People in This Country are in Awful Shape

Off Topic
101

[quote]Nards wrote:
With how cool video games are now and with all the fast food choices if I were 18 today I’d be 300lbs.

I was born in '73 and so I’m turning 38 soon, and I wasn’t a jock growing up, but the combination of a few bike rides, some walking and a few games of soccer with buddies and the fact that Coke only came in the can and the 2 liter(which is in the fridge for the family to share) and other junk foods didn’t come in that Xtreme HungerBuster! size yet kept me at a reasonable 173lbs on my 18th birthday. I remember because my weight was 173 and my birth year was 1973.

So I’m just saying that when I say that yeah, even the white women I see here in Taiwan that are only 23 or 24 and look like they’ve popped out two kids already it’s not because I think my generation walked uphill to school both ways in a blizzard every day, but that the addition of what even my 38 year-old self (who just got back from a 30 minute run in 33C/91F) would call light activity and the act of stopping at one can of Coke because when you think about it one can was more than enough and that the cartoons stopped at 11AM (at least the good ones) on Saturday morning and Atari sucked and we all knew it so that kept me from being a huge fatass till today.[/quote]

A fella 73’er - internet high 5!

102

[quote]DBCooper wrote:

[quote]roguevampire wrote:

[quote]imhungry wrote:

[quote]roguevampire wrote:

[quote]gregron wrote:

[quote]roguevampire wrote:
personally, any girl over 130lbs to me is a bit chunky…[/quote]

did you ever think to account for height or girls who actually have muscle?

With all due respect, you sir, are not very smart.[/quote]

girls with muscles. girls can’t get big muscles, end of story. unless they do steroids. they do not have the correct hormone balance. listen, i was 5’7 130lbs when i graduated high school, and im a dude. no way should a girl be over that. we have just come to accept over weight girls as “normal” when in reality, they aren’t. girls will argue and even some dudes that have more estrogen than test in their blood. women love to argue and say what about height and this or that. unless your 6 feet, you shouldn’t be over 140lbs max.[/quote]

Bud, I find it absolutely pointless to even argue or insult you at this point.

And, Beaker’s the shit.[/quote]

you can’t argue with facts. go to any beach, any mall, any night club, and you will see exactly what im talking about. [/quote]

Go back in time 400 years and you’ll see what everyone else is talking about. Your countess was probably a buck 50, easy. Back then, if you were UNDER 140 you were undesirable.[/quote]

Though i can’t speak from fact, i can only go by what has been written about her. it has been written she was extremely beautiful on the tall side for a girl and thin. we know she was thin, cause of this dress she wore, it is in a muesuem(spelling) in Hungary, and lets just say, she wasn’t over a size 2-4. she was thin.

103

[quote]roguevampire wrote:

first, Im a guy, the standards are different. as far as me being fat or chunky, when was the last time you saw a chest and shoulders like mine on a fat guy??? i doubt ever. so please. saying im fat, cause im talking about fat girls isn’t a good way to counter my belief. fat guys do not have an 18 inch difference between chest and waist, do they, maam???

and no, women shouldn’t weigh what men weigh. do you live on planet earth. biologically, men are bigger than women. this isn’t my opinion, its fact. its just we live in a country where there are so many girls that are just plain fat. so they like to defend themselves by looking around and saying, Im average weight. but if average itself is grossly obese, then what good is being average. [/quote]

Chest and shoulders like yours on a fat guy? Well, when I look at your avatar, I see chest and shoulders EXACTLY like yours on a fat guy, as well as every time I see a 20-30% bodyfat (perpetually) “off-season” bodybuilder at the gym or on this website, I see a fat guy with chest and shoulders like yours. What are your chest and waist measurements? Since you’re a mouthbreathing retard, let me clarify: chest is through the armpits and waist is around your belly button (not your pants size).

104

[quote]Stern wrote:

[quote]Nards wrote:
With how cool video games are now and with all the fast food choices if I were 18 today I’d be 300lbs.

