What about the companies that pull the strings?
I’m sure Cheney’s Halliburton has done quite well off of Iraq.
[quote]AdamDrew wrote:
- Additionally, the security footage from surrounding buildings pointing directly at the crash site was taken immediately after the crash.
[/quote]
Ok, I have zero desire whatsoever to get deeply involved in this thread, but I have to say–this particular fact DOESN’T BOTHER ME AT ALL. I am completely unsurprised by this fact.
It’s standard operating procedure to get security footage in every investigation that I know of, whether by local cops, FBI, CIA, or anyone else. That’s for “normal” crimes. I can only imagine that SOP for a terrorist attack, like it probably would be for an assassination attempt, would be to grab all footage, everywhere, from everyone, with CCTVs pointed even remotely at the event under investigation. And this would be done for no diabolical reason other than getting as much information as possible on every avenue to pursue an investigation. Which, incidentally, isn’t diabolical at all. In fact, that’s what I’d want my cops to do if I were mugged/shot/robbed/etc, much less for a thousands of citizens of a country being attacked.
And I also imagine that SOP also calls for classification of said camera footage. Even if that weren’t the case, grabbing CCTV footage often involves grabbing the digitized files or hard copy, so it’s a long way from guaranteed that any copy would remain.
[quote]thunderbolt23 wrote:
[quote]dnlcdstn wrote:
Just put your head in the sand you coward. I don’t like being lied to and taken advantage of. It’s human nature to take advantage of others and has been going on forever. It’s just done differently today.
You sound like a pawn who does whatever he is told. So, go sit in the corner and think about your stupid remarks.[/quote]
Someone provide this guy with a clue - and fast.[/quote]
You’re so smart and got it all figured out so why don’t you explain to everybody what’s going on?
[quote]AdamDrew wrote:
Here’s my official stance: Planes were crashed into the towers by people outside of our govt. Our govt had previous knowledge of the attacks and either chose to be complacent or simply missed some major hints. I haven’t made my mind up on whether or not devices were placed to assist with the collapse of the towers. In my opinion, it was not necessary. The official 9/11 commission report is garbage, and the majority of those that conducted it believe it is incomplete. What reasons are there for not conducting an impartial investigation? Every person that lost their lives that day deserves such. [/quote]
Previous knowledge? Crashing hijacked planes into buildings has been a plot device in novels. That doesn’t mean the government should ban air travel. There was no actionable information.
I predict a bank will be robbed. Obviously if it happens the government is involved because they didn’t heed my prediction.
[quote]Dustin wrote:
[quote]Big Banana wrote:
[quote]Dustin wrote:
[quote]Big Banana wrote:
Do you truthers all live in your parents basements? Do you shower?
Fucking nutjobs.[/quote]
I’m still waiting for you to make a contribution to this forum.
Over a 150 posts to your name, and they all fail.[/quote]
I must assume you are another truther, therefore scum off the earth, trying to shift blame away from the murderers responsible for the worst atrocity on American soil.
You can die in a fire. I wouldn’t piss on you to put it out.
[/quote]
And you would assume incorrectly.
So, here we are again. Another post to your name that contributes zero to the thread. At least you are consistent.
But that is beside the point, why u so mad Big Bronana?[/quote]
Someone from Oklahoma should understand that this type of thinking led to Tim McVeigh. Unless you are the elusive third person. You aren’t a disenchanted Gulf War vet are you?
[quote]Dustin wrote:
…
I’m still waiting for you to make a contribution to this forum.
…[/quote]
I went through some of your post history and you dare question mine?
Piss off.