[quote]AdamDrew wrote:
- There are pictures and videos everywhere. Hereâ??s one of hundreds: North Tower Flashes. People get injured or even died - YouTube
Are you visually impaired? I said there were explosions seen. Never did I say they were caused by placed explosives. I even gave some possible alternative causes. The bus duct explanation is plausible. Kudos to angry chicken. That is exactly the type of in depth thinking the investigation needs.[/quote]
That type of thinking is exactly what the “investigation” has.
[quote]2) Yes, I did post a link to pictures of several columns that obviously werenâ??t stressed to the point of failure. You responded by cutting and pasting some BS equation from the web. Pictures are better evidence than some equation about burning through a car engine. Thermite is not an explosive. Wikipedia: â??Thermite is a pyrotechnic composition of a metal powder and a metal oxide, which produces an exothermic oxidation-reduction reaction known as a thermite reaction. If aluminum is the reducing agent it is called an aluminothermic reaction. Most varieties are not explosive, but can create short bursts of extremely high temperatures focused on a very small area for a short period of time.â?? Read the last sentence again. Thatâ??s why it is used like this: http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/imagenes_sociopol/esp_so25.jpg
Wow. That setup looks a lot like the column in the first picture I posted. You state it doesnâ??t make clean cuts, but back that up with an example of some people melting a car engine. Prove those cuts were made by a recovery team.[/quote]
Show how the equation is BS. Put up or shut up.
Also, you are an idiot. To use thermite like shown in your picture takes time and precision. To bring down a building on cue without someone sitting at each structural column (and still provide a clean cut) requires technology that doesn’t exist. To bring it down like that would require a vast amount of thermite, necessitating human intervention.
3)Did I say â??2 people in the elevator shafts placed chargesâ??? I said they COULD HAVE. 2 per elevator shaft, not total. Again, you assume too much. [/quote]
No, they couldn’t have. Not in that scenario. Again, get the fuck outta here.
[quote]I donâ??t think any of this is damning evidence. It is only material, audio, and video evidence that deserves to be looked into further than the 9/11 commission did so. That is the point of this thread. There are questions that deserve answers.
Responding by saying â??proofâ?? only makes you look incapable of analytical thinking, which you very well may be.[/quote]
Responding by saying “proof” means you have simply stated something without backing it up.
Also:
[quote]AdamDrew wrote:
Regarding explosives being used to bring down the towers:
- There are videos of puffs of smoke and flashes coming from windows below the crash site all over the web. Every single one looks exactly the same. I don’t claim to know what caused these, but if it was different items (condensers on fridges, printers, etc) blowing up from exposure to fire the explosions wouldn’t have been exactly the same.
- Thermate, not thermite, was found in the rubble. Thermate is demolition grade.
- The main supports of the tower are the center columns that wrap the elevators. This is the “core” of the structure. The elevator shafts are hidden from the public eye. There could have been people placing charges for weeks without anyone noticing.[/quote]
What the fuck are people meant to think about your stance if you post that shit? You are posting bullshit scenarios about explosives and then try to claim that your view is the government missed something? No shit they missed something, in case you hadn’t noticed, the Twin Towers no longer exist.
