Planned Parenthood

[quote]countingbeans wrote:

[quote]oldstyle00 wrote:
You guys are throwing out in my mind hypotheticals that make no sense to the topic. Reason being is the main flux of this whole argument is when people believe life begins. [/quote]

Again, link one single authoritative paper that disagrees with the following:

A unique human life begins at conception.

Until you can prove that wrong, you are wrong and I am right. It isn’t a matter of opinion, but rather cold, hard scientific fact.

Ectopic pregnancy refutes your argument in most cases. There are some cases where it does develop into a fetus, but most times it doesn’t. That zygote would not be considered a human and in the vast vast majority of cases not develop into a fetus either.

The issue of â??personhoodâ?? is a theological and personal rather than medical or scientific question. While current teaching by the Vatican is that a fertilized egg is a â??personâ?? with full rights under the law, other religious traditions disagree. Jewish law and tradition does not recognize an egg, embryo, or fetus as a person or full human being, but rather â??part and parcel of the pregnant womenâ??s body,â?? the rights of which are subjugated to the health and well-being of the mother until birth. The United Methodist Church recognizes the primacy of the rights and health of women. Islamic scholars, like Jewish scholars, have debated the issues of â??ensoulmentâ?? and personhood, and continue to do so with no over-riding consensus.

And all those people are wrong, just like you. You can believe that Bill Buckner was the best hitter of all time, but the stats wont’ back you up. You can believe a bird is a rock, but the science won’t back you up. You can believe 2+2=5 but every single time you hold two apples in each hand you’ll only end up with 4.

You and anyone can believe “life begins” at any arbitrary point on the development timeline, but you can’t prove it. All you’ll ever be able to prove is a unique human being is formed at conception. And you’ve already admitted it is alive.

Your entire argument is utter shit, and you are smart enough to know it. Just admit, for the love of Christ you are okay with the whole sale slaughter of innocent humans in the name of convenience and be done with it. There is shame in it, unless you aren’t into the whole morality bit, then there is no shame. But there is, without question, shame in pretending people aren’t people in order to rationalize something you wouldn’t condone if the baby were out of the womb and dressed in a onezie.

And science proves you wrong, and us right.

Sure, but that ignores the giant elephant in the room. And that elephant is democrats and their significant problem with treating everyone equal, throughout history.

People that don’t believe that are intentionally ignorant of basic scientific fact. It’s biology 101. Any textbook in the world not written by the Three Stooges will confirm it so.

[quote] Obviously I believe the fetus growing inside is a human and that it is living (cells are living, bacteria are living).
[/quote]

So you believe it is a unique human being from inception, but you don’t?

what?[/quote]

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

Then what is it?
[/quote]

A zygote , a fetus a gob of goo
[/quote]

[quote]oldstyle00 wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]oldstyle00 wrote:
Obviously I believe the fetus growing inside is a human and that it is living (cells are living, bacteria are living).
[/quote]

Once again, if it is a living human that if left alone 9.9999999/10 will be born alive and healthy is it okay to kill it?

Oh, right, it’s a living human, but it isn’t a person… Like how slaves weren’t afforded personhood in our not to distant past. Do you really not see why most of us this is absurd? [/quote]

You guys are finding it absurd because we have 2 different definitions of when life begins. “Human life”, “personhood” whatever you want to call it. The difference between the analogy of slaves or jews is they are already born have brain activity and are alive. If the definition of “human death” is the lack of brain activity measured on an EEG. Then “human life” would thus begin when brain activity is measured on an EEG (many people believe it is when the fetus can live outside the womb). I have an open mind and can see things from your guys perspective, but I can’t get the same reciprocation? [/quote]

Your definition of when life begins is arbitrary and once again saying death occurs when the brain ceases to function and extrapolating that life must then begin when brain function begins is short sighted at best. At death the brain shuts down, cells begin to die, everything shuts down and dies. Pre-brain function the cells are not only living, but thriving. They are growing, multiply, becoming intricate organs including the brain. The heart is already beating at this point.

The beginning of life =/= the opposite of death.

