[quote]SWR-1240 wrote:
I’d hit it.[/quote]
I would not hit it. It would just seem too weird.
[quote]vbm537 wrote:
SWR-1240 wrote:
I’d hit it.
I would not hit it. It would just seem too weird. [/quote]
Weird would not be the word i chose…
it’d seem…
GAY
Yup it would seem gay!
[quote]emdawgz1 wrote:
vbm537 wrote:
SWR-1240 wrote:
I’d hit it.
I would not hit it. It would just seem too weird.
Weird would not be the word i chose…
it’d seem…
GAY
Yup it would seem gay![/quote]
I was trying to be more subtle but yeah, I agree with you.
If you just concentrate on the face and boobs, (but don’t look at the pecs, or arms…or shoulders, or neck, or legs) you should be fine.
Maybe feed her a cake and some salt water to smooth her out a bit first.
[quote]SWR-1240 wrote:
If you just concentrate on the face and boobs, (but don’t look at the pecs, or arms…or shoulders, or neck, or legs) you should be fine.
Maybe feed her a cake and some salt water to smooth her out a bit first.[/quote]
rrriiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight (dr. evil voice)
Holy crap is right! I’m all for big muscles but that’s just too much for me. If this girl did compete back in the 80s or 90s, I wonder what she looks like now. And I wonder if she looks at pictures of herself like this and wonders, “WTF was I thinking?”
How big do you think her arms are? I’m guessing they’re as big as most guys if not bigger.
Images like this will only scare women away from T-Nation and meaningful training. This only reinforces all the lies they’ve heard at the water cooler about resistance train making them HUGE! How many women in the world have this level of muscle mass? Is T-Nation trying to scare the shit of of girls new to serious training?
For the curious…Denise Rutkowski.
Last report is that she is actually trying to get back to “normal” (no cults).
(An article appeared in one of the Mags last year).
Mufasa
Hog (my fellow TarHeel!)
I don’t agree…
The “average” woman doesn’t come near sites like this. (“The Vixens” are unique).
They frequent more “woman-friendly” sites not frequented by a lot of Horn Dogs and pre-adolescent males who jack off to the “Powerful Images”.
From what I’ve learned from females close to me, muscular women are not even in their radar screen unless, by chance, they come across an occasional image.
Oprah has a HELLUVA’ lot more influence on female thought than TC…!
(Sorry, Brother…!)
Mufasa
[quote]Mufasa wrote:
For the curious…Denise Rutkowski.
Last report is that she is actually trying to get back to “normal” (no cults).
(An article appeared in one of the Mags last year).
Mufasa[/quote]
Why is that dude wearin a bikini top?
My girlfriend was looking at the Powerful Image and wondering the same thing as you guys.
I’m betting on collagen injections for the softer rounded face.
That thing on Powerful Image today was just disgusting.
[quote]vbm537 wrote:
SWR-1240 wrote:
I’d hit it.
I would not hit it. It would just seem too weird. [/quote]
I might hit it with a baseball bat if it tried to touch me ; )
[quote]TC wrote:
I knew this woman. I met her in the late 80’s or early 90’s. Can’t recall her name, but as I recall, this is a Steve Wennerstrom photo from “Women’s Physique World.”
And yes, yes, she looked like that.
We were also training partners for a time…she had me on arms, but I could just bench more.
And I was her love slave. I still keep her picture in my wallet.
[/quote]
TC! You have led an interesting life, haven’t you!
Fuckin gross, man.
[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
Fuckin gross, man.[/quote]
Absolutely. I can’t see how anyone in their right mine would want to get within 10 feet of that thing. Looks like some B movie monster.
More Annette Milbers, less roid popping male resembling freaks, please.
I wonder how much juice that chick is on. Enough to kill a dog, deer, or a horse? Yeah, that is not very sexy. But I am sure the schmoes love it.
I’m normally attracted to muscular/curvy women but that’s just NOT my cup of tea.
[quote]TC wrote:
SkyNett wrote:
Yea, I remember that whole schmoe phenomenon from back in the 90’s - more of the sordid underbelly of bodybuilding, but equal parts amusing and repulsive at the same time. I wonder if that shit is still prevalent today?
Remember Denise Rutkowski? ( I believe that was her name). She comes to mind because she had that kind of female muscularity. She was built like a (male) brick shithouse and was coming up big when she suddenly disappeared from the scene. Wonder what ever happened to her…
Denise? I saw her naked.
She was stripping in San Diego. It was interesting to watch how the other guys perceived her. Big, naked, muscular woman who could move well.
As I recall, she did pretty well with the tips.
Don’t know what happened to her, though.[/quote]
Her glutes were the best.
She was born again or something like that. She had a kid and “got away from it all”. I saw a recent picture of her somewhere and she was still in great shape, just not jacked.
[quote]TC wrote:
I knew this woman. I met her in the late 80’s or early 90’s. Can’t recall her name, but as I recall, this is a Steve Wennerstrom photo from “Women’s Physique World.”
And yes, yes, she looked like that. There were hundreds of women who looked like this in the early 90’s and “Women’s Physique World” glorified them.[/quote]
You’re right. That’s definitely that wooden deck where they did a lot of the WPW shoots.
Hey I like it there is nothing wrong with a tight ass and fake tit’s with some muscle I hate to say it bro’s but I would dive down in a second.