[quote]Thomasm122 wrote:
Karl Marx loved to fuck his physics, didn’t he? It’s all a metaphysical joke, meta-humorous. Politics, at least American politics, is bullshit! By trolling this thread, I’ve instigated symbolic ennui in numerous posters. Snap to defense of your discomfort with absurdity! [/quote]
This is a great post. Nothing seems to actually have been said.
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]Thomasm122 wrote:
on the basis of approximately over 70 instances of wrongdoing, [/quote]
Angst-filled child, stop lying. If you read your own source it said 66.[/quote]
Right and I added about a 1/4 paragraph from things I also listed as sources. Over 10, I think? I may be wrong. “approximately”. You can check the source, btw. As I said, I added a small amount. I did copy and paste 66 reasons, so that’s true. But what’s the difference?
[quote]Thomasm122 wrote:
So why comment? If you’re that disinterested, don’t be here. [/quote]
Difference between being disinterested in your opinion and the subject of debate.
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]Thomasm122 wrote:
Karl Marx loved to fuck his physics, didn’t he? It’s all a metaphysical joke, meta-humorous. Politics, at least American politics, is bullshit! By trolling this thread, I’ve instigated symbolic ennui in numerous posters. Snap to defense of your discomfort with absurdity! [/quote]
This is a great post. Nothing seems to actually have been said.[/quote]
[quote]Thomasm122 wrote:
[quote]pushharder wrote:
OMG, if we aint got us a prima donna-esque wonderboy 'round here.[/quote]
Look, I don’t mean any disrespect to you. Politically, I think you’re an asshole, but you are a strong motherfucker otherwise. [/quote]
Wow, still a lack of disrespect in his attempt to say he isn’t disrespecting you.
[quote]florelius wrote:
Actually this kid has balls, he is questioning the “reagan is god” myth on a pre-dominantly conservative forum. Thats a sign of balls and character. You on the other hand are only saying what the older conservative-minded posters wants to hear, thats not a sign of balls my friend.
[/quote]
That’s original. Guy disagrees, he’s original has balls. Guy agrees, must be a conformist with no balls. Great argument.
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]Thomasm122 wrote:
So why comment? If you’re that disinterested, don’t be here. [/quote]
Difference between being disinterested in your opinion and the subject of debate.[/quote]
I was referencing a comment specifically posted regarding myself, concerning my intelligence relative to my age. I would think that in light of this my opinion would be relevant. So is the subject of debate my I.Q, and thus why T-Nation should require age and intelligence limits (i.e. secret fascist agenda)? No, not at all. His comments were unnecessary and he was unable to refute a single thing I either “copied and pasted” or “listed”, not that it makes a fucking difference. You can nitpick the shit out of random posts all you want, but you don’t have a single thing to say to any of the relevant posts here, of which there are few. As well as the fact that he didn’t bother to read more than a 1/4 of my posts, but I already addressed this.
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]Thomasm122 wrote:
[quote]pushharder wrote:
OMG, if we aint got us a prima donna-esque wonderboy 'round here.[/quote]
Look, I don’t mean any disrespect to you. Politically, I think you’re an asshole, but you are a strong motherfucker otherwise. [/quote]
Wow, still a lack of disrespect in his attempt to say he isn’t disrespecting you.[/quote]
Edit: “a lack of respect”
I’d rather be honest than suck somebody’s dick. And on that basis I think my entire family, excluding my father, are ignorant assholes. Do I love them otherwise, and respect them in spite of it? Fuck yes. My grandmother is an economic policy consultant to the Romney campaign. Every male member on my mother’s side of the family is a graduate of the U.S.N.A. Two silver stars and one congressional medal of honor. Shit, you don’t think there’s been some interesting discussions there? Of course, much more polite than this particular one. Some of them result in fights, at least with my cousins. And I don’t really have any balls. This is the internet, in real life, I waited until I could kick the shit out of them to actually argue my opinions. But we still think of each other as brothers.
But thanks to Florelius. In defense of him, CS doesn’t understand what he’s commenting on. That’s why it’s easy to figure out, hey, he’s parroting
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]Thomasm122 wrote:
on the basis of approximately over 70 instances of wrongdoing, [/quote]
Angst-filled child[/quote]
More like cream filled
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
I personally liked the Cater cheek better
[/quote]
Decimated military, decimated economy, horrific foreign policy failures, geez what not to love. I guess the ‘billy beer’ could make you forget how bad it really was.
[quote]Thomasm122 wrote:
I’d rather be honest than suck somebody’s dick.[/quote]
False dichotomy.
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]Thomasm122 wrote:
I’d rather be honest than suck somebody’s dick.[/quote]
False dichotomy.[/quote]
You could take it that way
[quote]florelius wrote:
[quote]CSEagles1694 wrote:
[quote]Thomasm122 wrote:
[quote]Thomasm122 wrote:
Karl Marx loved to fuck his physics, didn’t he? It’s all a metaphysical joke, meta-humorous. Politics, at least American politics, is bullshit! By trolling this thread, I’ve instigated symbolic ennui in numerous posters. Snap to defense of your discomfort with absurdity! [/quote]
[/quote]
You’re the epitome of why “my generation is fucked.”
CS[/quote]
Actually this kid has balls, he is questioning the “reagan is god” myth on a pre-dominantly conservative forum. Thats a sign of balls and character. You on the other hand are only saying what the older conservative-minded posters wants to hear, thats not a sign of balls my friend.
