Nancy: 'Bush a Total Failure'

"“God bless him, bless his heart, president of the United States – a total failure, losing all credibility with the American people on the economy, on the war, on energy, you name the subject,” Pelosi told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer in an exclusive interview.

The comments came two days after the president sharply criticized Congress over what he described as relative inaction over the course of the legislative term. At the White House on Wednesday, Bush noted that there were only 26 legislative days left in the fiscal year and said Congress would need to pass a spending bill every other day to “get their fundamental job done.”

“This is not a record to be proud of, and I think the American people deserve better,” Bush said.

How would you like to work with this bitch everyday, who, no matter what you say or do, opposes everything you want to do in your job? This woman sucks donkey balls, plain and simple. No drilling for oil, no nuclear power, no voting on judges…she is a plain fucking cunt. I rarely say that about any woman but this woman is a fucking cunt.

[quote]Headhunter wrote:
"“God bless him, bless his heart, president of the United States – a total failure, losing all credibility with the American people on the economy, on the war, on energy, you name the subject,” Pelosi told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer in an exclusive interview.

The comments came two days after the president sharply criticized Congress over what he described as relative inaction over the course of the legislative term. At the White House on Wednesday, Bush noted that there were only 26 legislative days left in the fiscal year and said Congress would need to pass a spending bill every other day to “get their fundamental job done.”

“This is not a record to be proud of, and I think the American people deserve better,” Bush said.

How would you like to work with this bitch everyday, who, no matter what you say or do, opposes everything you want to do in your job? This woman sucks donkey balls, plain and simple. No drilling for oil, no nuclear power, no voting on judges…she is a plain fucking cunt. I rarely say that about any woman but this woman is a fucking cunt.[/quote]

I’m going to inch out on limb here and suggest that most women that have obtained that level of power have done so by acting that way. Just look at Hillary.

That said, Senator Feinstein appointed my little sister to the Air Force Academy so she’s fine with me.

She’s got room to talk…What was congresses approval rating? 9%…Yesh, she’s the solution. What a whore…I hope some well hung bastard drills her right in the asshole.

Well, she’s right. Only problem is, she could just as easily replace him with it, and POTUS with Congress.

[quote]Beowolf wrote:
Well, she’s right. Only problem is, she could just as easily replace him with it, and POTUS with Congress.[/quote]

When the Democrats have both Congress and President, I have to wonder if they will be as bad as the Republicans were, when they had both. You’d think that having both would get at least something done, but that hasn’t been the case with the republicans.

[quote]Standndeliver wrote:
Beowolf wrote:
Well, she’s right. Only problem is, she could just as easily replace him with it, and POTUS with Congress.

When the Democrats have both Congress and President, I have to wonder if they will be as bad as the Republicans were, when they had both. You’d think that having both would get at least something done, but that hasn’t been the case with the republicans.

[/quote]

The less they do the better. It is better when they have to fight it out .

[quote]Standndeliver wrote:
When the Democrats have both Congress and President, I have to wonder if they will be as bad as the Republicans were, when they had both. You’d think that having both would get at least something done, but that hasn’t been the case with the republicans. [/quote]

Tell that to the maimed Iraqis.

That’s gratitude for you. And remember how helpfull the Republicans were to Clinton?
You do remember that, don’t you?

[quote]lixy wrote:
Standndeliver wrote:
When the Democrats have both Congress and President, I have to wonder if they will be as bad as the Republicans were, when they had both. You’d think that having both would get at least something done, but that hasn’t been the case with the republicans.

Tell that to the maimed Iraqis.[/quote]

Won’t someone please think about the children…and Leave Britney Alone!

[quote]lixy wrote:
Standndeliver wrote:
When the Democrats have both Congress and President, I have to wonder if they will be as bad as the Republicans were, when they had both. You’d think that having both would get at least something done, but that hasn’t been the case with the republicans.

Tell that to the maimed Iraqis.[/quote]

Do you mean the ones killed under Saddam? I know his sons got their rocks off by feeding girls feet first into plastic recycling machines. They’d sit and watch, getting bj’s from girls who were happy it wasn’t them screaming as they’re tortured to death.

[quote]Wreckless wrote:
That’s gratitude for you. And remember how helpfull the Republicans were to Clinton?
You do remember that, don’t you?[/quote]

Yeah, the tax cuts and the resulting economic boom got credited to that ‘Belgian’.

[quote]Headhunter wrote:
lixy wrote:
Standndeliver wrote:
When the Democrats have both Congress and President, I have to wonder if they will be as bad as the Republicans were, when they had both. You’d think that having both would get at least something done, but that hasn’t been the case with the republicans.

Tell that to the maimed Iraqis.

Do you mean the ones killed under Saddam? [/quote]

No he means the ones killed by middle eastern suicide bombers.

