Rape-aXe: Anti-rape Condom

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:

[quote]Neospartan wrote:
Fellas… Africa ain’t the US. There ain’t no doctors readily available, nor police, etc. S.Africa is the most stable Sub-Saharan African state. So if the stats are that bad there, just imagened what it is like elsewhere. To put it in prespective, a woman is in constant danger of being raped while a man is in constant danger of being killed.

That being said I am not in favor of this device. Simply because any woman who hurts her rapist this way is sure to be tortured and killed as revenge by the attacker and/or his buddies. And made an example for all the women in the village and nearby areas.

This thing is simply too short sighted… now in a country like the US, Canada, England, yeah sure that thing can work here.

[/quote]

You aren’t suggesting a Bobby Knight attitude towards rape are you? “I think that if rape is inevitable, relax and enjoy it.”

I get what you are saying, and it is terrible that women are weaker than men, but that doesn’t mean they can’t fight back or that they shouldn’t.
[/quote]

What he is suggesting is that violent backlash is a very likely possibility. Women are weaker, and the backlash could result in permanent injury or death.

For that reason alone I personally have to worry about how sensible this idea is.[/quote]

This exactly. People arent stupid. You arent going to trick the gang of guys who plans to rape a woman by putting a penis trap in her vagina.

My question is how does one envision a society becoming more civilized if their women are being conditioned to expect being raped (even if they ALREADY expect to be rape, which I’d bet a lot do if the statistics are accurate, this ONLY reinforce that idea). It’s insane.

Obviously rape is a terrible thing, no sane person argues otherwise. But this isn’t the same as a cop wearing a bullet proof vest. This device will have an impact on the psyche of the women wearing it and generate extreme rage for the man who gets one on him which will undoubtedly be taken out on the woman.

I agree that the device will likely decrese the number of “successful” (for lack of a better term) rapes but the mental aspect of being attacked is still there.

This is like putting a bandaid on a chainsaw wound when it comes to this particular society.

Maybe the next step is to round up all men capable of getting an erection and chop their dicks off. It’s not like men wont find any other ways to oppress women in a lawless society or anything.

[quote]debraD wrote:
I really wish I didn’t read this thread :/[/quote]

x2

[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:

[quote]Neospartan wrote:
Fellas… Africa ain’t the US. There ain’t no doctors readily available, nor police, etc. S.Africa is the most stable Sub-Saharan African state. So if the stats are that bad there, just imagened what it is like elsewhere. To put it in prespective, a woman is in constant danger of being raped while a man is in constant danger of being killed.

That being said I am not in favor of this device. Simply because any woman who hurts her rapist this way is sure to be tortured and killed as revenge by the attacker and/or his buddies. And made an example for all the women in the village and nearby areas.

This thing is simply too short sighted… now in a country like the US, Canada, England, yeah sure that thing can work here.

[/quote]

You aren’t suggesting a Bobby Knight attitude towards rape are you? “I think that if rape is inevitable, relax and enjoy it.”

I get what you are saying, and it is terrible that women are weaker than men, but that doesn’t mean they can’t fight back or that they shouldn’t.
[/quote]

What he is suggesting is that violent backlash is a very likely possibility. Women are weaker, and the backlash could result in permanent injury or death.

For that reason alone I personally have to worry about how sensible this idea is.[/quote]

This exactly. People arent stupid. You arent going to trick the gang of guys who plans to rape a woman by putting a penis trap in her vagina.

My question is how does one envision a society becoming more civilized if their women are being conditioned to expect being raped (even if they ALREADY expect to be rape, which I’d bet a lot do if the statistics are accurate, this ONLY reinforce that idea). It’s insane.

Obviously rape is a terrible thing, no sane person argues otherwise. But this isn’t the same as a cop wearing a bullet proof vest. This device will have an impact on the psyche of the women wearing it and generate extreme rage for the man who gets one on him which will undoubtedly be taken out on the woman.

I agree that the device will likely decrese the number of “successful” (for lack of a better term) rapes but the mental aspect of being attacked is still there.

This is like putting a bandaid on a chainsaw wound when it comes to this particular society.

Maybe the next step is to round up all men capable of getting an erection and chop their dicks off. It’s not like men wont any other ways to oppress women in a lawless society or anything. [/quote]

Did you read the article or just the headline?

Women are already inserting sponges with razor blades into their vaginas, babies are being raped to cure AIDS, rape is not a crime that is being brought to the courts.

What is your solution?

