[quote]100meters wrote:
SteelyD wrote:
100meters wrote:
So SteelyD on record: against job creation/saving economy. Strange position.
I’m not quite sure I read where I said that anywhere in this thread. Please find where I said that.
you rejected at face value the saving of economy and jobs, i.e. the stimulus. Did you forget that already?
No stimulus = millions more jobs lost and continuing downward spiral of economy. And you reject it.
Clearly not one of our brighter Americans are you?[/quote]
We reject GOVERNMENT spending for stimulating the economy. It’s the projects. There is no long term sustainable projects bub.
I work in that industry. Build a building in DC, A Waterpark in FL, Redesign the Government center in Sacramento, fix some windows, put a few patches in the potholed streets, build some underground pipeline.
The materials and labor WILL stimulate ok, but for a short term only and only in sectors who serve the government. Other than that, it does nothing of real value to citizens.
The big tax break Obama promised sums up to about 13 dollars a week of extra income!! Damn. So are we going to stimulate the economy by buying a couple extra cups of coffee a week?
Sr. citizens on SS will get a one time check for 250!! Wow…
BUT 40 Million will go into protecting a rare mouse in a Bay Area county!
IT MAKES NO FUCKING SENSE!
The manner in which it is built is doomed to fast failure.
[quote]100meters wrote:
I eagerly wait your next Limbaugh lie…[/quote]
Once again, you prove to be a one-trick pony. You seem to be stuck with Limbaugh’s cock in your mouth. I haven’t even heard Limbaugh in over 10 years, and even then I couldn’t stand him.
You obviously hang on his every dear word. I expect that you accept as truth every unbiased word ever uttered from the fraud known as Dan Rather, no?
So, what school, government agency, union, non-profit, or NGO do you belong to or work for? Alternatively, how much welfare do you collect?
Your relentless and fanatical support of collectivism, big government, and reckless deficit spending bores me.
[quote]Sentoguy wrote:
Same can be said of the Patriot act.
Let’s just face the fact that congressmen/women don’t want to do any real work/research for themselves. [/quote]
Wait- you mean this didn’t just start when the Democrats took over Congress???
Really??? Here I was assuming that Republicans read every bill right after they clean their shotguns and say their prayers at night… man, you just sent my world for a loop.
[quote]SteelyD wrote:
Not that it will blunt the severe Bush Derangement Syndrome, but here’s the Bush Administration warning about the state and potential financial problems of Fannie/Freddy in 2003 and Barney (sits-on-cucumbers) Frank (and later Schumer) brushing off the warnings.
[quote]SteelyD wrote:
100meters wrote:
I eagerly wait your next Limbaugh lie…
Once again, you prove to be a one-trick pony. You seem to be stuck with Limbaugh’s cock in your mouth. I haven’t even heard Limbaugh in over 10 years, and even then I couldn’t stand him.
You obviously hang on his every dear word. I expect that you accept as truth every unbiased word ever uttered from the fraud known as Dan Rather, no?
So, what school, government agency, union, non-profit, or NGO do you belong to or work for? Alternatively, how much welfare do you collect?
Your relentless and fanatical support of collectivism, big government, and reckless deficit spending bores me.[/quote]
Because the two presidents that drove the deficit up without care or regard were… Republicans? Reagan and Bush?
And the guy who left it balanced and in the black was… a Democrat?
So answer me this guys, exactly which Republican president in the last 25 years has left the country without a huge fucking debt after spending far too much money?
[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
So answer me this guys, exactly which Republican president in the last 25 years has left the country without a huge fucking debt after spending far too much money?[/quote]
So, who here is defending wasteful Republican spending anyway?
You partisans sure don’t think outside the box much. You actually think there’s a damn bit of difference between the two parties with respect to raping the taxpayers?
[quote]Rockscar wrote:
100meters wrote:
SteelyD wrote:
100meters wrote:
So SteelyD on record: against job creation/saving economy. Strange position.
I’m not quite sure I read where I said that anywhere in this thread. Please find where I said that.
you rejected at face value the saving of economy and jobs, i.e. the stimulus. Did you forget that already?
No stimulus = millions more jobs lost and continuing downward spiral of economy. And you reject it.