Either way he’s a fucking moron.

She may be a bitch, but she’s right.

Worst years since the early 70s.

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
She may be a bitch, but she’s right.

Worst years since the early 70s.[/quote]

This is a pretty bold statement.

Even with our current “recession,” we’re still experiencing great economic growth, low unemployment, low tax rates compared to then, and much lower inflation then the 70s.

As much as I disagree with the “invade the world/invite the world” philosophy, economically we’re doing very well and better than the 70s.

[quote]PRCalDude wrote:
FightinIrish26 wrote:
She may be a bitch, but she’s right.

Worst years since the early 70s.

This is a pretty bold statement.

Even with our current “recession,” we’re still experiencing great economic growth, low unemployment, low tax rates compared to then, and much lower inflation then the 70s.

As much as I disagree with the “invade the world/invite the world” philosophy, economically we’re doing very well and better than the 70s. [/quote]

I have read that… I didn’t say that we were worse off right now, but it’s a time that’s comparable. And we’re not sure how deep this will go, either- it’s not as bad right now, but several things make me think that this could get much worse, namely the Fannie/Freddie shit.

We’re caught in an expensive war with a third world country that never seems to make progress, our economy is hurting like hell, three quarters of the world hates us… we more or less have to unfuck what our glorious leader has done in the last decade now.

[quote]Headhunter wrote:
lixy wrote:
Standndeliver wrote:
When the Democrats have both Congress and President, I have to wonder if they will be as bad as the Republicans were, when they had both. You’d think that having both would get at least something done, but that hasn’t been the case with the republicans.

Tell that to the maimed Iraqis.

Do you mean the ones killed under Saddam? I know his sons got their rocks off by feeding girls feet first into plastic recycling machines. They’d sit and watch, getting bj’s from girls who were happy it wasn’t them screaming as they’re tortured to death.

[/quote

People like lixy like to believe Iraq was a normal functioning country - they don’t understand “give me liberty or give me death.” They have no fight in them for anything. Lucky for them there are just enough Americans left who will fight from freedom.

I don’t think these people get it when hearing about women in Hussein’s Iraq being pulled from their cars and taken for their pleasure. Not to mention all the torture chambers. Many countries all over the world are free right now simply because America exists. They don’t get it.

I am really getting tired of all the whiners out there.

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
PRCalDude wrote:
FightinIrish26 wrote:
She may be a bitch, but she’s right.

Worst years since the early 70s.

This is a pretty bold statement.

Even with our current “recession,” we’re still experiencing great economic growth, low unemployment, low tax rates compared to then, and much lower inflation then the 70s.

As much as I disagree with the “invade the world/invite the world” philosophy, economically we’re doing very well and better than the 70s.

I have read that… I didn’t say that we were worse off right now, but it’s a time that’s comparable. And we’re not sure how deep this will go, either- it’s not as bad right now, but several things make me think that this could get much worse, namely the Fannie/Freddie shit.

We’re caught in an expensive war with a third world country that never seems to make progress, our economy is hurting like hell, three quarters of the world hates us… we more or less have to unfuck what our glorious leader has done in the last decade now.[/quote]

You are right - it is all over. Give me a break - you are just another one of those whiners. Recessions are a natural occurrence - remember 2000? The Nasdaq lost half of its value in Clinton’s last yr.

The dot com bubble - earnings restatements. World Com, Enron, Adelphia and others ring a bell? 9/11? Business rises and falls and rises again. Every time there is some trouble we want the Federal Gov to waive their magic wand and make everything ok. There is only so much the fed can do.

Some sectors are hurting, others are flourishing. GM and Ford are screwed up - but Toyota and Honda are making money by the bucket fulls. And they are building cars right here in America. Times do get tough for some - but it is not the end.

The President is not responsible for greedy lenders and he is not resoonsible for people who signed on for mortgages they could not afford. It is called personal responsbility. No lender ever talked me into something I could not pay for.

Personal responsibility. Something we need more of.

[quote]bald eagle wrote:
FightinIrish26 wrote:
PRCalDude wrote:
FightinIrish26 wrote:
She may be a bitch, but she’s right.

Worst years since the early 70s.

This is a pretty bold statement.

Even with our current “recession,” we’re still experiencing great economic growth, low unemployment, low tax rates compared to then, and much lower inflation then the 70s.

As much as I disagree with the “invade the world/invite the world” philosophy, economically we’re doing very well and better than the 70s.

I have read that… I didn’t say that we were worse off right now, but it’s a time that’s comparable. And we’re not sure how deep this will go, either- it’s not as bad right now, but several things make me think that this could get much worse, namely the Fannie/Freddie shit.

