Night vision.
How long do we let Seattle and Portland fail? They are demanding money and currently occupied housing.
The kids are not tuckering out, they have enough meth to go on forever…
And where is the media? Currently on CNN, the most trusted name in news:
“Orange man is bad, right?” “Certainly, Dr. Smith, but let me tell you how bad and orange he is…”
“Orange man sends secret police to hunt down and kill extremely peaceful, kind and loving protesters who just want a little justice.”
Meanwhile, Portland burns, Seattle burns…
A white 5 yr old kid was shot in the head at point, blank range by a neighbor… No news. Nothing outside local media.
If the races were reversed you know it would be front page for 2 fucking weeks.
Oh Fox did pick it up, two days later, but no one else. Sad.
I can’t stand the lies. I can’t stand the people who believe the lies.
I have no idea. The locals must have some threshold of failure which they are willing to accept, and past that they become willing to take action.
As I see it the political leadership there seems fully bought in to defunding and restructuring the police force while letting the subversives run rampant.
Eventually the people who disagree with all of this will either pack up and leave (many businesses and affluent reportedly already have), vote the leftists out, or people will take up arms to protect themselves.
We have the 2nd amendment for a reason. All this right to bear arms stuff isn’t so that you can stroke your dick to a shiny new boom stick. It is in part, so that you can defend you and yours if an angry mob tries to take your shit because a lazy innefectual government turns a blind eye to the violence.
That’s why I teasingly said “Lock and Lube” a while back to what’shisdumbfuckhole.
Because all of you 2A chumps are really a bunch of dick beaters. Years of talking about “When the shit hits the fan!” and now that the shit Is Hitting The Fan…
Crickets.
A couple of bearded wanna be’s on Facebook mean muggin for some tough talking memes.
A bunch of no-go jokes and wanna-be’s.
2 Likes
As we saw with Chaz, residents do indeed have a problem with all of this “protesting.” There is a disconnect between residents (the actual taxpayers) and the mayor. Has anyone noticed how no one ever interviews the residents? They show the “protestors” and label them anti-racists as well as peaceful (mostly). They show the cops looking like stormtroopers. They have created this narrative of good vs evil.
It’s no different with the inner cities. They will have black pundits and activists who never were poor or grew up in the inner cities explaining how black people there feel and what they want. Even white people will explain these things to us. The media doesn’t go into the inner cities to talk with the residents or with the cops or with people who work there.
It’s a money grab. They will give ineffectual agencies more funds to support their failures.
The media supports the activists’ narrative.
The new Seattle and Portland Police departments:
LOL! Now that was funny… This 2A chump is locked and loaded.
We just had some confederate morons go at it with BLM protesters not far from where I live… That’s not comforting, but if they keep it contained to each other, that’s better than a roving band of idiots.
One thing Georgia does not have is a gun shortage. Everybody is armed, so the chance of spilling into neighborhoods is much-less here, but it can still happen. But everybody is ready for that possibility.
It would be kinda amusing to see them try. I don’t want that to happen, but it would be a little funny if it did.
Fixed that for ya.
1 Like
I appreciate that! Time to beat my dick in to a nice shine…
1 Like
My man, if it ain’t shiny yet, it ain’t gonna be.
Might have to start calling it “tactical”.
2 Likes
Not exactly. People have been going to guns for weeks now. For example:
A vehicle gets trapped at an intersection by “peaceful protestors” and apparently one poor dumb bastard rushes at the car pointing his AK-47 and is shot and killed by the driver. Seems like a perfectly legit case of self defense. Also seems like the poor dumb bastard with the AK was probably a nice young man who got caught up in a deranged ideology. Rest in peace.
Here is a video where, allegedly, some antifa types tried to take their protest into the suburbs and ran into 2nd Amendment Supporters:
As a “2nd Amendment Supporter” I’m not happy about any of this, none of this is good. But what do you expect when you poor gasoline on the fire?
This will come off as victim blaming, but why do people knowingly try to drive through protests? Having been to and around a few protests in my time its very obvious where they are forming and when you are getting really close to the street/s it is happening on. Just turn around and go 10 minutes out of your way, or pull over and park for a few minutes. It seems like a lot of these incidents occur when a car knowingly tries to drive through a crowd.
Nah. Why are they blocking traffic on open roads without a permit? Seems like the purpose is to hold people against their will. At legal, genuinely peaceful protests, the police direct and reroute traffic so people can leave and go around as you suggest. People may be annoyed and inconvenienced, but there is very little chance for escalation, unlike what Antifa and BLM are doing these days. And escalation seems to be the point.
Speaking of escalation, why have they started bringing guns to their “peaceful protests” where they stop traffic and hold people against their will? To shoot at the people who don’t comply? All of this is pouring gasoline on the fire.
Because I carry a gun, I would NOT try to drive through a protest, I would sit there and do nothing. Because none of this is worth me dying for, and none of this is worth me spending the rest of my life in prison for. And if I shot some poor stupid bastard like Garret Foster, who was probably a nice guy who did dumb shit for a questionable cause, and it was a justifiable shoot as this one appears to be, I would still have to live with that the rest of my life.
I got problems of my own.
2 Likes
Open carry is still a thing, right?
Just like anybody else can. Like those guys in Michigan, only somewhere else.
No, there’s a difference between having a gun strapped to your back, and holding a gun at “low ready”, as if ready to shoot while you’re actively trying to hold them against their will.
