PS To our new “saviors”, let me just say that, as one Iraqi, I DON’T WANT YOUR “ATTEMPTS TO IMPROVE” THE IRAQ. QUIT YOUR INTERVENTIONISM AND LEAVE US BE. Draw down your forces and go back to worrying about YOUR OWN community.
“Are we clear?”
Changed citizenship to “the Iraq?” If not, KINDLY FUCK OFF, Mr Euro-trash.
Oh my, a sore loser.
Allways a pretty sight.
BAGHDAD, Sept. 26 – A strong majority of Iraqis want U.S.-led military forces to immediately withdraw from the country, saying their swift departure would make Iraq more secure and decrease sectarian violence, according to new polls by the State Department and independent researchers.
You seem to misunderstand. My post had nothing to do with Iraq. It’s all about US not wanting to hear another word of “improvement” from YOU and YOUR BOYFRIEND. YOU ARE NOT WANTED HERE.
Now “practice what you preach” little Whorion!
PS Does “Mr. Eurotrash” offend you? I can always use “Euroscum” if you prefer…
PPS YOU ARE NOT WANTED HERE
[/quote]
Oh my, I am beginning to understand that your problem is rampant anti-Europeism.
Dear Chushin,
even though your country is hardly 200 years old, being American is nothing to be ashamed of.
There really is no need to feel inferior. You do not have to try to make others smaller to feel bigger.
And do not despair, your lack of sophistication is nothing that some time abroad could not fix.
[quote]lixy wrote:
Simon Forsyth wrote:
I’m not selling it… Like I care what you think you know… Like I said there is a difference between thinking something and knowing it… Tell me what evidence you have to prove I am wrong, you cant just make a blanket statement and have no evidence to back it up… Its like the whole “Slam Dunk” statement regarding WMD in Iraq and look where thats got us…
Somebody’s not been paying attention in elementary school.
Go eat a Toblerone
Yum.
[/quote]
Lixy Dixy,
I asked what evidence you had to prove that I was wrong since I know what I saw. I have witnessed the facts if you will so maybe you just cant read, my comment wasn’t negative proof because I stated this is what I know because this is what I have seen.
Thats what happens when you learn shit off of the internet instead of going to school.
[quote]Mishima wrote: @zap: even though it`s not really important for this thread, but Austria was first mentioned in a document in the year 996. Just a fact.
[quote]Mishima wrote: @zap: even though it`s not really important for this thread, but Austria was first mentioned in a document in the year 996. Just a fact.
[/quote]
But the country as it is now is newer than the US.
[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
Mishima wrote: @zap: even though it`s not really important for this thread, but Austria was first mentioned in a document in the year 996. Just a fact.
But the country as it is now is newer than the US.[/quote]
Correct the latest iteration of Austria is quite new.
guys: than russia would be about 20 years old, germany 17 years old. there is no pride on my side on how old my country is (well maybe a little when I walk through the streets of Vienna) but you will find in every schoolbook or dictionary 996 as the “beginning” of Austria.
and than Austria would be 12 years old for we joined the EU in the year 1995 which changed our constitution tremendously as we gave up wide parts of our soverignity back than.
I asked what evidence you had to prove that I was wrong since I know what I saw. I have witnessed the facts if you will so maybe you just cant read, my comment wasn’t negative proof because I stated this is what I know because this is what I have seen.
Thats what happens when you learn shit off of the internet instead of going to school.[/quote]
You did ask me for negative proof. Worse, you brought up the Iraqi WMD when everybody knows Saddam couldn’t have provided a negative proof.
You saw what you saw, and I can’t possibly argue that particular case. But don’t try to pass it as a general rule in Iran.
[quote]lixy wrote:
Simon Forsyth wrote:
Lixy Dixy,
I asked what evidence you had to prove that I was wrong since I know what I saw. I have witnessed the facts if you will so maybe you just cant read, my comment wasn’t negative proof because I stated this is what I know because this is what I have seen.
Thats what happens when you learn shit off of the internet instead of going to school.
You did ask me for negative proof. Worse, you brought up the Iraqi WMD when everybody knows Saddam couldn’t have provided a negative proof.
You saw what you saw, and I can’t possibly argue that particular case. But don’t try to pass it as a general rule in Iran.[/quote]
When I am told that it is that way by Iranians, and I have read about it and watched documentaries about it (as well as being briefed about it in relation to child sex crimes - from when I was working as a detention officer at Baxter IDF) I will say that since everyone knows it and it is done then I can pass it off as a “this is the way it is statement”…
Note that I didn’t say it happened to every 9yr old girl. Nor did I imply that every old man would choose a 9yr old, more often than not the girls will be teenagers.
[quote]Simon Forsyth wrote:
lixy wrote:
Simon Forsyth wrote:
Lixy Dixy,
I asked what evidence you had to prove that I was wrong since I know what I saw. I have witnessed the facts if you will so maybe you just cant read, my comment wasn’t negative proof because I stated this is what I know because this is what I have seen.
Thats what happens when you learn shit off of the internet instead of going to school.
You did ask me for negative proof. Worse, you brought up the Iraqi WMD when everybody knows Saddam couldn’t have provided a negative proof.
You saw what you saw, and I can’t possibly argue that particular case. But don’t try to pass it as a general rule in Iran.
When I am told that it is that way by Iranians, and I have read about it and watched documentaries about it (as well as being briefed about it in relation to child sex crimes - from when I was working as a detention officer at Baxter IDF) I will say that since everyone knows it and it is done then I can pass it off as a “this is the way it is statement”…
Note that I didn’t say it happened to every 9yr old girl. Nor did I imply that every old man would choose a 9yr old, more often than not the girls will be teenagers.[/quote]
Do they get to trade in the teenaged girls every few years?
[quote]Simon Forsyth wrote:
When I am told that it is that way by Iranians, and I have read about it and watched documentaries about it (as well as being briefed about it in relation to child sex crimes - from when I was working as a detention officer at Baxter IDF) I will say that since everyone knows it and it is done then I can pass it off as a “this is the way it is statement”…
Note that I didn’t say it happened to every 9yr old girl. Nor did I imply that every old man would choose a 9yr old, more often than not the girls will be teenagers.[/quote]
Your sources obviously aren’t up to date pal. Look up the courageous work of Shirin Ebadi.
[quote]Mishima wrote:
guys: than russia would be about 20 years old, germany 17 years old. there is no pride on my side on how old my country is (well maybe a little when I walk through the streets of Vienna) but you will find in every schoolbook or dictionary 996 as the “beginning” of Austria.[/quote]
That is correct. There are relatively new governments for many of the countries in Europe. The US is an elder statesman in the world, not the young pup many pretend it to be.
No need to argue with lixy, he knows nothing of the middle east, he lives in San Franciso in his moms basement and gets off on acting like a muslim rebel just like John Walker Lindh, its only a matter of time before he is arrested for tapping his foot while in a bathroom stall.