Proof Gay Marriage is Wrong

[quote]ZEB wrote:
You always seem to have tolerance for just about every other thing that a human being can do, create or believe in. However, once again, no tolerance for others belief systems when it comes to God.[/quote]

I also make fun of grown men who believe in the tooth fairy. Grow the hell up, and I will stop. When you die, you die. Sorry. Pretending that you don’t have to die makes room for all kinds of freaky and weird illogical errors that will haunt you for the rest of your life.

Like mentally categorizing as “unclean” and denying governmentally sanctioned marriage (it’s a legal contract… oh the HORROR!!!) to a woman who is a righteous, kind, and fun individual because she happens to love (emotionally, spiritually and physically) other women. Like my friend here in the lab who, for the past eight years, has been raising a daughter with her wife… which I guess I can’t call her a wife technically, because she doesn’t fit the neat and “clean” definition of what your shortsighted and fearful kind calls a marriage partnership.

This is not HER problem, ZEB. This is yours. I have said this over and over, and it doesn’t sink in. You have created these enormous barriers in your mind which prevent you from seeing things as they really are, because of your pretending that there is a magical world beyond this one. And the baggage… the monumental baggage that comes along with your pretending… in your mind, it transforms what others can see as good and kind people into the UNDESERVING.

I know what I am here on earth to do, because I have made up my mind under my own choice to try to help people. I am trying to save as many people as I can from being assholes about some things, and making the world a collectively nicer place to live… one former asshole at a time, and I’m sorry that I have failed you so far, ZEB. You have to admit… I haven’t given up trying, have I? :slight_smile:

But seriously now, I mean it… all kdding aside… you owe me thirty bucks for this psychoanalysis session. Pay up.

[quote]harris447 wrote:
JTS wrote:
harris447 wrote:
When, exactly, did you choose your sexuality? If you are a heterosexual (and, for some reason, I’m just gonna assume you are), can you please tell me the moment, or series thereof, that you decided to become aroused by women? To take it further, can you see choosing to become homosexual?

No one on this planet decides what gives them a boner (or a girl-boner). Anyone who says different is trying to sell something.

If babies are born gay, then homosexuality should be considered a birth defect.

Please tell me you’re kidding. You’re kidding, right?
[/quote]

Well, yes, but I wonder, would people try to cure homosexuality?
Here is an article I found about preventing homosexuality.
Recently, researchers have succeeded in changing the behaviour of laboratory animals by grafting nerve cells into their hypothalamus. This wasn’t in the sphere of sex, but in that of circadian rhythms: animals that were bred to have an abnormally short, 20-hour sleep/wake cycle were switched to a 24-hour cycle by grafting brain cells from “normal” animals into them. It may not be such a great leap from that to changing the direction of a person’s sexual desire.

What’s really made these prospects seem more immediate and threatening is the molecular genetic research into sexuality: specifically, the research of Dean Hamer and his colleagues at the National Cancer Institute in Washington.

In 1993 Hamer’s group reported evidence that genes on the X chromosome predispose boys to become either gay or straight. The genes haven’t been identified yet, but if Hamer’s findings are right, it won’t be more than a few years before they are. And then it will be a simple matter to develop a blood test that could be applied to adults, to children, even to foetuses.

The test won’t be wholly accurate, of course, since genes are by no means the entire reason why an individual is gay or straight (even identical twins can have different orientations). But they’ll be accurate enough, in many people’s minds, to justify pre-employment testing, pre-marital testing, and pre-insurance testing. Accurate enough to counsel a child–to help stiffen his resistance to his gay tendencies, perhaps. And certainly accurate enough to abort a foetus, at least in countries like the US, where it’s permissible to abort for any reason or none.

LOL Gayness is a genetic defect because it’s partly genetic. What a newsflash.

I can even see how it could be classified as a “defect”, due to the fact that the more homosexual members of a group, the lower the chances for their procreation. Nice. Not very friendly, and definitely offensive to me, but the truth remains. Anything that lowers the survivability of an organism is working against it, and thus a defect.