Clearly not one of our brighter Americans are you?
We reject GOVERNMENT spending for stimulating the economy. It’s the projects. There is no long term sustainable projects bub.
I work in that industry. Build a building in DC, A Waterpark in FL, Redesign the Government center in Sacramento, fix some windows, put a few patches in the potholed streets, build some underground pipeline.
The materials and labor WILL stimulate ok, but for a short term only and only in sectors who serve the government. Other than that, it does nothing of real value to citizens.
The big tax break Obama promised sums up to about 13 dollars a week of extra income!! Damn. So are we going to stimulate the economy by buying a couple extra cups of coffee a week?
Sr. citizens on SS will get a one time check for 250!! Wow…
BUT 40 Million will go into protecting a rare mouse in a Bay Area county!
IT MAKES NO FUCKING SENSE!
The manner in which it is built is doomed to fast failure.
[/quote]
40 million for a mouse absolutely doesn’t make sense.
Of course, that’s because it’s made up, by folks paid to lie. You are a sucker.
Jeebus is every point in here a made up Republican talking point?
Because the two presidents that drove the deficit up without care or regard were… Republicans? Reagan and Bush?
And the guy who left it balanced and in the black was… a Democrat?
Newt Gingrich was a democrat?
Cute. But Clinton.
[/quote]
Oh, I remember that. He said “Newt have me a balanced budget plan ready to sign, friend.” And Newt saluted and did so. No battles. And I don’t recall any arguements about how long it would take, or anything like that.
Fighting Irish you are the idiot who hated Eli Manning until he won…cuzzz.
Your the dumbass who supports the porkoulus (check spelling please). Since both you and 10 millimeters (actual size of his penis) (after his girl told me). Check proper MLA thingy???
Only attack my damn ebonics or hispobonics…Hmmm guess you democrats are not tolerant of my edumafacation and more tolerant of Gitmo. Yeah thought so you dumbass.
Please feel free to point out all inaccuracies.
[quote]jre67t wrote:
Fighting Irish you are the idiot who hated Eli Manning until he won…cuzzz.
Your the dumbass who supports the porkoulus (check spelling please). Since both you and 10 millimeters (actual size of his penis) (after his girl told me). Check proper MLA thingy???
Only attack my damn ebonics or hispobonics…Hmmm guess you democrats are not tolerant of my edumafacation and more tolerant of Gitmo. Yeah thought so you dumbass.
Please feel free to point out all inaccuracies.
[/quote]
[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
jre67t wrote:
Fighting Irish you are the idiot who hated Eli Manning until he won…cuzzz.
Your the dumbass who supports the porkoulus (check spelling please). Since both you and 10 millimeters (actual size of his penis) (after his girl told me). Check proper MLA thingy???
Only attack my damn ebonics or hispobonics…Hmmm guess you democrats are not tolerant of my edumafacation and more tolerant of Gitmo. Yeah thought so you dumbass.
Please feel free to point out all inaccuracies.
[quote]John S. wrote:
<<< If you owed the bank $40,000 would you take out a 20,000 dollar loan to fix up your house? This spending bill is just like that except Its a 800 billion dollar loan. When you owe money the last thing you do is take out more but that’s just common sense.[/quote]
How people who can tie their own shoes and wipe their own ass (maybe not) do not get this can only be explained by a wholesale sycophantic commitment to evil collectivist ideology.
You’d have to be a liberal to think that spending, not only other people’s money, but that of people who have not even been born yet, and all of it, is a good idea.
Yes, the Republicans have been plenty liberal too, but… hang on… the common defense is actually a constitutional expenditure and we’d have plenty of money for it if only we would cease and desist from from buying off voters with mountains and mountains of spending on absolute bullshit never intended in the vision of what this country was supposed to be.
One last time. This is not a party problem. It is a principle problem and both parties have been willing participants in taking to us to the point where an enemy with a silver tongue now occupies our highest office with an army of lowlife allies in our legislative branch. Ultimately, its the plunging character and individual self determination in the populous that drove us into the very bosom of what we spent decades defeating.
When you pick your own leaders you get what you deserve.
