Old Man 'Schools' Some POS

Off Topic
161

I think Dana White should invite Old Beard Guy in to fight Kimbo. THAT would be epic. The Old guy does look like a really Big dude, and he certainly knows how to flip his switch. I bet it would be a good fight.

The pantsing video had to be a setup. That was jsut too perfect. Dude 1, Hey i’ll sit across from hot girl on train, after a minute, walk up and harrass her a little, I’ll pants you, and i’ll be the hero and she will think i’m awsome and i’ll get her number. Next week you pants me and you get the hot chicks number. LOL

If it wasn’t a setup, that is the most epic pwnge of a bully I have ever witnessed.

V

162

[quote]RBlue wrote:

[quote]admbaum wrote:
If someone attacks you, smashing their face in to preserve your life is the RIGHT thing to do. The old guy got away and the goon attacked him. [/quote]

I think a little shove to the chest barely qualifies as “attack”. Smashing in his face was a complete over-reaction, and I hope you were joking about “preserve your life”, because otherwise you’re seriously blowing it out of proportion.

Neither party was in the right, both were egging each other on. We didn’t see what started the whole thing, but they were BOTH acting like “goons”. And the old guy proceeded to lie about it, as the other guy clearly didn’t hit him in the face.
[/quote]

Any physical contact out of anger constitutes an attack/assault in Texas. All due respect, would you have just let someone put their hands on you like that? And no, I was no joking when I said “preserve your life”. If that “shove in the chest” happen to be accompanied by a knife would it have been more or less of an attack? Someone comes at you in an aggressive manner, are you going to look at what they are attacking you with or are you going to respond to preserve your life? I dont know where you come from but around here, any physical altercation is potentially a life and death situation and you need to handle yourself accordingly.

163

[quote]Vegita wrote:
The pantsing video had to be a setup. That was jsut too perfect. Dude 1, Hey i’ll sit across from hot girl on train, after a minute, walk up and harrass her a little, I’ll pants you, and i’ll be the hero and she will think i’m awsome and i’ll get her number. Next week you pants me and you get the hot chicks number. LOL

If it wasn’t a setup, that is the most epic pwnge of a bully I have ever witnessed.

V[/quote]

Definitely fake.

164

[quote]Big_Boss wrote:

[quote]admbaum wrote:

[quote]TrainerDude wrote:
Some of you clowns are just as racist as either one of these guys you’re calling racists. Your statements are provocative and you know it. On the street, we’d be in the same situation as those guys by what you say. Of course, you think I’m taking sides but I’m not. I side with the RIGHT thing. Neither of them did the RIGHT thing when they had a chance so it escalated. When people get mad, all kinds of “stuff” comes out of them that they ordinarily wouldn’t say or do. I could go on about my own experiences but for what? It won’t change minds or attitudes. I do appreciate the responses of several of you who pointed out some things without bias. As you see, I don’t have an avatar to hide behind so you see ME. But don’t pre-judge me or anyone. That’s what those clowns did.
Another note: kingkrs, what was that all about??? was she doped up or coked up or what? [/quote]

If someone attacks you, smashing their face in to preserve your life is the RIGHT thing to do. The old guy got away and the goon attacked him. Plain and simple case of assault where the assailant crys foul when they get their ass kicked. Their little cohort should also be charged for stealing the old guys stuff. The old guy did the RIGHT thing by moving away. The goon chose to attack him. Why is that so hard to see? Because one is white and the other is black? Stop looking at this as racial because its not. Assume they are both white or both black. The old guy was RIGHT to defend himself no matter what color his skin is. Hell, place yourself in the old guys shoes, are you just going to let someone attack you? [/quote]

Come on,ab…you’re better than that to make a blind assumption that TD is siding with the black guy because of race…especially when he’s alluded to no such thing.

You’re giving a clear example of racial-motivated POV that he was initially criticizing.[/quote]

You’re right BB, I shouldnt have quoted him and just made my comments. I didnt mean to single him out specifically and for that; my bad TD

165

No worries.

166

[quote]RBlue wrote:

[quote]admbaum wrote:
If someone attacks you, smashing their face in to preserve your life is the RIGHT thing to do. The old guy got away and the goon attacked him. [/quote]

I think a little shove to the chest barely qualifies as “attack”. Smashing in his face was a complete over-reaction, and I hope you were joking about “preserve your life”, because otherwise you’re seriously blowing it out of proportion.

