Questions About Training

[quote]tayjeremy wrote:
Coach,

When training exclusively to deplete glycogen do you feel the metabolic pairings approach achieves a more full body depletion rather than the total body circuit approach? (of course when i say metabolic pairings i mean each and everybody part is utilized with different exercises).

Or would combining both strategies be more effective? [/quote]

Both are abput as equally effective for that purpose, although metabolic pairings do seem to lead to a much greater caloric expenditure which can mean more direct fat loss.

Coach,

What type of cardio work would you suggest one do if they wanted to limit the affect it has on their strength and power? And also when would be the best time to perform it? Thanks!

Hi sir,

I’m currently using your “Ticket to the gun show” program (I’m a wrestler who was limited by a lack of volume on my arms, but it’s a long story :-)), and I’d like to know how I should consider training to failure, since I read in one of your old articles that arms, which were a lagging bodypart of yours, became a strong point by training them very frequently without going to failure. Is that appliable to the TTTGS program? Do I rather need to REALLY lower the training volume for other bodyparts?

Also, what does the rest time need to be between different pairings (for example on the monday workout between BP/curl and partial BP)?
Would you change something to that workout today?

Thanks a lot for the spent answering our questions.
Nicolas

Thib,
What has prompted this recent training ideology? You’ve always advocated hitting the whole range of reps for bodybuiding workouts in the past. Much like Scott Abel. This is quite a turnaround. Can you point to anything in particular that accounts for your new views? Maybe the trip to Ohio?

You seem to be advocating, much like Waterbury, that by training the HTMU’s the smaller fibers will come along for the ride. At what volume do you feel that one is getting a complete training effect to maximze growth in all relevant fibers while using heavy loads?

Best,
DH

[quote]Christian Thibaudeau wrote:
Thy. wrote:
Thib, can you tell from your experience if many sets of 1@90-95% are better for strength than few sets of 2-4@85-90% ?

As I told Nate Green, MY own favorite rep scheme is doing multiple sets of 1 rep. I know that I respond better to this type of training when it comes to building strength.

However it is not the same for everybody. My partner responds best to sets of 2 and 3 reps for example.

The approach I really like is the one currently being used by Dave Tate with his guys.

They gradually work up to their training max for that day, performing only singles. A training max is not an all out make-it-or-pass-out lift. It’s the most weight you can lift on that day without causing psychological distress or having to really psych yourself up.

Right off the bat that gives you are 4-6 sets of 1 above 85% of your max.

Then, when you have established you Tmax for the day you perform a prescribed number of sets and reps with a weight calculated from the Tmax.

Ex.

Week 1 80% 3 x 4
Week 2 85% 3 x 3
Week 3 90% 3 x 2
Week 4 95% 3 x 1[/quote]

Thanks, that’s a great and fun idea.
Would you say someone is well suited for low reps if he can perform many sets of low reps with very high intensity?
For example, on the bench press I’ve done 7x1@95% with no real problems with <= 3 min rest periods. And 14x2@90% <= 2 min rest. In both case, could’ve probably done 2-3 more sets. I know it’s probably because my bench is not really high now, but it’s 1.5xBW.

So my question - is it fine doing as much sets as you can (of 1-2@90-95%), or is it better to stop at some point to prevent CNS burnout?

[quote]Thy. wrote:
Christian Thibaudeau wrote:
Thy. wrote:
Thib, can you tell from your experience if many sets of 1@90-95% are better for strength than few sets of 2-4@85-90% ?

As I told Nate Green, MY own favorite rep scheme is doing multiple sets of 1 rep. I know that I respond better to this type of training when it comes to building strength.

However it is not the same for everybody. My partner responds best to sets of 2 and 3 reps for example.

The approach I really like is the one currently being used by Dave Tate with his guys.

They gradually work up to their training max for that day, performing only singles. A training max is not an all out make-it-or-pass-out lift. It’s the most weight you can lift on that day without causing psychological distress or having to really psych yourself up.

