Obama's War on Women

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]njrusmc wrote:
If nothing else, Romney knows how to run a business and he’s earned what is his. Clearly the man is innovative (Bain & Company contributions) and is capable of solving complex problems. Mormons generally piss me off with their “holier than thou” attitudes but if it stays out of politics, who cares?[/quote]

Exactly my point. Romney comes along at time when we need someone who can understand the complexities of a big economic structure such as the US economy. We tried a community organizer and we can now see where it got us.

Romney didn’t get to be worth 200 million because he’s an idiot. And those who think he inherited it are quite wrong. Romney gave away what inheritance that he did receive to his alma mater.

Romney is a self-made multi millionaire and that my friends takes intelligence, the ability to manage people and a great amount of initiative. The exact qualities that we need in our Chief Executive.

Community organizer… (shaking head)[/quote]

Really? Lets not forget he has his NAME, which I’m sure helped him quite a bit in getting jobs etc.

^His name almost definitely did help him get a foot in the door. But his performance is what made him rich and successful. You don’t become a CEO of a large organization by being someone’s buddy (please withhold the anecdotal evidence). Don’t blame his success on his birth status because it’s just not true.

LOL war on women. The real war on women is republicans trying to regulate what a women can do with her body. This is just senseless bickering.

[quote]njrusmc wrote:
^His name almost definitely did help him get a foot in the door. But his performance is what made him rich and successful. You don’t become a CEO of a large organization by being someone’s buddy (please withhold the anecdotal evidence). Don’t blame his success on his birth status because it’s just not true.[/quote]

No but It certainly leads to better opportunities then what most people will ever have.

[quote]jasmincar wrote:
LOL war on women. The real war on women is republicans trying to regulate what a women can do with her body. This is just senseless bickering.[/quote]

Are you really trying to turn this into yet another abortion debate? (And I use the term debate very loosely.)

I don’t know of any other subject where people have shut down their brains as they have on this one. And yes on both sides.

[quote]optheta wrote:

[quote]njrusmc wrote:
^His name almost definitely did help him get a foot in the door. But his performance is what made him rich and successful. You don’t become a CEO of a large organization by being someone’s buddy (please withhold the anecdotal evidence). Don’t blame his success on his birth status because it’s just not true.[/quote]

No but It certainly leads to better opportunities then what most people will ever have.[/quote]

Take no offense, but that statement is the root of all excuses.

“I never had the chance.”

“He only has what he has because of X, Y, and Z.”

“If someone had given me the opportunity I would have jumped on it!”

The list goes on. The facebook guy, the Spanx girl, and Michael Dell were nobodys and now all of them are billionaires. You certainly can’t hate someone who took their innovations to prime time and got rich from it. Doing so only makes you jealous and resentful.

Picture: Michelle Obama’s childhood home.


“I was raised in a working-class family on the south Side of Chicago. That’s how I identify myself, a working-class girl,” she has told the voters, time after time.

“Michelle was from a middle-class family,” confirmed one of her long-time friends, Angela Acree.

“She came from a regular family. They had a nice home. It wasn’t a mansion, but it was just fine. It was a decent neighbourhood.”

According to family friends, Michelle’s father was a volunteer organiser for the city’s Democratic Party, a by-word for machine politics in America, and his loyalty was rewarded with a well-paid engineering job at Chicago’s water plant. Even before overtime, he earned $42,686 - 25 per cent more than High School teachers at the time.

(At Princeton) she was obliged to take out loans to pay her way and this rankled, as she revealed in a 1985 thesis.

The document, now locked away by the university until after the election in November, betrays an angry, campaigning brand of politics which in no way fits with the mild-mannered advocate of common sense now winning hearts and minds from coast to coast.

An acquaintance of Obama’s family compares her with another political wife, another lawyer as it happens, with a keen interest in making money.

“Michelle is very much like Cherie Blair. She is a middle-class girl who has discovered that money is nice and doesn’t see that as a contradiction with having radical beliefs,” he said.

The rewards have been significant. Despite the image she projects on the Newsweek cover, Michelle owns an impressive collection of diamond jewellery, designer outfits and 400(pounds)-a-pair Jimmy Choo shoes.

“When I’m off the road, I’m going to Target [a U.S. chain store] to get the toilet paper.”

She did not bother to mention, however, that the paper, like the rest of the family shopping, is taken to an 825,000(pounds) three-storey red-brick Georgian revival mansion, set amid beautifully manicured lawns in one of Chicago’s most affluent districts.

