[quote]rainjack wrote:
I think your friends have killed way more innocents than the US has. [/quote]
Most pathetic! My friends, by definition, don’t kill innocents.
[quote]orion wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
lixy wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
I thought you were mad because Bush was thinning out their population. Make up your mind.
Dropping bombs on them is very different from giving them pills or condoms. It’s astoundingly more expensive and clearly less moral.
It is killing the guilty. Unfortunately radical Islam is taking joy in killing the innocent.
Intelligent daisycutters?
Baby- preserving- cruise missiles`?
Women, children and elderly friendly air support?
Or is your definition of “guilty” , “to have been killed by an American bomb”?[/quote]
Oh piss off. If we were targeting civilians there would be none left.
[quote]lixy wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
It is killing the guilty.
Need I remind you of the cluster bombs you guys drops on Iraq? The buildings - with babies in them - you levelled out without notice? The women your soldiers shot? What were those guilty of? Living? Not having the resources to flee the country?
At this point, there’s no point debating with you. You get to havee a well-deserved Fuck You![/quote]
Go fuck yourself you lying sack of shit.
We do not target civilians. If there is a suspicion we are targeting civilians we investigate and try those suspected. When your compatriots kill dozens in a market they get 70 virgin goats to fuck.
[quote]lixy wrote:
rainjack wrote:
I think your friends have killed way more innocents than the US has.
Most pathetic! My friends, by definition, don’t kill innocents.[/quote]
You come here every day and criticize the US for fighting terrorists. You continue to justify the the terrorists excuses for their murder. Once in a while you claim you do not support their action and then you go back to justifying it.
[quote]lixy wrote:
rainjack wrote:
I think your friends have killed way more innocents than the US has.
Most pathetic! My friends, by definition, don’t kill innocents.[/quote]
There are no innocents, right lixy?
[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
Oh piss off. If we were targeting civilians there would be none left.[/quote]
Without a doubt.
[quote]lixy wrote:
rainjack wrote:
I think your friends have killed way more innocents than the US has.
Most pathetic! My friends, by definition, don’t kill innocents.[/quote]
You, by definition, have no friends. But that aside, your terrorist compatriots kill innocents by the day-care center full.
[quote]jawara wrote:
Tokoya wrote:
lixy wrote:
pat36 wrote:
…
And it’s not getting any better. The rate of radicalization among Muslims is at record levels, I don’t see how they can “take over the U.K.” though.
P.S: Are you a Daily Mail reader?
Look at their birth rates across Europe.
There’s a great book about that that I read called “America Alone” by Mark Steyn. Check it out.[/quote]
No offense, Mark Steyn’s an entertaining polemicist, always liked his obituaries in The Atlantic, but on the central argument of his book he’s either willfully deceiving or just ignorant. The stats about the whole looming Eurabia are way off, Steyn used an article from the Daily Scotsman that messed up the CIA’s statistics on the subject. Muslims are a relatively small minority in Europe, their birth rates will stabilize and head down to European norms pretty quickly (look at Turkey and Iran, which have birthrates not too much higher than the “death spiral” demographics of Europe).
If you want to make an argument about Europe capitulating to Islam in a cultural sense, that’s a bit more tenable, given the rapid decline of European Christianity. But you could say something very similar about the U.S., multiculturalism, and Mexico.
In general, there are enough idiots writing about foreign policy without a guy whose background is as a theater critic getting involved.
[quote]kroby wrote:
There are no innocents, right lixy?[/quote]
Sure there are! In over 99% of cases, a person not carrying weapons for offensive purposes who’s shot dead (or blown to bits) is innocent.
[quote]lixy wrote:
kroby wrote:
There are no innocents, right lixy?
Sure there are! In over 99% of cases, a person not carrying weapons for offensive purposes who’s shot dead (or blown to bits) is innocent.[/quote]
Which would describe about 94% of the people you and your terrorist friends target.
[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
England and the rest of Europe is fucked if they don’t take drastic action immediately and I don’t see that happening although the Swiss may have woken up.
I am glad America’s immigrants are mostly Hispanic as their culture is compatible with ours.