We’re caught in an expensive war with a third world country that never seems to make progress, our economy is hurting like hell, three quarters of the world hates us… we more or less have to unfuck what our glorious leader has done in the last decade now.

You are right - it is all over. Give me a break - you are just another one of those whiners. Recessions are a natural occurrence - remember 2000? The Nasdaq lost half of its value in Clinton’s last yr. The dot com bubble - earnings restatements.

World Com, Enron, Adelphia and others ring a bell? 9/11? Business rises and falls and rises again. Every time there is some trouble we want the Federal Gov to waive their magic wand and make everything ok. There is only so much the fed can do.

Some sectors are hurting, others are flourishing. GM and Ford are screwed up - but Toyota and Honda are making money by the bucket fulls. And they are building cars right here in America. Times do get tough for some - but it is not the end.

The President is not responsible for greedy lenders and he is not resoonsible for people who signed on for mortgages they could not afford. It is called personal responsbility. No lender ever talked me into something I could not pay for.

Personal responsibility. Something we need more of.
[/quote]

What whiners? What’s all over? What the fuck are you talking about? You been drinkin?

Hey douchebag, don’t talk down to me like I don’t understand the economy. But besides that, I never said it was the end of the world, or whatever the hell else you said. I’m saying that these are lean times, and unless you live in an ivory tower, then I’m sure your ass is feeling it too.

What I am saying is that being involved in a massive foreign war in the cradle of the oil producing world was not a good idea, and has influenced our current political and economic situaion. It’s going to take a lot to unfuck all the ridiculousness that the man did, and restoring our reputation among the world is just as important as restoring the faltering economy.

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
bald eagle wrote:
FightinIrish26 wrote:
PRCalDude wrote:
FightinIrish26 wrote:
She may be a bitch, but she’s right.

Worst years since the early 70s.

This is a pretty bold statement.

Even with our current “recession,” we’re still experiencing great economic growth, low unemployment, low tax rates compared to then, and much lower inflation then the 70s.

As much as I disagree with the “invade the world/invite the world” philosophy, economically we’re doing very well and better than the 70s.

I have read that… I didn’t say that we were worse off right now, but it’s a time that’s comparable. And we’re not sure how deep this will go, either- it’s not as bad right now, but several things make me think that this could get much worse, namely the Fannie/Freddie shit.

We’re caught in an expensive war with a third world country that never seems to make progress, our economy is hurting like hell, three quarters of the world hates us… we more or less have to unfuck what our glorious leader has done in the last decade now.

You are right - it is all over. Give me a break - you are just another one of those whiners. Recessions are a natural occurrence - remember 2000? The Nasdaq lost half of its value in Clinton’s last yr. The dot com bubble - earnings restatements.

World Com, Enron, Adelphia and others ring a bell? 9/11? Business rises and falls and rises again. Every time there is some trouble we want the Federal Gov to waive their magic wand and make everything ok. There is only so much the fed can do.

Some sectors are hurting, others are flourishing. GM and Ford are screwed up - but Toyota and Honda are making money by the bucket fulls. And they are building cars right here in America. Times do get tough for some - but it is not the end.

The President is not responsible for greedy lenders and he is not resoonsible for people who signed on for mortgages they could not afford. It is called personal responsbility. No lender ever talked me into something I could not pay for.

Personal responsibility. Something we need more of.

What whiners? What’s all over? What the fuck are you talking about? You been drinkin?

Hey douchebag, don’t talk down to me like I don’t understand the economy. But besides that, I never said it was the end of the world, or whatever the hell else you said. I’m saying that these are lean times, and unless you live in an ivory tower, then I’m sure your ass is feeling it too.

What I am saying is that being involved in a massive foreign war in the cradle of the oil producing world was not a good idea, and has influenced our current political and economic situaion. It’s going to take a lot to unfuck all the ridiculousness that the man did, and restoring our reputation among the world is just as important as restoring the faltering economy.[/quote]

Your last sentence sums you up pretty well. “Our reputation among the world” - most of the free world is free because Americans are still simply breathing. Making them like us more will mean being willing to fight about as much as they are - basically never. As far as the economy it will basically take care of itself over time - as always. The Fed can tinker here and there with rates, etc. but inventories (housing) must come down for the real estate to rebound. Banks must reassure investors about the health of their loans. I know Obama does not have a freaking clue about what to do. Raise taxes on the top earners? Are you kidding me?? This creates jobs how? Oil wind fall profits? How much? Worked real well for Jimmy Carter.

By the way, can’t you understand that the dems like Nancy want us to lose in Iraq. Remember Harry Reid - “this war is lost.” They saw success in Iraq as bad news for them. How pathetic they would root against their own country. I guess this explains why they are so worried about what the Europeans think of us.

To act like Bush has screwed everything up is ridiculous. As if he made all those risky loans.