Instead of rounding up all the poor men that are going to be a victim to such a terrible thing when they are raping a girl that should just lay back and take it, maybe we should remove all the women from South Africa to some place where they don’t have to live their life waiting for them or their babies to be raped.

[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:

[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:

[quote]Neospartan wrote:
Fellas… Africa ain’t the US. There ain’t no doctors readily available, nor police, etc. S.Africa is the most stable Sub-Saharan African state. So if the stats are that bad there, just imagened what it is like elsewhere. To put it in prespective, a woman is in constant danger of being raped while a man is in constant danger of being killed.

That being said I am not in favor of this device. Simply because any woman who hurts her rapist this way is sure to be tortured and killed as revenge by the attacker and/or his buddies. And made an example for all the women in the village and nearby areas.

This thing is simply too short sighted… now in a country like the US, Canada, England, yeah sure that thing can work here.

[/quote]

You aren’t suggesting a Bobby Knight attitude towards rape are you? “I think that if rape is inevitable, relax and enjoy it.”

I get what you are saying, and it is terrible that women are weaker than men, but that doesn’t mean they can’t fight back or that they shouldn’t.
[/quote]

What he is suggesting is that violent backlash is a very likely possibility. Women are weaker, and the backlash could result in permanent injury or death.

For that reason alone I personally have to worry about how sensible this idea is.[/quote]

This exactly. People arent stupid. You arent going to trick the gang of guys who plans to rape a woman by putting a penis trap in her vagina.

My question is how does one envision a society becoming more civilized if their women are being conditioned to expect being raped (even if they ALREADY expect to be rape, which I’d bet a lot do if the statistics are accurate, this ONLY reinforce that idea). It’s insane.

Obviously rape is a terrible thing, no sane person argues otherwise. But this isn’t the same as a cop wearing a bullet proof vest. This device will have an impact on the psyche of the women wearing it and generate extreme rage for the man who gets one on him which will undoubtedly be taken out on the woman.

I agree that the device will likely decrese the number of “successful” (for lack of a better term) rapes but the mental aspect of being attacked is still there.

This is like putting a bandaid on a chainsaw wound when it comes to this particular society.

Maybe the next step is to round up all men capable of getting an erection and chop their dicks off. It’s not like men wont any other ways to oppress women in a lawless society or anything. [/quote]

Did you read the article or just the headline?

Women are already inserting sponges with razor blades into their vaginas, babies are being raped to cure AIDS, rape is not a crime that is being brought to the courts.

What is your solution?

Instead of rounding up all the poor men that are going to be a victim to such a terrible thing when they are raping a girl that should just lay back and take it, maybe we should remove all the women from South Africa to some place where they don’t have to live their life waiting for them or their babies to be raped.

[/quote]

I saw this story over a week ago.

I understand that women are already doing retarded things to prevent rape. Now it’s turning into a scientific endeavor of the blind leading the blind. It’s a BAD plan. The only thing preventing this from being worse is that the inventor is not making money off it, yet.

The solution? CIVILIZE THE POPULATION. Reinforcing barbarism is just stupid. Im not an anthropologist. I dont know the best way to turn country of possible rapists into a 21st century society. But obviously there is a way to do it. Case in point: the rest of the civilized world.

[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:

[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:

[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:

[quote]Neospartan wrote:
Fellas… Africa ain’t the US. There ain’t no doctors readily available, nor police, etc. S.Africa is the most stable Sub-Saharan African state. So if the stats are that bad there, just imagened what it is like elsewhere. To put it in prespective, a woman is in constant danger of being raped while a man is in constant danger of being killed.

That being said I am not in favor of this device. Simply because any woman who hurts her rapist this way is sure to be tortured and killed as revenge by the attacker and/or his buddies. And made an example for all the women in the village and nearby areas.

This thing is simply too short sighted… now in a country like the US, Canada, England, yeah sure that thing can work here.

[/quote]

You aren’t suggesting a Bobby Knight attitude towards rape are you? “I think that if rape is inevitable, relax and enjoy it.”

I get what you are saying, and it is terrible that women are weaker than men, but that doesn’t mean they can’t fight back or that they shouldn’t.
[/quote]

What he is suggesting is that violent backlash is a very likely possibility. Women are weaker, and the backlash could result in permanent injury or death.

For that reason alone I personally have to worry about how sensible this idea is.[/quote]

This exactly. People arent stupid. You arent going to trick the gang of guys who plans to rape a woman by putting a penis trap in her vagina.

