[quote]Thy. wrote:
Hey Thibs,
What are your thoughts on this:
You hear it all over the place, that it’s easier for lighter guys to pull-up. I don’t see why is that - aren’t bigger guys supposed to have more muscle tissue strong enough to pull their bigger body weight? I bet a 300 lb strongman can do as many pull-ups as an elite 150 lb athlete who trains upper body for his sport. I mean, look at videos of Konstantinovs - 55 kip pull-ups and 4 clean pull-ups with +132 lb at at bw of 277…
I think if a heavy guy says that it means that his back strength sucks in relation to his size.[/quote]
Relative strength always advantage the smaller guys. Let’s look at olympic lifting records in the clean and jerk for example:
56kg class = 167.5kg = 2.99 times bodyweight
62kg = 177.5 = 2.8
69kg = 195 = 2.82
77kg = 207.5 = 2.6
85kg = 215 = 2.53
94kg = 227.5 = 2.42
105kg = 235 = 2.24
And since all of these are world record we can assumed that they were accomplished by athletes of similar qualification.
As you can see, the tendency is that relative strength tends to decrease with an increase in bodyweight.
And if you do the same comparison for other lifts such as a snatch, bench, deadlift and squat, you will see a similar pattern: except for some freak exceptions, relative strength decreases and absolute strength increases as the weight goes up.
Heck, Rezazadeh Hossein who weighs around 170kg would have to clean and jerk 500kg to “equal” the 56kg lifter in relative strength. He “only” clean and jerks 266kg … which is a world record, does that make him an inferior athlete?