There is enough blame for everyone. Clinton signed the legislation to kill Glass- Steagall Act. Bush spent money like a drunk sailor. Barney Frank resisted any reform at FM/FM. Alan Greenspan allowed interest to stay at insanely low levels which fanned the bubble. Greedy CEO leverage themselves on the belief that real estate never goes down.
Citizens bought into that idea and lied in order to get mortages (that they could not afford) but believed was their right, greedy bankers looked the other way. Nixion took us off the Gold standard, Wilson allowed a private for profit bank (Fred Res) to set money policy for the nation. And now that the folks understand that you cant live like a king on credit alone and they are starting to save and pay off their debt. The fucking goverment is trying to reinflate that bubble so that the consumer can spend again.
[i][quote]"As always election campaigns are staged as an entertainment, a diversion for the people; they are permitted to think and act as if they are really making their own government, but it is always the Jews that win. And if after having elected their man or group, obedience is not rendered to the Jewish control, then you speedily hear of “scandals” and “investigations” and “impeachments” for the removal of the disobedient.
Usually a man with a “past” proves the most obedient instrument, but even a good man can often be tangled up in campaign practices that compromise him. It has been commonly known that Jewish manipulation of American election campaigns have been so skillfully handled, that no matter which candidate was elected, there was ready made a sufficient amount of evidence to discredit him in case his Jewish masters needed to discredit him. To arrange this is part of the thoroughness of Jewish control. And, of course, the American people have been sufficiently trained to roar against the public official immediately the first Jewish hound emits its warning bay.
Amazing as is the technique of the Jewish political process, the readiness with which the American people can be counted on to do their part in forwarding the game is still more amazing…"[/quote][/i]
– Henry Ford, 1921
Barack Obama: The first Jewish president?
Chicago circle nurtured him all the way to the top
Chicago Tribune - Dec 2008
Putting aside which of the three great Abrahamic religions can lay claim to Obama’s soul, it is clear that his political career, from its South Side inception to the audacious run for the White House, was nurtured and enabled by a close-knit network of Chicago Jews. http://www.njdc.org/blog/post/obama1stjewishpresident121208
Obama Rejects ‘Car Czar,’ Naming Geithner, Summers to Head Team
Feb. 16 (Bloomberg) – President Barack Obama opted against naming a “car czar,” instead asking Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and White House economic adviser Lawrence Summers to head a task force on revamping the U.S. auto industry… http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aNpLdwT2Frs4&refer=home
Division of congressional posts seems to favor Jewish issues
WASHINGTON, Jan. 9 (JTA) – The new Congress doesn’t just feature more Jews in powerful positions than the community has seen in more than a decade – it also features more friendly faces across the board, Jewish leaders say…
Other Jewish members guiding House committees include:
Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), who will deal with banking laws in the Financial Services Committee;
Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.), likely to assume a high profile heading the Government Reform Committee as he investigates the Bush administration’s handling of the Iraq war, the 2005 hurricanes and rising energy costs…
Jews in chairmanship positions include:
Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.) at Armed Services;
Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) at Environment;
Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) at Homeland Security;
Sen. Herb Kohl (D-Wis.) at Aging;
Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) at Rules; and
Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) at Economic
Both Houses have Jews in the top political position of caucus chair – Schumer in the Senate and Rep. Rahm Emanuel (D-Ill.) in the House
[quote][i]"Anti-Semitism is a term which is bandied about too loosely. If it continues to be used indiscriminately and vituperatively about all who attempt to discuss Jewish characteristics and Jewish world-power, it will, in time, arrive at the estate of respectability and honor. It may be a useful clearing of the ground to define what anti-Semitism is not.
It is not a recognition of the Jewish Question If it were, then it could be set down that the bulk of the American people are destined to become anti-Semites, for they are beginning to recognize the existence of a Jewish Question and will steadily do so in increasing numbers as the Question is forded on them from the various practical angles of their lives.
