[quote]pushharder wrote:
Airtruth wrote:
The indigenous people of the U.S. have the right to the land, we just happened to have killed most of them. The rest we gave some reservations where they can do what they want long as they let us gamble.
Off on a rabbit trail here but I simply can’t allow this unchallenged oversimplification of what actually occurred. I have heard this bullshit over and over my entire life usually by big city dorks who only paid attention to history when they were feeling up their girlfriends while watching “Dances With Wolves” on TNT.
And let me clue you in on a simple fact of human civilization: pragmatically, mankind and/or society has never had a “right” to any land they were wholly incapable of holding.
Long before and well after the white man ever first set foot on the Western Hemisphere, native Americans were ruthlessly, inhumanely and efficiently displacing their “brothers” from lands to which they may or may not have had a “right”. The white man ended up prevailing for three primary reasons:
- better technology
- a prolific birthrate, comparatively speaking
- an ability to efficiently use land to produce more vs. a nomadic society’s requirement of vast tracts to be left relatively unused at all.
Let me cite one small example. The US government, and the white man in general, has been excoriated for decades now for its actions against the Sioux in the Plains Indian Wars of the late 19th century. Incessant war drum beating that the white man “stole” the land from the Sioux has been drilled into the head of every American born since 1940.
Sorry. It didn’t quite happen that way. It’s rarely mentioned that the facts show the Sioux “stole” the land of the what is now the Dakotas and Montana from many other tribes including the Crows just two to three generations prior to the Little Big Horn. The Sioux were despised and hated far more by their Plains “brothers” than the white man ever was.
The Sioux were stronger militarily, had a more prolific birth rate and were mercilessly sadistic. BTW, the Sioux granted no “reservations” to their vanquished prey; they just wiped men, women and children from the face of the earth on a wholesale scale of genocide often after lengthy sessions of torture. This is the reason the Crows were allies of the U.S. Army at numerous engagements in the 1860s - 1880s.
Even thought this is a bit of a rabbit trail as I mentioned it still is pertinent to the Israeli/Palestinian conflict. Because stupid people with possession of little to no facts about the pertinent history make erroneous and at best, simplistic remarks about the Jews blitzkrieging Palestine and “stealing” land from its rightful owners.
You knuckleheads who don’t know their history need to tread on the GAL or Rate My Physique forums and stay off these type threads. Your ignorance is overwhelmingly putrefying the discussion.[/quote]
That’s all very true actually. It’s just human nature to act this way, but the latest and best winner of all of this is the White man, so he is now the target and cause of the misery. RRRIIIGGHHHHTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT. (sarcasm)