[/quote]
Flor, your avatar is just plain creepy…zombie Presbyterian minster?
[quote]UtahLama wrote:
[quote]florelius wrote:
[quote]CSEagles1694 wrote:
[quote]Thomasm122 wrote:
[quote]Thomasm122 wrote:
Karl Marx loved to fuck his physics, didn’t he? It’s all a metaphysical joke, meta-humorous. Politics, at least American politics, is bullshit! By trolling this thread, I’ve instigated symbolic ennui in numerous posters. Snap to defense of your discomfort with absurdity! [/quote]
[/quote]
You’re the epitome of why “my generation is fucked.”
CS[/quote]
Actually this kid has balls, he is questioning the “reagan is god” myth on a pre-dominantly conservative forum. Thats a sign of balls and character. You on the other hand are only saying what the older conservative-minded posters wants to hear, thats not a sign of balls my friend.
[/quote]
Flor, your avatar is just plain creepy…zombie Presbyterian minster?[/quote]
I know, thats why I have it as my avatar LOL
[quote]pat wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
I personally liked the Cater cheek better
[/quote]
Decimated military, decimated economy, horrific foreign policy failures, geez what not to love. I guess the ‘billy beer’ could make you forget how bad it really was.
[/quote]
Good.
Necessary.
Inherited by predecessors.
[quote]Thomasm122 wrote:
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]Thomasm122 wrote:
I’d rather be honest than suck somebody’s dick.[/quote]
False dichotomy.[/quote]
You could take it that way[/quote]
I do.
I don’t agree with most people on this forum. I at least try to be respectful.
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]Thomasm122 wrote:
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]Thomasm122 wrote:
I’d rather be honest than suck somebody’s dick.[/quote]
False dichotomy.[/quote]
You could take it that way[/quote]
I do.
I don’t agree with most people on this forum. I at least try to be respectful.[/quote]
I would’ve been respectful throughout this argument if I was given anything to respect. Had I lied on my hub, put no pictures or vids up, and just said I was 45 would the validity of my initial argument suddenly be reconsidered? Blind respect without reason is useless. That kind of mentality translates awfully quick into blind respect for every longstanding social structure evident within a society. Then, you get the Hitler youth. In that way, it’s not even respect. It’s psychological masturbation, performed in order to avoid discomfort with said longstanding social structures. It is blatant lack of a capability for autonomous thought that is the reason I implied “my generation is fucked”. The very same capability that I was expected to conform to commenting on this thread. Ask no questions, be a patriot. The same capability that CS, like so many others, so happily submits to, and then regurgitates in 5-year old glib “Tag, you’re it!”.
I mean both of us (CS and I) will be working long past our deaths to pay off the debt supply-side economics encouraged the racketeers running the casinos on Wall St. to chalk up. The only difference is, he’ll probably wind up being what, a narc? spook? My guess is something along those lines. But hey, the prison lobby is a success. And I’ll go into computer science and continue to get rejected from unknown underground poetry journals.
[quote]Thomasm122 wrote:
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]Thomasm122 wrote:
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]Thomasm122 wrote:
I’d rather be honest than suck somebody’s dick.[/quote]
False dichotomy.[/quote]
You could take it that way[/quote]
I do.
I don’t agree with most people on this forum. I at least try to be respectful.[/quote]
I would’ve been respectful throughout this argument if I was given anything to respect. Had I lied on my hub, put no pictures or vids up, and just said I was 45 would the validity of my initial argument suddenly be reconsidered? Blind respect without reason is useless. That kind of mentality translates awfully quick into blind respect for every longstanding social structure evident within a society. Then, you get the Hitler youth. In that way, it’s not even respect. It’s psychological masturbation, performed in order to avoid discomfort with said longstanding social structures. It is blatant lack of a capability for autonomous thought that is the reason I implied “my generation is fucked”. The very same capability that I was expected to conform to commenting on this thread. Ask no questions, be a patriot. The same capability that CS, like so many others, so happily submits to, and then regurgitates in 5-year old glib “Tag, you’re it!”.
I mean both of us (CS and I) will be working long past our deaths to pay off the debt supply-side economics encouraged the racketeers running the casinos on Wall St. to chalk up. The only difference is, he’ll probably wind up being what, a narc? spook? My guess is something along those lines. But hey, the prison lobby is a success. And I’ll go into computer science and continue to get rejected from unknown underground poetry journals. [/quote]
The debt supply side economics…
That makes no sense…
[quote]Thomasm122 wrote:
And I’ll go into computer science and continue to get rejected from unknown underground poetry journals. [/quote]
Would you do me a personal favor and go get rejected by reasonably attractive girls?
In case one or the other does not, dont drop the ball.
[quote]pat wrote:
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]pushharder wrote:
Gore Vidal…LOL…what a “source.”[/quote]
Um…he’s 16, probably a Sophomore or Junior in High School. What’s next some arrogant 12 year old political expert who quotes his 7th grade teacher?
Okay, funny stuff I suppose.
[/quote]
We should have a minimum age & IQ requirement. If you are under 18 and do not have an IQ of 100 or higher, your not allowed.
I have a teenager at home… They have the reasoning capability of an isolated wet noodle. It’s pretty much limited to 'Why I should have a smart phone"[/quote]
Does knowing the difference between your and you’re have any affect on being one of the cool kids?