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:
YAWN:)
[/quote]

What, losing make you sleepy?[/quote]
[/quote]

You pretty much know you won when people start bringing in completely unrelated shit and try to make it relate. Abortion?! Well the Palestinians, so there![/quote]

You know it pretty bad when all you can do is snipe , no substance , no discussion , no point , no stated opinion , just snipe
[/quote]

Logic, reason, science and fact have no effect on you. You just want the option to murder a baby should you happen to knock a bitch up because you don’t like rubbers and you won’t stand up and be a man about it.
That’s pretty much the long and the short of it.

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

Then what is it?
[/quote]

A zygote , a fetus a gob of goo
[/quote]
[/quote]

Thankfully I only see Pitts stupidity when others quote him.

[quote]oldstyle00 wrote:

[quote]jbpick86 wrote:

[quote]oldstyle00 wrote:
It is ok because by definition the fetus is not a “human life” at that point. [/quote]

Using your own argument, I have already shown you were this is incorrect. Try again.[/quote]

Where did you prove my argument to be incorrect? You haven’t posted a single link to EEGs on fetuses being largely incorrect. You say they are incorrect, but thats just stating your opinion. There is a lot know about fetal development its been studied a lot. Most experts as far as I have read know the timeline of fetal development (when things happen, when brainwave occur, when organs are formed, etc.) I would like to read any links you have. I am not trying to start fights attacking character or person attacks like other people, just trying to have a healthy debate.[/quote]

Science. Get some.
https://embryology.med.unsw.edu.au/embryology/index.php/Main_Page

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
Baby born without brain brain turns 2 - YouTube [/quote]

Is this a person?

[quote]oldstyle00 wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]oldstyle00 wrote:
Obviously I believe the fetus growing inside is a human and that it is living (cells are living, bacteria are living).
[/quote]

Once again, if it is a living human that if left alone 9.9999999/10 will be born alive and healthy is it okay to kill it?

Oh, right, it’s a living human, but it isn’t a person… Like how slaves weren’t afforded personhood in our not to distant past. Do you really not see why most of us this is absurd? [/quote]

You guys are finding it absurd because we have 2 different definitions of when life begins. “Human life”, “personhood” whatever you want to call it. The difference between the analogy of slaves or jews is they are already born have brain activity and are alive. If the definition of “human death” is the lack of brain activity measured on an EEG. Then “human life” would thus begin when brain activity is measured on an EEG (many people believe it is when the fetus can live outside the womb). I have an open mind and can see things from your guys perspective, but I can’t get the same reciprocation? [/quote]

You want respect? Be right, quit pretending that facts are not the facts, drawing arbitrary lines in the sand and making shit up. Then you get respect.

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
Baby born without brain brain turns 2 - YouTube [/quote]

Is this a person? [/quote]

of course , what is you point ?

[quote]oldstyle00 wrote:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:

[quote]oldstyle00 wrote:
You guys are throwing out in my mind hypotheticals that make no sense to the topic. Reason being is the main flux of this whole argument is when people believe life begins. [/quote]

Again, link one single authoritative paper that disagrees with the following:

A unique human life begins at conception.

Until you can prove that wrong, you are wrong and I am right. It isn’t a matter of opinion, but rather cold, hard scientific fact. [/quote]

Ectopic pregnancy refutes your argument in most cases. [/quote]

How on earth does the location of implantation make the organism a) not a unique human or b) not alive?

The location of implantation has jack and shit to do with WHAT is implanting. Just because it unfortunately doesn’t implant in an area conducive to survival (or safety for the mother) doesn’t make it not a unique human being.

I mean, does that mean people who live in Alaska aren’t humans? Or people who live in the Amazon? It’s odd to live there… So they aren’t people anymore because of where they are?

Did Armstrong stop becoming a person when he landed on the Moon?

This is absurd.

Based on what criteria? Your feels? Because it certainly isn’t based on science. What is it then? A dog? A tree? Acorn? Oh I know, it’s a fish?

Whether conception happens in the body or a test tube, or a tea cup, it is still a unique human being at conception. Which you can’t prove otherwise.

