[quote]dmaddox wrote:
[quote]UtahLama wrote:
[quote]Varqanir wrote:
[quote]UtahLama wrote:
You sound like my grandfather when I was a kid (101st airborne) and I am in total agreement…it’s amazing how many people will argue to the death that the Japanese were somehow victims in WWII.[/quote]
“The Japanese” is a very widely-encompassing term. You pointedly excluded the Japanese Americans from the group of non-victims, and rightly so: they had no part to play in the bombing of Pearl Harbor or the invasion of China. But neither did the civilian population of Japan.
A military dictatorship led by a man considered to be semi-divine does not put its military strategies to public vote, nor does it attempt to get public opinion on its side before acting.
Japanese civilians had no access to the Internet or CNN. Even listening to Voice of America could get you arrested or shot. All they knew about their government’s activities were what the government chose to tell them. Obviously, the government chose to tell them very little except that it was fighting those evil devil barbarians who were hindering Japan from expanding into new territories.
So one can hardly blame the starving, impoverished civilians in Tokyo for thinking, as the canisters of burning napalm fell on them as they slept, that they might be the victims of a murderous imperial power come to wipe them out, for no good reason.
One can hardly blame my children’s grandfather, seeing the bodies o his elementary school classmates lying on the riverbank riddled with bullets after being strafed by a Grumman Hellcat in broad daylight (take-home lesson: if your city is being firebombed, do NOT take shelter by the river) for feeling just a little bit like a victim.
And one can hardly blame the survivors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, seeing their city and their families reduced to ash, as they recovered from their third degree burns, and slowly died from radiation poisoning, that they personally had done little to deserve what they got.
Yes, the Japanese military government behaved extremely badly in the 1930s and 40s. They were atrocious bastards and deserved the hangings they got. The soldiers and sailors of the Imperial Army and Navy committed unspeakable crimes wherever they went, and if there is any justice they will suffer for it in whatever afterlife they might believe in.
The women and children and old people suffering under this brutal regime, however, were not party to these crimes. Strategically, bombing Tokyo, Hiroshima and Nagasaki made good sense. It forced the Emperor to capitulate and saved the Allied forces from having to mount a full-scale extermination of the Japanese population on the ground.
But the Japanese civilians were definitely victims twice over: first of their own government’s insane policies, and secondly of the consequences of these policies. [/quote]
All very good and eloquently put points.
I was actually referring to people who are not from Japan saying that the U.S. was out of line bombing Japan, and that they were somehow supposed to sacrifice 1 million+ troops (the best estimate to take the Japanese mainland) rather than end the war the way they did.[/quote]
Those people would have preferred us sacrificing 1 million of our young men. Why you ask? Because an entire generation of men would have been gone like what is going on in the Middle East. It keeps us down.
[/quote]
In many a Euro/liberal opinion, the U.S. can do nothing right.