I may be asking something completely scientifically incorrect here. Am i right in thinking that certain supposedly ‘injectable only’ steroids would in fact exhibit anabolic/androgenic properties when taken orally?
I ask because i have recently aquired a powder source that can get me very cheap Boldenone Undecylenate. Im talking 1/10th of the price of normal injectable EQ from where i am.
Now i dont have the appuratus, or the know-how to make my own injectables, and quite frankly, i wouldnt trust myself even if i knew. I’m no injection wimp, as ive ran needle cycles before, but could this powder EQ be taken orally and have a decent effect, and if so, at what doseages?
I dont know the bioavailibility of EQ when taken orally, but i hazard a guess (if it is even bioactive at all) at around 30%, meaning i could take 200mg ED along side some test (inject).
I know i will get replies telling me to learn how and pin it, but what i really want to know is will it work orally, and if so, what kind of hepatoxicity would it exhibit? Or would i just be wasting my cash on expensive piss?
The useful stuff is at the bottom. Seems to me that the addition of the ester enables absorbtion via the lymphatic system due to increased fat soluability. The author, Anthony Roberts, estimates that 250mg ED would suffice as an effective dose.
Anyone know of any more recent advances or trials regarding oral EQ?
I read a vet study in which EQ was administered to veal calves and as little as 30mg ED had an effect. So it seems at least plausable.
[quote]bushidobadboy wrote:
You can buy boldenone acetate for the purposes of oral ingestion, similar to oral primo if you will.
However you have the undec. ester. I don’t know how this would/might work, but really, yep, you should inject what you have since the oral bioavailablilty is likely to be laughably poor.
Bushy[/quote]
Thanks for the reply, always good to have your input Bushy.
So by that logic, would a powder compound such as Trenbolone acetate exhibit decent bioavailibility? I can get this too (the acetate version) at very low prices. Although i wouldn’t take it atm as i dont think i’m ready for tren yet, it could be something to consider in the future.
Something else to keep in mind is that if you can follow simple directions to bake a cake, then brewing your own gear should be a walk in the park for you as well.
And sublingual is much different than swollowing a tab, so the sub -EQ is far more possible at entering the bloodstream intact. And D-bol is NOT EQ dude. Try one, then the other. Even not knowing a thing about science will show up in the trenches.
Equipoise is Dianabol with the 17-aa removed. The adding or removing of a 17-aa group gives a steroid much differant functional characteristics. Because of this Equipoise is no where similar to Dianabol wrt to it’s effects.
[quote]nsane-membrain wrote:
And sublingual is much different than swollowing a tab, so the sub -EQ is far more possible at entering the bloodstream intact. And D-bol is NOT EQ dude. Try one, then the other. Even not knowing a thing about science will show up in the trenches.[/quote]
I don’t remember saying that EQ was in any way releated to Dbol. I am scientifically educated to degree level, however my field of education cannot answer whether EQ could be taken orally.