Right off the bat that gives you are 4-6 sets of 1 above 85% of your max.

Then, when you have established you Tmax for the day you perform a prescribed number of sets and reps with a weight calculated from the Tmax.

Ex.

Week 1 80% 3 x 4
Week 2 85% 3 x 3
Week 3 90% 3 x 2
Week 4 95% 3 x 1

Thanks, that’s a great and fun idea.
Would you say someone is well suited for low reps if he can perform many sets of low reps with very high intensity?
For example, on the bench press I’ve done 7x1@95% with no real problems with <= 3 min rest periods. And 14x2@90% <= 2 min rest. In both case, could’ve probably done 2-3 more sets. I know it’s probably because my bench is not really high now, but it’s 1.5xBW.

So my question - is it fine doing as much sets as you can (of 1-2@90-95%), or is it better to stop at some point to prevent CNS burnout?
[/quote]

From my experience, it’s better to quite while you’re ahead. After 6 singles or so, if you are feeling really good I suggest bumping up the weight and work toward a training max over 2-3 more sets. Although I have done as many as 22 singles on one lift in a workout, I suggest not going above 10 singles in the 92-100% range.

[quote]DH wrote:
Thib,
What has prompted this recent training ideology? You’ve always advocated hitting the whole range of reps for bodybuiding workouts in the past. Much like Scott Abel. This is quite a turnaround. Can you point to anything in particular that accounts for your new views? Maybe the trip to Ohio?

You seem to be advocating, much like Waterbury, that by training the HTMU’s the smaller fibers will come along for the ride. At what volume do you feel that one is getting a complete training effect to maximze growth in all relevant fibers while using heavy loads?

Best,
DH

[/quote]

I want to make one thing clear… I actually WROTE A BOOK CALLED HIGH THRESHOLD MUSCLE BUILDING before Chad even started using the term in his article. Although our goal is the same, we use different methods to do so.

I actually started out as a low reps guy many many years ago. This is because my background is as AN OLYMPIC LIFTER. For 5-6 years I never went above 5 reps, and lifted mostly in the 1-3 range.

As early as 1999 I wrote an article called ‘‘High Tension Training’’ for another site and I made a case for doing 10 x 3 even before any other ‘popular coaches’ began to think about the idea. Was I being innovative before everybody else? NOPE! That’s all I knew back then!!!

Then when I made the switch to bodybuilding I started to experiment with every technique imaginable. That’s one thing you must learn about me: I’m passionate about everything related to training and will experiment with everything, this is why I do not have ONE ideology to my name.

While I did find several higher volume techniques to work, none were actually up to par compared to the high threshold/tension methods I had been using for ten years, so when I sat down and decided to come up with the most efficient program possible, I naturally went back to what I knew worked best, then improved on it.

[quote]Christian Thibaudeau wrote:
From my experience, it’s better to quite while you’re ahead. After 6 singles or so, if you are feeling really good I suggest bumping up the weight and work toward a training max over 2-3 more sets. Although I have done as many as 22 singles on one lift in a workout, I suggest not going above 10 singles in the 92-100% range.[/quote]

What are you recommendations on total volume of 2-3@85-92% range then?

Also, if such workout has taken place (6-10 singles @92-100%), should other sessions of the week be of much reduced intensity and effort on the given or similar movements?

[quote]mmafan wrote:
Coach,

What type of cardio work would you suggest one do if they wanted to limit the affect it has on their strength and power? And also when would be the best time to perform it? Thanks![/quote]

It depends on diet.

Intervals will drain you of much energy for your strength workout if your carbs intake is lowish.

Sprints will interfere with strength sessions because they can fatigue the nervous system if overdone.

Long-duration, steady state cardio will elevate cortisol levels which may interfere with the muscle-building processes.

So my answer would be GPP work like sled dragging, sledgehammer swing, prowler pushing, med ball throws, etc.