Fucks I give about what a religion thinks is a person: zero.

I don’t care what religion thinks what. I care about the fact science dictates it is a unique human being from conception. This is irrefutable fact.

Personhood is made up nonsense used to justify slavery, holocaust and now abortion.

The only debate is whether all people should be treated equal or not. Democrats say no, they shouldn’t. I disagree. This is the only time opinion matters. Because if someone is of the opinion that life doesn’t begin until some other point than conception they are dead wrong. And if someone is of the opinion that a person isn’t a person based on how old they are, or what they look like, they are no better than a slave owner, segregationist or a Nazi…

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:
YAWN:)
[/quote]

What, losing make you sleepy?[/quote]
[/quote]

You pretty much know you won when people start bringing in completely unrelated shit and try to make it relate. Abortion?! Well the Palestinians, so there![/quote]

You know it pretty bad when all you can do is snipe , no substance , no discussion , no point , no stated opinion , just snipe
[/quote]

Logic, reason, science and fact have no effect on you. You just want the option to murder a baby should you happen to knock a bitch up because you don’t like rubbers and you won’t stand up and be a man about it.
That’s pretty much the long and the short of it.[/quote]

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

Then what is it?
[/quote]

A zygote , a fetus a gob of goo
[/quote]
[/quote]

your thought process let you down again:( so sad :frowning:

old styl , you will see it their way or you will be marginalized , they control the board . You will find a couple that will disagree on minor points , This thread will show you the method of operation of the CJS

Right from WebMD:

Ectopic pregnancies can be scary and sad. The baby probably can’t survive –

So… Yeah, that doesn’t refute shit.

[quote]countingbeans wrote:
Right from WebMD:

Ectopic pregnancies can be scary and sad. The baby probably can’t survive –

So… Yeah, that doesn’t refute shit. [/quote]

A baby isn’t a person Beans, come on…

[quote]countingbeans wrote:

[quote]oldstyle00 wrote:
I am not trying to start fights attacking character or person attacks like other people, [/quote]

We’ve been having this debate for years, and you’ve brought nothing new as far a rationalization to the table. Then add in Pitt’s dumb nonsense we’ve destroyed over and over and over, which he clings to because he gets some sort of kick out of trolling these treads with non-turths… And people get frustrated.

Again, you’re a smart person. (Assuming you meet the current lefty definition of person:
a) Survived the womb Yes
b) don’t own a gun Own a gun several
c) aren’t rich, but if are support democrats Middle class
d) hate on rich people Don’t hate rich people
e) speak about the LGBT community like they are the future of mankind Have several friends that are homosexual…defend their rights not that they are the future of mankind.
f) think anyone right or republican is evil by default Don’t think that at all both sides can be evil and stupid.
g) are intolerant of any idea that doesn’t fit your narrative, while claiming to be the tolerant ones. I will listen to anyones point of view…
h) are a person of color, and if not, think they need special treatment and their hand held to accomplish anything. Not a person of color, don’t think they need their handheld, but do think they need to be treated more fairly as far as incarcerations go for non violent crimes.
i) don’t understand how h makes you actually racist Not racist
j) ignore science when convenient, but claim you want your laws based off science. nope
k) claim people shouldn’t “legislate morality” while pushing to legislate your own morality, and ignore the fact most laws are in fact legislated morality. Agree with you except the legislate my own morality
l) relieved when someone you don’t like “switches parties” because now it’s okay to bad mouth them, and don’t understand that the actions of the individual do not reflect on the whole. Never had that happen and try not to bad mouth people. I am to busy for that.
[/quote]

[quote]pittbulll wrote:
old styl , you will see it their way or you will be marginalized , they control the board . You will find a couple that will disagree on minor points , This thread will show you the method of operation of the CJS[/quote]

There is no hope to even hear a different point of view.

[quote]oldstyle00 wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:
old styl , you will see it their way or you will be marginalized , they control the board . You will find a couple that will disagree on minor points , This thread will show you the method of operation of the CJS[/quote]

There is no hope to even hear a different point of view.[/quote]

Pittbull’s just mad because he’s the town clown.