Power of Christ

[quote]Go-Rilla wrote:
ZEB wrote:
Go-Rilla wrote:

Probably is pointless.
That thing about the plank…hypocrites,etc…in Matthew 7:5 just won’t sink in with these guys.

Both of the scriptures that you mention speak to FIRST removing that very same sin from YOUR own life, BEFORE you correct a brother Christian.

No one and I mean no one (me included) likes to be corrected about anything. BUT…when I fall (not if) it’s nice to know that there will be a brother Christian there to alert me to this fact which is of great help.

Stop taking scripture out of context.

Thank you.

Read and think about the text found in
Matthew 6: 1-8.

You are getting a lot of attention that I’m sure makes you feel important in your own eyes. At the same time I’d be interested to know if anyone has contacted you about how they might give their hearts to Christ based on your behavior in this forum.

[/quote]

Hey Go-rilla, consdier Matthew 28:
[i]
All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth. ?Go ye therefore, and teach?b all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: ?Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world. Amen. Matthew 28:18-20
[/i]

Obviously, this COMMAND of Jesus Christ cannot be done in private, so your “biblical interpretation” cannot be correct. Sorry, but good try…

[quote]Go-Rilla wrote:
terribleivan wrote:
Go-Rilla wrote:
ZEB wrote:
Go-Rilla wrote:

Probably is pointless.
That thing about the plank…hypocrites,etc…in Matthew 7:5 just won’t sink in with these guys.

Both of the scriptures that you mention speak to FIRST removing that very same sin from YOUR own life, BEFORE you correct a brother Christian.

No one and I mean no one (me included) likes to be corrected about anything. BUT…when I fall (not if) it’s nice to know that there will be a brother Christian there to alert me to this fact which is of great help.

Stop taking scripture out of context.

Thank you.

Read and think about the text found in
Matthew 6: 1-8.

You are getting a lot of attention that I’m sure makes you feel important in your own eyes. At the same time I’d be interested to know if anyone has contacted you about how they might give their hearts to Christ based on your behavior in this forum.

Those verses seem out of context with this thread. Please explain your thoughts. Also, please answer my previous post.

Yes mr. self proclaimed most high.
I am a Christian. I do not think you have a clue in regard to winning people to Christ. Satan can and will use people just like you to drive away those who might have a real desire to
understand and accept God’s grace and love. If you wish to be a Christian role model you have a terribly long way to go.
[/quote]

I thought you were against “judging” others. Can we assume that you are against this except and only when YOU do it?

A bit inconsistent I’d say…

[quote]All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth. ?Go ye therefore, and teach?b all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: ?Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world. Amen. Matthew 28:18-20

Obviously, this COMMAND of Jesus Christ cannot be done in private, so your “biblical interpretation” cannot be correct. Sorry, but good try…
[/quote]

Come on. Surely you know about context. Your quote is Jesus talking to his disciples after resurrection. What does it have to do with anyone else?

Have you self-appointed yourself as a disciple now?

You are going to have to work a lot harder than you have been I’m afraid… your interpretations are suspect and out of context.

[quote]vroom wrote:
I can’t believe I’m quoting scripture, what is the world coming to!!!

So, who would like to take a stab at reconciling the following with the fundamentalist views presented earlier in this thread?

Luke 10:25[i]
And, behold, a certain lawyer stood up, and tempted him, saying, Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?

He said unto him, What is written in the law? how readest thou?

And he answering said, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy strength, and with all thy mind; and thy neighbour as thyself.

And he said unto him, Thou hast answered right: this do, and thou shalt live.[/i]

Also, it would appear that children, who have obviously never even learned to read, much less had an opportunity to read anything approaching a bible, will be received:

Luke 18:15[i]
And they brought unto him also infants, that he would touch them: but when his disciples saw it, they rebuked them.

But Jesus called them unto him, and said, Suffer little children to come unto me, and forbid them not: for of such is the kingdom of God.
[/i]
And again, in Luke, we see Jesus telling people how to comport themselves for an eternal afterlife:

Luke 18:18[i]
And a certain ruler asked him, saying, Good Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?

And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? none is good, save one, that is, God.

