[quote]cap’nsalty wrote:
vroom wrote:
Despite Rainjack’s usual nonsense, you can’t discount the past and how much stirring the hornets nest has had.
–
However, the Islamic world proves itself ready to enact violence against anyone and anything that doesn’t follow extremist dogma.
What the fuck is up with Islam that it isn’t, in the majority, simply shocked at what supposed proponents of Islam are up to on a daily basis?
Hell, from all the claptrap people tell us about Islam here, in discussions, it is supposedly a religion of peace that would not support such actions.
I’m not seeing it…
This is the part I don’t understand. I’ve heard of Muslims who don’t necesarrily support the violence, but I’ve heard pretty much no one speak out against it. Where is the outrage?
If I was a member of a supposed religion of peace, I would be doing my utmost to ensure that it wasn’t tainted by the bloodlust of the radical sects. But the muslim community appears to be silent on this issue.
So in my mind this leaves two options: either Islam promotes war, or it’s a weak and useless religion that promotes nothing. [/quote]
Someone already gave a similar answer, but a big part of it comes down to media recognition. Best example is that a little over a year ago representatives of every sect in Islam came together (maybe unprecedented) in Amman to condemn terrorism and to state that fatwas and calls for jihad can only be issued by educated clerics. Bin Laden, Zarqawi, and the like, contrary to what some in America may believe, are not part of that category.
Unfortunately, know what happened the very next day? 7/7 bombings in London. Kinda tends to grab the headlines.
Having said all that, I’m kind of skeptical about Islam being a “religion of peace.” It needs a reformation, to accomodate itself to the modern world, which Christianity and Judaism did long ago.