oh and some chicken to go with it
[quote]jbpick86 wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]jbpick86 wrote:
Also you cant in one breath talk about Hobby Lobby trying to not be forced in to providing contraception by the government, and in the next mention how you are not for the government regulating reproduction. Well I suppose you can but you look like an idiot for not recognizing the double standard.[/quote]
Yes I can , contraception prevents abortions , we would both be happy then
[/quote]
Well you can, but it makes you look like an inconsistent ass. Are you in favor of government regulating how private citizens handle reproductive issues or not? Have some consistency in an opinion man. [/quote]
where the inconsistent ass comes in is where some gets all but hurt over abortions and goes after the biggest effort to prevent abortions .
A little story where a little well spent money reduced unwanted births and abortions by a whopping 40% . What do you think will happen when you do away with PPH , you will get a shit load of Democratic voters in 18 years:)
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]jbpick86 wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]jbpick86 wrote:
Also you cant in one breath talk about Hobby Lobby trying to not be forced in to providing contraception by the government, and in the next mention how you are not for the government regulating reproduction. Well I suppose you can but you look like an idiot for not recognizing the double standard.[/quote]
Yes I can , contraception prevents abortions , we would both be happy then
[/quote]
Well you can, but it makes you look like an inconsistent ass. Are you in favor of government regulating how private citizens handle reproductive issues or not? Have some consistency in an opinion man. [/quote]
where the inconsistent ass comes in is where some gets all but hurt over abortions and goes after the biggest effort to prevent abortions .
[/quote]
You are arguing for both sides of the same issue, you just lack the desire to see it. You view abortion as a personal liberty issue, I do to but I see abortion as infringing upon the right to life of the developing human. However, when confronted with another personal liberty issue, Hobby Lobby not wanting to pay for contraception, which would have 0 effect on the rate of unwanted pregnancies, you are in favor of the owners of Hobby Lobby not having any personal freedom.
You actually feel the same way about small business owners and other corporations not having the freedom to decide what to pay their employees. You basically argue against personal freedom at every turn, except when it comes to killing unborn children. Which is actually pretty typical of the far left hypocrite.
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
A little story where a little well spent money reduced unwanted births and abortions by a whopping 40% . What do you think will happen when you do away with PPH , you will get a shit load of Democratic voters in 18 years:)[/quote]
You are an idiot. Private donor provided the program, program had nothing to do with Planned Parenthood. Way to make a non-point.
[quote]pushharder wrote:
How do 177 representatives vote AGAINST this bill?
Good grief, these folks have NOTHING on the pro-slavery crowd of 155 years ago in terms of moral rectitude.[/quote]
It boggles my mind that we even need this bill. It’s disturbing that we need this bill.
[quote]pushharder wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]pushharder wrote:
How do 177 representatives vote AGAINST this bill?
Good grief, these folks have NOTHING on the pro-slavery crowd of 155 years ago in terms of moral rectitude.[/quote]
It boggles my mind that we even need this bill. It’s disturbing that we need this bill. [/quote]
Again, anyone who gets infuriated about the legal practice of 17th and 18th century slavery in the US has absolutely no business doing so if they support the heinous atrocity of killing babies in the 20th and 21st. They are stark, raving, despicable hypocrites.
[/quote]
Did you happen to see the video Fiorina’s campaign put out yesterday or today backing what she said about the videos during the debate? I hadn’t seen it, it’s almost unbelievable.
[quote]jbpick86 wrote:
You are arguing for both sides of the same issue,
[/quote]
Bullshit , I am arguing common sense , you are arguing the opposing of what I am but yours is also the opposite of common sense , go figure
[quote]jbpick86 wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
A little story where a little well spent money reduced unwanted births and abortions by a whopping 40% . What do you think will happen when you do away with PPH , you will get a shit load of Democratic voters in 18 years:)[/quote]
You are an idiot. Private donor provided the program, program had nothing to do with Planned Parenthood. Way to make a non-point.[/quote]
You are a dumb fuck simpleton and make no sense
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]pushharder wrote:
How do 177 representatives vote AGAINST this bill?
Good grief, these folks have NOTHING on the pro-slavery crowd of 155 years ago in terms of moral rectitude.[/quote]
It boggles my mind that we even need this bill. It’s disturbing that we need this bill. [/quote]
we agree
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]pushharder wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]pushharder wrote:
How do 177 representatives vote AGAINST this bill?