I was born in '73 and so I’m turning 38 soon, and I wasn’t a jock growing up, but the combination of a few bike rides, some walking and a few games of soccer with buddies and the fact that Coke only came in the can and the 2 liter(which is in the fridge for the family to share) and other junk foods didn’t come in that Xtreme HungerBuster! size yet kept me at a reasonable 173lbs on my 18th birthday. I remember because my weight was 173 and my birth year was 1973.

So I’m just saying that when I say that yeah, even the white women I see here in Taiwan that are only 23 or 24 and look like they’ve popped out two kids already it’s not because I think my generation walked uphill to school both ways in a blizzard every day, but that the addition of what even my 38 year-old self (who just got back from a 30 minute run in 33C/91F) would call light activity and the act of stopping at one can of Coke because when you think about it one can was more than enough and that the cartoons stopped at 11AM (at least the good ones) on Saturday morning and Atari sucked and we all knew it so that kept me from being a huge fatass till today.[/quote]

A fella 73’er - internet high 5!
[/quote]
Me too! - internet high five, already had my b-day this year though.

105

5’7" 170 sounds pretty good to me, heck 190 is even better!

106

[quote]roguevampire wrote:

[quote]DBCooper wrote:

[quote]roguevampire wrote:

[quote]imhungry wrote:

[quote]roguevampire wrote:

[quote]gregron wrote:

[quote]roguevampire wrote:
personally, any girl over 130lbs to me is a bit chunky…[/quote]

did you ever think to account for height or girls who actually have muscle?

With all due respect, you sir, are not very smart.[/quote]

girls with muscles. girls can’t get big muscles, end of story. unless they do steroids. they do not have the correct hormone balance. listen, i was 5’7 130lbs when i graduated high school, and im a dude. no way should a girl be over that. we have just come to accept over weight girls as “normal” when in reality, they aren’t. girls will argue and even some dudes that have more estrogen than test in their blood. women love to argue and say what about height and this or that. unless your 6 feet, you shouldn’t be over 140lbs max.[/quote]

Bud, I find it absolutely pointless to even argue or insult you at this point.

And, Beaker’s the shit.[/quote]

you can’t argue with facts. go to any beach, any mall, any night club, and you will see exactly what im talking about. [/quote]

Go back in time 400 years and you’ll see what everyone else is talking about. Your countess was probably a buck 50, easy. Back then, if you were UNDER 140 you were undesirable.[/quote]

Though i can’t speak from fact, i can only go by what has been written about her. it has been written she was extremely beautiful on the tall side for a girl and thin. we know she was thin, cause of this dress she wore, it is in a muesuem(spelling) in Hungary, and lets just say, she wasn’t over a size 2-4. she was thin.[/quote]

She was a fat fucking blimp and you know it! Thin? What, you fell in love with a fucking peasant?!?!?!

107

[quote]Stronghold wrote:

[quote]roguevampire wrote:

first, Im a guy, the standards are different. as far as me being fat or chunky, when was the last time you saw a chest and shoulders like mine on a fat guy??? i doubt ever. so please. saying im fat, cause im talking about fat girls isn’t a good way to counter my belief. fat guys do not have an 18 inch difference between chest and waist, do they, maam???

and no, women shouldn’t weigh what men weigh. do you live on planet earth. biologically, men are bigger than women. this isn’t my opinion, its fact. its just we live in a country where there are so many girls that are just plain fat. so they like to defend themselves by looking around and saying, Im average weight. but if average itself is grossly obese, then what good is being average. [/quote]

Chest and shoulders like yours on a fat guy? Well, when I look at your avatar, I see chest and shoulders EXACTLY like yours on a fat guy, as well as every time I see a 20-30% bodyfat (perpetually) “off-season” bodybuilder at the gym or on this website, I see a fat guy with chest and shoulders like yours. What are your chest and waist measurements? Since you’re a mouthbreathing retard, let me clarify: chest is through the armpits and waist is around your belly button (not your pants size).[/quote]

I have never ever claimed to be ripped or look like any contest ready bodybuilder. even contest ready bodybuilders only look like that leading up to a contest. saying i look like a perpetual off season bodybuilder, i can live with that.

we all have different goals and looks we want. some want to be lean and small. some want to be able to just live huge amounts of weights regardless of how they look. I fall in the category of wanting to be freaky looking with size and also be very strong.

