Planned Parenthood

Off Topic Politics & World Issues
661

[quote]jbpick86 wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]jbpick86 wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

A little story where a little well spent money reduced unwanted births and abortions by a whopping 40% . What do you think will happen when you do away with PPH , you will get a shit load of Democratic voters in 18 years:)[/quote]

You are an idiot. Private donor provided the program, program had nothing to do with Planned Parenthood. Way to make a non-point.[/quote]

You are a dumb fuck simpleton and make no sense
[/quote]

Because I pointed out your article had nothing to do with Planned Parenthood, making your comment regarding them seem out of place and nonsensical?? If you don’t understand that from my previous comment, well I can’t really help your lack of reading comprehension.

Either that or you were being intellectually dishonest about the article. So which is it? Do you have trouble reading or do you purposely misrepresent information for your own purposes?[/quote]

No dip shit , it has to do with birth control and it’s availability , If I have to connect those dots for you , you are like USMC , brainless:)

662

[quote]jbpick86 wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]jbpick86 wrote:

You are arguing for both sides of the same issue,
[/quote]

Bullshit , I am arguing common sense , you are arguing the opposing of what I am but yours is also the opposite of common sense , go figure
[/quote]

You are arguing your own moral judgments based on what is acceptable/unacceptable to you. You have no consistency in your reasoning.

Lets try a series of questions to illustrate it for everyones amusement…

Why are you in favor of women being able to have unrestricted abortions?[/quote]

You are arguing just the opposite so you are arguing against your own moral judgement too , then:)

I don’t know if you have realized this yet or not:) eye roll but life is not consistent , it is more complicated than that . If you need any other help feel free to ask

663

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]jbpick86 wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]jbpick86 wrote:

You are arguing for both sides of the same issue,
[/quote]

Bullshit , I am arguing common sense , you are arguing the opposing of what I am but yours is also the opposite of common sense , go figure
[/quote]

You are arguing your own moral judgments based on what is acceptable/unacceptable to you. You have no consistency in your reasoning.

Lets try a series of questions to illustrate it for everyones amusement…

Why are you in favor of women being able to have unrestricted abortions?[/quote]

You are arguing just the opposite so you are arguing against your own moral judgement too , then:)

I don’t know if you have realized this yet or not:) eye roll but life is not consistent , it is more complicated than that . If you need any other help feel free to ask [/quote]

I am making the argument that people should be free to do what they want as long as it doesn’t deprive some one else of their right to life or liberty.

You are arguing that certain people should be able to do what they want, some people shouldn’t be, and some people should be held responsible for the first groups bad choices.

By the way, one day you will grow up and join the real world when you get a real job. Then you will see what we have been trying to tell you. Feel free to thank me for my patience with you at that point.

664

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]jbpick86 wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]jbpick86 wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

A little story where a little well spent money reduced unwanted births and abortions by a whopping 40% . What do you think will happen when you do away with PPH , you will get a shit load of Democratic voters in 18 years:)[/quote]

You are an idiot. Private donor provided the program, program had nothing to do with Planned Parenthood. Way to make a non-point.[/quote]

You are a dumb fuck simpleton and make no sense
[/quote]

Because I pointed out your article had nothing to do with Planned Parenthood, making your comment regarding them seem out of place and nonsensical?? If you don’t understand that from my previous comment, well I can’t really help your lack of reading comprehension.

Either that or you were being intellectually dishonest about the article. So which is it? Do you have trouble reading or do you purposely misrepresent information for your own purposes?[/quote]

No dip shit , it has to do with birth control and it’s availability , If I have to connect those dots for you , you are like USMC , brainless:)
[/quote]

Congrats, you totally missed the point, but keep it up with the insults, I am sure that makes people think you are smarter than you seem. And if you could find your own damn dots and connect them, this conversation would have been over before I got involved but we have all pretty much given up on that by now.

665

[quote]jbpick86 wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]jbpick86 wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]jbpick86 wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

A little story where a little well spent money reduced unwanted births and abortions by a whopping 40% . What do you think will happen when you do away with PPH , you will get a shit load of Democratic voters in 18 years:)[/quote]

You are an idiot. Private donor provided the program, program had nothing to do with Planned Parenthood. Way to make a non-point.[/quote]

You are a dumb fuck simpleton and make no sense
[/quote]

Because I pointed out your article had nothing to do with Planned Parenthood, making your comment regarding them seem out of place and nonsensical?? If you don’t understand that from my previous comment, well I can’t really help your lack of reading comprehension.

