Holy crap.
[quote]rainjack wrote:
Holy crap. [/quote]
My thought was, “Who’s he?” right after, “Holy crap.”
I don’t know what to think of it. If I look at her arms, traps, shoulders, I’m thinking “steroids”. But her face looks very feminine, as does her chest and midsection.
Let’s call the Photoshop experts on this one.
[quote]Robert P. wrote:
I don’t know what to think of it. If I look at her arms, traps, shoulders, I’m thinking “steroids”. But her face looks very feminine, as does her chest and midsection.[/quote]
That chest looks feminine?
I didn’t know boobs had striations…
[quote]rainjack wrote:
Holy crap. [/quote]
“Frighteningly Arousing” comes to mind. Who is that?
[quote]Bauer97 wrote:
Robert P. wrote:
I don’t know what to think of it. If I look at her arms, traps, shoulders, I’m thinking “steroids”. But her face looks very feminine, as does her chest and midsection.
That chest looks feminine?
I didn’t know boobs had striations…[/quote]
Well, more or less…at least she HAS boobs.
I’m thinking…
-
Well done photoshop, but no, TC would never put a photoshopped image up, so…
-
Substitute teacher from hell perhaps?
and is more disconcerting that you have a cute feminine face with the bulging upper body or that she’s wearing a lacy top and skirt?
All in all, the women has put in some time, done some heavy lifting. Have to respect that
[quote]Yo Momma wrote:
Let’s call the Photoshop experts on this one.[/quote]
Seriously. The shading on the nipples isn’t consistent with the rest of the photo, and the lighting on the face isn’t consistent with other parts – like the left bicep. I’m obviously not an expert, but the pic looks as doctored as the subject.
WOW!!! (while putting my coat back on!)
I respect the Iron time, just not my cup-o-tea.
To each his own however.
[quote]Bauer97 wrote:
Robert P. wrote:
I don’t know what to think of it. If I look at her arms, traps, shoulders, I’m thinking “steroids”. But her face looks very feminine, as does her chest and midsection.
That chest looks feminine?
I didn’t know boobs had striations…[/quote]
Sir Titmaster,
Would thy reject they boobies if placed upon thy face?
I’m no expert, but the face doesn’t go with the body. Has anyone else ever seen a woman with a body like that who had a soft, gentle face? I’ve seen women built like that, but NEVER with that kind of face.
Whatever, it’s gross.
[quote]sdspeedracer wrote:
Yo Momma wrote:
Let’s call the Photoshop experts on this one.
Seriously. The shading on the nipples isn’t consistent with the rest of the photo, and the lighting on the face isn’t consistent with other parts – like the left bicep. I’m obviously not an expert, but the pic looks as doctored as the subject.[/quote]
I knew this woman. I met her in the late 80’s or early 90’s. Can’t recall her name, but as I recall, this is a Steve Wennerstrom photo from “Women’s Physique World.”
And yes, yes, she looked like that. There were hundreds of women who looked like this in the early 90’s and “Women’s Physique World” glorified them.
These women had fans–called “schmoes” (usually little guys with smudgy glasses)–who followed them around and paid them a lot of money to treat them like babies (literally babies, with diapers and the whole bit).
I’d hit it.
[quote]TC wrote:
And yes, yes, she looked like that. There were hundreds of women who looked like this in the early 90’s and “Women’s Physique World” glorified them.
These women had fans–called “schmoes” (usually little guys with smudgy glasses)–who followed them around and paid them a lot of money to treat them like babies (literally babies, with diapers and the whole bit).
[/quote]
Well… In that case I guess it’s OK.
I’d hit it! …(very, very, carefully)… Mommy!!
I recognize her from the thread “Powerful Images - Our Own Choices.”
She should be the poster girl in a ‘Steroids For Health’ campaign.
:>
[quote]TC wrote:
sdspeedracer wrote:
Yo Momma wrote:
I knew this woman. I met her in the late 80’s or early 90’s. Can’t recall her name, but as I recall, this is a Steve Wennerstrom photo from “Women’s Physique World.”
And yes, yes, she looked like that. There were hundreds of women who looked like this in the early 90’s and “Women’s Physique World” glorified them.
These women had fans–called “schmoes” (usually little guys with smudgy glasses)–who followed them around and paid them a lot of money to treat them like babies (literally babies, with diapers and the whole bit).
[/quote]
That’s freakin’ hilarious. There you have it – thanks for the clarification.
I’d do her 