[quote]cycobushmaster wrote:
[quote]clenone wrote:
[quote]cycobushmaster wrote:
[quote]clenone wrote:
[quote]cycobushmaster wrote:
[quote]clenone wrote:
[quote]TheTaskmaster wrote:
[quote]clenone wrote:
Thanks for the response. I did lower clomid to 25mg, and my pharm source does not have torem, so I had to get clomid and nolva. Also, I tried 500IU eod on cycle and my balls did not get any bigger or sore. This could either mean I needed a higher dose to respond, or my source was just underdosed.
[/quote]
I don’t understand these massive dosages of HCG or why you would want your nuts to get substantially larger or sore. The whole purpose is just to prevent/reverse atrophy and resume production of natural testosterone. I could see overdosing actually lead to further suppression. 250iu EOD + 0.25mg adex ED seemed most reasonable to me. And it worked by my experience, because I actually continued to make gains while on HCG and even during PCT. No weight loss and some actual strength gains in certain lifts. Only nolva for pct too, and that was after deca.
Some might say 250iu is too low but someone posted recently that 250iu is actually equivalent to the bodys natural production levels. I’m hoping they post a reference to that study soon[/quote]
Well both the Power PCT and Cashout’s exit strategy(Two protocols with tons of success with hpta restoration after years of staying on aas) use 2000IU hCG, and from the research I’ve done this was the right dose. Also I would never use arimidex on a pct as estrogen rebound is the LAST thing you would ever want while trying to return to homeostasis. It sounds like you are speaking from opinion as well. And my nuts are raisins from a year of being on aas. Getting sore and getting bigger is a GOOD thing. That means they are starting to work again, much like when they get sore and shrink during long cycles. HCG would be suppressive like you say, but that is where the SERMS come in.
[/quote]
uhm, why are you adamant that using an AI is a bad idea for PCT?
i’m gonna give you a hint here: high estrogen is actually more suppressive (about 200-fold more suppressive!) than high testosterone levels… and of course, SERMs and HCG actually raise estrogen levels.[/quote]
I said that ARIMIDEX is a bad idea for PCT, which it is. AROMASIN is a good idea, as there is no rebound effect, and it can be used with nolvadex, and raises igf-1. Did you read the OP?
[/quote]
i agree that aromasin is a better choice, but i don’t necessarily think a-dex is a bad choice, either.
if you have estrogen rebound when you stop your AI, then the obvious issue is that the AI was stopped too soon, or simply could have been tapered down.
anyway, i don’t think we are disagreeing, but splitting hairs on solutions for PCT
[/quote]
I wouldn’t wank to risk rebound no matter how unlikely, I’ve rebounded even with a slow taper on arimidex, aromasin is just the safest bet. [/quote]
not to hijack your thread, but could you elaborate on your estrogen rebound from A-dex?
typically, i have not seen that in the method i use/suggest, but i’m always looking to identify issues…
[/quote]
Well I tapered adex slowly over about 4 weeks and still rebounded as per my estradiol blood tests… I just don’t see the point in risking it when aromasin is a far superior AI. Especially since nolvadex cannot be used with a-dex, aromasin is the obvious choice. The igf-1 and testosterone raising qualities are also a benefit