It should be renamed " common sense conservitives trying to enlighten the minds of liberals in denial"
[quote]Carl_ wrote:
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]Carl_ wrote:
tu coque.
[/quote]
I hope you’re kidding, you do understand you’re talking to a Jew, right?[/quote]
What? No, not kidding at all.
Was just addressing the “over the top” nature of the post and the dialogue in general, really.
Are you referring to the rather shameful part of Norwegian history pertaining to deporting Jews during WW2? If so, rest assured that I’m totally and painfully aware of that.
Dunno what you’re getting at here.[/quote]
to coque.
Rename it “Pseudo Smart People Wearing Intellectual Glasses and Chatting Smugly Over CoooHFEEEY”. That way libs will be more attracted to it and we can further annihilate them.
[quote]Jewbacca wrote:
[quote]florelius wrote:
it should be renamed to “the fox forum” :P[/quote]
Hey, isn’t Norway the litle country that collaborated with the Nazis, somehow escaped justice for its crimes, and now gets by with socialism because it happened to sit on a bunch of oil that the Americans drill for them?[/quote]
ouch you need to check your history sources sir.
first off: norway where occupied by the nazis and the nazis put in charge a puppet administration consisting of norwegian fascists. the true elected administration fleed the country because they would have been killed by the nazis if they stayed. norwegians off all political colours formed para-military groups and sabotaged the nazis in norway. they also collaborated with the allies. On the other hand you had sweden who took a neutral stance, but who let the nazis drive equipment and troops with norway as destination trough theire country. and btw the swedish king had nazi sympathys. Maybe you mix sweden with norway. I want you to know that my fathers uncle sat in saxenhousen for opposition to the nazi occupation. He was a communist btw.
second: Norway is not a socialist country. We have capitalism with a welfare state, usa does also have a welfare state( not saying identical with the norwian one, but still a welfare state). would you call them socialist?
third: Today norway drill theire own oil, but we had help from american petrolium companies to start our oil industry. Israel on the other hand have gotten and still gets economic help from usa. So maybe its you thats living in a “socialist paradis” in the dessert sponsored by american tax dollars.
fifth: was it as good for you as it was for me?
shalom.
[quote]SUPER-T wrote:
It should be renamed " common sense conservitives trying to enlighten the minds of liberals in denial"[/quote]
Ha! You are one of the biggest offenders making really really stupid threads all the time, your words carry no weight sorry.
[quote]SUPER-T wrote:
It should be renamed " common sense conservitives trying to enlighten the minds of liberals in denial"[/quote]
Two things:
-
Get Firefox (or some other browser with a built in spell checker) and use the spell checker. I make a lot of spelling mistakes too, but I also right click words that are underlined in red and correct them. Conservatives is a word I am likely to spell wrong if I am trying to type too fast, leading into the next point…
-
Please stop trying to type so fast. It really messes with the formatting of your sentences and paragraphs and obscures clarity. Take the extra 15 seconds to make sure that there aren’t any stray taps of the space bar.
[quote]optheta wrote:
Ha! You are one of the biggest offenders making really really stupid threads all the time, your words carry no weight sorry.[/quote]
Did you really just write this?
just rename it “intellectual masturbation” and it will be nearly as populated as SAMA.
and btw, this forum does not only lack lefties, it lacks girlz.
I think it should be called “the grammar police”. I’d say almost half of what you guys argue about over here is SPELLING. It’s the go-to reaction! “let me check his spelling so that I can ignore his point and feel superior”. It’s entertainment, though!
[quote]Makavali wrote:
Bible Study and Non-Issues.[/quote]
I gotta wonder what nut bags like you did before the Internet. I’m guessing it had something to do with the telephone and hanging up a lot - Just a guess though.
[quote]Makavali wrote:
[quote]SUPER-T wrote:
It should be renamed " common sense conservitives trying to enlighten the minds of liberals in denial"[/quote]
Two things:
-
Get Firefox (or some other browser with a built in spell checker) and use the spell checker. I make a lot of spelling mistakes too, but I also right click words that are underlined in red and correct them. Conservatives is a word I am likely to spell wrong if I am trying to type too fast, leading into the next point…
-
Please stop trying to type so fast. It really messes with the formatting of your sentences and paragraphs and obscures clarity. Take the extra 15 seconds to make sure that there aren’t any stray taps of the space bar.[/quote]
Now he thinks he’s the grammar police (eye roll). Attacks God and corrects other posters grammar. Got it. You are just worthless around here, you really are.
[quote]optheta wrote:
Is it me or should it this subforum be called “Trivial Links of why Obama is a terrible President/person”
Whose with me?