My question is how does one envision a society becoming more civilized if their women are being conditioned to expect being raped (even if they ALREADY expect to be rape, which I’d bet a lot do if the statistics are accurate, this ONLY reinforce that idea). It’s insane.

Obviously rape is a terrible thing, no sane person argues otherwise. But this isn’t the same as a cop wearing a bullet proof vest. This device will have an impact on the psyche of the women wearing it and generate extreme rage for the man who gets one on him which will undoubtedly be taken out on the woman.

I agree that the device will likely decrese the number of “successful” (for lack of a better term) rapes but the mental aspect of being attacked is still there.

This is like putting a bandaid on a chainsaw wound when it comes to this particular society.

Maybe the next step is to round up all men capable of getting an erection and chop their dicks off. It’s not like men wont any other ways to oppress women in a lawless society or anything. [/quote]

Did you read the article or just the headline?

Women are already inserting sponges with razor blades into their vaginas, babies are being raped to cure AIDS, rape is not a crime that is being brought to the courts.

What is your solution?

Instead of rounding up all the poor men that are going to be a victim to such a terrible thing when they are raping a girl that should just lay back and take it, maybe we should remove all the women from South Africa to some place where they don’t have to live their life waiting for them or their babies to be raped.

[/quote]

I saw this story over a week ago.

I understand that women are already doing retarded things to prevent rape. Now it’s turning into a scientific endeavor of the blind leading the blind. It’s a BAD plan. The only thing preventing this from being worse is that the woman is not making money off it, yet.

The solution? CIVILIZE THE POPULATION. Reinforcing barbarism is just stupid. Im not an anthropologist. I dont know the best way to turn country of possible rapists into a 21st century society. But obviously there is a way to do it. Case in point: the rest of the civilized world. [/quote]

The rest of the world? Like honor killings, bride immolation, cutting off a nose for disgracing the family, genital mutilation, sewing shut a vagina so the female won’t enjoy sex, beating a woman if she shows any portion of her skin, beating a woman for driving a car or having a job or going to school, stoning to death a woman for bearing a child of rape, killing babies because they are female.

It isn’t that I don’t understand what you are saying, but how do you propose to civilize South Africa? I don’t think a culture that is enjoying this practice of raping women is going to stop because they realize it isn’t civilized.

Seems to me like this thing is a necessary evil.

Having hooked barbs in my dick would make me think twice about raping someone else.

[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:

[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:

[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:

[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:

[quote]Neospartan wrote:
Fellas… Africa ain’t the US. There ain’t no doctors readily available, nor police, etc. S.Africa is the most stable Sub-Saharan African state. So if the stats are that bad there, just imagened what it is like elsewhere. To put it in prespective, a woman is in constant danger of being raped while a man is in constant danger of being killed.

That being said I am not in favor of this device. Simply because any woman who hurts her rapist this way is sure to be tortured and killed as revenge by the attacker and/or his buddies. And made an example for all the women in the village and nearby areas.

This thing is simply too short sighted… now in a country like the US, Canada, England, yeah sure that thing can work here.

[/quote]

You aren’t suggesting a Bobby Knight attitude towards rape are you? “I think that if rape is inevitable, relax and enjoy it.”

I get what you are saying, and it is terrible that women are weaker than men, but that doesn’t mean they can’t fight back or that they shouldn’t.
[/quote]

What he is suggesting is that violent backlash is a very likely possibility. Women are weaker, and the backlash could result in permanent injury or death.

For that reason alone I personally have to worry about how sensible this idea is.[/quote]

This exactly. People arent stupid. You arent going to trick the gang of guys who plans to rape a woman by putting a penis trap in her vagina.

My question is how does one envision a society becoming more civilized if their women are being conditioned to expect being raped (even if they ALREADY expect to be rape, which I’d bet a lot do if the statistics are accurate, this ONLY reinforce that idea). It’s insane.

Obviously rape is a terrible thing, no sane person argues otherwise. But this isn’t the same as a cop wearing a bullet proof vest. This device will have an impact on the psyche of the women wearing it and generate extreme rage for the man who gets one on him which will undoubtedly be taken out on the woman.

I agree that the device will likely decrese the number of “successful” (for lack of a better term) rapes but the mental aspect of being attacked is still there.

This is like putting a bandaid on a chainsaw wound when it comes to this particular society.

Maybe the next step is to round up all men capable of getting an erection and chop their dicks off. It’s not like men wont any other ways to oppress women in a lawless society or anything. [/quote]

Did you read the article or just the headline?

