Myth of Heterosexual AIDS

Off Topic Politics & World Issues
241

[quote]forlife wrote:
TheBodyGuard wrote:
You sir, and your friends, are a “study of a dozen” and not representative of what occurs in the gay community as a whole.

Then save your criticism for promiscuous gays, and apply the same criticism to promiscuous heterosexuals. I’m glad that you agree with me that sexual responsibility is important, and I’m sure that you are practicing this in your own life.

Please leave raising children to heterosexuals.

Keep your advice to yourself, I love being a dad and am a damn good one. Research, and my own experience, show that children with gay parents are equally healthy on all psychological measures compared with children raised by straight parents. Save your breath, I know you’re going to tell me how this is IMPOSSIBLE, but the medical and mental health organizations say you’re wrong.[/quote]

Disgusting beyond the pale. How the heck did you become a Dad? I’m not sure I want to know. Don’t tell me - you’re “bisexual”. Because if you are, it’s the confused likes of you that we have to thank for the HIV penetration into the hetero community.

Everyone, please join me in thanking “forlife” for his contribution to society.

242

[quote]forlife wrote:

I’m not promiscuous, and I have many gay friends who are also not promiscuous. We live in established neighborhoods, pay taxes, raise kids, and go to soccer games just like everyone else. I realize nothing I say will convince you, but I’m still going to call out blatant misinformation like this when I see it.[/quote]

I don’t think any of us are claiming that you are promiscuous, however you are the exception not the rule and that has always been my point.

243

I don’t know why I bother, feel free to continue believing whatever you want about the evil gays. I don’t depend on your opinions, and more people than ever see your views for what they really are. Time is on my side :slight_smile:

244

[quote]PRCalDude wrote:
Schlenkatank wrote:
PRCalDude wrote:

I don’t know what the hell AIDS orphans have to do with this discussion.

Here’s what the WHO has been saying lately about heterosexual HIV:

So, somehow magically a “heterosexual” pandemic of HIV has managed to confine itself only to sub-Saharan Africa in this day and age of jet travel and immigration while every other freaking continent hasn’t experienced the same thing? Somehow, only sub-Saharan African ‘heterosexuals’ are getting HIV, while the rest of us are sleeping around like there’s no tomorrow and getting off scot-free? Does Occam’s razor exist in your universe?

Guy, live in a fantasy land for all I care. Just try to fix Africa with your checkbook and not mine, ok?
[/quote]

Dude heres what the article you posted basically summarized.

“it was now recognised that, OUTSIDE SUB SAHARAN AFRICA, it was confined to high-risk groups including men who have sex with men, injecting drug users, and sex workers and their clients.”

So in lay terms, your article claims that Heterosexual AIDS transmissions occur a lot in Africa, but not very often in other places. People with a scientific mind don’t simply say, “Well, they must all be gay in Africa because that problem doesn’t exist here.” That’s extremely biased of you. A scientist asks what other key differences between the two cultures exist that may be causing the problem such as education, literacy rates, and cultural norms. For instance, most Africans today are still not given enough education and incentives to practice safe sex.

Also, I don’t know if you’re aware of this but Sub Saharan Africans don’t have enough money to travel anywhere. The ones that do don’t have Aids. It’s typically the poorest members of their society that get the disease.

When you start to look at why heterosexuals in there country might contract the disease so readily and connect that with a difference in other parts of the world it becomes very possible to explain why in other societies Hetero Aids transmissions are uncommon.

245

[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:
Schlenkatank wrote:
TheBodyGuard wrote:
Schlenkatank wrote:

Honestly, I could care less about Africa and their “culture”. I live here.
[/quote]

On that point I can assure you you’re quite mistaken. We all live here.

246

[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:
forlife wrote:
TheBodyGuard wrote:

Keep your advice to yourself, I love being a dad and am a damn good one. Research, and my own experience, show that children with gay parents are equally healthy on all psychological measures compared with children raised by straight parents. Save your breath, I know you’re going to tell me how this is IMPOSSIBLE, but the medical and mental health organizations say you’re wrong.

Disgusting beyond the pale. How the heck did you become a Dad? I’m not sure I want to know. Don’t tell me - you’re “bisexual”. Because if you are, it’s the confused likes of you that we have to thank for the HIV penetration into the hetero community.