Although the previous 3 can be used if kept in moderation.

DH, I wrote that in 1999… keep that in mind before you start laughing at how poor my grammar was :slight_smile:

It doesn’t show my exact beliefs, but shows that my foundation is as a low-reps guy.

High Tension Training
By Christian Thibaudeau

Chronic adaptations to training simply mean that the structural adaptations to your training regimen will be relatively stable. At this point your body will be perfectly adapted to the training stress you are used to present to your body and thus it will not require further adaptation (read no further progress). At this point most peoples assume that their body has adapted to the exercises they are using and that’s why they change them around. Initially this will bring new strength gains but more often than not this is not correlated with added muscle gains. Why? Well the gains you get from switching exercises are mostly due to and increased neural efficiency at performing the new movement. In other words you initially get stronger in the new movement because you learn to be better at it! This has led people to believe that when they stagnate they must change the exercises around. This is erroneous in most cases (sports where relative strength and neuromuscular efficiency is the goal are another animal altogether!).

As it was stated, your body adapts to stress - in our case physiological stress in the form of strength training. Your body will adapt itself to the stress placed upon it, not to the means that provide that stress. Your body doesn’t know if you are doing barbell curls or preacher curls, nor does it care to know about it! All that your body “knows” and needs to know is that there is a physical stress x placed upon the elbow flexors (biceps brachii, brachioradialis, brachialis and the various forearm muscles). To make an oversimplification out of it, your body only needs the following information to start and modulate the adaptive response:

  1. What structures are affected by the stressor?

  2. What is the magnitude, or importance, of the stressor on each of the structures?

  3. What’s the nature of the stress?

Obviously the structures affected by the stressor will depend on the exercise you use (chances are that a squat will cause more stress in the lower body than a bench press!) however because of the structure of your muscles, changing the exercises you perform for a specific body part will not lead to a great variation in the structure affected by the stressor (some recent research indicate that it might be possible to recruit different fibers with different exercises though). The only things that you can vary when you change your exercises around are the muscles involved. For example preachers curls are good to develop peaking biceps because this exercise will place most of the stress on the brachialis (placed under the biceps and which give the impression of a peaked biceps when overdeveloped) not because this exercise recruit different parts of the biceps which lead to the development of a peak.

Thus changing your exercises around can help resume your progress by working previously under worked muscles or by improving the neural factors involved in weight lifting performance. Both of which can be of benefit to athletes and bodybuilders. But once you have changed your exercises so many times that no muscles are under worked in relation to each other and that your nervous system is efficient in all the exercises you do you will not be able to kick start your progress simply by changing the exercises you use.

Probably the most important factor in triggering the adaptive response is the magnitude of the stressor. For easy comprehension’s sake we will define the factors involved in the magnitude of the training stress:

  1. The tension produced (intensity)

  2. The total duration, or workload at which tension is produced during your workout (volume, either in it’s time under tension form, or tonnage form

  3. The total load of tension (intensity x volume) per unit of time (density)

Muscle strength is exhibited by creating muscular tension. The harder a muscle needs to contract the more tension it must produce. So basically the heavier the resistance, the greater is the required muscular tension. For you scientific minds out there the higher is the muscle tension produced, the greater is the rate of protein degradation (which is one of the factor triggering growth stimulation).

If maximum muscle tension were the only factor involved in developing size and strength we would simply have to do singles in every exercises we do and grow like crazy! Unfortunately (or fortunately for some!) it’s not the only factor involved.

The amount of growth stimulated is dependant upon the amount of muscle protein degraded during training. The more muscle protein are degraded the more your body will need to mobilise it’s resources and the more it will “rebuild” the muscles to avoid such a stressful (pun intended) situation in the future!

The amount of degraded protein is a function of the rate at which protein is degraded (if you degrade 10x proteins per second you will degrade more protein than if you were to degrade 5x proteins per second all else being equal). And as it was stated the rate of protein degradation is determined by the importance of the muscular tension created. The other important factor involved in determining the total amount of degraded proteins is the duration of the degradation process. Obviously the more time you spend degrading proteins the more proteins will be degraded! This second factor is determined by the volume of training.