Women are already inserting sponges with razor blades into their vaginas, babies are being raped to cure AIDS, rape is not a crime that is being brought to the courts.

What is your solution?

Instead of rounding up all the poor men that are going to be a victim to such a terrible thing when they are raping a girl that should just lay back and take it, maybe we should remove all the women from South Africa to some place where they don’t have to live their life waiting for them or their babies to be raped.

[/quote]

I saw this story over a week ago.

I understand that women are already doing retarded things to prevent rape. Now it’s turning into a scientific endeavor of the blind leading the blind. It’s a BAD plan. The only thing preventing this from being worse is that the woman is not making money off it, yet.

The solution? CIVILIZE THE POPULATION. Reinforcing barbarism is just stupid. Im not an anthropologist. I dont know the best way to turn country of possible rapists into a 21st century society. But obviously there is a way to do it. Case in point: the rest of the civilized world. [/quote]

The rest of the world? Like honor killings, bride immolation, cutting off a nose for disgracing the family, genital mutilation, sewing shut a vagina so the female won’t enjoy sex, beating a woman if she shows any portion of her skin, beating a woman for driving a car or having a job or going to school, stoning to death a woman for bearing a child of rape, killing babies because they are female.

It isn’t that I don’t understand what you are saying, but how do you propose to civilize South Africa? I don’t think a culture that is enjoying this practice of raping women is going to stop because they realize it isn’t civilized.

[/quote]

Options:

  1. Throw money at it. Working great in Afghanistan right now!
  2. Abandon free market capitalism and live within very modest means and share the bounty of the earth.

Edit: Trolling

[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:

[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:

[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:

[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:

[quote]Neospartan wrote:
Fellas… Africa ain’t the US. There ain’t no doctors readily available, nor police, etc. S.Africa is the most stable Sub-Saharan African state. So if the stats are that bad there, just imagened what it is like elsewhere. To put it in prespective, a woman is in constant danger of being raped while a man is in constant danger of being killed.

That being said I am not in favor of this device. Simply because any woman who hurts her rapist this way is sure to be tortured and killed as revenge by the attacker and/or his buddies. And made an example for all the women in the village and nearby areas.

This thing is simply too short sighted… now in a country like the US, Canada, England, yeah sure that thing can work here.

[/quote]

You aren’t suggesting a Bobby Knight attitude towards rape are you? “I think that if rape is inevitable, relax and enjoy it.”

I get what you are saying, and it is terrible that women are weaker than men, but that doesn’t mean they can’t fight back or that they shouldn’t.
[/quote]

What he is suggesting is that violent backlash is a very likely possibility. Women are weaker, and the backlash could result in permanent injury or death.

For that reason alone I personally have to worry about how sensible this idea is.[/quote]

This exactly. People arent stupid. You arent going to trick the gang of guys who plans to rape a woman by putting a penis trap in her vagina.

My question is how does one envision a society becoming more civilized if their women are being conditioned to expect being raped (even if they ALREADY expect to be rape, which I’d bet a lot do if the statistics are accurate, this ONLY reinforce that idea). It’s insane.

Obviously rape is a terrible thing, no sane person argues otherwise. But this isn’t the same as a cop wearing a bullet proof vest. This device will have an impact on the psyche of the women wearing it and generate extreme rage for the man who gets one on him which will undoubtedly be taken out on the woman.

I agree that the device will likely decrese the number of “successful” (for lack of a better term) rapes but the mental aspect of being attacked is still there.

This is like putting a bandaid on a chainsaw wound when it comes to this particular society.

Maybe the next step is to round up all men capable of getting an erection and chop their dicks off. It’s not like men wont any other ways to oppress women in a lawless society or anything. [/quote]

Did you read the article or just the headline?

Women are already inserting sponges with razor blades into their vaginas, babies are being raped to cure AIDS, rape is not a crime that is being brought to the courts.

What is your solution?

Instead of rounding up all the poor men that are going to be a victim to such a terrible thing when they are raping a girl that should just lay back and take it, maybe we should remove all the women from South Africa to some place where they don’t have to live their life waiting for them or their babies to be raped.

[/quote]

I saw this story over a week ago.

I understand that women are already doing retarded things to prevent rape. Now it’s turning into a scientific endeavor of the blind leading the blind. It’s a BAD plan. The only thing preventing this from being worse is that the woman is not making money off it, yet.

