MSM Journalism, Now We Have Proof They Lie All the Time!

Off Topic Politics & World Issues
568

Fucking nonsense lol.

Obvious recutting and selective placement of dialogue - see the part where he sits on the bed. There should have been a slight break in his voice when his ass hits the bed if he was talking at the same time. They even purposefully chose footage from the camera facing his back when there’s clearly one in front of him.

Scene loop at the bed from 3 different angles. Don’t believe me? Pause and count the cameras. There are 2 facing the direction of the main camera in one shot. Look at the movement of the chick.

Mic placed near his crotch? Why? This is done by the film crew. Nobody mics themselves in an interview.

The chick is removing the mic. Then he’s obviously tucking in his shirt but the scene is prolonged with the aforementioned scene loop.

Obvious post-production dialogue added in when he sits up. See abrupt cut from him sitting up to him standing at the door.

I can go on and on about the earlier scenes. Don’t get taken in by good editing. Ask for the entire uncut footage.

Would he have fucked the chick if this were real? Who knows?

All I’m saying is I can spot all the silly little editing tricks easily because I’ve overseen this shit lots of times(editing and interviews, not faking shit although I’ve had to edit a 25min profile video into a 2 minute one with a lot of cutting and dialogue splicing because the person couldn’t speak English coherently). You should be able to quite easily after all the hints I gave you.

And it’s not like I don’t find it funny. But this Borat dude has had a fat fuck literally rub his balls in his face on camera for the shock and comedic value and the media is actually taking him seriously?

4 Likes
569

(I’ve linked the video so it starts at the exact time the scene I’m talking about starts.)

Again, if you don’t believe me, here’s another obvious example:

See the part where Borat is arguing with the actress? That scene was probably filmed at a different time when Rudy wasn’t around. There’s a camera angle where the camera directly faces the door after he exits. Where would you place a hidden camera for that specific angle and why would you even do that? I’ll give an alternative explanation below.

There would need to be at least 8 cameras in all for this entire sequence, with 6 of them hidden. Bullshit lol.

Notice the camera PANS slightly to the left when she says, “I’m so sorry.”? That means there obviously was a camera man in the room WITH THEM ALL THE TIME unless they were using a remote controlled camera for just ONE angle and to capture the aforementioned scene of the angle facing the door. The latter would be ABSURD because:

See the part where she says, “Shall we have a drink in the bedroom?” It’s an entirely different angle from the rest so that’s the 8th camera I counted if they were alone.

BUT the camera ALSO MOVES so there must either be a second camera controlled remotely or there’s a fucking camera man present.

Also, note that you can’t see their lips at any time in the bedroom. The dialogue could easily have been taken from earlier in the interview and spliced in. They could even have been different words spliced into one sentence(I’ve done this shit. See my post above) since the audio is all from the same mic so you wouldn’t have an abrupt change in audio quality.

But the audio quality would not be the same as what was captured DURING THE INTERVIEW since the acoustics of the bedroom would be slightly different from the interview room AND a good mic will pick up clear movement noise due to friction when someone is doing something like… DROPPING HIS FAT ASS DOWN ON A BED.

Listen and judge for yourselves. The chick’s dialogue could even have been added in during post-production.

And why would you mic someone near the crotch? The norm is near the collar if they’re wearing a buttoned down shirt or the pants pockets if you’re using a really good mic. It’s both for getting the best audio possible and the comfort of the guest. What is this? Some fucking undercover FBI sting operation where they expect their guy to be patted down and searched for listening devices lol?

Seriously, I don’t expect anyone who doesn’t have experience with stuff like this to be able to easily tell it’s all fake but people in the FUCKING MEDIA who do this shit EVERY DAY should know better.

You dishonest fucks don’t know anything about camera set-up, sound and editing? You’ve never edited an hour long interview into 3-4 minutes because the audience doesn’t have the attention span for anything longer? FUCK YOU.

And I’m gonna watch Borat 2 anyway since I know it’s something called ENTERTAINMENT, which means it’s a MOVIE where people MAKE SHIT UP, and I loved the first Borat.

1 Like
570

That article compares Amazon as a retailer not just the online retail space where Amazon has a HUGE margin, arguably monopolistic. That’s where the monopoly argument comes in. That there is no credible threat to their dominance on online retail. Looking at the chart, the difference between 1 and 2 is staggering. The rest is made up of companies like Biotest handing their own sales and delivery which only makes up a tiny sliver, per site. If we swicthed the analysis to 3rd party retailers only, I am sure their market share would be even, uh, huge-r…
Considering how much total retail space Amazon is taking up on top of it, the little guy has no chance. I for one have stopped ordering from Amazon unless I have no options. Even if I pay a little more, but price does matter. I won’t pay a lot more, but if the prices are fairly competitive, I will go to the little guy when I can. I seriously doubt Amazon will miss me, but you gotta start somewhere.

https://www.marketingcharts.com/industries/retail-and-e-commerce-112285

I also am lobbying to remove that giant bug called alexa, out of my house. It’s a glorified kitchen timer, that can listen to your every move and stutter. Boy, the soviets would have loved alexa!
I never liked it, but when I heard Bill Burr talking about it. He made a hilarious, good point. “Why are we voluntarily bugging our own houses?” Got it as a gift, hate the damn thing, everybody else likes it. I want to shoot it with my shotgun, I think that would make a neat little video, though I am sure if I searched, it’s been done.