[/quote]
GOP Blowjob Barn
To the op, when you elect the most liberal, and inexperienced man in the history of our country to the highest office in the land you’ll have to expect that there will be a multitude of critics. Look at what the press did to GW and he was superb in comparison to Obama. Honestly, I’m still trying to find just one thing that Obama has done that is actually helping our country. If I didn’t know better (and some days I don’t) I’d swear he’s actually trying to harm us.
One more point, I’m actually surprised at the number of defenders that Obama has on this site. But then again if you take away all of the foreigners, and the 20 year old self-proclaimed socialists (awe they’re so cute), he doesn’t have many protectors.
[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
[quote]optheta wrote:
Is it me or should it this subforum be called “Trivial Links of why Obama is a terrible President/person”
Whose with me?
[/quote]
GOP Blowjob Barn[/quote]
That sounds like an offer.
And I personally take offense to the GOP label. I bet I dislike them at least as much as you do.
[quote]ZEB wrote:
To the op, when you elect the most liberal, and inexperienced man in the history of our country to the highest office in the land you’ll have to expect that there will be a multitude of critics. Look at what the press did to GW and he was superb in comparison to Obama. Honestly, I’m still trying to find just one thing that Obama has done that is actually helping our country. If I didn’t know better (and some days I don’t) I’d swear he’s actually trying to harm us.
One more point, I’m actually surprised at the number of defenders that Obama has on this site. But then again if you take away all of the foreigners, and the 20 year old self-proclaimed socialists (awe they’re so cute), he doesn’t have many protectors. [/quote]
wtf 
I am a foreigner and a 24 year old self-proclaimed socialist and I am no obama supporter, I just react
when alzeimers pasients like you try to lump him in with my group( socialist ). I dont support people who
send people over sea to kill others.
[quote]florelius wrote:
[quote]ZEB wrote:
To the op, when you elect the most liberal, and inexperienced man in the history of our country to the highest office in the land you’ll have to expect that there will be a multitude of critics. Look at what the press did to GW and he was superb in comparison to Obama. Honestly, I’m still trying to find just one thing that Obama has done that is actually helping our country. If I didn’t know better (and some days I don’t) I’d swear he’s actually trying to harm us.
One more point, I’m actually surprised at the number of defenders that Obama has on this site. But then again if you take away all of the foreigners, and the 20 year old self-proclaimed socialists (awe they’re so cute), he doesn’t have many protectors. [/quote]
wtf
I am a foreigner and a 24 year old self-proclaimed socialist and I am no obama supporter, I just react
when alzeimers pasients like you try to lump him in with my group( socialist ). I dont support people who
send people over sea to kill others.
[/quote]
In case you didn’t know, socialism isn’t immune to imperialism. Google the “Iron Curtain”.
And please fill me in on what your socialism would do to your nieghbor if he tried to claim self ownership? Socialism by definition must use force to collect property of people whom disagree. Oh right, you said over seas, I guess you don’t see threats of violence against your own countrymen as bad as someone overseas.
Oh, and claiming to be socialist is claiming to own others so I always try to give a big FU to supporters of slavery.
Claiming to be socialist and pacifistic is completely contradictory.
I always come here and laugh when liberals try to make a point. It’s like they bring out the thesaurus and try to sound smart, but can’t use the spell check. Give it up-
[quote]florelius wrote:
[quote]ZEB wrote:
To the op, when you elect the most liberal, and inexperienced man in the history of our country to the highest office in the land you’ll have to expect that there will be a multitude of critics. Look at what the press did to GW and he was superb in comparison to Obama. Honestly, I’m still trying to find just one thing that Obama has done that is actually helping our country. If I didn’t know better (and some days I don’t) I’d swear he’s actually trying to harm us.
One more point, I’m actually surprised at the number of defenders that Obama has on this site. But then again if you take away all of the foreigners, and the 20 year old self-proclaimed socialists (awe they’re so cute), he doesn’t have many protectors. [/quote]
wtf
I am a foreigner and a 24 year old self-proclaimed socialist and I am no obama supporter, I just react
when alzeimers pasients like you try to lump him in with my group( socialist ). I dont support people who
send people over sea to kill others.
[/quote]
Which caused you to misinterpret my post? The fact that you’re a socialist, a foreigner, or a dumb kid? Simply because I said that Obama had support among those groups does not mean that all 20 something’s and foreigners agreed with him. And I never said that they did.
Read much idiot, or are you too busy licking your Karl Marx poster?
Lengthy, but I’d call it “Well that was a waste of time, better check back in an hour”
[quote]optheta wrote:
[quote]SUPER-T wrote:
It should be renamed " common sense conservitives trying to enlighten the minds of liberals in denial"[/quote]
Ha! You are one of the biggest offenders making really really stupid threads all the time, your words carry no weight sorry.[/quote]
like I said liberals in denial.