But let’s keep relevant to the thread here, and ask ourselves if this birth defect is reason enough to deny this small percentage of our population some tiny measure of relief. So many people get on here and act like it’s the end of the universe to say that two gays are married. Yeah, it’s the friggin’ apocalypse… wah wah.

[quote]ZEB wrote:
orion wrote:
ZEB wrote:

My point still stands. The WORD OF GOD IS THE WORD OF GOD. Or it isn?t. Which is it? Why can you disregard THE WORD OF GOD and others can?t?

Please expalain how I am disregarding the word of God.

Because you take something away from these men if you do not allow them to marry.

You have that backwards. There is no Homosexual right to marry currently and there never was. No one is “taking” anything away from anyone.
[/quote]

There is nothing that guarantees the right of heterosexuals to marry, either. What is your point?

[quote]bdyer wrote:
Are human beings merely animals?

Part of the reason certain sorts of Christians, Jews, ancient Stoics etc. oppose a variety of things is that we believe God has endowed us with a free will wherewith to choose whether or not to conform to “nature” in its highest, or religious, sense.

If you believe that there is no God, or that God has not communicated His will to mankind, moral language has no force. You may condemn my close-mindedness as immoral, but if you have no standard higher than human, its just your code against mine.

So everything is reduced to an issue of power. And if its just an issue of power, I’ll do what it takes to make my side the winning side. I’ll vote for what I have to vote for, support who I need to support, do what I have to do consequences to others be damned.

Look at the strongest civilizations in history. The strongest civilizations, from the Roman Republic to Samurai Japan, have been the ones with some of the most unyielding codes of ethics and homogenous views. If “civilization works” to help us survive, we ought to cast our lots in with the civilization most likely to wind up on top.[/quote]

You might actually want to do a bit more research on the Romans before you start talking about them as homogeneous, because they weren’t. They were a mongrel race and quite proud of it, frankly. There were as many viewpoints as there were people. And how powerful was Samurai Japan outside of, say, Japan? What influence did they have besides their willingness to test their swords on whatever peasant happened to be walking by?

Interestingly amoral stance, btw. It’s all about power. Yay for me, fuck everybody else.

[quote]Aleksandr wrote:
Does any ever get the feeling that homophobes are just having a hard time accepting their own homosexuality? Because I get that feeling sometimes…[/quote]

Oh yeah, baby!

[quote]lothario1132 wrote:
ephrem wrote:
ToShinDo wrote:
“God, I have loved a man. It felt right for me to do so. He has made me happier, as I have done for him. We have spent our lives together in a loving, honest relationship. Our existences have been made immeasurably better by each other. Please, Lord, is what we have done wrong?”

If God was not understanding of this, he would not be God. And in that case, who cares what he thinks?

Very simple and very true. I would love to see this answered by anyone opposing samesexmarriages. It should not be that hard, most of them assume to know God’s will anyway.

Any fundamentalist worth their salt will easily provide a “no one can question the will of God” and a “God made homo-ness a sin… not me”.

I’m sorry, but you guys will never get an answer that makes any rational sense from a fundie unless you are a fundie yourself. It’s like a secret code.

They have special handshakes too.

You see, when you hide behind a book to indulge in your hatred and fear of others…
EMT-FF Jordan wrote:
maybe if you read the Bible a little more…remember a story called Soddom and Gomorrah…He sent those fuckers in a flaming specatilve of fire and brim stone. pretty sweet if you ask me.
Then any people who try to point out how clueless and empty you are will be wasting their time, for you have traded your common sense and reason for the belief that you are superior or special.

Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed because they were insular and cruel to outsiders, BTW. The lesson is one of kindness, charity and good will, Jordan. Something I guess you missed in all of the heavenly-inspired cluster-bombing and whatnot. Yeah, it’s cool when God blows stuff up, but it helps to appreciate the story a little bit, too.

PS And it was just a STORY. Wrap your mind around that for a second. If you dare.[/quote]

Loth, good points all the way. The best part is where the fundies think that an entire city of, say, 10,000 or so people (average for the time) was homosexual and they all wanted a shot at some angelic ass.