Even the house became a source of controversy when it emerged that the wife of a Chicago slum landlord, Tony Rezko, helped them buy land to enlarge its grounds.

Renowned for leaving tenants of one of his squalid buildings without heat in the city’s brutal winter, Rezko now is facing federal corruption charges.

More contentious still was Michelle’s appointment as the 150,000(pounds)-a-year vice-president of external affairs at the University of Chicago hospital in 2005.

It came only two months after Barack was sworn in as a U.S. senator, and was attacked by critics as a blatant attempt, critics claim, by the hospital’s hierarchy to curry favour with her husband, in an era when some politicians want to rein in the vast profits of America’s medical system. They questioned why the wife of a committed Democrat would work for a hospital that has been accused of ruthless greed. Michelle’s image was further tarnished in May 2006, when it was revealed that the centre - despite earning some 50million(pounds) a year - had refused to treat a man who could not afford to pay his bill. He died.

All of which has led some political veterans to accuse Michelle of the very lack of compassion and moral scruples that her husband has lambasted in his Republican rivals for the White House.

Michelle also is under attack for joining the board of a food company where she allegedly took part in a 2005 decision to close a pickle and relish plant in La Junta, Colorado, putting 150 mostly Hispanic labourers out of work.

The small town was devastated. “It totally amazed me when they closed it,” said La Junta Mayor Don Rizzuto, who had believed that Michelle and her husband were “the champions of the little guy”.

To Joe Novak, this only goes to prove that Michelle is distorting reality when she attempts to depict herself as a champion of the masses. “For the past year (she and Barack) have jetted around the country with Oprah Winfrey and Robert De Niro, enjoying penthouse parties and living the high life,” he said. Perhaps, when she contrasts her current red-carpet lifestyle with the unassuming world of South Euclid Avenue, she genuinely may think that her childhood was impoverished. And the one thing that is certain about the incredible Mrs O is that she never intends to have to live that way again.’ - UK Daily Mail

[quote]optheta wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]njrusmc wrote:
If nothing else, Romney knows how to run a business and he’s earned what is his. Clearly the man is innovative (Bain & Company contributions) and is capable of solving complex problems. Mormons generally piss me off with their “holier than thou” attitudes but if it stays out of politics, who cares?[/quote]

Exactly my point. Romney comes along at time when we need someone who can understand the complexities of a big economic structure such as the US economy. We tried a community organizer and we can now see where it got us.

Romney didn’t get to be worth 200 million because he’s an idiot. And those who think he inherited it are quite wrong. Romney gave away what inheritance that he did receive to his alma mater.

Romney is a self-made multi millionaire and that my friends takes intelligence, the ability to manage people and a great amount of initiative. The exact qualities that we need in our Chief Executive.

Community organizer… (shaking head)[/quote]

Really? Lets not forget he has his NAME, which I’m sure helped him quite a bit in getting jobs etc.
[/quote]

I think when you are born with a good name that does help. But let’s not forget Paris Hilton who was born with a good name as well. Her Grandfather started the Hilton Hotel chain. But what did she do with that good name? She became a media whore. And our country is rife with those who had “good names” but grew up to do nothing out of the ordinary with that good name.

With that said, Mitt Romney made his fortune on his own! While the name helped open a few doors no doubt, he actually had to walk through those doors and perform in order to succeed. That is the kind of leadership that we need right now. Not many know this but Romney has his law degrgee and a Masters in business both from Harvard. So here is a guy with a great education, an outstanding business background and solid experience as a chief executive of a large company and as Governor of Massachusetts. I honestly feel if we had a fair media that the election wouldn’t even be close. But the media is on the Obama train with this class warfare nonsense.

Ww need someone competent that understands the US economy matters not whether you are a democrat or republican you must understand this. Barack Obama is a great politician to be sure, but when it comes to governing he’s proven to be clueless. But what did the public expect he was never a chief executive, nor did he ever hold a job where he had any real authority. He was a community organizer, a law professor and then Senator for two years before beginning his run for the White House.

Let’s put the class warfare aside and elect someone who is competent in the areas where we need help.

By the way check our founding fathers lineage if you really want to see blue blood and lots of money. And I think they did a heck of a great job don’t you?

