[quote]nickj_777 wrote:
@ Counting Beans==> I cannot do a graph on tnation for you. Just use google scholar or read an economics text or google anything[/quote]
How about you prove your own claim.
Because your statement contradicts numbers I’ve seen.
Candy Crowley Embarrasses Herself, Falsely ‘Corrects’ Romney on Libya
[quote]Sloth wrote:
Uh, I’m seeing on twitter that Crowley said about Romney regarding Libya “He was right in the main, but he just chose the wrong word.” [/quote]
She is backing off a bit in the post game presser
[quote]nickj_777 wrote:
Education subsidies create jobs by allowing the cost of education to go down and become more affordable. The more affordable a product becomes the more people’s willingness to pay increases opening the range of new people into the education market place. With more people in the education market place more economic opportunities occur because those who are educated have higher absorptive capacity (generally) for new ideas. Education generally leads to information exchange or positive spillovers which creates new methods or ways of doing things. WIth new ways of doing things people may pursue economic ventures. ====> harvard economist Edward Glaeser (Republican)[/quote]
sounds great in theory.
[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
FYI - the above clip has black guys in it, that’s ok in the politics forum right?[/quote]
What is your problem dude?
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
FYI - the above clip has black guys in it, that’s ok in the politics forum right?[/quote]
What is your problem dude?
[/quote]
No it’s just that every time I take a look at this forum I feel like I’m sittin at the lunch counter in Alabama in 1940. I’m just making sure things haven’t changed in the GOP Blowjob Barn.
How bout you read a book or an economics text that now dispels the Laffer Curve from the 1980s? Think about man how would cutting tax rates increase tax revenues? George Bush and both Gerald Ford hammered Reagen on this. The laffer curve posits if you cut taxes you can generate more government revenue by encouraging people to spend but the US has no federal government sales tax.
[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
FYI - the above clip has black guys in it, that’s ok in the politics forum right?[/quote]
What is your problem dude?
[/quote]
No it’s just that every time I take a look at this forum I feel like I’m sittin at the lunch counter in Alabama in 1940. I’m just making sure things haven’t changed in the GOP Blowjob Barn.
[/quote]
Shit, Irish is still a dickhead. haha
V
[quote]Sloth wrote:
Uh, I’m seeing on twitter that Crowley said about Romney regarding Libya “He was right in the main, but he just chose the wrong word.” [/quote]
[quote]nickj_777 wrote:
Education subsidies create jobs by allowing the cost of education to go down and become more affordable. The more affordable a product becomes the more people’s willingness to pay increases opening the range of new people into the education market place. With more people in the education market place more economic opportunities occur because those who are educated have higher absorptive capacity (generally) for new ideas. Education generally leads to information exchange or positive spillovers which creates new methods or ways of doing things. WIth new ways of doing things people may pursue economic ventures. ====> harvard economist Edward Glaeser (Republican)[/quote]
Link?
Your writing is hard to follow at midnight.
[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
FYI - the above clip has black guys in it, that’s ok in the politics forum right?[/quote]
What is your problem dude?
[/quote]
No it’s just that every time I take a look at this forum I feel like I’m sittin at the lunch counter in Alabama in 1940. I’m just making sure things haven’t changed in the GOP Blowjob Barn.
[/quote]
Absolutely, we’re the KKK itself. Got a cross burning tomorrow, in fact.
In theory it generally does work Steven so long as the jobs created through subsidies are the ones the market demands. For example in countries where this is most effective is where degrees in math, science and engineering are high and that there is a propensity to encourage clustering of private tech companies and educational institutions together to exchange ideas.
[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
FYI - the above clip has black guys in it, that’s ok in the politics forum right?[/quote]
What is your problem dude?
[/quote]
No it’s just that every time I take a look at this forum I feel like I’m sittin at the lunch counter in Alabama in 1940. I’m just making sure things haven’t changed in the GOP Blowjob Barn.
[/quote]
Lets see… Two posts in and you’re race baiting, projection and general distraction from otherwise civil conversation.
Sweet dude, great.
[quote]nickj_777 wrote:
How bout you read a book or an economics text that now dispels the Laffer Curve from the 1980s? [/quote]
How about you prove your claim?
That is how things work. You make a claim, you should be able to back it up.
Obama decisively. I am literally astounded that Mitt Romney could somehow have allowed Obama to knock Libya out of the park and end up looking like a castigated child crossed with a stuttering deer in the headlights in the aftermath. I suspect that Crowley’s interjection won’t play well around here, but my view is that Mitt Romney posed the question and she answered it. Correctly. Moderators should be doing a hell of a lot more of that kind of fact-checking, not less (and yes, I agree with all of you that the facts should be checked for both candidates and not just the Republican).
Without the Libya moment, I’d say it was a draw–each side did what it had to, Obama came out like a candidate and not a narcoleptic while Romney continued to hammer away at the numbers and hammer them well.
Again, how in God’s name did Romney end up losing the night on Libya?
What will it mean? A few points and therefor the lead back to Obama. Things could change with the 3rd debate but time is running out and the contours of the electorate are probably already beginning to crystallize.
[quote]smh23 wrote:
Obama decisively. I am literally astounded that Mitt Romney could somehow have allowed Obama to knock Libya out of the park and end up looking like a castigated child crossed with a stuttering deer in the headlights in the aftermath. I suspect that Crowley’s interjection won’t play well around here, but my view is that Mitt Romney posed the question and she answered it. Correctly. Moderators should be doing a hell of a lot more of that kind of fact-checking, not less (and yes, I agree with all of you that the facts should be checked for both candidates and not just the Republican).
Without the Libya moment, I’d say it was a draw–each side did what it had to, Obama came out like a candidate and not a narcoleptic while Romney continued to hammer away at the numbers and hammer them well.
Again, how in God’s name did Romney end up losing the night on Libya?
What will it mean? A few points and therefor the lead back to Obama. Things could change with the 3rd debate but time is running out and the contours of the electorate are probably already beginning to crystallize.[/quote]
I posted the transcript on the last page. Please show me where he says it was a terror attack? At least remotely close to directly.
EDIT: I’m in no way saying romney didn’t fuck up the libya portion of the night, but she fucking lied for the president.
Irish,
Dude, you have people here admitting Obama did better, no doubt about that. I don’t think that is even arguable. Candy Crowley fucked up by calling Romney out on Libya, and she seems to be clarifying herself now.
You have a GOP devil as your Governor who worked with a Dem legislature to get pension reform done, something we need here.
Obama is getting the same amount of heat that GW Bush got, remember equal rights for all.
I found the most right wing top school in the US for economics the Chicago School (Milton Friedmen) to dispel the point that tax cuts do not generate revenue
http://www.igmchicago.org/igm-economic-experts-panel/poll-results?SurveyID=SV_2irlrss5UC27YXi
Counting Beans I am neither a leftist or a right winger. I only believe in practical policies that achieve intended goals in a fashion they were designed for. You can disagree but do it in a way that makes me think critically and articulate my points instead of researching for you.
[quote]nickj_777 wrote:
I found the most right wing top school in the US for economics the Chicago School (Milton Friedmen) to dispel the point that tax cuts do not generate revenue
You lost when you quoted a source from Chicago.