Brilliant…

[quote]alstan90 wrote:
CaptainLogic wrote:
bdyer wrote:
Look at the strongest civilizations in history. The strongest civilizations, from the Roman Republic to Samurai Japan, have been the ones with some of the most unyielding codes of ethics and homogenous views. If “civilization works” to help us survive, we ought to cast our lots in with the civilization most likely to wind up on top.

Probably one of the strongest and most progressive societies (technologically, economically etc.) in all of history was Nazi Germany. Draw your own conclusions.

Not politically though and the whole economy was geared to war, it was good on the face of it, but the individual suffered. Wages were frozen and the armaments business boomed. And the government borrowed money from Germany’s savings banks to contribute to the building of the military. [/quote]

Deja freakin vu, man…

[quote]alstan90 wrote:
being gays ok, just not gay with children.[/quote]

Being heteros ok, just not with children.

[quote]alstan90 wrote:
lothario1132 wrote:
alstan90 wrote:
being gays ok, just not gay with children.

Is this a reference to South Park’s “Getting Gay with Kids” episode, or do you mean all the gay workers here at my hospital who are parents are not cool in your book?

Because I will nominate them to take the Pepsi Challenge For Parenting against any fundie bible-thumping family – any day of the week.

No im not refering to an episode of South Park, and no I don’t thump bibles, it wouldn’t be good parenting to make baby jesus cry. Also, WTF is a pepsi challenge for parenting? . Why on Earth would you want your parenting to be adjudicated by schmuckingly evil multi-national corporation? Maybe it’s just me, I don’t drink pepsi, s’not clean food and its not good for your teeth, take note.

Seriously though, I don’t have a problem with people being gay but think about the social implications for a child who has gay parents. You wouldn’t want to invite your friends round for tea, would you? Gay people may well be loving parents, and im sure most would do their best to care for the kids, but unless society changes this isn’t enough.
It maybe that views like mine are why it can be difficult and awkward when talking about gays. But lets face it, if society was perfect their would not be any gays with children; as their would not be any to adopt. As for gay relationships, well many animals in the animal kingdom are gay, but you dont get gay monkeys and monkettes, or whatever. ‘Nuff said.’
AlexSt.

[/quote]

Since when do you not get “gay monkeys and monkettes”? Read a little Jane Goodall.

And yes people with views like yours do make it damned difficult to be gay in this culture. You come across as open-minded on the surface but then you’ll say something like, “Seriously though, I don’t have a problem with people being gay but think about the social implications for a child who has gay parents. You wouldn’t want to invite your friends round for tea, would you?” Why not? Why would you assume that a kid raised by gay parents would be ashamed of this or not have the intelligence and strength to stand up to the morons that inhabit our world? Black children have to grow up in a culture that doesn’t really embrace them yet many of them turn out just fine.

Yet another bogus argument based on ignorance.

[quote]bugs wrote:
Life & Free Will

Don’t fuck with mine and I wont fuck with yours.

As adults and citizens of the planet, it is our responsibity to protect the life and free will of those who cannot protect themselves (children, elderly).

As long as you are not fucking with the life and free will of another person, you can have sex with and love anyone or anything you want to.

If there is a God (and I hope there is), we were given life and free will and that’s it. Everything else is bullshit.[/quote]

One of the best posts on this thread.

[quote]alstan90 wrote:
bugs wrote:
Life & Free Will

Don’t fuck with mine and I wont fuck with yours.

As adults and citizens of the planet, it is our responsibity to protect the life and free will of those who cannot protect themselves (children, elderly).

As long as you are not fucking with the life and free will of another person, you can have sex with and love anyone or anything you want to.

If there is a God (and I hope there is), we were given life and free will and that’s it. Everything else is bullshit.

Lol ffs. I don’t have a problem with gay relationships. But if your that into god and free will them why didn’t he give men a penis and vagina? with the same for women? we wouldn’t need to sexes, horrible thought.

[/quote]

Why didn’t he give you the ability to spell and use logic? God works in mysterious ways.

And good job reducing human beings to nothing more than their genitalia. Heck, since that’s all we are I’m certain women were put here for no better reason than to give men a place to put their penises and semen. If that is the case, why did God even bother giving women brains?

[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
I don’t have a problem with gay people.