A third factor in modulating the adaptive response is the density of training. The more work you perform per unit of time, the more important will be the growth stimulation (this is mostly due to an increase in growth hormone production).

So to resume. To stimulate muscle growth you need:

  1. High tension contractions

  2. High total time under tension

  3. High density of training

As we stated, tension is what is required to produce force. The more force needs to be produced, the more tension your muscles have to create. Now, force is defined as such:

F = MA

In which F means force, M means mass and A means acceleration. In other words you can either increase the force output by:

a) Increasing the weight lifted (lifting heavy loads relatively slowly)

b) Increasing the acceleration/speed (lifting light loads very rapidly)

c) Using an optimal combination of weight and acceleration (moderate loads lifted as fast as possible)

In regular bodybuilding training method a) is the only one currently used. Which means that bodybuilders are only stimulating 33% of the growth they could trigger if they used all three methods!

Increasing the weight lifted (lifting heavy loads relatively slowly)

The first method is already well known of most bodybuilders and powerlifters. It involves increasing the weight that one lifts. Basically there are two ways of making this work.

  1. Keeping the reps relatively high and trying to increase the weight as often as possible

  2. Using low reps and very heavy loads

It is generally accepted that point 1. Is the approach to use. We disagree. More weights = more force to be produced = more tension = more stimulation.

I know what you are thinking: “I’ve used low reps in the past, I got stronger but not bigger”. Maybe, but that’s because you forgot that muscle mass is stimulated via 3 factors (tension, total time under tension, density). So if you kept doing the same number of sets when using low reps as you did when you were using high reps you greatly diminished the total time under tension factor which probably negated the benefits of using very heavy weights.

Let us illustrate our point:

If one keeps using the same number of sets

High reps: 3 sets of 10 reps with 120lbs for the chest, each rep lasts 4 seconds, the “workout” lasts 12 minutes (total volume: 30 reps, total tonnage 3600lbs, total time under tension 120 seconds, density: 300lbs/min)

Low reps: 3 sets of 3 reps for the chest with 200lbs, each rep lasts 4 seconds, the “workout” lasts 12 minutes (total volume: 9 reps, total tonnage: 1800lbs, total time under tension: 36 seconds, density 150lbs/min)

Difference:

Total volume: -21reps

Total tonnage: -1800lbs

Total time under tension: -84 seconds

Density: -150lbs/min

So in this case using heavier weights will lead to less gain. However if we were to adjust the sets to keep the same volume:

If one adjust the sets

High reps: 3 sets of 10 reps with 120lbs for the chest, each rep lasts 4 seconds, the “workout” lasts 12 minutes (total volume: 30 reps, total tonnage 3600lbs, total time under tension 120 seconds, density: 300lbs/min)

Low reps: 10 sets of 3 reps for the chest with 200lbs, each rep lasts 4 seconds, the “workout” lasts 20 minutes (total volume: 30 reps, total tonnage: 6000lbs, total time under tension: 120 seconds, density: 300lbs/min)

Difference:

Total volume: equal

Total tonnage: +2400lbs

Total time under tension: equal

Density: equal

In this case the second workout will obviously be more effective. When all other things are equal, the workout with the heaviest average weight will always stimulate more growth. Why? Simply because heavier weights increase the “M” in F = MA compared to lighter sets. So it is the premise of the HTT program that the first type of training to include is heavy lifting then adjusting the sets to have a high enough total time under tension to stimulate muscle growth.

