That is just sad. I truly feel sorry for that child.
[quote]allNatural wrote:
http://pandachute.com/videos/400_pound_7_year_old[/quote]
Very sad indeed. This was posted a few days ago as well and is very disturbing to watch.
Dre Cappa, is that you in your avatar? If so, you are one ripped guy. Nice work.
Could someone tell me how you can go to jail for giving kids pot…but you can feed a little girl until she can only stay mobile by scooting herself around on her humongous overfed ass and all they do is get you help?
How, honestly, is one worse than the other?
[quote]Professor X wrote:
Could someone tell me how you can go to jail for giving kids pot…but you can feed a little girl until she can only stay mobile by scooting herself around on her humongous overfed ass and all they do is get you help?
How, honestly, is one worse than the other?[/quote]
Good point Prof X.
The only rationale I could think of is because pot is illegal and food is legal, which is why giving kids pot seems so much worse. But nonetheless, the kids are being harmed in both cases.
But then, if you keep giving the kids dope, then they get the munchies, they might swell up to 400 pounds also. Hopefully this doesn’t happen.
[quote]tmoney1 wrote:
Professor X wrote:
Could someone tell me how you can go to jail for giving kids pot…but you can feed a little girl until she can only stay mobile by scooting herself around on her humongous overfed ass and all they do is get you help?
How, honestly, is one worse than the other?
Good point Prof X.
The only rationale I could think of is because pot is illegal and food is legal, which is why giving kids pot seems so much worse. But nonetheless, the kids are being harmed in both cases.
But then, if you keep giving the kids dope, then they get the munchies, they might swell up to 400 pounds also. Hopefully this doesn’t happen.[/quote]
This is 100x worse than smoking weed.
[quote]tmoney1 wrote:
Professor X wrote:
Could someone tell me how you can go to jail for giving kids pot…but you can feed a little girl until she can only stay mobile by scooting herself around on her humongous overfed ass and all they do is get you help?
How, honestly, is one worse than the other?
Good point Prof X.
The only rationale I could think of is because pot is illegal and food is legal, which is why giving kids pot seems so much worse. But nonetheless, the kids are being harmed in both cases.
[/quote]
What difference does that make in a system that hypocritical? They recognize the mother of the obese girl as being stupid and incompetent (which is why they get her help)…yet they allow her to keep her and remain free. Why not recognize the behavior with the two kids as equally stupid and incompetent and get them all help as well? I don’t get the difference. This girl couldn’t finish a sentence without taking another deep breath. She can’t even stand on her own…yet that’s not criminal?
I have seen the pot smoking kids on the news for the past week. This is no doubt going to be used to fuel “The Amazing War On Drugs”…yet no one seems as pissed at the obese people shoving cupcakes down the gullets of their children at Golden Corral.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
Could someone tell me how you can go to jail for giving kids pot…but you can feed a little girl until she can only stay mobile by scooting herself around on her humongous overfed ass and all they do is get you help?
How, honestly, is one worse than the other?[/quote]
Overfeeding to that degree is actually worse in my opinion. Certainly more likely to cause serious long-lasting damage. They say the girl might have permanent structural damage and always struggle with walking normally. Not to say that the pot situation isn’t pretty damn bad.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
…yet no one seems as pissed at the obese people shoving cupcakes down the gullets of their children at Golden Corral.[/quote]
I am. I’m constantly amazed by people’s inability to think logically, in this case politicians. It’s probably a lack of balls too, that they avoid any changes that would be sure to cause controversy. I mean, how outside of the box to the average non-thinker is it to have some sort of lawful standard of care taking? What’s ironic is that they instead cause controversy on accident in some other way trying to protect their asses.
hehe whats with the flood of reposts these days 
[quote]Professor X wrote:
Could someone tell me how you can go to jail for giving kids pot…but you can feed a little girl until she can only stay mobile by scooting herself around on her humongous overfed ass and all they do is get you help?
How, honestly, is one worse than the other?[/quote]
Well, theoretically if it was a pot of Rice Krispies, maybe…however a tub of Rice Krispies is far worse.
Marijuana has been used by humans since prehistoric times as a medicine, as a religious/ceremonial tool, and as a basic recreational aid. In all that time, surely it’s been given to children without issue. Not that there aren’t obvious risks in that, but there are risks in most things.
I’d rather see that happen, than see children’s health ruined by the binge eating bullshit thats grown so prevalent in western culture over the last decades.
Granted, kids don’t need to be smoking or taking any drugs. But if I had to choose, it’d be occasional pot use over them becoming amorphous monsters.
Oh. My. God.
That is horrifying. Her parents are truly the most negligent pieces of garbage out there. I feel very, very sorry for her and I hope that no severe permanent damage has been done.
[quote]Plisskin wrote:
Marijuana has been used by humans since prehistoric times as a medicine, as a religious/ceremonial tool, and as a basic recreational aid. In all that time, surely it’s been given to children without issue. Not that there aren’t obvious risks in that, but there are risks in most things.[/quote]
Fair enough, if that’s true. However, the pot they gave kids in earlier times was presumably far less potent and certainly wasn’t laced with God knows whatever creeps are putting in pot these days. What is more, the context in which they smoked was spiritual, disciplinary and solemn – absolutely nothing like the retards in that video.
[quote]I’d rather see that happen, than see children’s health ruined by the binge eating bullshit thats grown so prevalent in western culture over the last decades.
Granted, kids don’t need to be smoking or taking any drugs. But if I had to choose, it’d be occasional pot use over them becoming amorphous monsters.[/quote]
6 of one, half a dozen of the other. They’re both sickening forms of child abuse – qualification of the evil amounts to intellectual masturbation, more or less. Besides, even if giving kids drugs had no long term side effects, while they were on the drugs could very likely confuse and scare the hell out of them. Frankly, it’s best not to risk that situation in the first place.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
Could someone tell me how you can go to jail for giving kids pot…but you can feed a little girl until she can only stay mobile by scooting herself around on her humongous overfed ass and all they do is get you help?
How, honestly, is one worse than the other?[/quote]
I think both are bad, but being fat isn’t a crime, while being high is.
I do think that child welfare might have some say in this also.
[quote]Puny@138 wrote:
Plisskin wrote:
Marijuana has been used by humans since prehistoric times as a medicine, as a religious/ceremonial tool, and as a basic recreational aid. In all that time, surely it’s been given to children without issue. Not that there aren’t obvious risks in that, but there are risks in most things.
Fair enough, if that’s true. However, the pot they gave kids in earlier times was presumably far less potent and certainly wasn’t laced with God knows whatever creeps are putting in pot these days. What is more, the context in which they smoked was spiritual, disciplinary and solemn – absolutely nothing like the retards in that video.
I’d rather see that happen, than see children’s health ruined by the binge eating bullshit thats grown so prevalent in western culture over the last decades.
Granted, kids don’t need to be smoking or taking any drugs. But if I had to choose, it’d be occasional pot use over them becoming amorphous monsters.
6 of one, half a dozen of the other. They’re both sickening forms of child abuse – qualification of the evil amounts to intellectual masturbation, more or less. Besides, even if giving kids drugs had no long term side effects, while they were on the drugs could very likely confuse and scare the hell out of them. Frankly, it’s best not to risk that situation in the first place.[/quote]
Marijuana does have an affect on the brain. A person’s brain is not formed until app. 25 years old. do the math.