The solution? CIVILIZE THE POPULATION. Reinforcing barbarism is just stupid. Im not an anthropologist. I dont know the best way to turn country of possible rapists into a 21st century society. But obviously there is a way to do it. Case in point: the rest of the civilized world. [/quote]

The rest of the world? Like honor killings, bride immolation, cutting off a nose for disgracing the family, genital mutilation, sewing shut a vagina so the female won’t enjoy sex, beating a woman if she shows any portion of her skin, beating a woman for driving a car or having a job or going to school, stoning to death a woman for bearing a child of rape, killing babies because they are female.

It isn’t that I don’t understand what you are saying, but how do you propose to civilize South Africa? I don’t think a culture that is enjoying this practice of raping women is going to stop because they realize it isn’t civilized.
[/quote]

I specifically said the rest of the CIVILIZED world. I dont consider any of those practices civilized even though they may happen in countries more civilized than South Africa, including the US. Perhaps I should have specifically said “civilized populations”.

I already said I’m not an anthropologist. I took two anthro classes in undergrad. I dont have an answer for that. But it sounds like youre implying that razor blades in a vagina is leading people down the path of civilization. That’s just not true. This is equivalent to Hannibal’s “eye for an eye” code.

What’s going to happen when a mother gets raped with one of these. But instead of just being raped (again, excuse the downplaying of the act) she is now killed by the rapist. Her children are now motherless instead of the still horrible alternative. There is so much that can go wrong with this “solution” Im amazed people think this will lead to any progress whatsoever.

Good responses all.

I have to fall on the side of ‘bad idea’. It will only take a few times of this working before ‘word on the street’ gets out and to-be rapists know to “check before inserting”. I think the ones in-the-know will be driven toward more violent action knowing what could have just happened. It’s not going to be pretty either way.

Personally, I think carrying a gun, know how to use it, and be willing to use it is a better option.

I don’t have any answers other than that.

[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:
I specifically said the rest of the CIVILIZED world. I dont consider any of those practices civilized even though they may happen in countries more civilized than South Africa, including the US. Perhaps I should have specifically said “civilized populations”.

I already said I’m not an anthropologist. I took two anthro classes in undergrad. I dont have an answer for that. But it sounds like youre implying that razor blades in a vagina is leading people down the path of civilization. That’s just not true. This is equivalent to Hannibal’s “eye for an eye” code.

What’s going to happen when a mother gets raped with one of these. But instead of just being raped (again, excuse the downplaying of the act) she is now killed by the rapist. Her children are now motherless instead of the still horrible alternative. There is so much that can go wrong with this “solution” Im amazed people think this will lead to any progress whatsoever. [/quote]

I don’t know that anyone said it would lead to civilizing South Africa.

Some of what I posted as crimes against women happen here in the U.S by the way.

Women are already raped and killed. Are you advocating women lay back and take it, is that what you would do?

I don’t know what the answer is, but I can certainly understand the outrage at a society like South Africa and the culture of abuse for women.

[quote]SteelyD wrote:
Good responses all.

I have to fall on the side of ‘bad idea’. It will only take a few times of this working before ‘word on the street’ gets out and to-be rapists know to “check before inserting”. I think the ones in-the-know will be driven toward more violent action knowing what could have just happened. It’s not going to be pretty either way.

Personally, I think carrying a gun, know how to use it, and be willing to use it is a better option.

I don’t have any answers other than that.[/quote]

and the women are going to get the money to buy a gun how?

I don’t even know if I think it is a good idea, I just understand what inspired and drove the doctor to invent and produce the thing.

[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:

[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:
I specifically said the rest of the CIVILIZED world. I dont consider any of those practices civilized even though they may happen in countries more civilized than South Africa, including the US. Perhaps I should have specifically said “civilized populations”.

I already said I’m not an anthropologist. I took two anthro classes in undergrad. I dont have an answer for that. But it sounds like youre implying that razor blades in a vagina is leading people down the path of civilization. That’s just not true. This is equivalent to Hannibal’s “eye for an eye” code.

What’s going to happen when a mother gets raped with one of these. But instead of just being raped (again, excuse the downplaying of the act) she is now killed by the rapist. Her children are now motherless instead of the still horrible alternative. There is so much that can go wrong with this “solution” Im amazed people think this will lead to any progress whatsoever. [/quote]

I don’t know that anyone said it would lead to civilizing South Africa.

Some of what I posted as crimes against women happen here in the U.S by the way.

Women are already raped and killed. Are you advocating women lay back and take it, is that what you would do?

