Says the man who talks endlessly about how bad one particular candidate is over and over again. If I’m like a timeshare salesman for the GOP then you must be a hit man for Hillary.
You’re not comparing Trump and Hillary - you’re attempting to rebut criticism of Trump by claiming Hillary is awful. But that isn’t a rebuttal - it’s a dodge, it’s a distraction. I’ve compared Trump and Hillary, and they are eminently comparable - and both loathesome. So neither will get my vote in 2016. But you’re confused on basic logic - whether Trump is unfit or not has nothing to do with Hillary’s shortcomings. His fitness or not rises or falls on its own merits. Smart people get that. You don’t. I think I’ve discovered the issue - I thought you were smarter than you are. My mistake. Please accept my apologies.
Trash talk, while not preferred, is fine, if it is good. You suck at it.
Your attempts to claim I just don’t know nothing about business made me laugh so hard I won’t have to do abs tonight. No, really.
I’m not saying anything about Trump that scores (hundreds?) of conservatives have been saying for months. Are all of these conservatives really just Hillary water carriers, too, when they comment how Trump is completely unfit for office? Are they?
Trump is nothing special in the business world. This is pretty well common knowledge among folks involved in that space and who don’t get their information solely from blogs and “The Apprentice”. Tell me, Zeb, where do to get your information about Trump’s business record?
You keep saying Trump is going to to appoint conservative justices based on “taking him at his word” - how many words have been spilled in this very forum explaining that Trump is merely saying things to get elected and nothing he said is genuine? He’s been pro-choice since time immemorial and recently conceded there was no need to change the law on abortion (after taking about five different positions on abortion in 48 hours). No one is making sense on Trump - he’s not telling truth in anything policy-related, except when he is, and the sole determinant is whether that person likes what he is hearing. Idiots, and you’re one of them.
It’s amazing, isn’t it? Because you can’t muster an independent thought of your own, you’re forced to support a moderate Democrat for the Republican ticket in 2016. Tell me, Zeb, what is it like to be a sucker?
Meanwhile, the rest of us - of many political stripes, who disagree on plenty but at least think for ourselves - will press on and speak the truth about the sorry state of affairs when the nation is being given a horrid choice between two garbage candidates in 2016. Sycophants like you? Who cares what you have to say, really?
Nope, Zep is a true believer - in an idiotic ideology, but he is true believer, nonetheless.
The GOP could nominate a rotted fence post for the presidency and Zeb would be mindlessly cheerleading that the fence post was the greatest ever and was probably the second coming of Reagan.
Yes, my opposition to a big government, would be war criminal-torturer, POW-insulting, amoral and vulgar, conspiracy whack-job is “hysteria.” Despite having cited my claims over and over and over again. Let’s be real, it’s only hysteria because Trump ran Republican. Had he run Democrat you’d be here going on about “Shrump” or whatever name you’d adopt for him.
The AP link to the original story is dead in your article btw but the first time I heard this story they went a far back as 1974.
My question is: how do they even know the business relations between him and his father? His father died in 1999. At what point did those assets go from being his fathers to into being under his control?
I thought he was a buffoon who just rode his father’s coat-tails. If that’s the case why would you assume he even had control over the company’s assets while his father was alive?