The Question is here. We may be honestly blind to it. We may be timidly silent about it. We may even make dishonest denial of it. But it is here and in time all will have to recognize it. In time the polite “hush, hush,” of oversensitive or intimidated circles will not be powerful enough to suppress it…"[/i][/quote]
–Henry Ford
Almost forgot:
Dominique Strauss-Kahn: Head of International Monetary Fund
Neocon, Robert Zoellick: Head of World Bank (love that pic)
Ben Bernanke: Chairman of the Fed (four out of the five board members)
[i]"As always election campaigns are staged as an entertainment, a diversion for the people; they are permitted to think and act as if they are really making their own government, but it is always the Jews that win. And if after having elected their man or group, obedience is not rendered to the Jewish control, then you speedily hear of “scandals” and “investigations” and “impeachments” for the removal of the disobedient.
Usually a man with a “past” proves the most obedient instrument, but even a good man can often be tangled up in campaign practices that compromise him. It has been commonly known that Jewish manipulation of American election campaigns have been so skillfully handled, that no matter which candidate was elected, there was ready made a sufficient amount of evidence to discredit him in case his Jewish masters needed to discredit him. To arrange this is part of the thoroughness of Jewish control. And, of course, the American people have been sufficiently trained to roar against the public official immediately the first Jewish hound emits its warning bay.
Amazing as is the technique of the Jewish political process, the readiness with which the American people can be counted on to do their part in forwarding the game is still more amazing…"[/i]
– Henry Ford, 1921
Barack Obama: The first Jewish president?
Chicago circle nurtured him all the way to the top
Chicago Tribune - Dec 2008
Putting aside which of the three great Abrahamic religions can lay claim to Obama’s soul, it is clear that his political career, from its South Side inception to the audacious run for the White House, was nurtured and enabled by a close-knit network of Chicago Jews. http://www.njdc.org/blog/post/obama1stjewishpresident121208
Obama Rejects ‘Car Czar,’ Naming Geithner, Summers to Head Team
Feb. 16 (Bloomberg) – President Barack Obama opted against naming a “car czar,” instead asking Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and White House economic adviser Lawrence Summers to head a task force on revamping the U.S. auto industry… http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aNpLdwT2Frs4&refer=home
Division of congressional posts seems to favor Jewish issues
WASHINGTON, Jan. 9 (JTA) – The new Congress doesn’t just feature more Jews in powerful positions than the community has seen in more than a decade – it also features more friendly faces across the board, Jewish leaders say…
Other Jewish members guiding House committees include:
Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), who will deal with banking laws in the Financial Services Committee;
Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.), likely to assume a high profile heading the Government Reform Committee as he investigates the Bush administration’s handling of the Iraq war, the 2005 hurricanes and rising energy costs…
Jews in chairmanship positions include:
Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.) at Armed Services;
Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) at Environment;
Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) at Homeland Security;
Sen. Herb Kohl (D-Wis.) at Aging;
Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) at Rules; and
Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) at Economic
Both Houses have Jews in the top political position of caucus chair – Schumer in the Senate and Rep. Rahm Emanuel (D-Ill.) in the House
[i]"Anti-Semitism is a term which is bandied about too loosely. If it continues to be used indiscriminately and vituperatively about all who attempt to discuss Jewish characteristics and Jewish world-power, it will, in time, arrive at the estate of respectability and honor. It may be a useful clearing of the ground to define what anti-Semitism is not.
It is not a recognition of the Jewish Question If it were, then it could be set down that the bulk of the American people are destined to become anti-Semites, for they are beginning to recognize the existence of a Jewish Question and will steadily do so in increasing numbers as the Question is forded on them from the various practical angles of their lives.
The Question is here. We may be honestly blind to it. We may be timidly silent about it. We may even make dishonest denial of it. But it is here and in time all will have to recognize it. In time the polite “hush, hush,” of oversensitive or intimidated circles will not be powerful enough to suppress it…"[/i]
–Henry Ford
Almost forgot:
Dominique Strauss-Kahn: Head of International Monetary Fund
Neocon, Robert Zoellick: Head of World Bank (love that pic)
Ben Bernanke: Chairman of the Fed (four out of the five board members)
Thats a lock.[/quote]
Do they have to religious jews, or just have “jew blood” somewhere in their family tree to raise your suspicions?
And I wonder if you favor some kind of reverse Affirmative Action. Like only a certain amount of Jews are to be represented in congress, cabinet positions, etc. And, what about in the private sector?