Thou knowest the commandments, Do not commit adultery, Do not kill, Do not steal, Do not bear false witness, Honour thy father and thy mother.

And he said, All these have I kept from my youth up.

Now when Jesus heard these things, he said unto him, Yet lackest thou one thing: sell all that thou hast, and distribute unto the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come, follow me.

And when he heard this, he was very sorrowful: for he was very rich.

And when Jesus saw that he was very sorrowful, he said, How hardly shall they that have riches enter into the kingdom of God!

For it is easier for a camel to go through a needle’s eye, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.
[/i]
Alternately, here we have James dealing with the need for works as well as faith. Basically, faith is not enough on it’s own. This doesn’t seem to sit well with fundamentalist posts above either.

James 2:10[i]
For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all.

For he that said, Do not commit adultery, said also, Do not kill. Now if thou commit no adultery, yet if thou kill, thou art become a transgressor of the law.

So speak ye, and so do, as they that shall be judged by the law of liberty.

For he shall have judgment without mercy, that hath shewed no mercy; and mercy rejoiceth against judgment.

What doth it profit, my brethren, though a man say he hath faith, and have not works? can faith save him?

If a brother or sister be naked, and destitute of daily food,

And one of you say unto them, Depart in peace, be ye warmed and filled; notwithstanding ye give them not those things which are needful to the body; what doth it profit?

Even so faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone.[/i]

Here we have Jesus talking about the greatest in the kingdom of heaven. How could little children even have enough religious knowledge to qualify according to the rules of the fundamentalists?

Matthew[i]
At the same time came the disciples unto Jesus, saying, Who is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven?

And Jesus called a little child unto him, and set him in the midst of them,

And said, Verily I say unto you, Except ye be converted, and become as little children, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven.

Whosoever therefore shall humble himself as this little child, the same is greatest in the kingdom of heaven.
[/i]
So, with all that said, I would like to see a fundamentalist explain to me why living a righteous life, following the commandments, and loving your neighbor is not enough.

Jesus himself apparently said it was. If you wish to claim Jesus was mistaken, I would suggest that the bible certainly contains inconsistencies.[/quote]

Vroom,

Good try and I like the use of Scripture, but you didn’t finish the story, because there is another rendition of this story in the Gospel of Luke 18:22-24…


?And a certain ruler asked him, saying, Good Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life? ?And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? none is good, save one, that is, God. ?Thou knowest the commandments, Do not commit adultery, Do not kill, Do not steal, Do not bear false witness, Honour thy father and thy mother. 21?And he said, All these have I kept from my youth up. ?Now when Jesus heard these things, he said unto him, Yet lackest thou one thing: sell all that thou hast, and distribute unto the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come, follow me. 23?And when he heard this, he was very sorrowful: for he was very rich. 24?And when Jesus saw that he was very sorrowful, he said, How hardly shall they that have riches enter into the kingdom of God!

Let me point out a couple of things:

(1) The young man wanted to “inherit” eternal life. It cannot be bought or inherited from anyone.

(2) The commandments were no problem for this pious Jewish man – he kept all of them he said from the time he was a teenager or a young boy.

(3) The young man’s question – “what lacketh I yet?” – shows that realized himself that there was something missing from his “religious experience” that couldn’t be fulfilled form keeping the commandments.

(4) Jesus requires us to take a step of faith – in the case of this rich young man, it was to sell all the things he had and give it to the poor. The reason for this is that the young man was trusting his possessions and riches, instead of trusting God. In fact, I would go a step further, his having such great riches, actually in a way prevented him from coming to Jesus, even though he left “sorrowful.”

So, keeping God’s Law – which is impossible – is not enough. Doing your best is not enough. Faith in Christ is what you need to do.

[quote]vroom wrote:
I’m still waiting for a fundie to enlighten me as to why Jesus didn’t know what he was talking about…

Anyone?[/quote]

Answered, please read it and THINK about it before you knee-jerk write a respone Vroom.

[quote]vroom wrote:
All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth. ?Go ye therefore, and teach?b all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: ?Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world. Amen. Matthew 28:18-20

Obviously, this COMMAND of Jesus Christ cannot be done in private, so your “biblical interpretation” cannot be correct. Sorry, but good try…

Come on. Surely you know about context. Your quote is Jesus talking to his disciples after resurrection. What does it have to do with anyone else?