Using an optimal combination of weight and acceleration (moderate loads lifted as fast as possible)

As we stated, Force can be increased many ways. One of the best ways to produce a high level of force and tension is to lift moderate loads in an explosive manner. The only movements that allow that type of training are the olympic lifts and their variations. These movements are by far the most powerful lifting movements that one can do and as an added benefit they involve most of the muscles in the body at the same time, with a special emphasis on the legs, lower back, upper back, traps and shoulder muscles. In fact look at elite weightlifters and for the same bodyweight they have the most muscular legs, back and traps or all athletes who train with weights (even bodybuilders). So it really is a wonder why bodybuilders have not picked up on it!

Well to be fair they DID pick up on it WAY back. When elite bodybuilders were still natural, the olympic lifts were a major part of their training. John Grimek who was considered to be the best-developed man before steroids was also a competitive olympic weightlifter (even went to the World Championships), Steve Stanko who won the Mr. Universe when the title still meant something was also a world class olympic lifter. Bodybuilding legend Reg Park (Arnold’s hero and model) regularly used power cleans in his training and I could go on and on.

When you look at the physique of these guys you’ll agree that it’s an example to follow for natural trainee.

We recommend that easier variations of the olympic lifts be used. The objective is not to win the Olympics but to develop an impressive physique. The complex, technical version of the olympic lifts (full snatch, full clean & jerk) are too hard to learn without a coach rapidly. We want to use exercises that have the benefits of the full lifts without being as complex. We thus recommend the power variations of the lifts from various heights as well as various types of explosive pulls, mainly:

  1. Power snatch from the floor

  2. Power clean from the floor

  3. Power snatch from blocks

  4. Power clean from blocks

  5. Snatch pull from the floor

  6. Clean pull from the floor

  7. Snatch pull from the blocks

  8. Clean pull from the blocks.

Don’t worry, all of these exercises will be explained and illustrated later in the article.

The olympic lifts are also high tension exercises. However these lifts cannot be performed at a high time under tension because they are explosive movements. So for hypertrophy purposes it’s best to keep the reps moderately high (4-6 reps) and the sets high (5-8) to ensure proper stimulation.

At this point we would like to add that a recent study (Bosco et al. 2000) found that a high volume olympic lifting workout produced a marked increase in testosterone (+ 45%) while a classic bodybuilding workout led to an important decrease in testosterone ( - 70%). If you increase your testosterone levels naturally you will increase your capacity to gain strength and size.

What does the program look like?

The basic principles of the HTT program are simple:

  1. The program is divided in 3 weeks phases. An accumulation phase (3 weeks) is alternated with an intensification phase (3 weeks) and the process is repeated.

  2. The accumulation phase uses 5 sets of 5-6 reps for all the exercises.

  3. The intensification phase uses 5-8 sets of 2-3 reps for all exercises.

  4. Each workout consist of 4 exercises:

a) a main olympic lifting movement

b) an assistance olympic lifting movement (explosive)

c) a limit strength main movement

d) a limit strength assistance movement

  1. There are 4 workouts per week:

a) a snatch-based workout

b) a clean-based workout

c) a jerk-based workout

d) a remedial exercise workout (work on your perceived weaknesses)

  1. The rest between sets is minimal:

a) 1-2 minutes during the accumulation phase

b) 2-3 minutes during the intensification phase

What are the exercises that can be used

  1. Snatch-based workout (one of each category)

a) main olympic lifting movement

  • power snatch from the floor

  • power snatch from the blocks

  • power snatch from the hang

b) assistance olympic lifting movement (explosive)

  • snatch pull from the floor

  • snatch pull from the blocks

  • snatch pull from the hang

  • overhead squat

c) limit strength main movement

  • snatch grip deadlift from the floor

  • snatch grip deadlift from the blocks

  • snatch grip deadlift from an elevated podium

d) limit strength assistance movement

  • Romanian deadlift

  • Straight legged deadlift

  • Upright row

  1. Clean-based workout (one of each category)

a) main olympic lifting movement

  • power clean from the floor

  • power clean from the blocks

  • power clean from the hang

b) assistance olympic lifting movement (explosive)