I believe gay people should have the same rights as straight people and should have some sort of civil partership that allows them to share health benefits, etc. This is not the same as marriage. Marriage is between a man and a woman.

While I support gay rights I also believe the promiscuity of active young gay is incredibly high and that is not a good thing for society due to the spread of disease etc.

A lot of pro-gay marriage people want to minimize the problems that go along with homosexuality. They are almost as close minded as the anti-gays.

[/quote]

Because the hetero kids aren’t having sex like little bunnies and they can’t spread disease, anyway, because they’re straight. Right.

I’m almost afraid to ask, but what exactly are the problems that go along with homosexuality?

[quote]bdyer wrote:
Also, for a bunch of open-minded tolerant people, some of you are extraordinarily closed minded about the idea of a just God and those religious people who might believe in this concept (Christian fundamentalists, Orthodox Jews, Mormons, etc.). Never heard anything so bigoted in my whole life.[/quote]

It’s becaue the fundies DON’T believe in a just God. They believe in a God that looks, acts and thinks like they do. That and they want to cause an entire group of people near permanent harm because of what they believe.

[quote]BeefEater wrote:
In a country that boasts a separation of church and state Gay marriage should be legal. If it wasn’t then marriage betweeen Islamic folks or Agnostics shouldn’t be legal as well. If the a church rejects a gay couples request to marry they should still be allowed to have a justice of the peace marry them.[/quote]

Well said.

LOL She’s at it again! Duck everybody!!

:smiley:

Just funnin’ ya, WMD… you know I love ya girl. At least take it easy on ZEB… he’s old. :slight_smile:

[quote]harris447 wrote:
For the bible people out there:

Is there any tangible, archeaological evidence that Sodom and/or Gomorrah actually existed? And were then destroyed?[/quote]

Yes, to both. However, whether or not that destruction was heaven sent is an entirely different question.

There are excavations at a site that may correspond to the Biblical Gomorrah and a burn layer has been found that indicates some sort of destruction. However it also appears to have been rebuilt shortly thereafter.

[quote]djbige05 wrote:
Lonnie123 wrote:
fatsensei wrote:
Ahhh liberals. This is probably a poor attitude but I really hope that on judgement day when you are trying to explain to God why being a homosexual is ok that I can be there. It’ll be a hoot.

FatSensei

Well God, You make all people in your image, and some people come out gay (or become gay, if you will). I’m not saying you are gay God, but perhaps you are tolerant of gay people because afterall, you did make them.

Furthermore God, you are an all loving being. I don’t recall ever hearing that you are “A being that loves all straight people.”, but maybe that got lost in the english translation of the bible.

I don’t understand this mentality that gay people are “wrong”. I’ll concede that it is abnormal, by definition, to be gay… but I’ll never declare that its wrong. What about straight people engaging in anal sex? Do they go to hell, I mean surely you can’t bear a child that way, heathens.

Liberate your minds people, does everything need to be spoon fed to you to form your opinion?

I am sad for you…Yes you are right God the Father, God made man is his image. He also through satin out of heaven to earth to prove to him that now matter how hard he trys to be like the almighty high satin will never win and return to the loving father that our god is. So God is not gay he made woman for man and he saw that it was good. Now Satin made man think that being gay is ok, just like divorce, sex before marrage, cursing your parents…Go read Laviticus 20…The one thing he gave us is free will. He wants his loved returned so he will not force us to love him.

We all live in sin…but a sin is a sin. In Gods eyes if you lie is just as bad if you killed someone. Now our man made laws put these at a certain level. Now if you believe Christ died for your sins and rose up again, then your ticket is already punched but if not then you will go to hell as simple as that. Hell is eternal seperation from god. So, the way you chose to live is up to you and only you, but think about this, what if you are wrong? My dad always told me that you need to make the bed you want to lie in.

Now say what you want but these threds always show up and repeat them selves. If there was not spiritual warfare going on then do you think I would be writing this. So just like everything else in your life. You always should ask the right people the right questions.

[/quote]

If God is so great why the hell can’t He make you use grammar, spelling and punctuation? Satin is a type of cloth; Satan is a job description in the Old Testament and only becomes a character in 1st Enoch, NOT the Bible.