Neither party was in the right, both were egging each other on. We didn’t see what started the whole thing, but they were BOTH acting like “goons”. And the old guy proceeded to lie about it, as the other guy clearly didn’t hit him in the face.
[/quote]

He threw the first punch, even if it was a sissy one. It is absolutely an attack. There probably would have been more to follow if the old guy hadn’t taken action. He has no duty to sit there and wait to see if the guy pulls a knife or hits him harder before responding. That’s one of the dumber things I’ve heard of.

Plus the dude is old, just the anxiety of any assault could be fatal. Could have recently had open heart surgery, in such case even a soft blow to the chest could kill him. Bottom line being he had every right and it was his life and limb being threatened. I suppose you think the pantsing shouldn’t have been done either, cause he hadn’t even touched anyone yet.

The other thing you’re missing is that generally the “bad” guys in these videos don’t do these things just once. Maybe teaching these guys lessons prevents some assaults against weaker opponents in the future?

167

[quote]admbaum wrote:

[quote]RBlue wrote:

[quote]admbaum wrote:
If someone attacks you, smashing their face in to preserve your life is the RIGHT thing to do. The old guy got away and the goon attacked him. [/quote]

I think a little shove to the chest barely qualifies as “attack”. Smashing in his face was a complete over-reaction, and I hope you were joking about “preserve your life”, because otherwise you’re seriously blowing it out of proportion.

Neither party was in the right, both were egging each other on. We didn’t see what started the whole thing, but they were BOTH acting like “goons”. And the old guy proceeded to lie about it, as the other guy clearly didn’t hit him in the face.
[/quote]

Any physical contact out of anger constitutes an attack/assault in Texas. All due respect, would you have just let someone put their hands on you like that? And no, I was no joking when I said “preserve your life”. If that “shove in the chest” happen to be accompanied by a knife would it have been more or less of an attack? Someone comes at you in an aggressive manner, are you going to look at what they are attacking you with or are you going to respond to preserve your life? I dont know where you come from but around here, any physical altercation is potentially a life and death situation and you need to handle yourself accordingly. [/quote]

BOTH sides were verbally aggressive, so where, exactly, does the attack start? I don’t disagree that the shove was out of line, but I think it’s important to look at degrees of aggression. We’re all going to interpret their actions in different ways (as none of us can read their minds to know their motivations), but it seemed to me that the old guy was simply trying to fuck the other guy up, not preserve his life. He was looking for any excuse to get very violent, and then lied about what instigated it after the fact.

I’m fairly certain we’re not going to agree about this, so I’m going to leave it at that.

168

[quote]RBlue wrote:

[quote]admbaum wrote:

[quote]RBlue wrote:

[quote]admbaum wrote:
If someone attacks you, smashing their face in to preserve your life is the RIGHT thing to do. The old guy got away and the goon attacked him. [/quote]

I think a little shove to the chest barely qualifies as “attack”. Smashing in his face was a complete over-reaction, and I hope you were joking about “preserve your life”, because otherwise you’re seriously blowing it out of proportion.

Neither party was in the right, both were egging each other on. We didn’t see what started the whole thing, but they were BOTH acting like “goons”. And the old guy proceeded to lie about it, as the other guy clearly didn’t hit him in the face.
[/quote]

Any physical contact out of anger constitutes an attack/assault in Texas. All due respect, would you have just let someone put their hands on you like that? And no, I was no joking when I said “preserve your life”. If that “shove in the chest” happen to be accompanied by a knife would it have been more or less of an attack? Someone comes at you in an aggressive manner, are you going to look at what they are attacking you with or are you going to respond to preserve your life? I dont know where you come from but around here, any physical altercation is potentially a life and death situation and you need to handle yourself accordingly. [/quote]

BOTH sides were verbally aggressive, so where, exactly, does the attack start? I don’t disagree that the shove was out of line, but I think it’s important to look at degrees of aggression. We’re all going to interpret their actions in different ways (as none of us can read their minds to know their motivations), but it seemed to me that the old guy was simply trying to fuck the other guy up, not preserve his life. He was looking for any excuse to get very violent, and then lied about what instigated it after the fact.