108

[quote]DBCooper wrote:

[quote]roguevampire wrote:

[quote]DBCooper wrote:

[quote]roguevampire wrote:

[quote]imhungry wrote:

[quote]roguevampire wrote:

[quote]gregron wrote:

[quote]roguevampire wrote:
personally, any girl over 130lbs to me is a bit chunky…[/quote]

did you ever think to account for height or girls who actually have muscle?

With all due respect, you sir, are not very smart.[/quote]

girls with muscles. girls can’t get big muscles, end of story. unless they do steroids. they do not have the correct hormone balance. listen, i was 5’7 130lbs when i graduated high school, and im a dude. no way should a girl be over that. we have just come to accept over weight girls as “normal” when in reality, they aren’t. girls will argue and even some dudes that have more estrogen than test in their blood. women love to argue and say what about height and this or that. unless your 6 feet, you shouldn’t be over 140lbs max.[/quote]

Bud, I find it absolutely pointless to even argue or insult you at this point.

And, Beaker’s the shit.[/quote]

you can’t argue with facts. go to any beach, any mall, any night club, and you will see exactly what im talking about. [/quote]

Go back in time 400 years and you’ll see what everyone else is talking about. Your countess was probably a buck 50, easy. Back then, if you were UNDER 140 you were undesirable.[/quote]

Though i can’t speak from fact, i can only go by what has been written about her. it has been written she was extremely beautiful on the tall side for a girl and thin. we know she was thin, cause of this dress she wore, it is in a muesuem(spelling) in Hungary, and lets just say, she wasn’t over a size 2-4. she was thin.[/quote]

She was a fat fucking blimp and you know it! Thin? What, you fell in love with a fucking peasant?!?!?![/quote]

wow, i won’t argue about nonsense. her dress is hanging in the hungary muesuem, if anything she was thin. only in some countries did the rich over indulge and get fat. this wasn’t rome. she lived in a different time and place. please, don’t talk about what you don’t know. though she was extremely rich and powerful, she lived in a war torn area. blimp??? your funny little guy, lol.

109

According to this article 1\3 of all US children and 2\3 adults are either overweight or obese. It doesn’t bother me other than from the perspective that my income may be stolen (taxation) to pay for care for those who have made poor lifestyle choices willingly.

http://www.cnn.com/2011/HEALTH/06/02/usda.new.food.plate/

At least they’ve finally updated the food pyramid.

110

[quote]DBCooper wrote:

[quote]Edevus wrote:

[quote]DBCooper wrote:
What I find funny is that many of the same people in this thread who are lamenting the increase in fatties in this country are also in Squat Rack Curls, volumes 1-5, making fun of every single stupid thing they see in the gym. I think it’s beyond facetious to get on here and participate in a thread that almost solely consists of making fun of people who don’t know how to properly work out, without offering advice or doing anything to help those people, and then get on this thread and start bitching and whining about how many fat people there are.

If you care about how many fat people there are to the point where you feel the need to start a thread about what a travesty this is and how disgusting it is and how it didn’t used to be like this and blah, blah, blah, then what the fuck are you doing to help alleviate this epidemic, aside from ridiculing fat people’s appearances and ridiculing the warped, ineffective workout regimens of the fat masses you see in the gym?[/quote]

And what is your solution?

People know that eating junk food is unhealthy. People know that being so overweight is not attractive and it’s unhealthy. People know that sports are good for the body and the mind.
Yet “nobody” does it because it takes effort.

If it was in my hand (like, politician) :
-I’d tax soda and junk food like McDonald’s and company.
-In the physical activity subject in school I’d add nutrition, so children learn more about it and maybe grow interested.

