Renaming PWI

Off Topic Politics & World Issues
41

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]SUPER-T wrote:
It should be renamed " common sense conservitives trying to enlighten the minds of liberals in denial"[/quote]

Two things:

  1. Get Firefox (or some other browser with a built in spell checker) and use the spell checker. I make a lot of spelling mistakes too, but I also right click words that are underlined in red and correct them. Conservatives is a word I am likely to spell wrong if I am trying to type too fast, leading into the next point…

  2. Please stop trying to type so fast. It really messes with the formatting of your sentences and paragraphs and obscures clarity. Take the extra 15 seconds to make sure that there aren’t any stray taps of the space bar.[/quote]

So basicly you like my name, because all you criticized was my spelling and space bar use.

42

[quote]angry chicken wrote:
I think it should be called “the grammar police”. I’d say almost half of what you guys argue about over here is SPELLING. It’s the go-to reaction! “let me check his spelling so that I can ignore his point and feel superior”. It’s entertainment, though! [/quote]

That is the classic liberal response. They can not fight the issues, because deep down they know they are wrong, so instead, they try to ridicule or make fun of you to try to shut you up. I got thick skin and a head full of thoughts, so they can keep it coming.

43

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]florelius wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:
To the op, when you elect the most liberal, and inexperienced man in the history of our country to the highest office in the land you’ll have to expect that there will be a multitude of critics. Look at what the press did to GW and he was superb in comparison to Obama. Honestly, I’m still trying to find just one thing that Obama has done that is actually helping our country. If I didn’t know better (and some days I don’t) I’d swear he’s actually trying to harm us.

One more point, I’m actually surprised at the number of defenders that Obama has on this site. But then again if you take away all of the foreigners, and the 20 year old self-proclaimed socialists (awe they’re so cute), he doesn’t have many protectors. [/quote]

wtf :open_mouth:

I am a foreigner and a 24 year old self-proclaimed socialist and I am no obama supporter, I just react
when alzeimers pasients like you try to lump him in with my group( socialist ). I dont support people who
send people over sea to kill others.

[/quote]

Which caused you to misinterpret my post? The fact that you’re a socialist, a foreigner, or a dumb kid? Simply because I said that Obama had support among those groups does not mean that all 20 something’s and foreigners agreed with him. And I never said that they did.

Read much idiot, or are you too busy licking your Karl Marx poster?

[/quote]

what the fuck did you meen with your post then? just read it again and see if its still weird I reacted.

44

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

[quote]florelius wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:
To the op, when you elect the most liberal, and inexperienced man in the history of our country to the highest office in the land you’ll have to expect that there will be a multitude of critics. Look at what the press did to GW and he was superb in comparison to Obama. Honestly, I’m still trying to find just one thing that Obama has done that is actually helping our country. If I didn’t know better (and some days I don’t) I’d swear he’s actually trying to harm us.

One more point, I’m actually surprised at the number of defenders that Obama has on this site. But then again if you take away all of the foreigners, and the 20 year old self-proclaimed socialists (awe they’re so cute), he doesn’t have many protectors. [/quote]

wtf :open_mouth:

I am a foreigner and a 24 year old self-proclaimed socialist and I am no obama supporter, I just react
when alzeimers pasients like you try to lump him in with my group( socialist ). I dont support people who
send people over sea to kill others.

[/quote]

In case you didn’t know, socialism isn’t immune to imperialism. Google the “Iron Curtain”.

And please fill me in on what your socialism would do to your nieghbor if he tried to claim self ownership? Socialism by definition must use force to collect property of people whom disagree. Oh right, you said over seas, I guess you don’t see threats of violence against your own countrymen as bad as someone overseas.

Oh, and claiming to be socialist is claiming to own others so I always try to give a big FU to supporters of slavery.

Claiming to be socialist and pacifistic is completely contradictory.[/quote]

I never said anything about pacifism( read my post again ).

I implied that I dont suppport imperialism and occupation. And even if Stalin where a imperialist, does not meen that all socialists are. most are anti-imperialist and all socialist I know dont support Obama or the western occupation of afganistan.

45

[quote]SUPER-T wrote:

[quote]angry chicken wrote:
I think it should be called “the grammar police”. I’d say almost half of what you guys argue about over here is SPELLING. It’s the go-to reaction! “let me check his spelling so that I can ignore his point and feel superior”. It’s entertainment, though! [/quote]

That is the classic liberal response. They can not fight the issues, because deep down they know they are wrong, so instead, they try to ridicule or make fun of you to try to shut you up. I got thick skin and a head full of thoughts, so they can keep it coming.[/quote]

Rarely do you bring up issues worth fighting

46

[quote]SUPER-T wrote:

[quote]angry chicken wrote:
I think it should be called “the grammar police”. I’d say almost half of what you guys argue about over here is SPELLING. It’s the go-to reaction! “let me check his spelling so that I can ignore his point and feel superior”. It’s entertainment, though! [/quote]

That is the classic liberal response. They can not fight the issues, because deep down they know they are wrong, so instead, they try to ridicule or make fun of you to try to shut you up. I got thick skin and a head full of thoughts, so they can keep it coming.[/quote]

Wow, how can you say that somebody acting like a “grammer police” is a “classic liberal response” that if anything is a indication of there persona not if there “Liberal” or not lol.