I don’t know what the answer is, but I can certainly understand the outrage at a society like South Africa and the culture of abuse for women.
[/quote]

Are you reading my posts? Its not late at night where you are, what’s your excuse or are you just seeing what you want to see. PLease read my most recent post one more time. I said it sounds like you are IMPLYING that this will have positive effects on society (call that what you want, I’ll call it civilization).

Second. I clearly acknowledged that those practices happen in the US.

Of course Im not advocating women accept rape as the norm. Are you serious with that question. It almost sounds like you are trolling at this point. My whole argument has been that this device will cause more harm than good over the long term. This device is reinforcing barbaric behavior. My opinion is that time and resoruces should be invested in finding ways to change the culture, not find a sophisticated way to put “barbs” in a rapist’s penis during the act.

Please dont make anymore nonsensical posts. I dont feel like insulting anyone personally to make my point so if you are going to ignore my actual words simply dont reply.

i think we should all just join hands across America. that worked last time, right?

…right?

[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:

[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:

[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:
I specifically said the rest of the CIVILIZED world. I dont consider any of those practices civilized even though they may happen in countries more civilized than South Africa, including the US. Perhaps I should have specifically said “civilized populations”.

I already said I’m not an anthropologist. I took two anthro classes in undergrad. I dont have an answer for that. But it sounds like youre implying that razor blades in a vagina is leading people down the path of civilization. That’s just not true. This is equivalent to Hannibal’s “eye for an eye” code.

What’s going to happen when a mother gets raped with one of these. But instead of just being raped (again, excuse the downplaying of the act) she is now killed by the rapist. Her children are now motherless instead of the still horrible alternative. There is so much that can go wrong with this “solution” Im amazed people think this will lead to any progress whatsoever. [/quote]

I don’t know that anyone said it would lead to civilizing South Africa.

Some of what I posted as crimes against women happen here in the U.S by the way.

Women are already raped and killed. Are you advocating women lay back and take it, is that what you would do?

I don’t know what the answer is, but I can certainly understand the outrage at a society like South Africa and the culture of abuse for women.
[/quote]

Are you reading my posts? Its not late at night where you are, what’s your excuse or are you just seeing what you want to see. PLease read my most recent post one more time. I said it sounds like you are IMPLYING that this will have positive effects on society (call that what you want, I’ll call it civilization).

Second. I clearly acknowledged that those practices happen in the US. I

Of course Im not advocating women accept rape as the norm. Are you serious with that question. It almost sounds like you are trolling at this point. My whole argument has been that this device will cause more harm than good over the long term. This device is reinforcing barbaric behavior. My opinion is that time and resoruces should be invested in finding ways to change the culture, not find a sophisticated way to put “barbs” in a rapist’s penis during the act.

Please dont make anymore nonsensical posts. I dont feel like insulting anyone personally to make my point so if you are going to ignore my actual words simply dont reply.
[/quote]

I have read your post fully. I don’t agree that my posts are nonsensical, you just don’t agree with my opinion or I am not making my point clear.

You said this would probably make the situation worse and the enraged rapist might then kill the woman. I said this happens anyways. It read to me that a woman shouldn’t be doing anything to anger her rapist. That was my point.

Another point I made is that there is no motivation for the country to change. The entire continent is in shambles. Look at Darfur.

So much aid already goes to South Africa both governmental and private. If it reads as if I know what the answer is, I hadn’t meant to imply that. I’m not trolling. But quite a few of the posts are coming across as if the woman shouldn’t make her rapist angry.

There is no need for personal insults.

[quote]WormwoodTheory wrote:
i think we should all just join hands across America. that worked last time, right?

…right?[/quote]

“Hands across Americaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa! oh man we were almost there. Just a few breaks in the chain”

.greg.

[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:

[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:

[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:

[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:
I specifically said the rest of the CIVILIZED world. I dont consider any of those practices civilized even though they may happen in countries more civilized than South Africa, including the US. Perhaps I should have specifically said “civilized populations”.

I already said I’m not an anthropologist. I took two anthro classes in undergrad. I dont have an answer for that. But it sounds like youre implying that razor blades in a vagina is leading people down the path of civilization. That’s just not true. This is equivalent to Hannibal’s “eye for an eye” code.

What’s going to happen when a mother gets raped with one of these. But instead of just being raped (again, excuse the downplaying of the act) she is now killed by the rapist. Her children are now motherless instead of the still horrible alternative. There is so much that can go wrong with this “solution” Im amazed people think this will lead to any progress whatsoever. [/quote]

I don’t know that anyone said it would lead to civilizing South Africa.

Some of what I posted as crimes against women happen here in the U.S by the way.

