In a cycle this year I plan to try Tren for the 1st time.
I, more than likely, will try Tren Ace for all the obvious reasons a 1st time user of Tren would.
Just curious if anyone here has ever had the opportunity to experiment with Parabolan ? I know its background, history and ester. Yes I have access to it (100% sure its as real as Para can be these days) but again … it curiosity about it that led me to start this thread.
Anyone who has delt with it would certainly know there is a significant cost difference. Why that is, is a question I have heard several different answers too.
One of those drugs that I have always wondered about. In my research the last few months about Tren, Parabolan comes up frequently. Looking forward to hearing what anyone has to say.
Real parabolan would cost more than UGL tren acetate the same way pharm grade cyp is more expensive than UGL tesotosterone. Brand names demand higher prices.
If you have real, accurately dosed, tren A you don’t have much of a reason to spend the extra money on the longer estered real stuff.
I don’t plan on using Para … 1) because I wanna start out with no ester so that I can see how I respond to the Tren 2) as you pointed out bone … since I have access to both good quality Tren or Para … why pay the extra $ … I agree.
I just wondered if anyone here actually had an real world experience with Para or knew someone who did. It certainly has it followers although the exact reason why is not clear to me and from the outside looking in, I can’t imgaine why you would use Para instead of TA or TE. Most board posts (not necessarily here) I find on it are much older. But in those posts I see the replys like “love para, would never do any other tren product” … and of course the token reply “why pay so much for Para when you can just take TA or TE” …
Perhaps since its so expensive and obviously hard to find … I won’t get much feedback here but I figured its worth a shot.
horsepuss … its my understanding that the Para has a longer ester (see hex) that wouldn’t require daily pinning. Not sure if I understood your post correctly. I have no such aversion to daily pinning which is why I will be doing Tren Ace, Test Prop etc on my next cycle. Cycle your sites and its really not that bad.
If anyone has any other info on Para to discuss or opinions … feel free. Other wise I will assume not much info around here on it and won’t bump again. =)
GG, I have used Parabolin, and I must say it was probably the best cycle I’ve done for cutting. Nice hard gains, you could eat whatever you want and not worry much. With any Tren keep Test in the equation, drink lots of water, I usually add in cranberry pills just to help out the kidneys for anything beyond 6 weeks.
[quote]Randizo wrote:
GG, I have used Parabolin, and I must say it was probably the best cycle I’ve done for cutting. Nice hard gains, you could eat whatever you want and not worry much. With any Tren keep Test in the equation, drink lots of water, I usually add in cranberry pills just to help out the kidneys for anything beyond 6 weeks. [/quote]
Thanks for the reply Rand …
Have you also used Tren Ace or E ? If so … what would be the most obvious difference, if in fact there was one? I have no qualms about using Para down the road perhaps if there was a benefit, although as far as I can see, its only an Ester diff. Yet Para does have its own devoted following so it begs the question. As I stated though … being a 1st time Tren user I am going with ACE.
I will be using t.prop and plan to pin them together … same day …
T3 will be in the mix as well as will my normal AI.
Did you use T3 while on Tren? Any caber? It would seem the T3 would be sufficient although I have seen caber thrown in to some tren cycles.
Also … did you notice something specific about kidney function during (dark dark urine) or were u doing that mainly as a preventative based on something you read/heard etc?