Have you self-appointed yourself as a disciple now?

You are going to have to work a lot harder than you have been I’m afraid… your interpretations are suspect and out of context.[/quote]

Yes, I am a disciple of Christ. A disciple means a follower of and is, in the CONTEXT of the New Testament, synonomous with a Christian.

quote The young man wanted to “inherit” eternal life. It cannot be bought or inherited from anyone.

(2) The commandments were no problem for this pious Jewish man – he kept all of them he said from the time he was a teenager or a young boy.

(3) The young man’s question – “what lacketh I yet?” – shows that realized himself that there was something missing from his “religious experience” that couldn’t be fulfilled form keeping the commandments.

(4) Jesus requires us to take a step of faith – in the case of this rich young man, it was to sell all the things he had and give it to the poor. The reason for this is that the young man was trusting his possessions and riches, instead of trusting God. In fact, I would go a step further, his having such great riches, actually in a way prevented him from coming to Jesus, even though he left “sorrowful.”
[/quote]

Ha! See, now you are making shit up. You can’t simply use the words in scripture as if they are current common english words.

Look again, the young man did not ask what he then lacked.

And Jesus did not say that he required an act of faith. You are creating your own interpretation and meaning to suit you.

Another interpretation is that rich people have horded their riches, at the expense of those around them, not using their riches to benefit their neighbors.

Somehow, combined with the fact that Jesus is always preaching to love thy neighbor, and the important of acts or works, I think my interpretation is more likely.

Especially given that this is not the only time Jesus provides the same basic answer to a person asking it of him. Perhaps you should reread the entire post a little more carefully.

It is so frustrating talking to you fundies.

You elevate yourself too much.

The message you quoted was him talking to his closest cadre… not some mass of people. As much as you may wish it, you cannot grant yourself such “closeness” or “status”.

[quote]thunderbolt23 wrote:
So here is the last Atomic Dog article, from the proprietors of this website:

http://www.T-Nation.com/readTopic.do?id=967425

This article includes discussion of sex, evolution, lust, and plastic surgery. I think a swear word may have even been used.

So, ‘true’ Christians - where was the righteous protest of the article? Where was the outspoken condemnation of such blatant sinful indulgences? What about the discussion of sexual evolution, all of which stands in contrast to the inerring belief of the ‘true’ Christian?

Not a peep.

Yet, here, we are entreated to smug complaints that we don’t speak up and condemn sinful behavior, that we tacitly accept ‘atheists’ point of view because of our interpreted silence.

The self-professed ‘true’ Christians here log on to T-Nation surrounded by this stuff daily, and yet none of them chimed in the most recent Atomic Dog to chastise TC for not being a ‘true’ Christian. Nor do they act with the kind of consistency they demand in this thread - but they profess a standard that any ‘true’ Christian must speak out whenever confronted with inquity.

Even our proud ‘true’ Christians don’t live up to the standards they stridently condemn the rest of us for not displaying - and I can’t think of a worse example of Christian behavior.[/quote]

Why do they avoid responding to this?

[quote]DPH wrote:
to be saved all someone has to do is accept Jesus as their lord and savior…

ACTS (other than accepting Jesus) has NOTHING to do with whether someone is to be saved or not…[/quote]

Actually, that’s not what Jesus himself said. You’re quoting men who twisted his words around to suit their own purposes.

What Jesus said was that a person’s acts have EVERYTHING to do with whether or not they will be saved. Read his own words in Matthew 25:31-46, for starters.

If you’re going to claim to be a follower of Christ, I don’t understand why you (and so many others) grasp so eagerly onto the words of Paul, or Martin Luther, rather than the words of Christ himself.

Actually, I do understand. It’s easy to think that you’ll be saved by faith alone. It’s a lot harder to get off your butt, feed and cloth the hungry, visit and care for the sick and those in prison, turn the other cheek, forgive your enemy, etc.

So you all turn from the teachings of Jesus to someone else’s spin on those teachings - something more watered down, more palatable.

[quote]steveo5801 wrote:
Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and thou shalt be saved.