Either that or you were being intellectually dishonest about the article. So which is it? Do you have trouble reading or do you purposely misrepresent information for your own purposes?[/quote]

No dip shit , it has to do with birth control and it’s availability , If I have to connect those dots for you , you are like USMC , brainless:)
[/quote]

Congrats, you totally missed the point, but keep it up with the insults, I am sure that makes people think you are smarter than you seem. And if you could find your own damn dots and connect them, this conversation would have been over before I got involved but we have all pretty much given up on that by now.
[/quote]

Just let it go. Pittbull is by far the dumbest poster on this site and probably the entire internet.

666

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]jbpick86 wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]jbpick86 wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]jbpick86 wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

A little story where a little well spent money reduced unwanted births and abortions by a whopping 40% . What do you think will happen when you do away with PPH , you will get a shit load of Democratic voters in 18 years:)[/quote]

You are an idiot. Private donor provided the program, program had nothing to do with Planned Parenthood. Way to make a non-point.[/quote]

You are a dumb fuck simpleton and make no sense
[/quote]

Because I pointed out your article had nothing to do with Planned Parenthood, making your comment regarding them seem out of place and nonsensical?? If you don’t understand that from my previous comment, well I can’t really help your lack of reading comprehension.

Either that or you were being intellectually dishonest about the article. So which is it? Do you have trouble reading or do you purposely misrepresent information for your own purposes?[/quote]

No dip shit , it has to do with birth control and it’s availability , If I have to connect those dots for you , you are like USMC , brainless:)
[/quote]

Congrats, you totally missed the point, but keep it up with the insults, I am sure that makes people think you are smarter than you seem. And if you could find your own damn dots and connect them, this conversation would have been over before I got involved but we have all pretty much given up on that by now.
[/quote]

Just let it go. Pittbull is by far the dumbest poster on this site and probably the entire internet. [/quote]

Abortion issues are trending on social media recently. Check out some peoples opinions/comments on there and you will appreciate the intelligence of pittbull.

667

[quote]sufiandy wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]jbpick86 wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]jbpick86 wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]jbpick86 wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

A little story where a little well spent money reduced unwanted births and abortions by a whopping 40% . What do you think will happen when you do away with PPH , you will get a shit load of Democratic voters in 18 years:)[/quote]

You are an idiot. Private donor provided the program, program had nothing to do with Planned Parenthood. Way to make a non-point.[/quote]

You are a dumb fuck simpleton and make no sense
[/quote]

Because I pointed out your article had nothing to do with Planned Parenthood, making your comment regarding them seem out of place and nonsensical?? If you don’t understand that from my previous comment, well I can’t really help your lack of reading comprehension.

Either that or you were being intellectually dishonest about the article. So which is it? Do you have trouble reading or do you purposely misrepresent information for your own purposes?[/quote]

No dip shit , it has to do with birth control and it’s availability , If I have to connect those dots for you , you are like USMC , brainless:)
[/quote]

Congrats, you totally missed the point, but keep it up with the insults, I am sure that makes people think you are smarter than you seem. And if you could find your own damn dots and connect them, this conversation would have been over before I got involved but we have all pretty much given up on that by now.
[/quote]

Just let it go. Pittbull is by far the dumbest poster on this site and probably the entire internet. [/quote]

Abortion issues are trending on social media recently. Check out some peoples opinions/comments on there and you will appreciate the intelligence of pittbull.

[/quote]

That is true. If you happen to use Imgur the comments section is just awful. Heck, the comments section of any article online is just awful.

668

LA Times, color me surprised.

It’s not Fiorina who is wrong in the Planned Parenthood fight

669

[quote]jbpick86 wrote:

I am making the argument that people should be free to do what they want as long as it doesn’t deprive some one else of their right to life or liberty.
[/quote]

Oh I thought you were all concerned about the poor little gobs of goo being extracted . I was offering a solution that would eliminate a large percentage and you are so concerned about some liberty of some one to impose their will on some one else

670

[quote]jbpick86 wrote:
but keep it up with the insults.
[/quote]

No I am having fun , you calling me names , me calling you names , it’s kind of cute , don’t you think:)

671

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

Just let it go. Pittbull is by far the dumbest poster on this site and probably the entire internet. [/quote]

says the man that claims a person can live with out a brain:)

