[quote]RustBeltGym wrote:
Would this also apply to position players in baseball, or would you assess such cases on a more individual basis? [/quote]
Some baseball players can handle overhead word, especially when they are younger. But any player with a history of shoulder injury or pain should avoid overhead work.
[quote]RustBeltGym wrote:
And would the little to no overhead pressing apply to tennis players, volleyball players, swimmers, and athletes like that who also are using the arms overhead quite a nit? [/quote]
Yes, those are also good examples. Swimmers are especially prone to damage from overhead work because of great shoulder joint laxity (hypermobility).
[quote]RustBeltGym wrote:
For athletes who should limit or cut out overhead pressing, would partial overhead pressing still have a place and possible value, or is it still too risky for those populations? [/quote]
I wouldnāt risk it. And Iām a huge fan of overhead pressing work.
[quote]RustBeltGym wrote:
Can holding dumbbells, sandbags, or some other implement overhead for time be used to get in some extra scapular stability work and a focus on āpackingā the shoulder in thee populations or should that be left out, as well? [/quote]
Iām really not a fan of overhead carries or holds, so Iām not the right guy to ask as my answer will always be āNOā.
[quote]RustBeltGym wrote:
Lastly, since you have familiarity with Coach Poliquinās structural balance testing, what would be done with the behind-the-neck press portion of upper body testing when certain athletes would not be performing overhead work in their programming? For example, what would testing for a pitcher look like, since this exercise would not be one heād be executing?[/quote]
I would do the abridged version of the test, the one used when we have a lot of athletes to test at any given time:
Test for:
Bench press 1RM, Preacher curl 1RM, Bench press reps with 85%, Preacher curl reps with 85%, External rotation with 10% of bench 1RM for reps, Trap 3 test with 10% of bench 1RM for reps.