Good grief, these folks have NOTHING on the pro-slavery crowd of 155 years ago in terms of moral rectitude.[/quote]
It boggles my mind that we even need this bill. It’s disturbing that we need this bill. [/quote]
Again, anyone who gets infuriated about the legal practice of 17th and 18th century slavery in the US has absolutely no business doing so if they support the heinous atrocity of killing babies in the 20th and 21st. They are stark, raving, despicable hypocrites.
[/quote]
Did you happen to see the video Fiorina’s campaign put out yesterday or today backing what she said about the videos during the debate? I hadn’t seen it, it’s almost unbelievable.
[/quote]
That’s a good ad… Damn.
And hat’s off to those still entertaining Pitt’s trolling. Hat’s off. I don’t have the energy for his nonsense.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]pushharder wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]pushharder wrote:
How do 177 representatives vote AGAINST this bill?
Good grief, these folks have NOTHING on the pro-slavery crowd of 155 years ago in terms of moral rectitude.[/quote]
It boggles my mind that we even need this bill. It’s disturbing that we need this bill. [/quote]
Again, anyone who gets infuriated about the legal practice of 17th and 18th century slavery in the US has absolutely no business doing so if they support the heinous atrocity of killing babies in the 20th and 21st. They are stark, raving, despicable hypocrites.
[/quote]
Did you happen to see the video Fiorina’s campaign put out yesterday or today backing what she said about the videos during the debate? I hadn’t seen it, it’s almost unbelievable.
[/quote]
That’s a good ad… Damn.
[/quote]
Ya, good luck arguing against that.
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]jbpick86 wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
A little story where a little well spent money reduced unwanted births and abortions by a whopping 40% . What do you think will happen when you do away with PPH , you will get a shit load of Democratic voters in 18 years:)[/quote]
You are an idiot. Private donor provided the program, program had nothing to do with Planned Parenthood. Way to make a non-point.[/quote]
You are a dumb fuck simpleton and make no sense
[/quote]
Because I pointed out your article had nothing to do with Planned Parenthood, making your comment regarding them seem out of place and nonsensical?? If you don’t understand that from my previous comment, well I can’t really help your lack of reading comprehension.
Either that or you were being intellectually dishonest about the article. So which is it? Do you have trouble reading or do you purposely misrepresent information for your own purposes?
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
That’s a good ad… Damn.
[/quote]
Ya, good luck arguing against that.[/quote]
Not sure why people think fuckign with women is a smart move… They can be some harsh and brutal creatures.
That whole “hell hath no furry” saying… Shit is true, married men understand this.
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]jbpick86 wrote:
You are arguing for both sides of the same issue,
[/quote]
Bullshit , I am arguing common sense , you are arguing the opposing of what I am but yours is also the opposite of common sense , go figure
[/quote]
You are arguing your own moral judgments based on what is acceptable/unacceptable to you. You have no consistency in your reasoning.
Lets try a series of questions to illustrate it for everyones amusement…
Why are you in favor of women being able to have unrestricted abortions?
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
That’s a good ad… Damn.
[/quote]
Ya, good luck arguing against that.[/quote]
Not sure why people think fuckign with women is a smart move… They can be some harsh and brutal creatures.
That whole “hell hath no furry” saying… Shit is true, married men understand this. [/quote]
Ya, no kidding.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]pushharder wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]pushharder wrote:
How do 177 representatives vote AGAINST this bill?
Good grief, these folks have NOTHING on the pro-slavery crowd of 155 years ago in terms of moral rectitude.[/quote]
It boggles my mind that we even need this bill. It’s disturbing that we need this bill. [/quote]
Again, anyone who gets infuriated about the legal practice of 17th and 18th century slavery in the US has absolutely no business doing so if they support the heinous atrocity of killing babies in the 20th and 21st. They are stark, raving, despicable hypocrites.
[/quote]
Did you happen to see the video Fiorina’s campaign put out yesterday or today backing what she said about the videos during the debate? I hadn’t seen it, it’s almost unbelievable.
[/quote]
That’s a good ad… Damn.
And hat’s off to those still entertaining Pitt’s trolling. Hat’s off. I don’t have the energy for his nonsense. [/quote]
You just don’t have energy for someone with a differing opinion . You know probably the majority of people have an opinion that is similar to mine than yours.