Please stop assuming that your particular beliefs apply to everyone everywhere.

[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
xtolgax wrote:
…I can handle the extreme arguments on both sides just fine…beliefs are beliefs and they are hard to change.

but when you come out here and start spewing PURE BULLSHIT I have to call you on it.

THE STATISTICS? show me the statistics. I want the academic proof that gays are more sexually active than straight people. I want the proof that they are more likely to spread disease. WHERE ARE YOUR STAGGERING STATISTICS?

if there is a god, you will either have a gay child, or you will have the shit kicked out of you by a 150 pound man in stilletos.

Wow, not only are you not very bright, you are also an ass.

If you are not aware that sexually active gay young men are statistically far more promiscuous compared to sexually active straight young men then you are ill informed and likely do not know any gay people.

I have gay friends. One of my best friends is HIV positive. His stories of sexual activity are stunning.

I suggest you either take a class in human sexuality or improve your personality so you can make some gay friends and you can get the scoop from them.

[i]Gay author Gabriel Rotello notes the perspective of many gays that "Gay liberation was founded . . . on a ‘sexual brotherhood of promiscuity,’ and any abandonment of that promiscuity would amount to a ‘communal betrayal of gargantuan proportions.’"4 Rotello’s perception of gay promiscuity, which he criticizes, is consistent with survey results. A far-ranging study of homosexual men published in 1978 revealed that 75 percent of self-identified, white, gay men admitted to having sex with more than 100 different males in their lifetime: 15 percent claimed 100-249 sex partners; 17 percent claimed 250- 499; 15 percent claimed 500-999; and 28 percent claimed more than 1,000 lifetime male sex partners.5By 1984, after the AIDS epidemic had taken hold, homosexual men were reportedly curtailing promiscuity, but not by much. Instead of more than 6 partners per month in 1982, the average non-monogamous respondent in San Francisco reported having about 4 partners per month in 1984.6

In more recent years, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control has reported an upswing in promiscuity, at least among young homosexual men in San Francisco. From 1994 to 1997, the percentage of homosexual men reporting multiple partners and unprotected anal sex rose from 23.6 percent to 33.3 percent, with the largest increase among men under 25.7 Despite its continuing incurability, AIDS no longer seems to deter individuals from engaging in promiscuous gay sex.8

The data relating to gay promiscuity were obtained from self-identified gay men. Some advocates argue that the average would be lower if closeted homosexuals were included in the statistics.9 That is likely true, according to data obtained in a 2000 survey in Australia that tracked whether men who had sex with men were associated with the gay community. Men who were associated with the gay community were nearly four times as likely to have had more than 50 sex partners in the six months preceding the survey as men who were not associated with the gay community.10 This may imply that it is riskier to be “out” than “closeted.” Adopting a gay identity may create more pressure to be promiscuous and to be so with a cohort of other more promiscuous partners. [/i]

I am amazed that someone can find ill-informed opinion acceptable, but when confronted by simple facts they get their panties in a bunch.

Now put on your stilettos and come on over if you want to kick my ass.[/quote]

Now Zap, there you go not providing the reference for your quote above. It did not come straight (heh) from Rotello, did it? Have you read Sexual Ecology? Do you even understand his reason for writing the book?

I like how you make this issue all about single gay men, leaving out lesbians and monogamous gay and lesbian couples altogether. Because it’s the single guys who want to be able to get married and not the monogamous couples. You know one gay guy with AIDs. How does he represent every other gay person in this country?

YOur “simple facts” are neither. Let’s just say there are about 2-4 million gay people in this country (1-2 % of about 200 million people). Your assertion is that the vast majority of those 2-4 million are going to bathhouses and parks to have anonymous sex with multiple partners. And of course there’s the assumption that straight people are less promiscuous than gay people and therefore less likeley to get AIDs or other diseases.

Please.

[quote]lothario1132 wrote:
LOL She’s at it again! Duck everybody!!

:smiley:

Just funnin’ ya, WMD… you know I love ya girl. At least take it easy on ZEB… he’s old. :)[/quote]

Ah, you know me, man. I can’t help myself. Ignorance and sanctimony bring out the pit bull in me. ;p