FUBAR state known as Cali-fucking-fornia as the best example. Look at all the crazy spending we have (nearly 100 Billion per year), we cater to EVERYONE, yet have the highest taxes, worst schools, highest paid teachers, worst business environment, 1/3 of the country’s welfare, highest number of illegal aliens, and so on and so on.

Dude, you live here, you know exactly how these tree-hugging hippie mother fuckers are here. Because this state is highly Liberal, promise any Dem a shit ton of votes, and you will get anything on the ballot and probably passed.

It makes me SICK to think that a soldier coming back from the Middle East, now has to wait BEHIND an illegal alien for funding, if he/she wants to attend college.

It also makes me SICK that we could not fire a school teacher, who fed kids cookies with his semen on them, and filmed it. The teachers Union would not allow the school district to fire him. So now, I have to pay for his pension.

It makes me SICK that I am taxed in the highest tax bracket the moment a single person makes $47k per year or more.

The 2006 Global Warming Law has chased business right out of the state.

ALL THANKS TO LIBS^^^

73

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]killerDIRK wrote:

So here it is. For the most part I am fiscally CONSERVATIVE and socially liberal TO A POINT…

[/quote]

The big problem with that philosophy, Dirk, is fiscal CONSERVATISM cannot support social LIBERALISM. And vice versa. Ne’er the twain shall meet.

You have one of them thar conundrums goin’ on.[/quote]

Yes but must fiscal conservatism always attach itself to the religious right? Drives me nuts…

74

[quote]milktruck wrote:

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]killerDIRK wrote:

So here it is. For the most part I am fiscally CONSERVATIVE and socially liberal TO A POINT…

[/quote]

The big problem with that philosophy, Dirk, is fiscal CONSERVATISM cannot support social LIBERALISM. And vice versa. Ne’er the twain shall meet.

You have one of them thar conundrums goin’ on.[/quote]

Yes but must fiscal conservatism always attach itself to the religious right? Drives me nuts…[/quote]

Yeah, well, you just might be a libertarian.

Though nuts, but if you could embrace it you would have a lot of energy to ficus in other things.

75

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]K2000 wrote:
Christian conservatives rally in Broward County, Florida.[/quote]

Please provide evidence that this man is a Christian.

Please also provide evidence this man is a conservative.[/quote]

The guy is at a Dennis Ku-Cinich rally…because you know he’s supper conservative.

76

[quote]TooHuman wrote:

[quote]benos4752 wrote:

[quote]simpstr1 wrote:
republicans SUCK[/quote]

Thank you for your eloquent words of wisdom…[/quote]
That’s RACIST![/quote]

That’s sexist.

78

[quote]killerDIRK wrote:
Seeing as how Catholic Priests love to PREY on children in the church.
[/quote]

How does a minority qualify a majority for something?

79

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]killerDIRK wrote:
If one takes personal responsability for ones own social liberalism then why would there be a NEED for fiscal conservatism to have to support it ?

I am asking seriously and not to be a prick. You have peaked my curiousity on this, thank you .[/quote]

Seriously…think this through. You can’t have all the government programs and policies that are immersed in social liberalism and still be fiscally conservative. You must spend lots and lots and lots of (Chinese financed) money to fund social liberalism.

Social liberalism is the fundamental basis of the nanny state. The nanny state is the antithesis of fiscal conservatism.

Which of the two is more important to you? That will define who you are and what you stand for.[/quote]

Um… if his answer was “fuck it, I dont play that game” what would he be then?