[quote]jasmincar wrote:
LOL war on women. The real war on women is republicans trying to regulate what a women can do with her body. This is just senseless bickering.[/quote]

Is that all you learned in your scant 21 years on this earth? You learned to parrot the liberal media – Nice job!

As for the government telling people what they can do with their own bodies maybe you better read the 2,700 page national health care laws rammed through the democratic congress by Barack Obama. In that bill are countless ways that the government tells women (and men too) what they can do with their own bodies.

(shaking head) Maybe you better get your news from better sources than Jon Stewart, Chris Matthews and the other Obama sycophants.

Yeah Ann Romney has the Chauffeur to run the kids around the maids do the laundry and cooking and cleaning

The average house wife does all the jobs listed above and works a full time job . Poor Ann I feel her pain

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]Mufasa wrote:
Wait a minute:

  1. If I’m not mistaken; this was NOT the President’s comment to begin with and

  2. The President AND the First Lady came our strongly and quickly against the comment.

Mufasa[/quote]

No one said it was the President’s comment. It was Hilary Rosin’s comment and she is an Obama operative having been in the White House on multiple occasions. The Allusion is that they floated such an attack through her just in case it backfired, which it did. There is certainly no proof that it came from Obama. But, keeping with his class warfare campaign strategy it would make perfect sense.

[/quote]

I do not think the statement Hillary Rosin made backfired at all , I think the Obama’s disavowed the statement because it was the politically correct thing to do . Plain and simple

[quote]pittbulll wrote:
Yeah Ann Romney has the Chauffeur to run the kids around the maids do the laundry and cooking and cleaning

[/quote]

Tagg: “I don’t remember my mom ever eating a bon bon, or honestly, I don’t remember her ever sitting down and watching TV. She was, I mean, I remember changing diapers, cleaning messes, cooking food, shopping for food, trying to get laundry done, make beds, driving kids to soccer practices. But I mean, we never had a nanny. We never had someone that was doing that stuff for us.”

[quote]
The average house wife does all the jobs listed above and works a full time job . Poor Ann I feel her pain[/quote]

What are you talking about? She’s a 65-year-old grandmother of 16. She raised her five kids herself. You’re an idiot.

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]Mufasa wrote:
Wait a minute:

  1. If I’m not mistaken; this was NOT the President’s comment to begin with and

  2. The President AND the First Lady came our strongly and quickly against the comment.

Mufasa[/quote]

No one said it was the President’s comment. It was Hilary Rosin’s comment and she is an Obama operative having been in the White House on multiple occasions. The Allusion is that they floated such an attack through her just in case it backfired, which it did. There is certainly no proof that it came from Obama. But, keeping with his class warfare campaign strategy it would make perfect sense.

[/quote]

I do not think the statement Hillary Rosin made backfired at all , I think the Obama’s disavowed the statement because it was the politically correct thing to do . Plain and simple
[/quote]

Yeah…it has nothing to do with trying to get reelected nothing. LOL

Obama doesn’t blink without thinking how it effects his reelection!

[quote]pittbulll wrote:
Yeah Ann Romney has the Chauffeur to run the kids around the maids do the laundry and cooking and cleaning

The average house wife does all the jobs listed above and works a full time job . Poor Ann I feel her pain[/quote]

Following your hero Obama on his class warefare charge I see.

You think rich people have it easy because they might have cooks or drivers?

Sure no question money helps I bet. But most of the important things you cannot do with money my friend.

It doesn’t take millions to have dinner with your entire family each night, or attend your childs games or dance recitals. Nor does it take millions to spend time talking to your children about their problems. These are things that good parents do. And it takes no money at all just time and plenty of love.

And when you look at how great the Romney kids turned out there is no question that Ann Romney (and Mitt) directed plenty of love and attention toward their children.

What the hell is the problem with democrats? They’re so envious of the wealthy that everything must come back to money?

If ever there was a sick party it is the democratic party.

Made up of unions and other special interest groups not voting for Obama because he’s good for the nation but because he will continue to support them.

You guys truly make me sick!

[quote]ZEB wrote:
It doesn’t take millions to have dinner with your entire family each night, or attend your childs games or dance recitals. Nor does it take millions to spend time talking to your children about their problems. These are things that good parents do. And it takes no money at all just time and plenty of love.
[/quote]

Correct, it only requires you don’t have a job with evening/night hours.