47

[quote]angry chicken wrote:
I think it should be called “the grammar police”. I’d say almost half of what you guys argue about over here is SPELLING. It’s the go-to reaction! “let me check his spelling so that I can ignore his point and feel superior”. It’s entertainment, though! [/quote]

Guilty as charged. Though, to provide a defense, if you cannot form a reasonably understandable, readable sentence, then don’t expect to have your argument taken seriously. Plus sometimes I feel like I’m talking with a retard.

Btw, periods go inside of quotation marks. Zing!

48

[quote]optheta wrote:

Wow, how can you say that somebody acting like a “grammer police” is a “classic liberal response” that if anything is a indication of there persona not if there “Liberal” or not lol.[/quote]

Example of what I mean about the retard thing.^^^^^^^^^^^^^

49

[quote]SUPER-T wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]SUPER-T wrote:
It should be renamed " common sense conservitives trying to enlighten the minds of liberals in denial"[/quote]

Two things:

  1. Get Firefox (or some other browser with a built in spell checker) and use the spell checker. I make a lot of spelling mistakes too, but I also right click words that are underlined in red and correct them. Conservatives is a word I am likely to spell wrong if I am trying to type too fast, leading into the next point…

  2. Please stop trying to type so fast. It really messes with the formatting of your sentences and paragraphs and obscures clarity. Take the extra 15 seconds to make sure that there aren’t any stray taps of the space bar.[/quote]

So basicly you like my name, because all you criticized was my spelling and space bar use.[/quote]

I wasn’t attacking you.

I am now though.

BASICALLY.

50

[quote]Cortes wrote:
Guilty as charged. Though, to provide a defense, if you cannot form a reasonably understandable, readable sentence, then don’t expect to have your argument taken seriously. Plus sometimes I feel like I’m talking with a retard.[/quote]

This.

51

[quote]Cortes wrote:

[quote]optheta wrote:

Wow, how can you say that somebody acting like a “grammer police” is a “classic liberal response” that if anything is a indication of there persona not if there “Liberal” or not lol.[/quote]

Example of what I mean about the retard thing.^^^^^^^^^^^^[1]

Ya poorly written sentence i agree…

  1. /quote ↩︎

52

[quote]optheta wrote:

[quote]Cortes wrote:

[quote]optheta wrote:

Wow, how can you say that somebody acting like a “grammer police” is a “classic liberal response” that if anything is a indication of there persona not if there “Liberal” or not lol.[/quote]

Example of what I mean about the retard thing.^^^^^^^^^^^^[1]

Ya poorly written sentence i agree… [/quote]

You get points for owning it, at least.

  1. /quote ↩︎

53

[quote]florelius wrote:

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

[quote]florelius wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:
To the op, when you elect the most liberal, and inexperienced man in the history of our country to the highest office in the land you’ll have to expect that there will be a multitude of critics. Look at what the press did to GW and he was superb in comparison to Obama. Honestly, I’m still trying to find just one thing that Obama has done that is actually helping our country. If I didn’t know better (and some days I don’t) I’d swear he’s actually trying to harm us.

One more point, I’m actually surprised at the number of defenders that Obama has on this site. But then again if you take away all of the foreigners, and the 20 year old self-proclaimed socialists (awe they’re so cute), he doesn’t have many protectors. [/quote]

wtf :open_mouth:

I am a foreigner and a 24 year old self-proclaimed socialist and I am no obama supporter, I just react
when alzeimers pasients like you try to lump him in with my group( socialist ). I dont support people who
send people over sea to kill others.

[/quote]

In case you didn’t know, socialism isn’t immune to imperialism. Google the “Iron Curtain”.

And please fill me in on what your socialism would do to your nieghbor if he tried to claim self ownership? Socialism by definition must use force to collect property of people whom disagree. Oh right, you said over seas, I guess you don’t see threats of violence against your own countrymen as bad as someone overseas.

Oh, and claiming to be socialist is claiming to own others so I always try to give a big FU to supporters of slavery.

Claiming to be socialist and pacifistic is completely contradictory.[/quote]

I never said anything about pacifism( read my post again ).

