WOW
In anticipation of what is to come:
1.) She looks like she never lifted a weight in her whole life.
2.) She lacks triceps and serratus development.
3.) Yes, you would hit it anyway.
4.) But this is a bodybuilding-focused sight, yet the Powerful Images don’t represent this. Rather, the vast majority is mere eye-candy.
5.) True, but it’s called “Powerful Image”. An aesthetic image is by all means powerful.
6.) I know, you already said that you’d hit it anyway.
7.) But look at the “Women with Muscle” thread. Those are muscular AND they look great.
8.) This site is called T-Nation. Not E-Nation. Stop whining.
9.) The pic looks photo shopped. Like the ones of Arnold.
10.) Yes, I bet you’d hit it anyway.
Did I forget something?
She’s not realy my type, but I’d hit it.
If you like women - then you like eye candy.
[quote]michael2507 wrote:
In anticipation of what is to come:
1.) She looks like she never lifted a weight in her whole life.
2.) She lacks triceps and serratus development.
3.) Yes, you would hit it anyway.
4.) But this is a bodybuilding-focused sight, yet the Powerful Images don’t represent this. Rather, the vast majority is mere eye-candy.
5.) True, but it’s called “Powerful Image”. An aesthetic image is by all means powerful.
6.) I know, you already said that you’d hit it anyway.
7.) But look at the “Women with Muscle” thread. Those are muscular AND they look great.
8.) This site is called T-Nation. Not E-Nation. Stop whining.
9.) The pic looks photo shopped. Like the one’s of Arnold.
10.) Yes, I bet you’d hit it anyway.
Did I forget something?[/quote]
I was going to post about the last Powerful Image but it’s gone to the archives now. Who was that?
The question is not, would you hit it.
The question is, would you hit it succesfully? Or would you bounce? Or not bounce at all, depending how you look at it.
Yes it is photo shopped, air brushed, lighing enhanced, etc. etc.
Who cares! She looks awesome! At least her image does… I wonder what she really looks like… Who cares, I like it and I’m not going to meet her, so the fantasy is better with the photoshop.
My 1.5 cents,
Rolo
[quote]michael2507 wrote:
In anticipation of what is to come:
1.) She looks like she never lifted a weight in her whole life.
2.) She lacks triceps and serratus development.
3.) Yes, you would hit it anyway.
4.) But this is a bodybuilding-focused sight, yet the Powerful Images don’t represent this. Rather, the vast majority is mere eye-candy.
5.) True, but it’s called “Powerful Image”. An aesthetic image is by all means powerful.
6.) I know, you already said that you’d hit it anyway.
7.) But look at the “Women with Muscle” thread. Those are muscular AND they look great.
8.) This site is called T-Nation. Not E-Nation. Stop whining.
9.) The pic looks photo shopped. Like the ones of Arnold.
10.) Yes, I bet you’d hit it anyway.
Did I forget something?[/quote]
You’ve just won the TC “Sarcastic But Oh-So Beautiful SOB” award.
Thank you!
i just jacked to this picture.
Yep, she’s cute alright.
Unfortunately, I noticed I pretty much became a “girl” instantly though. Not intending to be catty, I noticed a pet peeve of mine and thought I’d take a informal poll to see just how dumb I am being… (Probably insanely)
I hate it when chicks wear bikini tops (or similar item) and part of their boob shows at the bottom (and not those tiny bikini tops that are really just pasties with string - those don’t bug me). Not sure why exactly. It just seems wrong somehow - like VPL. It would take less than .02 seconds to fix it, so why don’t they?
Anyway, what’s the general feeling here:
A) I notice it and it bugs me.
B) I notice it and I don’t give a damn.
C) I didn’t notice it but since you pointed it out… I don’t like it.
D) I didn’t notice it but since you pointed it out… I don’t give a damn.
E) Uuh, what?
F) Much like dudes dig Camel Toe, I DIG it!
I’m guessing most would go with E.
Wish I knew why this stupid thing bugged me…
That’s funny, I almost immediately noticed the exact same thing, Karma. Wouldn’t you just give that a quick tug to fix it? It’s bugging me like when the person in front of you in church has a long strand of hair stuck on their shirt and you just want to pull it off for them…
Anyway, she’s beautiful, but I wonder about the photoshop factor after seeing that website that was posted a while ago (very interesting). Lately whenever I see models with her bodytype, instead of being envious, I find myself thinking they’re too skinny and toneless - where’s the muscle?
Karma, F
Any time we get to see more of a womans body then the clothing is suppoised to let us it makes us think they are sluts and want to play with our pee pees. 
V
F
She’s so hot I’d it hit even if she was my sister.
Was that outloud?
“I like it when you can see the bottom of her thingies.” Butthead to Beavis, talking about a Van Halen video (might have been ‘California Girls’).
I have to agree with Butthead here. It’s very nice to see the bottom of her “thingies”. Even if you can see more cleavage up top, I prefer seeing the bottom.
I guess it’s something like legs looking much sexier in a short skirt, compared to even shorter shorts.
G) GREAT!
On peeking boobies…
I dig it. A lot. Can’t begin to explain it, but it has always turned me on a little…sigh, okay, a lot. Especially when it’s crop top with the underside of both cans. Like when sorority girls play beach volleyball on Skinamax at 2:30 in the morning…
Nah… for me the Powerful Image from yesterday had me more entranced 
I lover her, and that little smirk on her face.
Crop tops with the undercarriage showing and short skirts are cool - but their appeal is all about the easy access and slut factor…which I dig. A lot.
This is more of a incorrectly adjusted clothing item issue. Visible panty line, crooked backseam pantyhose, thigh highs that are too tight at the top and you can see the soft upper thigh squishing out over the sides even while under a skirt or dress, back boobs created by wearing your bra too tight and your rolls flopping over the strap, granny panties peeking out from low-rise jeans…