[quote]Phoenix44e wrote:
^ Yeah but neither of them answered the fucking question. And Altough Obama did call it a terrorist attack the next day EVERYONE else in his administration spent weeks blamming it on a video.[/quote]
Just read the transcript, I don’t see the words terror and attack next to each other, but maybe I’m missing it.
[quote]Phoenix44e wrote:
It is blatently clear (to me atleast) that Obama absolutely hates Rich White Mitt Romney[/quote]
Agree to agree. But the press has documented that for awhile now.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]Phoenix44e wrote:
^ Yeah but neither of them answered the fucking question. And Altough Obama did call it a terrorist attack the next day EVERYONE else in his administration spent weeks blamming it on a video.[/quote]
Just read the transcript, I don’t see the words terror and attack next to each other, but maybe I’m missing it.
[/quote]
Not a lot of time atm, family is over. But, wow, did Crowley carry Obama’s water on that or what? Forget the transcript. The issue has nothing to do with Obama using that language or not. The issue is how the act was carried out. Framing it up as an unpredictable sudden protest that exploded into an ‘act of terror’ vs. a potentially far more damaging pre-planned terrorist attack is the issue.
Mitt Romney: “Government does not create jobs!”
It is about time someone spells this out for the general population. The government can certainly have an effect on creating jobs through its policies, but ultimately it falls to private citizens to create jobs, and private citizens bear most of the responsibility for creating jobs.
[quote]Dr.Matt581 wrote:
Mitt Romney: “Government does not create jobs!”
It is about time someone spells this out for the general population. The government can certainly have an effect on creating jobs through its policies, but ultimately it falls to private citizens to create jobs, and private citizens bear most of the responsibility for creating jobs.[/quote]
“You didn’t build that !..” Remember that bullshit ?
^ Not spoken by a single business owner EVER.
Obama deffo won that.
Romney is going to get pwned in the foreign policy debate at this rate.
But, I will say Romney came off more in power, like he was in charge, and more presidential.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]Phoenix44e wrote:
^ Yeah but neither of them answered the fucking question. And Altough Obama did call it a terrorist attack the next day EVERYONE else in his administration spent weeks blamming it on a video.[/quote]
Just read the transcript, I don’t see the words terror and attack next to each other, but maybe I’m missing it.
[/quote]
Romney was correct. That sack of crap lied and the moderator supported the lie. Obama used the word terror ONE time in the speech, and it can’t be more obvious that he was speaking generally. They made Romney look bad when he was actually correct.
Romney didn’t take advantage of that the way he could have either.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
But, I will say Romney came off more in power, like he was in charge, and more presidential. [/quote]
He came off as a mess.
Al Sharpton is calling this as Obama knocking out the bully. Surprised ?
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
But, I will say Romney came off more in power, like he was in charge, and more presidential. [/quote]
In regard to the whole debate or particular issues? If the entire debate, I think that’s your bias coming through.
Obama showed up, that’s all that really happened, so by default he looked better.
Both bases will rally, Obama will probably do better, maybe slow the Romney momentum.
For me roughly a draw, Barry much improved.
[quote]Fletch1986 wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
But, I will say Romney came off more in power, like he was in charge, and more presidential. [/quote]
In regard to the whole debate or particular issues? If the entire debate, I think that’s your bias coming through.[/quote]
It might be.
I saw it as edge for Obama but Romney definitely held his own.
I’m surprised Romney wasn’t able to take advantage of the Libya deal. And he came close to totally floundering with the women’s equality question.
CBS Poll among “uncommitted” voters has it as 37% Obama won, 30% Romney won, 33% tie.
[quote]Fletch1986 wrote:
I saw it as edge for Obama but Romney definitely held his own.
I’m surprised Romney wasn’t able to take advantage of the Libya deal. .
[/quote]
When the moderator lies for your opponent, it is hard to take advantage.
Libya will be front and center next week. That’s the big picture. If Romney can’t knock that out of the park, it’s on him -that’s all he can ask for.
I think also the Romney camp will definitely have Mitt say something about Obama’s time advantage in now two debates, when Obama/his camp keeps acting like Romney is getting a time advantage.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]Fletch1986 wrote:
I saw it as edge for Obama but Romney definitely held his own.
I’m surprised Romney wasn’t able to take advantage of the Libya deal. .
[/quote]
When the moderator lies for your opponent, it is hard to take advantage.[/quote]
This going to be another “you didn’t build that” crock of shit “context” deal, I can see it now.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]Fletch1986 wrote:
I saw it as edge for Obama but Romney definitely held his own.
I’m surprised Romney wasn’t able to take advantage of the Libya deal. .
[/quote]
When the moderator lies for your opponent, it is hard to take advantage.[/quote]
This going to be another “you didn’t build that” crock of shit “context” deal, I can see it now.[/quote]
Yep.