I’m really sure that the availability of junk food is the main reason of people being overweight in USA and many European countries right now. It’s disgusting to see a 6 years old girl who’s like 45kg.
[/quote]

My solution is this: nothing. I don’t care about fat people and how ignorant of their long-term health they are. It means NOTHING to me. I am not emotionally-invested in the BMI of the state I live in. So if you are, to the point where you feel the need to actively voice this concern or this disgust at something so ignorant and unhealthy, why aren’t you doing something about it?[/quote]

I’m on the process of doing it. I contribute in a blog and talk about nutrition and lifestyle. I have tried to convince my friends and some relatives to drop the junk food. I promote healthy lifestyle in the office if someone brings up the topic.

I do my part because most people are very ignorant about all that concerns nutrition and health (I was in that pack not so much ago) and I hope that my words and attitude encourage them to take action.
One guy at my office has dropped soda and candy all together because he’s overweight and bit worried about it already (and he’s like 23). I do what I can.

You also have to think about the society in general. More people will be affected by diabetes and other diseases caused by poor eating. All that money that is spend on research and medicines could be spend in other health causes.

What will happen if in 50 years 90% of the population is overweight and close to obese? I don’t think that’s good for the economy…

111

[quote]roguevampire wrote:
…

we all have different goals and looks we want. some want to be lean and small. some want to be able to just live huge amounts of weights regardless of how they look. I fall in the category of wanting to be freaky looking with size and also be very strong. [/quote]

Translation: We all have different goals and that’s fine. Unless you’re a woman. Then you have to be under 130 pounds. And not have any more muscle than the average prepubescent male. Otherwise you’re a chunky lardass. And too manly. And somethings wrong with you.

112

[quote]buckeye girl wrote:

[quote]roguevampire wrote:
…

we all have different goals and looks we want. some want to be lean and small. some want to be able to just live huge amounts of weights regardless of how they look. I fall in the category of wanting to be freaky looking with size and also be very strong. [/quote]

Translation: We all have different goals and that’s fine. Unless you’re a woman. Then you have to be under 130 pounds. And not have any more muscle than the average prepubescent male. Otherwise you’re a chunky lardass. And too manly. And somethings wrong with you. [/quote]

99.99% of women, do not have more muscle than any other girl. its only in extreme cases. so i was speaking of the vast overwhelming majority. yes, if a woman has more muscle, she may weigh a tad more. but we are talking extremes here.

113

[quote]buckeye girl wrote:

[quote]roguevampire wrote:
…

we all have different goals and looks we want. some want to be lean and small. some want to be able to just live huge amounts of weights regardless of how they look. I fall in the category of wanting to be freaky looking with size and also be very strong. [/quote]

Translation: We all have different goals and that’s fine. Unless you’re a woman. Then you have to be under 130 pounds. And not have any more muscle than the average prepubescent male. Otherwise you’re a chunky lardass. And too manly. And somethings wrong with you. [/quote]

This guy clearly has issues with women. Not the first thread he’s posted stupidity in that regard.

You look fabulous in your avi BTW BG

114

This woman is 140 pounds. What a lard ass.

115

[quote]roguevampire wrote:

[quote]buckeye girl wrote:

[quote]roguevampire wrote:
…

we all have different goals and looks we want. some want to be lean and small. some want to be able to just live huge amounts of weights regardless of how they look. I fall in the category of wanting to be freaky looking with size and also be very strong. [/quote]

Translation: We all have different goals and that’s fine. Unless you’re a woman. Then you have to be under 130 pounds. And not have any more muscle than the average prepubescent male. Otherwise you’re a chunky lardass. And too manly. And somethings wrong with you. [/quote]

99.99% of women, do not have more muscle than any other girl. its only in extreme cases. so i was speaking of the vast overwhelming majority. yes, if a woman has more muscle, she may weigh a tad more. but we are talking extremes here.
[/quote]

That is a very meaningful statistic you threw out there. Why not go all the way to 100%?

My morning deuce contained more viable brain cells than do you.

DB

116

[quote]super saiyan wrote:
This woman is 140 pounds. What a lard ass.

damn, that girl is chunky as fuck

117

[quote]roguevampire wrote:
first, Im a guy, the standards are different. as far as me being fat or chunky, when was the last time you saw a chest and shoulders like mine on a fat guy??? [/quote]

Actually, I think you’ve been riding that half-assed avatar pic for far too long.