[/quote]
First-generation Hispanics generally are. The younger set sees the whites/blacks with the good jobs and has high crime rates. The parents live in disbelief.
The future of Islam…
“Muslim Brotherhood, officially Jamiat al-Ikhwan al-Muslimun [Arab.,=Society of Muslim Brothers], religious and political organization founded (1928) in Egypt by Hasan al-Banna. Early opposed to secular tendencies in Islamic nations, the organization has sought to foster a return to the original precepts of the Qur’an.”
This led them to establish Al-Qaeda, Hamas, and sundry other satanic organisations.
The unsavory pattern continues in Finland.
http://globalpolitician.com/articledes.asp?ID=3416&cid=3&sid=102
Can’t see why the Finns should worry about this trend.
[quote]Tokoya wrote:
The unsavory pattern continues in Finland.
http://globalpolitician.com/articledes.asp?ID=3416&cid=3&sid=102
Can’t see why the Finns should worry about this trend. [/quote]
According to Wikipedia, foreign citizens comprise 2.3 percent of the population and most of them are from Russia, Estonia and Sweden.
[quote]kaaleppi wrote:
According to Wikipedia, foreign citizens comprise 2.3 percent of the population and most of them are from Russia, Estonia and Sweden. [/quote]
What? You mean Muslims’ plan to take over the world is failing in Finland? I’ll wire that to HQ ASAP. Osama will be very disappointed.
[quote]lixy wrote:
kaaleppi wrote:
According to Wikipedia, foreign citizens comprise 2.3 percent of the population and most of them are from Russia, Estonia and Sweden.
What? You mean Muslims’ plan to take over the world is failing in Finland? I’ll wire that to HQ ASAP. Osama will be very disappointed.[/quote]
I chuckled. That was pretty good.
Europe is a breeding ground for radicalisation for a number of reasons.
Thanks to years of socialist politicians pushing for the worlds most generous welfare system, Europe has a much higher tax burden than other contries like the US. All the tax and spend policies have created a situation where the economy of Europe is a pig that cannot perform.
The vast majority of immigrants to Europe and America are economic migrants. What happens is that they go to Europe looking for opportunity and they end up at the bottom rung of the employment ladder.
In America they can overcome this position by starting their own businesses and making their own opportunities. America is full of stories of immigrants who came here with nothing and built successful businesses.
In Europe on the other hand the high taxes and government red tape make it difficult if not impossible to be an entrepreneur. The only option is work for someone else or go on the dole.
People on the dole have plenty of free time to sit around listening to radical indoctrination.
Someone who is working hard at a low paying job with little to no hope for a better future, because much of their limited income gets eaten up by high taxes have their own frustrations. Frustrated people can be worked up into doing crazy things.
France provides a good example of how the socialists have messed things up. They have an employee protection law in France that makes it impossible to fire someone for being a bad employee. Because of this law no business in France will hire someone unless they are absolutely desperate and the person can provide very good references.
The lack of job creation in France is a big part of why you saw the Paris riots a few years ago. You have large numbers of immigrants stuck in a ghetto with no way out.
The people of Europe need to wake up to the reality that they are now in a global economy and they need to take steps to become more competitive. Radicalisation is a symptom of this lack of competitiveness.
Another issue that Europe neeeds to wake up to is their attitude of indifference towards immigration and the difference in birthrates. Too many people in Europe just take it for granted that they will always be the majority population.
When Lebanon was founded in the nineteen twenties the majority of it’s people were Christian. Now the Christians are a minority.
If Turkey becomes part of Europe, One third of the population of Europe will be Muslim. In nineteen hundred one third of the population of South Africa was black two thirds was white. Thanks to immigration and a higher birthrate now two thirds of South Africa’s population is black.
We should also not forget that one of the EU’s conditions on Turkey joining the EU is that the military can no longer intervene to keep the government secular. So joining the EU could be a big step towards making Turkey an Islamist state.
Especially if a large number of the secular Turks move into other countries and leave behind the fundamentalist ones. Who will now be in a country that now has noone to oppose their taking over.