  • clean pull from the floor

  • clean pull from the blocks

  • clean pull from the hang

c) limit strength main movement

  • back squat

  • front squat

d) limit strength assistance movement

  • deadlift

  • sumo deadlift

  1. Jerk-based workout (one of each category)

a) main olympic lifting movement

  • split jerk

  • power jerk

  • jerk behind the neck

b) assistance olympic lifting movement (explosive)

  • push press

  • push press from behind the neck

c) limit strength main movement

  • military press

  • incline press

  • bench press

d) limit strength assistance movement

  • seated dumbbell press

  • flat dumbbell press

  • incline dumbbell press

  1. Remedial exercises workout (one of each category)

a) Biceps exercise

  • Barbell curl

  • Reverse curl

  • Hammer curl

  • Cable curl

  • Dumbbell curl

b) Triceps exercise

  • Nose breaker

  • Cable extension

  • Dumbbell extension

  • Kickback

c) Pectorals exercise

  • Dumbbell fly

  • Dumbbell incline fly

  • Cable cross-over

  • Pec deck machine

Abdominal work is done for 5-8 sets of 10-15 reps at every workout.

Absolutely Thib. I can vouch for you as we had conversed about this long before you were on T_nation. Back when you were writing for IronWeights (0r something like that, I forget the exact name). We used to converse on IM back then. You and I are about the same age and we would talk training and football. Remember your German Volume variations with pre/post fatigue emphasis? I do. You sent them to me about 10 years ago. :wink:

Now, I was under the impression that you had subsequently decided that not only should one use HTMU focus for hypertrophy but also higher rep ranges with slightly reduced loads to also maximally stimulate the lower threshold motor units. You know, the standard setup of doing a heavy compound move for strength as the first move and then moving to moderate ranges of 8-12 for the next exercise or two. Like what you laid out in your excellent 4 part series on your methods that you laid out recently on T-Nation.

The biggest “critique” folks seemed to have was that if you only focus on low rep methods, then you will leave some fibers stimulated but not fatigued enough for growth.

My feeling is that you simply overcome this by doing more sets (or even reducing rest periods somewhat) so that a sufficient volume stimulus is achieved via multiple sets of 3-5 instead of doing higher reps.

I will say that I have a terrible time doing less than 8 reps on DB Laterals. My rear delts do fine with low reps, but not the lateral delts.

Your thoughts?

best,
DH

Coach Thib,

I tweeked my lower back a bit doing deadlifts. I feel the pain just above my left butt cheek to be exact. Anyway, I felt fine a week later, and gave deads another go. This time, using about 50% of my max, just to be sure I was healed. Sure enough, tweeked it again after abuot 7 reps.

I now plan on taking about a month off of deads and squats to make sure its healed up. Do you think that is enough time?

Also, I have always used the ‘hand under/ hand over’ set up. Can you tell me the difference between deadlifting with alternating grip as opposed to using the two overhand grip? I feel like the alternating grip helps keep my chest out/shoulders back. But I have been reading some things lately that suggest any non-powerlifter to simply go with the overhand approach.

Thanks for any help/advice you can offer.

Hello Christian, quick one:

How would you fix a glute dominance problem? Goal: maximize leg size.

Coach

If I do a CNS activation workout in the AM and a high-threshold motor-unit stimulation session in the PM for back/chest and shoulders and I want to focus on my arms as a priority of mass goal, is it necessary follow this structure with them too? Or they have enough stimulation/activation.
How can I structure my arms routine? Obviously, some guidelines while Iâ??m looking forward your new training release.

Thanks

[quote]MEYMZ wrote:
Hello Christian, quick one:

How would you fix a glute dominance problem? Goal: maximize leg size.[/quote]

It depends on what the problem is exactly. The source of the problem might be:

  • a poor capacity to recruit the high-threshold motor units of the quads

  • leverages advantaging the glutes and hips over the quads during compound movements (short torso, long legs)

  • extremely efficient at recruiting the HT motor units of the glutes

I would see several effective strategies:

  1. ‘Practice’ activating the quads by performing a few sets of leg extensions at the end of every workout (4-6 times per week). On each rep hold the peak contraction position for 2-3 secondsm squeezing the quads hard.