EDIT: Thought I’d post this analysis just because it’s interesting, it’s not pertinent to the above…

571

Me and my wife have Amazon Prime, but I don’t load the account info to my phone. I think having Prime increases consumption, which I try to only consume minimally (both because I want to be rich eventually, and that not being a standard American consumer is great for the environment).

If I have to have my wife order it, it cuts down on how much stuff I get. I probably only order a few things a year. Amazon and EliteFTS get pretty much all my eCommerce. An awesome quote I heard the other day: A poor man wants more.

1 Like
572

This brought a little trickling tear to my eye with joy. lol… That was great analysis.

1 Like
573

Of course. It’s a lot like google, you can try to avoid it, but sometimes you have to break down and use it because it’s the only tool you have. I hate giving Bezo’s more money, but sometimes Amazon is the only place that has what I am looking for. I try to avoid it as much as I can, but I cannot always avoid it.

574

Wtf is online retail space?

575

That’s not how it works. Plus, there are lots of other factors. But screw it. Don’t want to argue about amazon lol. They’re not worth thinking about. I buy all my online stuff from AliExpress anyway.

EDIT:

Ok, here’s something to think about and I’m done with this topic, ok? Has amazon resulted in cheaper prices for you? How much were you paying prior to amazon - product prices, shipping prices, ease and security of payment, product range etc?

Is it a net win or loss for the consumer? Would breaking it up result in a net win or loss?

I know I never dared to buy anything online from China retailers until AliExpress came along. That was only because I had been using AliBaba for business transactions. And prices are a lot cheaper than even amazon for the same products(when they do have the same products) plus shipping to my part of the world is much cheaper and faster.

Lmao

Appreciated. Here’s what’s interesting. My own video editor(I’ve only supervised editing) was the one who sent me this clip and told me it made his blood boil when the media was acting like it was real. The dude is from China. What I wrote would be nothing compared to what he probably spotted.

I only do this shit(media production) as part of a larger project a couple of times a year. The media does this EVERYDAY. Fuck them.

1 Like
576

Well, of course when Amazon started, they offered goods and services at a good price and that’s what made them so huge. My beef came when they started gobbling up their competition and got larger and larger to where, at least in the U.S. market place, nobody can reasonably compete.
So, yeah Amazon capitalized on an untapped market and they were successful. They should be. I just want others to be able to reasonably compete. They got too big and dominated the space and became basically the only game in town for many people.
Initially, Amazon was a win for the consumer. Now I think they are becoming a net loss as they continue to grow.

1 Like
577

Why are they becoming a net loss for the customer?

1 Like
578

You could use AliExpress if you don’t mind supporting a China business(The CCP has a stake in it). Lots of people in Europe are using it. I’m not sure if the shipping costs to the US and/or waiting time will make it worth it, though.

In Asia, we have qoo10(South Korea), shoppee(Singapore), redmart(Japan) and taobao(China) amongst others I can’t recall atm. qoo10 is pretty cheap but, again, shipping costs have to be taken into consideration. But these are all at amazon’s level when it comes to ease of payment and security.

579

Lack of competition. So I have to use Amazon sometimes, why? Because they are the only one selling the product I need at the time. Not having options is a net loss. Albeit not a huge loss, nothing anybody would realistically pay attention to, but a loss nonetheless. Fortunately, I have not purchased from Amazon for a long time now. Thankfully, I don’t require a lot of shit to be happy, but I am sure the occasion will come again where I will have to order from Amazon. As long as I have options I won’t. The problem is that Amazon likes to gobble up 3rd party retailers so, even if you have a retailer who is not Amazon now, it may be an Amazon subsidiary in a little while.
Of course, I consider lack of availability from other vendors as a net loss, you may not and that’s fine it’s up to you.

580

Yeah, I mind that even more. I don’t want to support the CCP in anyway. I have chosen to go without some minor things just because the whole industry is in China.
Unfortunately, I got Nike running shoes as a gift. I am grateful for the gift, not particularly happy it was Nike, though they are nice shoes. I hope we do bring our manufacturing back to the level where I have options. I don’t think anybody has a not made in china item somewhere in there house. This damn laptop was made in china. I actually do not know of any that are not made in china.

581

If you see a product on Amazon being sold 3rd party. Look up said 3rd party and see if you can obtain the product directly. It is often less money, but more shipping. Ends up the same for you, but the 3rd party makes more money and Amazon makes 0 money.

3 Likes
582
583

The first twitter post which says: “We don’t: Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey admits they don’t have any evidence to say the New York Post Biden story is disinformation" seems a bit misleading.

It is implying that Twitter owns the burden of proof to show the NY Post Biden story is disinformation. The burden belongs to the NY Post. If Twitter doesn’t find it credible and a likely source of disinformation, they shouldn’t have to show it is disinformation to remove the story. The NY Post has to show that it is credible. Once they do that, Twitter should allow the story.

1 Like
584

If they have no evidence it’s disinformation why would they find it to be a likely source of disinformation?

C’mon man!

2 Likes
585

And why are they afraid of disinformation? Do they believe their platform could be used to manipulate/interfere with elections?

586

Let’s say I right a report in the NY Post that says Trump’s body is inhabited and controlled by an invisible big foot. Could you prove that it is disinformation? Since you can’t prove it is disinformation, would you find it credible?

That is what is going on here. The story is fishy. The burden of proof on a fishy story is on the one telling it, not on the person who doubts it (they don’t own a burden to show it false).

587

Bigfoot? That isn’t remotely analogous. We have emails, a computer shop on record, a receipt, a former business partner, private photos of Hunter, and the Director of National Intelligence saying it wasn’t “Russian disinformation.”

C’mon