Women are already raped and killed. Are you advocating women lay back and take it, is that what you would do?

I don’t know what the answer is, but I can certainly understand the outrage at a society like South Africa and the culture of abuse for women.
[/quote]

Are you reading my posts? Its not late at night where you are, what’s your excuse or are you just seeing what you want to see. PLease read my most recent post one more time. I said it sounds like you are IMPLYING that this will have positive effects on society (call that what you want, I’ll call it civilization).

Second. I clearly acknowledged that those practices happen in the US. I

Of course Im not advocating women accept rape as the norm. Are you serious with that question. It almost sounds like you are trolling at this point. My whole argument has been that this device will cause more harm than good over the long term. This device is reinforcing barbaric behavior. My opinion is that time and resoruces should be invested in finding ways to change the culture, not find a sophisticated way to put “barbs” in a rapist’s penis during the act.

Please dont make anymore nonsensical posts. I dont feel like insulting anyone personally to make my point so if you are going to ignore my actual words simply dont reply.
[/quote]

I have read your post fully. I don’t agree that my posts are nonsensical, you just don’t agree with my opinion or I am not making my point clear.

You said this would probably make the situation worse and the enraged rapist might then kill the woman. I said this happens anyways. It read to me that a woman shouldn’t be doing anything to anger her rapist. That was my point.

Another point I made is that there is no motivation for the country to change. The entire continent is in shambles. Look at Darfur.

So much aid already goes to South Africa both governmental and private. If it reads as if I know what the answer is, I hadn’t meant to imply that. I’m not trolling. But quite a few of the posts are coming across as if the woman shouldn’t make her rapist angry.

There is no need for personal insults.
[/quote]

So you think it’s not a (really) bad idea to make a rapist angry?

Women are raped and killed to begin with (your point). So a possible solution is to implement a device that will possibly increase the rage and certainly not stop killing because it will also harm the man? I cant imagine a more backwards approach to modernizing a culture. This is boggling my mind.

Youre saying that since they dont want to change that people shouldnt attempt to help? Let them continue to be a cesspool of human life? These are human beings with fucntioning brains and reasoning skills. Providing women with rape traps will certainly not give the society incentive to change.

[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:

[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:

[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:

[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:
I specifically said the rest of the CIVILIZED world. I dont consider any of those practices civilized even though they may happen in countries more civilized than South Africa, including the US. Perhaps I should have specifically said “civilized populations”.

I already said I’m not an anthropologist. I took two anthro classes in undergrad. I dont have an answer for that. But it sounds like youre implying that razor blades in a vagina is leading people down the path of civilization. That’s just not true. This is equivalent to Hannibal’s “eye for an eye” code.

What’s going to happen when a mother gets raped with one of these. But instead of just being raped (again, excuse the downplaying of the act) she is now killed by the rapist. Her children are now motherless instead of the still horrible alternative. There is so much that can go wrong with this “solution” Im amazed people think this will lead to any progress whatsoever. [/quote]

I don’t know that anyone said it would lead to civilizing South Africa.

Some of what I posted as crimes against women happen here in the U.S by the way.

Women are already raped and killed. Are you advocating women lay back and take it, is that what you would do?

I don’t know what the answer is, but I can certainly understand the outrage at a society like South Africa and the culture of abuse for women.
[/quote]

Are you reading my posts? Its not late at night where you are, what’s your excuse or are you just seeing what you want to see. PLease read my most recent post one more time. I said it sounds like you are IMPLYING that this will have positive effects on society (call that what you want, I’ll call it civilization).

Second. I clearly acknowledged that those practices happen in the US. I

Of course Im not advocating women accept rape as the norm. Are you serious with that question. It almost sounds like you are trolling at this point. My whole argument has been that this device will cause more harm than good over the long term. This device is reinforcing barbaric behavior. My opinion is that time and resoruces should be invested in finding ways to change the culture, not find a sophisticated way to put “barbs” in a rapist’s penis during the act.

Please dont make anymore nonsensical posts. I dont feel like insulting anyone personally to make my point so if you are going to ignore my actual words simply dont reply.
[/quote]

I have read your post fully. I don’t agree that my posts are nonsensical, you just don’t agree with my opinion or I am not making my point clear.

You said this would probably make the situation worse and the enraged rapist might then kill the woman. I said this happens anyways. It read to me that a woman shouldn’t be doing anything to anger her rapist. That was my point.

Another point I made is that there is no motivation for the country to change. The entire continent is in shambles. Look at Darfur.