[quote]sufiandy wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:
It doesn’t take millions to have dinner with your entire family each night, or attend your childs games or dance recitals. Nor does it take millions to spend time talking to your children about their problems. These are things that good parents do. And it takes no money at all just time and plenty of love.
[/quote]

Correct, it only requires you don’t have a job with evening/night hours.[/quote]

True and I think that is a matter of priorities. If there are two people raising the children as there should be then certainly one of them can make it a priority to be there in the evening.

On a side note I’ve seen some couples who both work just so they can have more things. And in the process the children suffer.

First of All I am not voting Obama , why the fuck would I care if the lying sack of shit liberal Romney wins , No skin off my ass , I will vote the libertarian candidate

You guys act like some woman that has more domestic servants than most women have dollars are in the same category . Most women today do all the things SM’s Mom did and worked also , I do not feel sorry for Ann Romney , I am sure she is a good mother but I can not believe she was an over worked Mom

[quote]pittbulll wrote:
First of All I am not voting Obama , why the fuck would I care if the lying sack of shit liberal Romney wins , No skin off my ass , I will vote the libertarian candidate

You guys act like some woman that has more domestic servants than most women have dollars are in the same category . Most women today do all the things SM’s Mom did and worked also , I do not feel sorry for Ann Romney , I am sure she is a good mother but I can not believe she was an over worked Mom [/quote]

“SM’s mum?” Again, what are you talking about? I quoted Tagg Romney talking about his mum.

'It cost taxpayers nearly a half-million dollars for first lady Michelle Obama to travel to Spain in 2010, according to an analysis by Judicial Watch.

The right-leaning watchdog group estimated that the trip cost $467,585. It based its analysis on documents obtained from the U.S. Secret Service and the U.S. Air Force.

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said it took his group “two years and a lawsuit to get these documents out of the Obama administration.”

“It is hypocritical for President Obama to fire GSA officials for wasteful conference spending, while his family went on a luxury vacation in the Costa del Sol Spain that cost taxpayers nearly half a million dollars,” Fitton said.

Among the various travel costs, the group estimated ? using the Defense Department’s 2010 published hourly rates ? that it cost the government $199,323 to fly to Spain and back to the United States.

The New York Times reported that those on the trip included the first lady, one of her daughters and “two friends and four of their daughters, as well as a couple of aides and a couple of advance staff members.”

Fitton’s group has previously disclosed the cost of sending the first family on overseas trips. Its analysis indicated that it cost $424,142 to fly the first family to South Africa and Botswana in 2011.

White House press secretary Jay Carney declined to comment on the report during a press briefing Thursday.

Source: Group: Michelle Obama’s Spain trip cost taxpayers $467k | The Daily Caller


‘March 19, 2012 - AFP, the French news agency, first reported around mid-day Monday that Malia Obama was vacationing in Mexico with 12 friends under the protection of 25 Secret Service agents and a number of local police officers…’ - DailyCaller

[quote]SexMachine wrote:
'It cost taxpayers nearly a half-million dollars for first lady Michelle Obama to travel to Spain in 2010, according to an analysis by Judicial Watch.

The right-leaning watchdog group estimated that the trip cost $467,585. It based its analysis on documents obtained from the U.S. Secret Service and the U.S. Air Force.

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said it took his group “two years and a lawsuit to get these documents out of the Obama administration.”

“It is hypocritical for President Obama to fire GSA officials for wasteful conference spending, while his family went on a luxury vacation in the Costa del Sol Spain that cost taxpayers nearly half a million dollars,” Fitton said.

Among the various travel costs, the group estimated ? using the Defense Department’s 2010 published hourly rates ? that it cost the government $199,323 to fly to Spain and back to the United States.

The New York Times reported that those on the trip included the first lady, one of her daughters and “two friends and four of their daughters, as well as a couple of aides and a couple of advance staff members.”

Fitton’s group has previously disclosed the cost of sending the first family on overseas trips. Its analysis indicated that it cost $424,142 to fly the first family to South Africa and Botswana in 2011.

White House press secretary Jay Carney declined to comment on the report during a press briefing Thursday.

Source: Group: Michelle Obama’s Spain trip cost taxpayers $467k | The Daily Caller


‘March 19, 2012 - AFP, the French news agency, first reported around mid-day Monday that Malia Obama was vacationing in Mexico with 12 friends under the protection of 25 Secret Service agents and a number of local police officers…’ - DailyCaller

[/quote]

I recommend you make a constitutional requirement that all Presidents have no kids and must spend their all their time secluded to the White House unless on official business