672

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]jbpick86 wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]jbpick86 wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]jbpick86 wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

A little story where a little well spent money reduced unwanted births and abortions by a whopping 40% . What do you think will happen when you do away with PPH , you will get a shit load of Democratic voters in 18 years:)[/quote]

You are an idiot. Private donor provided the program, program had nothing to do with Planned Parenthood. Way to make a non-point.[/quote]

You are a dumb fuck simpleton and make no sense
[/quote]

Because I pointed out your article had nothing to do with Planned Parenthood, making your comment regarding them seem out of place and nonsensical?? If you don’t understand that from my previous comment, well I can’t really help your lack of reading comprehension.

Either that or you were being intellectually dishonest about the article. So which is it? Do you have trouble reading or do you purposely misrepresent information for your own purposes?[/quote]

No dip shit , it has to do with birth control and it’s availability , If I have to connect those dots for you , you are like USMC , brainless:)
[/quote]

Congrats, you totally missed the point, but keep it up with the insults, I am sure that makes people think you are smarter than you seem. And if you could find your own damn dots and connect them, this conversation would have been over before I got involved but we have all pretty much given up on that by now.
[/quote]

Just let it go. Pittbull is by far the dumbest poster on this site and probably the entire internet. [/quote]

I tend to agree, but did you not ban him?

673

[quote]Bismark wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]jbpick86 wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]jbpick86 wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]jbpick86 wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

A little story where a little well spent money reduced unwanted births and abortions by a whopping 40% . What do you think will happen when you do away with PPH , you will get a shit load of Democratic voters in 18 years:)[/quote]

You are an idiot. Private donor provided the program, program had nothing to do with Planned Parenthood. Way to make a non-point.[/quote]

You are a dumb fuck simpleton and make no sense
[/quote]

Because I pointed out your article had nothing to do with Planned Parenthood, making your comment regarding them seem out of place and nonsensical?? If you don’t understand that from my previous comment, well I can’t really help your lack of reading comprehension.

Either that or you were being intellectually dishonest about the article. So which is it? Do you have trouble reading or do you purposely misrepresent information for your own purposes?[/quote]

No dip shit , it has to do with birth control and it’s availability , If I have to connect those dots for you , you are like USMC , brainless:)
[/quote]

Congrats, you totally missed the point, but keep it up with the insults, I am sure that makes people think you are smarter than you seem. And if you could find your own damn dots and connect them, this conversation would have been over before I got involved but we have all pretty much given up on that by now.
[/quote]

Just let it go. Pittbull is by far the dumbest poster on this site and probably the entire internet. [/quote]

I tend to agree, but did you not ban him? [/quote]

I have him on ignore, but you still see his posts when someone quotes him.

674

Why I had an abortion after 20 weeks

I don’t believe that this women is guilty of murder.

675

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

I have him on ignore, but you still see him. [/quote]

676

[quote]Bismark wrote:
Why I had an abortion after 20 weeks

I don’t believe that this women is guilty of murder.[/quote]

This is such an extremely rare occurrence, but fine, come up with some reasonable exceptions and pass the bill. Rape, incest, mother’s health, anencephaly, etc… The list should be very short though.

679

[quote]Bismark wrote:
Why I had an abortion after 20 weeks

I don’t believe that this women is guilty of murder.[/quote]

I agree with you. But she did agree to end a human life. With that said, you are talking about <7.5%** of women (http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/3711005.pdf) if you lump all the common exceptions together, rape, incest, health of mother, health of baby.

The health of fetus/mother groups reasons however leave something to be desired:

**Percentage of women that reported it was the most important factor. Used that number because my assumption is that should the reason be as emotionally gut-wrenching as the one in the article, that would be the most important reason.

As a personal anecdote: Close friend’s sister was told she had a similar situation to the woman described in the article, with the child’s brain and other organs developing outside of its body. She was encouraged to abort by several people and according to her, her first doctor. She chose to deliver instead and gave birth to a child that is now 6 years old, never had a surgery, or any other major health issues. He is slightly developmentally delayed probably always will be, but he is extremely highly functioning.

680

[quote]pittbulll wrote:
You know probably the majority of people have an opinion that is similar to mine than yours.
[/quote]

And they are all wrong too.

Aside from the Appeal to Popularity fallacy you’ve got nothing.