So he wasn’t a Nazi? Did Nazis even exist?
Akshually, it was the National Socialist German Workers Party.
1 Like
“Why,” I asked Hitler, “do you call yourself a National Socialist, since your party programme is the very antithesis of that commonly accredited to socialism?”
“Socialism,” he retorted, putting down his cup of tea, pugnaciously, "is the science of dealing with the common weal. Communism is not Socialism. Marxism is not Socialism. The Marxians have stolen the term and confused its meaning. I shall take Socialism away from the Socialists.
"Socialism is an ancient Aryan, Germanic institution. Our German ancestors held certain lands in common. They cultivated the idea of the common weal. Marxism has no right to disguise itself as socialism. Socialism, unlike Marxism, does not repudiate private property. Unlike Marxism, it involves no negation of personality, and unlike Marxism, it is patriotic.
“We might have called ourselves the Liberal Party. We chose to call ourselves the National Socialists. We are not internationalists. Our socialism is national. We demand the fulfilment of the just claims of the productive classes by the state on the basis of race solidarity. To us state and race are one.”
Hitler had a different definition of socialism and often this difference is lost in translation.
Everyone was on vacation.
That was a very poorly written article with very little supporting evidence for the narrative.
No “capitalists” supported Hitlers rise to power and he was an actual communist in 1919. He received many bribes in the 1930s after taking power, which Marxists attempt to spin as making National Socialism “right wing”.
He was anti Marxist but pro socialism. Clearly.
Gunther Reiman laid the economic case out in 1939 and many more have since. The Vampire Economy is the book. It is a primary source historical document, not some imprisoned Nazis memoir. There was virtually nothing about Nazi governance that resembles Republican Party policy.
It wasn’t supposed to be a thesis, just a few quick points to dispel what you’re saying.
Meine Hausaufgaben verloren.
Btw, Hitler didn’t say that.
It in no way dispels what I’m saying.
It is very true that Marxists and National socialists hated each other, fought the largest land war ever over resources and ideology while spewing a nearly endless amount of propaganda, as did other belligerents in the war.
All of the Marxist narratives are crumbling in nearly every way possible. It is all based on lies and magical thinking borne out of dialectical materialism.
Keep an eye on Argentina in the coming years. They shifted gears away from it big time with their new President.
So why bring up Nazis if they weren’t Maxists?
What? Argentina? That country just keeps collapsing and going supernova every few years, it’s business as normal.
Good thing the Nazis never made it there.
1 Like
Good thing Italians did.
Because in 2024 dipshits in the DSA and their Democrat allies are STILL lying to their dwindling supporters by calling American republicans fascists and/or Nazis.
It just isn’t there at all.
Lots of similarities to DSA, which really explains a lot, if you think about
Two groups singing different verses in the same shitty song.
1 Like
It is Southern Hemisphere Italy. Tierra del fuego is cold Sicily, then you have the good wine and food. I want to visit.
Plus the accents give it away.
I thought the in thing was to call Democrats and socialists Nazis. Which again makes me wonder if Nazis really existed. You even posted a quote that is falsely attributed to Hitler that was posted on conservative websites.
Even if it was falsely attributed to him, which I’m not about to go verify, he said a LOT of stuff just like that. Was the earlier quote false, too? I know that one wasn’t because of my source.
Biden and Harris literally just ran and lost a presidential campaign with a core strategy of calling their political opponents fascists, implying they were Nazis and calling them threats to democracy.
You’re too rich, but thanks for helping me with the project I’ve been tackling to address your insane ideology’s very real effects on my city.
Of course not.
Which means Nazis were socialists? Or socialists are Nazis?
Yes. Lewiston is a major strategic target. We plan on taking over the potato recess.
It’s like Hitler was a chronic liar and idiot, so nothing he claimed about him, his motives, his party, his plans, his intentions, his goals, or his (checks notes) propaganda, about the nation and its future should be taken at face value.
So maybe don’t replicate that.
That is where PRIMARY SOURCE documentation comes in to help us understand the past.
“Madman Hitler” is another historical myth that has already been busted, just not accepted among Marxist academics. Most of what he did made a lot of sense within the ideological framework and his resource constraints.
I recently learned that Hitler had the right strategic concept for invading the Soviet Union, which was to secure the Caucuses oilfields and the Volga river. It was his General Franz Halder who prioritized the drive to Moscow in defiance of the Austrian corporal/Fuhrer.
The myth of Madman Hitler is part of what Zeitelman addresses in his book.
So are you judging him on his intentions or his actions here?