Either post up some more pictures of yourself or I’d say you’re just a troll who copped someone else’s pic and is using it to create an online persona.

118

[quote]SkyNett wrote:

[quote]roguevampire wrote:
first, Im a guy, the standards are different. as far as me being fat or chunky, when was the last time you saw a chest and shoulders like mine on a fat guy??? [/quote]

Actually, I think you’ve been riding that half-assed avatar pic for far too long.

Either post up some more pictures of yourself or I’d say you’re just a troll who copped someone else’s pic and is using it to create an online persona.

[/quote]

YEAH!

119

[quote]dollarbill44 wrote:

[quote]roguevampire wrote:

[quote]buckeye girl wrote:

[quote]roguevampire wrote:
…

we all have different goals and looks we want. some want to be lean and small. some want to be able to just live huge amounts of weights regardless of how they look. I fall in the category of wanting to be freaky looking with size and also be very strong. [/quote]

Translation: We all have different goals and that’s fine. Unless you’re a woman. Then you have to be under 130 pounds. And not have any more muscle than the average prepubescent male. Otherwise you’re a chunky lardass. And too manly. And somethings wrong with you. [/quote]

99.99% of women, do not have more muscle than any other girl. its only in extreme cases. so i was speaking of the vast overwhelming majority. yes, if a woman has more muscle, she may weigh a tad more. but we are talking extremes here.
[/quote]

That is a very meaningful statistic you threw out there. Why not go all the way to 100%?

My morning deuce contained more viable brain cells than do you.

DB[/quote]

ok, answer me this question, if you feel im that stupid. how often do you see really fit muscular women???

120

[quote]roguevampire wrote:

[quote]DBCooper wrote:

[quote]roguevampire wrote:

[quote]DBCooper wrote:

[quote]roguevampire wrote:

[quote]imhungry wrote:

[quote]roguevampire wrote:

[quote]gregron wrote:

[quote]roguevampire wrote:
personally, any girl over 130lbs to me is a bit chunky…[/quote]

did you ever think to account for height or girls who actually have muscle?

With all due respect, you sir, are not very smart.[/quote]

girls with muscles. girls can’t get big muscles, end of story. unless they do steroids. they do not have the correct hormone balance. listen, i was 5’7 130lbs when i graduated high school, and im a dude. no way should a girl be over that. we have just come to accept over weight girls as “normal” when in reality, they aren’t. girls will argue and even some dudes that have more estrogen than test in their blood. women love to argue and say what about height and this or that. unless your 6 feet, you shouldn’t be over 140lbs max.[/quote]

Bud, I find it absolutely pointless to even argue or insult you at this point.

And, Beaker’s the shit.[/quote]

you can’t argue with facts. go to any beach, any mall, any night club, and you will see exactly what im talking about. [/quote]

Go back in time 400 years and you’ll see what everyone else is talking about. Your countess was probably a buck 50, easy. Back then, if you were UNDER 140 you were undesirable.[/quote]

Though i can’t speak from fact, i can only go by what has been written about her. it has been written she was extremely beautiful on the tall side for a girl and thin. we know she was thin, cause of this dress she wore, it is in a muesuem(spelling) in Hungary, and lets just say, she wasn’t over a size 2-4. she was thin.[/quote]

She was a fat fucking blimp and you know it! Thin? What, you fell in love with a fucking peasant?!?!?![/quote]

wow, i won’t argue about nonsense. her dress is hanging in the hungary muesuem, if anything she was thin. only in some countries did the rich over indulge and get fat. this wasn’t rome. she lived in a different time and place. please, don’t talk about what you don’t know. though she was extremely rich and powerful, she lived in a war torn area. blimp??? your funny little guy, lol. [/quote]

You won’t argue about nonsense…and yet, here you are.

So she was skinny, eh? So in other words, she was hopelessly hooked on Turkish heroin?