Everyone, please join me in thanking “forlife” for his contribution to society.
[/quote]

I’ve seen enough here, I don’t know about you forlife, but this discussion seems to be getting a bit nasty. To me you sound like a fine father and a considerate and well balanced individual. Good luck with raising your kids.

I’m not sure what to say to you bodyguard. Good luck, and goodbye for now.

249

[quote]Mick28 wrote:
forlife wrote:
I don’t know why I bother)

You continue to debate this topic because you’re looking for ways to rationalize leaving your wife and two young children to go shack up with some guy named Bruce…AND…you will never really feel good about it even after 50,000 posts.[/quote]

Ohhhhh get the eff outta here. Is that true? Wow.

wow wow wow. such fertile ground for analysis.

250

[quote]Schlenkatank wrote:

I’m not sure what to say to you bodyguard. Good luck, and goodbye for now.[/quote]

I know exactly what to say to you; I’ve already said it.

251

[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:
Mick28 wrote:
forlife wrote:
I don’t know why I bother)

You continue to debate this topic because you’re looking for ways to rationalize leaving your wife and two young children to go shack up with some guy named Bruce…AND…you will never really feel good about it even after 50,000 posts.

Ohhhhh get the eff outta here. Is that true? Wow.

wow wow wow. such fertile ground for analysis.
[/quote]

I wouldn’t doubt it.

252

Well, anti-gay sentiment aside, this book is still retarded and wrong and has been renounced by anyone with a brain in the decades since its publication. Heterosexual aids is not myth. A proper title and description of the state of things would be: “Gays Are Much More Likely To Get AIDS Because Of Ease Of Transmission By Anal Sex And Increased Likelhood Of Promiscuity. Duh.” Maybe a subtitle, “Be careful, it can still happen to you.” But I guess that would not have sold as many copies.

253

Seems like an Aids immunization is coming.

That might be bad news for some because Aids becomes more or less harmless like syphilis, where will the gay bashing draw its strength from then?

254

[quote]orion wrote:
where will the gay bashing draw its strength from then?

[/quote]

mankind never needed aids to be repulsed by gay sex because…let’s see…it’s repulsive.

257

[quote]Mick28 wrote:
orion wrote:
Seems like an Aids immunization is coming.

That might be bad news for some because Aids becomes more or less harmless like syphilis, where will the gay bashing draw its strength from then?

All politically correct crap and put downs aside…is everyone supposed to love homosexuals for spreading the HIV virus into the heterosexual population?

Take it out of a politically correct context and just say that group A because of their dangerous lifestyle is spreading a horrible disease to group B…how is that a good thing…and why shouldn’t we try to stop group A from endangering the rest of society? No I’m not suggesting anything outlandish…but how about NOT promoting homosexuality as does the media and those on the left?[/quote]

You see, for me that is not that big an issue because no “hypnotic asshole” is tempting me.

So I guess I´ll file gay sex under the same category as bungee jumping.

259

[quote]Mick28 wrote:
orion wrote:
Mick28 wrote:
orion wrote:
Seems like an Aids immunization is coming.

That might be bad news for some because Aids becomes more or less harmless like syphilis, where will the gay bashing draw its strength from then?

All politically correct crap and put downs aside…is everyone supposed to love homosexuals for spreading the HIV virus into the heterosexual population?

Take it out of a politically correct context and just say that group A because of their dangerous lifestyle is spreading a horrible disease to group B…how is that a good thing…and why shouldn’t we try to stop group A from endangering the rest of society? No I’m not suggesting anything outlandish…but how about NOT promoting homosexuality as does the media and those on the left?

You see, for me that is not that big an issue because no “hypnotic asshole” is tempting me.

So I guess I�?�´ll file gay sex under the same category as bungee jumping.

I actually agree with you to an extent. They do what they do and who cares? BUT…when the media glorifies this which can influence the young already vulnerable into the lifestyle and legitimize this behavior by trying to legalize gay marriage then it becomes something we should all care about.
[/quote]

The media glorifies bungee jumping.

Have you ever seen Jackass, the WWF or X-TREME!!! sport shows?

Male risk taking is everywhere and I dare say that most do it to get laid.

Gay dudes at least get their rocks off.