  2. Improve the CNS efficiency to recruit the quad’s HT motor units by performing a set of 8-10 vertical jumps prior to compound lower body movements.

  3. Emphasize the range of motion where the quads naturally dominate over the glutes (last half of a squat). You can do so either by performing heavy sets of half or quarter squats before your regular squats OR by performing high double contraction squats (go down halfway, lift back up, lower down completely, stand up… this is ONE rep).

Coach,
Squats have been my main exercise for legs since I began training. My legs have always been somewhat thick, but they don’t seem to grow at the same rate as the rest of my body. I work up to about 365x4 below parallel and can do 425 for a single. This is not stong given my weight and my other lifts. I have tried switching my stance, going lighter for more reps, adding sets, adding reps, doing them 2 times a week, etc… My legs just dont seem to grow or gain strength in the same fasion as the rest of my body. Can you recommend someway to gain both size and strength with my squat?

Thanks, any advice would be greatly appreciated.

Coach,

While searching for a leg specialization program, I came across you’re beautifully written article ‘The Specialization Zone.’ I really like the concept of alternating between intensity, volume and density. I was considering doing a 5x5 squat program, this approach sounds a lot more appealing. Here is my program, I would certainly appreciate it if you would point out any flaws or errors.

Quad/Ham Specialization:

Monday:
A) ATG Back Squats 53-5 (120s)
B) Romanian Deadlift 4
6-8 (90s)
C) Leg Press OR Bulgarian Squats 4*6-8 (90s)

Tuesday:
A) Bentover BB Row 46-8 (120s)
B) Bench Press 4
6-8 (120s)
C) Pull-Ups 38-12 (60s)
D) Standing BB Press OR Hammer Strength Shoulder Press 3
8-12 (90s)
E) Skull Crushers 38-12 (60s)
F) BB Curl 3
8-12 (60s)

Wednesday:
A) Leg Press OR Bulgarian Squats 46-8 (90s)
B) ATG Front Squats 3
8-12 (60s)
C) Unilateral leg curls 3*12-15 (45s)

Thursday: OFF

Friday:
A1) ATG Back Squats 6-8 reps
A2) SLDL 8-12 reps
A3) BB Lunge 12-15 reps

3 minutes rest/3 triple sets

Saturday/Sunday: OFF

Thanks in advance for any insights!

-Andrew

Thibs,

Is there any benefits to the “gut punching” ab training that is prevalent on youtube?

What are your thoughts on ab flexion exercises? Is it worth the flexion and stress that it imposes on the spine?

Hi Thibs,

Would this be an acceptable/effective Mechancial Drop set? And would it work more the hamstrings or the quads?
a1 - leg press feet high on the pad (toes probably off the pad)
a2- leg press feet close together on pad
a3 - leg press feet wide apart on the pad?

Thanks

Scott

Sup CT?

I finally made an account because I have reached the brink of pure confusion on an upper/lower split you recommended in a specific article. I researched all over the forums on upper/lower splits, yet I cannot find one similar to what you suggested in “Training Split Round Table, Part II.” To refresh your memory, this is the split:

DAY 1 (Monday): Legs, quad dominant/calves

DAY 2 (Tuesday): Upper body pull

DAY 3 (Thursday): Legs, hips/hams dominant

DAY 4 (Friday): Upper body push

While I like the upper/lower split in “Training Strategy Handbook,” it just seems that everyone uses that template in a heavy/light fashion (i.e. Upper heavy, Upper light, etc). Anyways, my main question is how many exercises per day? For example, at the moment, I have Dumbbell RDLs, Lateral Lunges, Pull-Throughs, and Leg Press (feet as high as possible on pad) for Ham/Hip day. Too little exercises? Too Redundant?