Newspaper Article BS

Thought I would share what I just read in an Australian news paper. Sounds like a load of bull crap. 13 picomoles and you are doomed for prostate cancer. Give me break you are okay with 277 but 290 is bad.

Seriously who friggin comes up with this crap and lets it be published.

Just convinient to blame it on testosterone. Feel like throwing up after reading it.

MEN whose testosterone levels remain naturally high may be more likely to develop prostate and lung cancer in old age, according to an Australian study that calls into question the growing practice of hormone supplementation to maintain energy, muscle mass and sexual potency.

The Perth research followed the medical records of men in their 70s and 80s for up to a decade, finding that among those who were diagnosed with prostate cancer, the average level of testosterone circulating freely in the bloodstream was 290 picomoles per litre of blood versus 277 for those who did not develop the disease.

The picture was more pronounced for those who developed lung cancer. Their levels of free testosterone - the small proportion that is not chemically bonded to blood proteins and is therefore biologically active - averaged 317 picomoles per litre, compared with 278 for those who remained free of the disease.

The study leader, Zoe Hyde, from the Western Australian Institute for Medical Research, said prostate cancer’s progression was already known to depend on testosterone, and blocking the hormone was considered the best treatment for the disease. However, the hormone’s role in triggering the cancer’s initial development had not been firmly established.
Advertisement

Lung development differed between males and females, Dr Hyde wrote in the journal Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention, which might explain why testosterone appeared also to trigger lung cancer. But it was also possible the result might have been skewed by the role of smoking, which itself could raise testosterone levels, or that lung tumours were promoting testosterone rather than the reverse.

Dr Hyde and her team also looked for any link between testosterone and bowel cancer but found none. She said studies of testosterone-boosting drugs - sometimes given to men who report low energy or flagging libido - had so far been too small to determine any role in the development of cancer, and larger studies were now needed to enable ‘‘the detection of any carcinogenic signal’’.

‘‘While some men can benefit from testosterone therapy, we still don’t fully understand all of the benefits and risks of treatment,’’ Dr Hyde said. She said there was ‘‘no need for men who are currently taking testosterone to stop, but in light of our findings, prostate health should be monitored closely during treatment’’.

Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme statistics show a nearly threefold increase in subsidised prescriptions for testosterone implants, gels, patches and tablets between 2000 and 2012, and many more are thought to be dispensed on private prescriptions.

Bullshit. Just part of the media/social effort to convince us that being male is not only wrong… but bad for you.

Sorry, I wasn’t born with a pussy… and refuse to become one. Deal with it.

And in other news you can buy Test in Thailand like it’s candy. God help me. Who comes up with this crap. Take a pill Australia. Why on earth would a naturally occurring hormone kept at youthful physiological levels be unhealthy? Are 14 year old boys running around with exploding prostates? Maybe Australia should just cut off everyone’s balls at birth.

I don’t know about the veracity of this study, the methodology, or who/what was backing ($$$) the study. What I do know is that I’d rather not feel like shit and live until I’m 70 than feel like shit and live until I’m 90. Quality of life is far more important than quantity of life.

They should have looked at other hormonal values like E2 for example. Maybe they would have seen that these men also might have higher Estradiol than women. Maybe that is perfectly fine and healthy in their opinion.

ctastrophe is dead on. There is no point in “doing the dainty” things just so you can bit in a chair staring out the window at the home, drooling, in your diapers for an extra 15-20 years.

What’s the point of that? Squeeze out a few extra years of being a vegetable? Saving yourself up for being dead?

You get one life. Don’t save it up for later. You don’t need to be buried with a very well-kept corpse.

Guys with no T, look and feel like shit, but have low cholesterol and do everything the media says will make them “healthy” get run over by cars every day. People who do all the right things get cancer.