Equipoise vs Tren E

I know the tren ester has a binding affinity for the androgen receptor three times as high as that of testosterone but what about EQ?

Will you make half the strength gains with Equipoise compared to Tren? Anyone have a idea of the %?

I am figuring that cardio should be better with Equipoise.

Any thoughts or experience?

By the way I am done making tren from Finiplex. PITA! At least with powder you are not throwing anything away. I never know with a Fina conversion if the product (binders) I throw away has hormone in it. Just my experience.

I don’t mean to be a dick, but please try to get terminology right if you want to get into something resembling a technical discussion.

It is not the “tren ester” that does whtever, but the tren molecule. The ester is a largely inert (from an AA perspective) chain of carbon atoms and does not have a binding affinity for the androgen receptor as far as I’m aware.

If you want to compare tren to EQ, then you are comparing apples and oranges my friend.

EQ and tren are not comparable IMO. it’s like comparing 30 minutes on a bike with tabata on a rower. One is boring and yields average results. The other is insane and will turn you into a greek god.

:wink:

BBB

Sorry about the terminology. You are not being a dick BBB. I know what you mean about tren and I would say it is largly responsible for the build I have. I was going to try some EQ for some less frequent injections. I guess I will just stack it with the Tren and test. I bought it for my wife to try but from what I read that wasnt a good idea for a female. I just wanted to know how lame EQ was to Tren. From what you say BBB eq wasnt worth the cash when I can use tren E.

I dont much care for Eq, decent for appetite and pump, thats about it.

Dbol is cheaper, more anabolic in my experience, makes you eat like a horse, and has very good strength gains.

1 Like

EQ is a good addition to a bulking cycle to stimulate hunger (300mg/w was enough for me anything over that just jecks up my BP too much) and it does help a little with endurance (so it might be good as a stack with your tren in that regard) although I found that it really only helped me to be able to stay in the gym longer (good recovery between sets) vs any real endurance benifit of being able to last longer during a sprint or something like that. It is not nearly as strong as tren though in terms of strength or body comp changes. It is basically a weaker test which has less water retention when you get right down to it.

Awsome Awsome Answers. Thanks guys!

See I have different experiences with these two compounds.

When I pulled 600mg/week eq out of a previous test/tren cycle…My strength, stamina and recovery between sets dropped VERY quickly and hard over 2 weeks.

I definetly noticed more from 600mg eq than 300mg tren ace per week (which is almost the same cost for me overall, tren being MUCH more expensive mg for mg).

While eq makes me feel good no exceptions, tren doesnt…and makes me thirsty all the time, up and down moods/tiredness, bad indigestion unfocuses me a bit.

I thought maybe I had bogus tren…but another different type feels exactly the same at the moment.

One thing tren does though is burn stubborn fat like nothing else can…its just amazing for me in this respect (remember my diet is 100% though).

So basically I take test as I believe it is the most effective overall steroid and prime male androgen.

I take eq as while not as powerful as test feels milder, nicer, doesnt feel as strong or aggressive but seems to give me endurance and rapid recovery, better breathing respiratory performance that the test doesnt and some strength.

I take tren to melt fat and give me some strength (seems to also cut subq water alot for me as well).

Everyone is different and some people cant get on with eq, alot with tren, or see no gains from eq and the funny thing is test makes me hungrier than eq! lol

This is just my observations on myself