I implied that I dont suppport imperialism and occupation. And even if Stalin where a imperialist, does not meen that all socialists are. most are anti-imperialist and all socialist I know dont support Obama or the western occupation of afganistan. [/quote]

The occupation of your neighbor is still occupation.

I never claimed all socialists were imperialists in foreign policy. I did note they all were domestically though. I fail to see why you think you should have rights to violently subdue someone who is geographically near to you, but its suddenly attrocious

And I’m a capitalist, and I don’t support Obama (like most capitalists) By your logic that makes him not a capitalist.

Many Capitalists are also isolationists, and don’t support foreign wars too. War policy and economic policy have little to do with one another.

54

[quote]optheta wrote:

[quote]SUPER-T wrote:

[quote]angry chicken wrote:
I think it should be called “the grammar police”. I’d say almost half of what you guys argue about over here is SPELLING. It’s the go-to reaction! “let me check his spelling so that I can ignore his point and feel superior”. It’s entertainment, though! [/quote]

That is the classic liberal response. They can not fight the issues, because deep down they know they are wrong, so instead, they try to ridicule or make fun of you to try to shut you up. I got thick skin and a head full of thoughts, so they can keep it coming.[/quote]

Wow, how can you say that somebody acting like a “grammer police” is a “classic liberal response” that if anything is a indication of there persona not if there “Liberal” or not lol.[/quote]

I forgot that some need the obvious pointed out for them. What I meant was liberals can not argue on facts, so they just attack anything else (like spelling or grammer) to take attention away from the issue. Before you blast someone for errors, you should make sure that you have none, which you do, but I wont’t point it out.

55

[quote]florelius wrote:
I dont support people who send people over sea to kill others.
[/quote]

You mean, like the Taliban/Al-quadi flying planes into buildings in NYC? Or Iran sending proxies to Gaza to shell elementary schools in Israel? Or Iraq sending assasins to try to kill George Bush, the Elder?

Your one-sided non-interventionists crap is a transparent lie to everyone but youself.

The real truth is you (and most Europeans) hate America, hate Americans, look down on them, and yet are jealous of them and their success, and so revel in the USA getting put in its place.

56

[quote]Jewbacca wrote:

[quote]florelius wrote:
I dont support people who send people over sea to kill others.
[/quote]

You mean, like the Taliban/Al-quadi flying planes into buildings in NYC? Or Iran sending proxies to Gaza to shell elementary schools in Israel? Or Iraq sending assasins to try to kill George Bush, the Elder?

Your one-sided non-interventionists crap is a transparent lie to everyone but youself.

The real truth is you (and most Europeans) hate America, hate Americans, look down on them, and yet are jealous of them and their success, and so revel in the USA getting put in its place.[/quote]

There is so much truth to this, you deserve a PWI medal today.

57

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
In case you didn’t know, socialism isn’t immune to imperialism. Google the “Iron Curtain”.
[/quote]

People always forget the other socialism — National Socialism of Germany aka Nazis. National Socialism was about as Imperial as it comes – ask Poland.

How this leftist Hitler got painted as a creature of the “Right” I have no idea.

I suppose because he didn’t like that the Communists because the communists let stupid Jewish people (and they were stupid) in their ranks.

58

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:

[quote]optheta wrote:
Is it me or should it this subforum be called “Trivial Links of why Obama is a terrible President/person”

Whose with me?

[/quote]

GOP Blowjob Barn[/quote]

While I don’t agree with Irish on politics, his name for PWI is funny and it would be hysterical to see it as a forum title.

59

[quote]Jewbacca wrote:

[quote]florelius wrote:
I dont support people who send people over sea to kill others.
[/quote]

You mean, like the Taliban/Al-quadi flying planes into buildings in NYC? Or Iran sending proxies to Gaza to shell elementary schools in Israel? Or Iraq sending assasins to try to kill George Bush, the Elder?

Your one-sided non-interventionists crap is a transparent lie to everyone but youself.

The real truth is you (and most Europeans) hate America, hate Americans, look down on them, and yet are jealous of them and their success, and so revel in the USA getting put in its place.[/quote]

Well said!

60

[quote]Jewbacca wrote:

[quote]florelius wrote:
I dont support people who send people over sea to kill others.
[/quote]

You mean, like the Taliban/Al-quadi flying planes into buildings in NYC? Or Iran sending proxies to Gaza to shell elementary schools in Israel? Or Iraq sending assasins to try to kill George Bush, the Elder?

Your one-sided non-interventionists crap is a transparent lie to everyone but youself.

The real truth is you (and most Europeans) hate America, hate Americans, look down on them, and yet are jealous of them and their success, and so revel in the USA getting put in its place.[/quote]

give me a fucking break. I dont hate americans, but I hate imperialism and therefor I hate american imperialism. I would not like chinese imperialism any better.