So much aid already goes to South Africa both governmental and private. If it reads as if I know what the answer is, I hadn’t meant to imply that. I’m not trolling. But quite a few of the posts are coming across as if the woman shouldn’t make her rapist angry.

There is no need for personal insults.
[/quote]

You can at least agree this is not a device that should be imported into North American society?

I think this device is horrific, barbaric and gruesome…much like the criminal act of rape itself. Also the circumstances that nurtured the mind and thought processes of the inventor of this evil contraption would be equally repulsive. Also I think that the unforseen consequences of this device hittin’ the market are going to be regretable. But I wouldn’t argue with OctoberGirl about it’s merits. She has a perspective that I’ll never have. I would tend to put a lot of value in her thoughts on this. That is not a carte-blanche agreement on the issue, but a recognition that her perspective has insight to be valued.

[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:

[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:

[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:

[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:

[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:
I specifically said the rest of the CIVILIZED world. I dont consider any of those practices civilized even though they may happen in countries more civilized than South Africa, including the US. Perhaps I should have specifically said “civilized populations”.

I already said I’m not an anthropologist. I took two anthro classes in undergrad. I dont have an answer for that. But it sounds like youre implying that razor blades in a vagina is leading people down the path of civilization. That’s just not true. This is equivalent to Hannibal’s “eye for an eye” code.

What’s going to happen when a mother gets raped with one of these. But instead of just being raped (again, excuse the downplaying of the act) she is now killed by the rapist. Her children are now motherless instead of the still horrible alternative. There is so much that can go wrong with this “solution” Im amazed people think this will lead to any progress whatsoever. [/quote]

I don’t know that anyone said it would lead to civilizing South Africa.

Some of what I posted as crimes against women happen here in the U.S by the way.

Women are already raped and killed. Are you advocating women lay back and take it, is that what you would do?

I don’t know what the answer is, but I can certainly understand the outrage at a society like South Africa and the culture of abuse for women.
[/quote]

Are you reading my posts? Its not late at night where you are, what’s your excuse or are you just seeing what you want to see. PLease read my most recent post one more time. I said it sounds like you are IMPLYING that this will have positive effects on society (call that what you want, I’ll call it civilization).

Second. I clearly acknowledged that those practices happen in the US. I

Of course Im not advocating women accept rape as the norm. Are you serious with that question. It almost sounds like you are trolling at this point. My whole argument has been that this device will cause more harm than good over the long term. This device is reinforcing barbaric behavior. My opinion is that time and resoruces should be invested in finding ways to change the culture, not find a sophisticated way to put “barbs” in a rapist’s penis during the act.

Please dont make anymore nonsensical posts. I dont feel like insulting anyone personally to make my point so if you are going to ignore my actual words simply dont reply.
[/quote]

I have read your post fully. I don’t agree that my posts are nonsensical, you just don’t agree with my opinion or I am not making my point clear.

You said this would probably make the situation worse and the enraged rapist might then kill the woman. I said this happens anyways. It read to me that a woman shouldn’t be doing anything to anger her rapist. That was my point.

Another point I made is that there is no motivation for the country to change. The entire continent is in shambles. Look at Darfur.

So much aid already goes to South Africa both governmental and private. If it reads as if I know what the answer is, I hadn’t meant to imply that. I’m not trolling. But quite a few of the posts are coming across as if the woman shouldn’t make her rapist angry.

There is no need for personal insults.
[/quote]

So you think it’s not a (really) bad idea to make a rapist angry?

Women are raped and killed to begin with (your point). So a possible solution is to implement a device that will possibly increase the rage and certainly not stop killing because it will also harm the man? I cant imagine a more backwards approach to modernizing a culture. This is boggling my mind.

Youre saying that since they dont want to change that people shouldnt attempt to help? Let them continue to be a cesspool of human life? These are human beings with fucntioning brains and reasoning skills. Providing women with rape traps will certainly not give the society incentive to change. [/quote]

If you read my posts I never said I thought it was a good idea.

I said I can understand the motivation behind the condom.

Do you see where your saying “don’t make the rapist angry” can come across a bit as “just take it and don’t do anything because you might make him angry”?

I didn’t say there shouldn’t be an attempt to help. I said millions of dollars in aid are already being funneled to South Africa, it isn’t working.

I have said I don’t know what the answer is because throwing money and good wishes at South Africa isn’t working.

[quote]therajraj wrote:

You can at least agree this is not a device that should be imported into North American society?[/quote]

yes, just like brass knuckles and stilettos are illegal I can see where this would be a terrible thing.