Here’s open carry:
Perfectly legal in many states. The guy carrying the rifle is also not actively holding anybody against their will.
This is low ready:
That’s brandishing everywhere. It’s a very explicit threat of violence. It leads directly to dumb shit like this:
And this:
So you want to say “both sides do it!” Except the left has already unintentionally hurt far more people. It serves no good purpose.
I don’t know why pro 2nd Amendment people carry long guns to rallies either. They would probably deny that it’s about intimidation. I’ve never seen or heard of them trying to hold people somewhere against their will as part of a peaceful protest, nor have I heard of a pro 2nd Amendment guy accidentally shooting a bunch of his fellow demonstrators at a rally. But I think jshowing up armed is counter productive as it probably scares away people in the middle, the people we should be trying to win over.
But I’m really baffled by your shit talking 2nd Amendment supporters. Do you want them to show up at an antifa rally and shoot a few dozen people? Because if they did that then they wouldn’t be a bunch of do nothing pussies, right?
Well, they do.
And according to the 2A, they’re allowed to. Except when the other side doesn’t like it.
Does it have to? Determining purpose is right in the ballpark of “Why do you need so many bullets, anyways?” isn’t it?
I’m just wondering when all of the tough guy talk is going to come to fruition. When all of the “shit hits the fan” and “cold dead hands” guys are going to show up as a militia and make everything “right” again.
Ive seen these boards, social media, certain news channels absolutely littered with tough guy smack talk since ohhh, about the Obama admin. that “they” are encroaching on our rights, gonna take our guns, and “when the shit hits the fan, I’ll be ready!”
Well it seems they’re here, for the property, money, guns, or what ever. The shit has pretty thoroughly hit the fan,wouldnt you say?
I don’t really want to see a bunch of people getting shot, Im just saying either put up, or shut up.
And something to think about: That article in Austin is a perfect example of the stupidity that has overtaken gun ownership and responsibility in the US.
1.You have a guy open carrying into a guaranteed to get heated situation.
- Someone else who feels threatened, legally concealed carrying, and shoots him dead.
3.Another guy who saw it happen, heard the shots, saw the muzzle flashes jumps into the fray and fires on the guy in the car.
But according to you, The Other Side is doing it wrong.
No. THEY’RE ALL A BUNCH OF FUCKING IDIOTS.
And Everybody has been throwing gasoline on the fire.
I’m just pointing out that all of the shit talking has been coming from the Right for about 12 years at this point.
1 Like
@SkyzykS
I’m surprised at your stance towards gun owners also, knowing that you have walked away from a past with a lot of violence.
Marxists are not really wanting any armed confrontation with either LEOs or ‘vigilante’ 2Aers. They are flitting in and out of native population like guerrillas and stopping short of gunplay. Their end would be swift and final, we all know that.
If you are merely laughing at excess posturing of tachticool dudes, figuring many would wet their pants in an actual confrontation - l get that.
Nope. There’s a huge difference between a gun in the hand, and a gun in holster, or on a sling on your back. There is a huge difference between a law abiding citizen in his vehicle on the road, and the moron who runs up pointing a rifle at him to illegally hold him against his will. If you think the law abiding citizen who didn’t want an AK47 pointed at his face is a fucking idiot. There’s nothing else to say.
And again, “put up or shutup”? So it’s a massacre or you guys are all pussies. Ok. You have a nice day.
Hard to do when you are surrounded. Imagine you are driving and suddenly come upon protestors blocking the road. They surround your car. Maybe there are other cars stuck behind you. What if it’s the highway? How do you turn around? How about this idea for peaceful protestors: they could set up a detour or alternate route for cars that approach. They could leave room so cars could turn around. No, they would rather surround a car, yell whatever feel good slogans they have, berate drivers, scare drivers, etc.
Look at most of these situations. The cars typically do stop and then the protestors surround them. At that point you are not a peaceful protestor exercising your rights; you are a criminal. These entitled brats don’t understand certain truths. If you surround a car with a woman driving with her kids, she is going to do what any good parent would do: protect her children at all costs. They have shitty parents so that concept is foreign to them.
If I were a protestor (god, no) and we stopped a car, and I saw there were children in the car, I would immediately tell everyone to calm down because they are going to scare the kids and then help the driver to take another route. I don’t want to scare children and I know that a parent is going to protect his or her kids no matter what. But these protestors’ attitude is “fuck the kids.” Because they are kids, emotionally speaking, themselves. There is a difference between persuading people to believe in your cause and scaring them into compliance.
Yep.
You guys have been stocking up and sporting for a fight for a looooong time.
Well it’s happening.
And that’s your response.
It seems there’s a lot of truth to the rhetoric that there are 2 sides to a story, so make sure you shoot to kill.
You don’t like other sides.
It’s always “The Other Guy”.
Lock and lube!
If someone approaches an armed individual who knows what low ready is, with their gun at low ready, they should expect to be shot. This is what happens when kids play too many video games and then want to play soldier for real.
The laws vary by state. Some don’t have laws against brandishing weapons (brandishing meaning, in its simplest definition, carrying a weapon in your hands). However, approaching someone with a weapon at low ready, which is without question considered a combat stance, pretty much makes you an aggressor who is threatening someone with a firearm. In Texas it might not be illegal to carry (brandish) a rifle at low ready, I’m not sure, but approaching someone with your weapon at low ready is by definition threatening since it is, as I stated, a combat stance. These kids don’t understand these things.
2 Likes