I’m fairly certain we’re not going to agree about this, so I’m going to leave it at that.[/quote]

Name calling isn’t assault. the guy moved away from the other, the other guy followed him and threw a punch. It could not be more cut and dry. I’m absolutely positive that if a guy walked up and started hitting you with weak punches, you’d feel the need to defend yourself.

Next, if the response was really over and beyond what was appropriate, the younger guy wouldn’t have been running his mouth afterward. He continued to threaten afterward.

After threatening violence, following after the old guy, and getting up in his face, I think the old guy would have been justified throwing the first punch, the guy was a threat to his well being at that point.

The guy started a fist fight, and got punched in the face. how is that not appropriate?

169

[quote]RBlue wrote:

BOTH sides were verbally aggressive, so where, exactly, does the attack start? I don’t disagree that the shove was out of line, but I think it’s important to look at degrees of aggression. We’re all going to interpret their actions in different ways (as none of us can read their minds to know their motivations), but it seemed to me that the old guy was simply trying to fuck the other guy up, not preserve his life. He was looking for any excuse to get very violent, and then lied about what instigated it after the fact.

I’m fairly certain we’re not going to agree about this, so I’m going to leave it at that.[/quote]

The old guy got hit in the chest, that is called assault. He then beat the guy down to where he was no longer a threat then got off the bus. Everything the old guy did was right.

Lets go over what happened. It looks like the old guy and the young guy where giving each other shit. The young guy got offended and the old guy moved. The young guy says some shit to the old guy as he is walking up and the old guy makes a joke out of it. The old guy in the front says he would slap the shit out of the young guy if he tried anything. The young guy comes up to him and hits him in the chest(assaults the old man). The old guy precedes to teach the young punk a lesson.

How you can blame the old guy is beyond me. You can’t admit you where wrong blaming the old guy so now you are pulling “we all interpret things different” card, which is a load of shit.

170

This may be a little off but there is Assault and there is Battery. Try either one against your old lady or old man and see where it gets you–Domestic Violence. My point is-- words carry results, especially in court.

171

[quote]Mackk wrote:
Both of those videos make me happy[/quote]

Here’s one of my all-time favorites

172

I disdain racism. Hopefully I’ve misunderstood the context of the old guy asking the other guy for a spit shine. If not, and he said it because of his race, that’s disgraceful.

173

[quote]Beershoes wrote:
I disdain racism. Hopefully I’ve misunderstood the context of the old guy asking the other guy for a spit shine. If not, and he said it because of his race, that’s disgraceful. [/quote]

Being disgraceful is protected by the bill of rights, the right to not be offended is not. Racist or not, the old guy did nothing wrong.

174

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

[quote]Beershoes wrote:
I disdain racism. Hopefully I’ve misunderstood the context of the old guy asking the other guy for a spit shine. If not, and he said it because of his race, that’s disgraceful. [/quote]

Being disgraceful is protected by the bill of rights, the right to not be offended is not. Racist or not, the old guy did nothing wrong.[/quote]

legally speaking he did nothing wrong. Tho something tells me there was more to the conversation then was shown.

175

[quote]John S. wrote:

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

[quote]Beershoes wrote:
I disdain racism. Hopefully I’ve misunderstood the context of the old guy asking the other guy for a spit shine. If not, and he said it because of his race, that’s disgraceful. [/quote]

Being disgraceful is protected by the bill of rights, the right to not be offended is not. Racist or not, the old guy did nothing wrong.[/quote]

legally speaking he did nothing wrong. Tho something tells me there was more to the conversation then was shown. [/quote]

Please note that “not wrong” does not equal “right”. He definitely could have done things better in my opinion, but he was within his rights.

176

very k0ol karate instructor video… that’s a nice move.

177

Anyone else old enough to remember the audio tape of “Joe” needing a 'bambulance, because he got bit by a deer?

178

[quote]Mad_Duck wrote:
Anyone else old enough to remember the audio tape of “Joe” needing a 'bambulance, because he got bit by a deer?[/quote]

HOLY SIT, YES!!!

That recording made me cry when I first heard it!!

You must find it!!!

179

There was also a video of an older lady that gets knocked down in a crowd rushing to get in a store (black Friday I think) she keeps asking for “AH AMBA-LANCE” or some such thing even though it was apparent she was unharmed.

180

Here’s the same video I posted earlier but with sound this time.

This guy appears to be in martial arts/karate as well. It’s amazing how he keeps his cool for that long.