This is a quote from the Bible and it is the only way that one becomes a true Christian.[/quote]

Nope. Not what Jesus said. See my previous post.

[quote]terribleivan wrote:

2)Never seen on the threads taking a strong moral stand (to my knowledge at least). In fact, they all seem to be among the most liberal individuals in the forum (from what they have posted)

[/quote]

Am I not pro-choice?

For the legalisation of weed?

For gay marriage?

I would not call posting on a forum “taking a moral stand” but if you want to call it that, I did that…

Unless of course you determine what is a “moral stand”…

[quote]Professor X wrote:

Why do they avoid responding to this?
[/quote]

Prof X, I wonder the same thing.

[quote]thunderbolt23 wrote:
So here is the last Atomic Dog article, from the proprietors of this website:

http://www.T-Nation.com/readTopic.do?id=967425

This article includes discussion of sex, evolution, lust, and plastic surgery. I think a swear word may have even been used.

So, ‘true’ Christians - where was the righteous protest of the article? Where was the outspoken condemnation of such blatant sinful indulgences? What about the discussion of sexual evolution, all of which stands in contrast to the inerring belief of the ‘true’ Christian?

Not a peep.

Yet, here, we are entreated to smug complaints that we don’t speak up and condemn sinful behavior, that we tacitly accept ‘atheists’ point of view because of our interpreted silence.

The self-professed ‘true’ Christians here log on to T-Nation surrounded by this stuff daily, and yet none of them chimed in the most recent Atomic Dog to chastise TC for not being a ‘true’ Christian. Nor do they act with the kind of consistency they demand in this thread - but they profess a standard that any ‘true’ Christian must speak out whenever confronted with inquity.

Even our proud ‘true’ Christians don’t live up to the standards they stridently condemn the rest of us for not displaying - and I can’t think of a worse example of Christian behavior.[/quote]

Why do they avoid responding to this?

And as for the propriety of context, i.e., there is a time and place to bring it up,along with recognition of the audience:

“Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn again and rend you.”

-from the Sermon on the Mount, Matthew 7:06

[quote]Professor X wrote:
What I want to know is if they actually think they are preaching to or converting anyone by acting the way they are. [/quote]

Any conversion would probably be away from their brand of religion. It takes a special kind of stupid to be attracted by the hate and bigotry they keep spewing.

[quote]thunderbolt23 wrote:
And as for the propriety of context, i.e., there is a time and place to bring it up,along with recognition of the audience:

“Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn again and rend you.”

-from the Sermon on the Mount, Matthew 7:06

[/quote]

That was the one I was thinking of but forgot where it was found. My dad used to make a point of this. As a preacher, he made it clear that while he would witness to anyone who asked, to preach to those unwilling to listen is actually against what God intended.

[quote]pookie wrote:
Headhunter wrote:
Isn’t Pookie from the sport of Curling?

No, it’s from full-contact chess.

[/quote]

I know its either that or ice dancing. Saw those ‘sports’ on the winter olympics and seems they mentioned that.

I could be wrong.

See, unlike others here, I will admit when I’m in error. I don’t throw a blanket of bullshit or pass it off as ‘sarcasm’ or ‘humour’.

[quote]thunderbolt23 wrote:
So here is the last Atomic Dog article, from the proprietors of this website:

http://www.T-Nation.com/readTopic.do?id=967425

This article includes discussion of sex, evolution, lust, and plastic surgery. I think a swear word may have even been used.

So, ‘true’ Christians - where was the righteous protest of the article? Where was the outspoken condemnation of such blatant sinful indulgences? What about the discussion of sexual evolution, all of which stands in contrast to the inerring belief of the ‘true’ Christian?

Not a peep.

Thunder,

You are stealing Profeesor X’s ‘thunder’! :slight_smile:

Its his job here to assign sins of ommission to us ignorant fools.

Get it right – Vroom is the censor, X is the high priest assigning sin, and harris is comic relief.
:slight_smile:
HH

[quote]vroom wrote:
Once I develop those, can I use them to excuse myself when I say stupid and/or evil things too?

I think you had best hope so…[/quote]

So either you’re admitting that’s what YOU do, or you didn’t understand what I wrote.

Pathetic.